For a second day in a row, Lehman Brothers shares are getting pounded downward. The stock is off 30 percent as we file this entry, and had traded as low as $8 a share earlier this morning.
There are several conflicting reports rumors floating around that may be helping fuel the panic. Earlier, the Wall Street Journal reported that Korean regulators said talks between Lehman and the Korea Development Bank had ended. The KDB had reportedly been in on and off again talks about acquiring a stake in Lehman for weeks. A later report from Reuters denied this and Korean regulators denied they have commented on developments between KDB and Lehman.
The confusion certainly seems to be scaring off buyers. There is also a lot of speculation that Lehman may be permitted to actually collapse by a government concerned about moral hazard in the market following the rescues of Bear Stearns and the GSEs. Here’s John Jansen’s analysis:

There is some talk that they might truly be compelled to fold as the Treasury is currently busy frying other fish. They have had quite some time to right their ship (I think the ship metaphor is ok because it follows the fish fry) and not having done so they might be left to their own devices.Lehman CDS currently 420/440 after closing 320/330.


Update:
MarketBeat reports: “Michael Schwartz, options strategist at Oppenheimer & Co., says the activity reflects a re-pricing of Lehman’s shares without Neuberger.”

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (193)

  1. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:48 AM

    sham-wow 1st!!!

  2. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:48 AM

    Anyone with half a brain and a chart of the dollar vs. won knew the KDB deal was not happening.

  3. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:50 AM

    first….face

  4. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:50 AM

    Too long, didn’t read.

  5. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:51 AM

    # 4 you rule brother people hate you!!

  6. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:53 AM

    I’m boycotting DB until shamwow, mayo and first are blocked.

  7. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:53 AM

    I’m boycotting DB until shamwow, mayo and first are blocked.

  8. Posted by diablo | September 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM

    I’m amazed that Dick Fuld still has a job. There’s no saving LEH while he is there.

  9. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:56 AM

    any word on first year associate pay at leh?

  10. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:58 AM

    There is NO saving LEH. The question is in a liquidation sale how much does someone pay for LEH to get NEuberger?
    LEH will not be bailed out.
    Neither will WM. I am guessing that they will fail by Friday.
    Then the next issue becomes a bailout of the FDIC (they get some ability to borrow from treasury as needed?)

  11. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 11:58 AM

    Samueel Eells had TB

  12. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:00 PM

    #6 boycott all u want ,you can not stop the mayo revolution!

  13. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM

    #6 boycott all u want ,you can not stop the mayo revolution!

  14. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM

    Great to be making a lot shorting them. Couldn’t be happening to a better firm or better group of guys.

  15. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM

    Fuld + KDB = Shamwow!

  16. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM

    #6 and 7 nice double blog moron. Boycott your ass off WHAT aloss knowing that you no longer read this tabloid.

  17. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM

    Bess, Carney PLEASE BLOCK shamwow, mayo and first…..THEY SUCK.

  18. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:01 PM

    Rumors that they thought they were talking to Kim Jong-Il but he turned out to be the impostor. Shares falling on news Kim Jong-Il AWOL at anniversary parade.

  19. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:03 PM

    Can we have another Tim Sykes thread? LEH is toast….why dwell on the inevitable.
    Timmay where are you!

  20. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:03 PM

    NB cannot just be sold, because the value is associated with the brand (think US Trust + Charles Scwhab)…they want LEH to fail, so they can just split off and be on their own, rather than buy themselves out.

  21. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:03 PM

    How many shamwows are necessary to clean up the mess left by Lehman?

  22. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:05 PM

    well this may be the first time in weeks the Fed doesn’t get their weekend disturbed with Diet Coke sessions. sort it out during the work week like other underpaid govt employees.

  23. Posted by Bess Levin | September 9, 2008 at 12:06 PM

    @17– we will be filtering all comments with the word ‘mayo’ and ‘sham-wow.’ So get it out of your systems now, boys!

  24. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:06 PM

    I reluctantly state that at 1st mayo and the shammer were annoying But I’VE GROWN TO LOOK FORWARD TO THERE SOPHMORIC AND HARMLESS COMMENTS.

  25. Posted by beentheredonethat | September 9, 2008 at 12:07 PM

    @20
    I disagree. Given the opportunity, NB could be free and clear of LEH by say, 2:15 pm, 9/09/08.

  26. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:07 PM

    BL – THANK YOU!

  27. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:09 PM

    I hope it turns out ok for LEH but if it doesn’t, they have no one to blame but themselves. This has been going on forever and they’ve had plenty of time to address it. If not, it would only be because they were clueless or overplayed their hand.

  28. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:09 PM

    @23
    “Bess Levin”
    …Stopped reading right there.

  29. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:10 PM

    #21 bear in mind they are reusuable, machine washable and bleachable, so taxpayers will only be paying 19.95 + S&H, rather than $20 for each month the mess lasts!

  30. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:10 PM

    Bess please don’t stop these guys. I’ve never even been interested before these ladies started to write in. let them be and fuck all the naysayers.

  31. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:10 PM

    Bess Levin = Kim Il Jong. So now you want to censor the site. Now problem with people cursing and talking about sex acts, but God forbid someone should have fun with the word mayo and shamwow. Shame on you.

  32. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:12 PM

    @31. just stop. really. you ruin threads. it’s enough.

  33. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:13 PM

    @25 – only if the mgmt buy themselves…the only shop on the street where NB would fit is GS, and they’d rather watch LEH die
    NB is asset management / wealth management for silver spooners…you really think they want to have WB statements?

  34. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:13 PM

    @32
    Here they come, to your rescue…
    - – - – - -___@@@__
    ____/_____||___\_____
    /o——–CARE-POLICE——@\
    \—(@)====+====(@)—-/

  35. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:13 PM

    # 31 bravo!!!

  36. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:14 PM

    Dick Fuld = sham-wow with mayo

  37. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:15 PM

    @29, 21 here, great analysis. I work for a hedge fund, we need that kind of analysis around here. Let me know if you are ever looking for something.

  38. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:15 PM

    19: Tim?

  39. Posted by TheUpwardlyMob | September 9, 2008 at 12:15 PM

    I also would be happy to see the sham-mayo comments go. I’m pretty sure they’ll find a different way to be just as annoying, though. They’re trolls.

  40. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:17 PM

    give me mayo or give me death,i’m out of here!

  41. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM

    @ Bess Levin:
    Oh goody! Now we will get “may0″ “m@y0″ and “Sh@mw0w” posts while Billy and Skippy spend their supposed-working hours throwing spitballs from the back.

  42. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:20 PM

    Ask not what your shamwow can do for you, ask what you can do for your shamwow

  43. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:21 PM

    bess do’nt believe the hype its a sequel

  44. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:23 PM

    Bess do you think you would’ve gotten 45 comments without shammer and mayo guy ??

  45. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM

    just saw Collyn Gilbert from Stifel on CBNC. she’s an absolute babe. takes the cake for hottest babe on the street hands down!
    anybody got her email? i’d like to discuss my stife(l) nickolaus with her.

  46. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM

    @ 42, didnt Vince Offer say that?

  47. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:26 PM

    Shamwow/Mayo/tldr invade our space, and we fall back. They assimilate entire worlds, and we fall back. Not again. The line must be drawn here! This far and no further! And Bess will make them pay for what they’ve done!

  48. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:29 PM

    I wonder if paulson tells bernanke to throw this bone to gs.

  49. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:29 PM

    There is no way Fed/Treasury will let LEH fail.
    You guys sink it to $6 a share and I am going long.
    Mom and Pop still have plenty of cash left to bailout the risk takers.

  50. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM

    First they came for the guest posters,
    - but I was not a guest so I did not speak out.
    Then they came for the shamwowists and the mayoists,
    - but I was neither, so I did not speak out.
    Then they came for the ‘too long, didnt read’-ists,
    - but I read full posts so I did not speak out.
    And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.

  51. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:32 PM

    #50 enough with the haikus. have you noticed that we’re dealing with a financial meltdown here?!

  52. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:33 PM

    boycott until people learn to post only once

  53. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:34 PM

    @ 49
    Yes they will let it fail. They have to. Something has to fail. And timing does matter on this issue.
    LEH had plenty of time to right the ship. Jesus, 3 weeks ago Fuld couldn’t get a straight up financing done because he wanted an 6-8% premium from where LEH was currently trading.
    Mark my words next bailout goes to FDIC.

  54. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:34 PM

    @51
    I’m trying to remember the name of a song. It’s something like…
    Ho ho him….
    Maybe, “Go with him…..” ?
    Do you know it? It’s been killing me.

  55. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:35 PM

    Mayow

  56. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:36 PM

    @51
    “haikus”
    …Stopped reading right there

  57. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:37 PM

    @ 49
    Yes they will let it fail. They have to. Something has to fail. And timing does matter on this issue.
    LEH had plenty of time to right the ship. Jesus, 3 weeks ago Fuld couldn’t get a straight up financing done because he wanted an 6-8% premium from where LEH was currently trading.
    Mark my words next bailout goes to FDIC.

  58. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:40 PM

    @54, its:
    Lehmans sucking wind
    While Koreans walk away
    Ben Bernanke help

  59. Posted by Suits | September 9, 2008 at 12:40 PM

    51 does that strike you as a haiku?
    50 I don’t think that particular poem is all that funny being co-opted into something this ridiculous.

  60. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:41 PM

    They bailed out Bear because of its CDS exposure. Surely Lehman has the same or greater CDS exposure.

  61. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:42 PM

    Only postive thing to come out of LEH faliure will be to see Crammer try and justify his BUY LEH call (from $30 on down – at this point mine as well buy some more as if you bot at $30 only lost around 70%)

  62. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:44 PM

    @60
    They bailed out Bear? News to me. I thought they bent Bear over a chair like Kobe did to his Colorado wingbat as retribution for what Bear did during the LTCM fiasco.
    What do I know, though. I invested in Shamwow.

  63. Posted by blndebnker | September 9, 2008 at 12:44 PM

    @50 – Semi brilliant. I have to say I sort of get a kick out of the shamwowists.

  64. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:45 PM

    ISDA must be frantically trying to settle frannie CDSs before counterparty risk sets in…

  65. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:45 PM

    Ladies and gentlemen, I’ll be brief. The issue here is not whether we broke a few rules, or took a few liberties with our borrowers and financial counterparties – we did.
    But you can’t hold a whole institution responsible for the behavior of a few, sick twisted individuals. For if you do, then shouldn’t we blame the whole financial system? And if the whole financial system is guilty, then isn’t this an indictment of capitalism itself? I put it to you, Greg – isn’t this an indictment of our entire American society? Well, you can do whatever you want to LEH, FNMA, FRE and BS, but we’re not going to sit here and listen to you badmouth the United States of America. Gentlemen!

  66. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:46 PM

    I feel sorry for my classmates from the top-7 MBA program, who joined LEH this August.
    Ironicaly, I know a couple of people who spent their summer internship with the firms like HSBC or BNP Paribas, got full-time offers, but decided to shop around for a bigger name, eventually opting for Lehman

  67. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:46 PM

    We are talking about unchecked aggression…
    THIS AGGRESSION WILL NOT STAND
    Am i wrong

  68. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:48 PM

    You guys are all idiots. 50′s “poem” is cribbed from a poem written by a German pastor during the Holocaust.
    nice spin though.

  69. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:49 PM

    Chairman Mayo?
    Chairman Shamwow?
    “Chairman”
    … Stopped reading right there.

  70. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:49 PM

    @67 – I think you forgot to take you medication today. Go down some lithum, maybe a vodka shot and head to matt drudge’s website.
    Thanks!

  71. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:50 PM

    There won’t be a “bailout” of the FDIC because they can borrow (from the fed I think, though that may be wrong) against the future cash inflows from insuring all the banks. The insurance is a must-have for institutions seeking average depositors. The FDIC will just have to raise their rates to banks in the future to pay for the loans.

  72. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:50 PM

    Didn’t the LSE hook up with Lehmans on their tradings systems to form Baikal? Shoulda say the writing on the wall as I twiddled my thumbs for 7 hours on Monday…

  73. Posted by TheUpwardlyMob | September 9, 2008 at 12:50 PM

    um, #68, we know that. Hence #59′s comment.

  74. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:51 PM

    Didn’t the LSE hook up with Lehmans on their tradings systems to form Baikal? Shoulda saw the writing on the wall as I twiddled my thumbs for 7 hours on Monday…

  75. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:51 PM

    My left foot itches.

  76. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:53 PM

    Please comment on the dick fuld deathwatch:
    http://americanmadness.com/2008/09/09/dick-fuld-deathwatch/

  77. Posted by whatelseisgoingon | September 9, 2008 at 12:58 PM

    @#65
    So what else is going on, how are we opening up?

  78. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    the sad reality of the whole shamwow/mayo/etc phenomenon is that each inane post drives ad revenue via page hits. as much as you hate them, these posts make db money.

  79. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:01 PM

    without Neuberger, LEH stock goes to 0.

  80. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:01 PM

    @78 – I feel used

  81. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:03 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  82. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:04 PM

    Shamwow
    Mayo
    First
    3 Chimps

  83. Posted by whatelseisgoingon | September 9, 2008 at 1:04 PM

    Gasparino put on his glasses to explain Credit default swaps…. genius
    so what else is going on

  84. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:04 PM

    Shamwow
    Mayo
    First
    3 Chimps

  85. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:06 PM

    LEH may pre-announce earnings today.

  86. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:07 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  87. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:09 PM

    To the Stifel “Babe?” stalker
    http://www2.stifel.com/site/content.aspx?id=192&aid=100
    This is hot????????…looks like generic white-ho trash you would see in infield at Preakness or Vons checkout
    Get out and meet some models, its fashion week..

  88. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:10 PM

    To Shamwow, Mayo, and Too long, didn’t read:
    Do not go gentle into that good night,
    Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
    Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
    Because their words had forked no lightning they
    Do not go gentle into that good night.
    Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
    Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
    Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
    And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
    Do not go gentle into that good night.
    Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
    Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
    And you, Bess Levin, there on the sad height,
    Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
    Do not go gentle into that good night.
    Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

  89. Posted by Suits | September 9, 2008 at 1:10 PM

    Sham-wow:
    http://getshamwow.com/Default.asp?bhcp=1
    SFW. The guy in the video is named Vince Offer. Seriously.
    Hilarious, right?

  90. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:12 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  91. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:15 PM

    oh DB is going to hell

  92. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  93. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM

    Sham-wow needs to merge with Mayo in order to survive these hostile conditions.
    #50 Bravo.
    SPODE

  94. Posted by EconAnalyst | September 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM

    @47 Star Trek reference?
    @88 Dylan Thomas reference?
    @50 Holocaust reference?!
    All of this trouble in the defense of inane comments?
    Bess and Carney are right to edit out the B.S.
    LEH will be back up to at least $12 for NB alone. This is overkill.

  95. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:26 PM

    Bess – you still there?

  96. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:27 PM

    Bess = Mayo and First, how do you think she always gets in there early.
    I have no idea who Shamwow is, probably Bill Miller.

  97. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:30 PM

    @96. shut up. just shut up.

  98. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:32 PM
  99. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:36 PM

    can some equity analyst explain me how LEH stock crawls out of this hole when it pays 7B per qtr on interest expense and has 2.8B in operating income?

  100. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:38 PM

    Wow. I’ve been making shit-loads out of this short. I missed shorting BSC. And we lesser mortals can’t short ABX like John Paulson could. So instead, it’s done to shorting Lehman.
    And this is what I have to say to you guys — It is *NEVER* too late to short Lehman. It’s got wayy more downside. join the party guys.
    And screw you poor Lehman employees. freaking pussies.

  101. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:38 PM

    Too long, didn’t read.
    100th.

  102. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:39 PM

    Bess:
    Please filter all comments before they hit the board. The more time I waste skipping over the “mayo, etc” comments, the less likely I’ll be returning.

  103. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:41 PM

    @101
    Too late, missed the post.
    @102
    Mayo, shamwow.

  104. Posted by FUNdamental | September 9, 2008 at 1:42 PM

    has bloomberg started any of their rumor mongering about this yet?

  105. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:43 PM

    Can Sham-wow clean up my cum. I am Einhorny and I just came in my pants when I saw Lehman go into single digits. I need to clean up after myself.

  106. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:45 PM

    @98 – actually all that confirms is GASPO is a GASBAG.
    Press release states that earnings and “stategic initatives” will be announced on Sept 18, 2008.
    I bet there is not announcement on Sept 18, 2008 because LEH doesn’t exisit on Sept 18th.

  107. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:46 PM

    Bess and the DB team:
    I understand that you not gonna ban anonymous posting as it’s gonna violate your philosophy. What you should do then is:
    1. Encourage regular users to register and post under their user names
    2. Provide readers an option to read only comments from registered users, so one can skip all this mayo shit
    otherwise you’ll start losing the audience pretty soon

  108. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:48 PM

    >$10. BOOYAH.
    HOw many days before bail-out? How many days before Fuld is out? How many more employees laid out? Plez answer my queries.
    This is crazy man. Serves you Wall-street asswholes right.
    What are the future uses of the Lehman headquarters now?

  109. Posted by blndebnker | September 9, 2008 at 1:50 PM

    You people are all so uptight. This isn’t NASA, it’s dealbreaker. Just ignore the mayo guy. So not that big of a deal. What a bunch if princesses.

  110. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 1:51 PM

    Einhorny @105
    I don’t know about cum and sperm, but Shamwow can definitely clean up mayo, ketchup and mustard. Not to mention water. Does that help?
    for more info go to http://www.getshamwow.com

  111. Posted by Bess Levin | September 9, 2008 at 1:57 PM

    @102/107– Considering the enthusiasm with which mayo, etc post their garbage on every single god damn post, I don’t really have time to be sitting here removing their comments. But it’s also been mentioned that filtering comments with mayo, etc probably won’t do much, because the troglodytes will just find a substitute word with which to annoy the shit out of every one. And banning their IPs– users can spoof IP addresses. We are considering having people register, but know that many people do not feel comfortable with that, even though you can give us a fake email/fake name, and we’d have no way of knowing who you are, anymore so than we do when you comment as a guest.
    Interestingly enough, I just received an email from one of the mayo,etc guys, who can’t understand why we blocked his address. Apparently I should be “ashamed” of myself, and “Livingston, NJ” is “disappointed in me” for blocking “a few harmless blogs about pretty much nothing.”

  112. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:06 PM

    @Bess– I would register so we wouldn’t have to hear their shit.

  113. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:13 PM

    @ BEss .
    So would i register. If it meant i wouldn’t have to hear from those idiots again.
    Tell the mayo kid to get a job and maybe he could move out of his mom’s basement.

  114. Posted by AJ | September 9, 2008 at 2:16 PM

    Bess I like the filtering option. Make it so we can click to read only posts from registered users if we want

  115. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:18 PM

    @111 Bess from @107
    Thanks for reacting to my message
    I dont think you should ban anonymous posting, but rather find a creative way to encourage registering
    For instance – anonymous comments would be premoderated
    Or, as I mentioned earlier, give registered users an option to read only posts from registered users

  116. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:19 PM

    I call dibs on username ‘Shamwow’

  117. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:22 PM

    #111
    Knee-jerk reaction. And the more attention you give it the more you will see it. Obviously the people complaining have never been the tormentor in life.
    22 year old kid trying to make a difference. “A” for effort but throwing stones at the beehive is not a good idea. Let it go an move on and so will the mayo, etc guys.

  118. Posted by Bess Levin | September 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM

    @115 et al– by filtering I meant, filter comments with mayo,etc; there is no way to make it so you can only read comments from registered users. Pre-moderated comments are way too labor intensive. It would mean I would have to approve every single comment of the non-registered users, of which there are many. Plus, not all guests are mayo,etc people, and there is nothing more annoying than being told that your comment is being held for approval.
    and banning him was not a knee-jerk reaction, @117. He and the other mayo,etc guys have been annoying the shit out of people– myself most especially included– for a while. And they have only intensified. I wrote him back and explained that they’re not harmless but ruining comments and said that I would think about reinstating his IP, which I really will consider, since he e-mailed me from his work address, so I now know his employer and real name.

  119. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:29 PM

    >that I would think about reinstating his >IP, which I will, since he e-mailed me >from his work address, so I now know his >employer and real name.
    Dick Fuld? :)

  120. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:30 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  121. Posted by diablo | September 9, 2008 at 2:31 PM

    Bess, if your 12 yr. old IT guy can hack it, I’m all for letting registered users be able to filter out comments from guests. It’s done in other boards with great success and encourages registration.

  122. Posted by finance_baller | September 9, 2008 at 2:38 PM

    I would have never guessed ‘mayo-gate’ would be todays top story overshadowing everything else…

  123. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:39 PM

    “so I now know his employer and real name.” and will end him at the first mayo comment?
    Please? I’ll do it for you. Just say the word.

  124. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:41 PM

    @diablo– what sites do that? I’ve never seen it.

  125. Posted by finance_baller | September 9, 2008 at 2:42 PM
  126. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:42 PM

    And so begins the pussification of DB. Just remember when you sleep with pussies you will become sympathetic to their sensitive needs and soon the pussy will dictate the path you travel. Less than 5% dictates the reality of the community. AFUKNAMAZING.
    Those willing to give up a little liberty for a little security deserve neither security nor liberty.
    -Benjamin Franklin
    SPODE

  127. Posted by Bess Levin | September 9, 2008 at 2:46 PM

    @SPODE– it is not the pussifcation of DB. You of all people should know that for the most part we are more than willing to let you guys say whatever the fuck you want, be it crude, obnoxious, or about the DB editors. And we haven’t yet decided what the appropriate solution will be, meaning you might not have to make ‘SPODE’ a registered name. So put a sock in it.

  128. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 2:50 PM

    So, assuming someone creates a username, and then continues to spamwow the board, what is the recourse? Ban the username? And that will stop the person from creating another username and beginning the cycle again how?

  129. Posted by diablo | September 9, 2008 at 2:56 PM

    #124
    dslreports.com is one example where a registered user can filter out unregistered users.

  130. Posted by Suits | September 9, 2008 at 2:59 PM

    SPODE,
    Seriously? Using that Ben Franklin quote for a disagreement about an anonymous internet comment section on a low traffic website? Get a life.
    Bess,
    Just do like EP and nuke the comments.

  131. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:02 PM

    @suits– what’s with you and the other db’ers who insists on trash talking (“a low traffic website,” etc) the site they obviously take the time to read and comment on?

  132. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:04 PM

    @suits– read the previous posts– there are too many of these dbags to be constantly deleting their comments. ep would delete the handful of ones attacking her personally, not this army of spamming fucks.

  133. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:06 PM

    126 My grandmother used to say “when you sleep with a baby, you wake up covered in pee”. It sounds especially profound in Italian. Grandma was one tough bird.

  134. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM

    @133– or you roll over and “accidentally” suffocate it in its sleep.

  135. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:09 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  136. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:12 PM

    120 Guess you’re not on the treadmill on Saturday afternoon, watching infomercials. A sham-wow looks like a dust mop but is apparently strong enough to absorb about half of the Hudson River. They demonstrate this by showing how it sucks up everthing in sight. I’m this close to buying one.

  137. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:21 PM

    Uh, so what does a sham-wow have to do with Lehman Brothers?

  138. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:23 PM

    137 Same as mayo: nothing

  139. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:26 PM

    here is a novel idea for answering questions…www.google.com

  140. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:51 PM

    @139
    What’s your problem? Like you were looking for the answer to life’s mysteries and my question regarding what sham-wow was got in your way. Good luck finding out why you were born on this forum. You’re just mayo-fodder at this point.

  141. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 3:54 PM

    139 Actually, I’d like to thank 139. I googled sham-wow and learned the Vince Offer connection. Also learned that the absorbant properties of the sham-wow, as demonstrated during the commericial, are greatly overstated. Imagine that.

  142. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 4:06 PM

    @140
    139 here,
    If you were a stock I’d short you…lazy bitch!

  143. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 4:08 PM

    So, the spammer(s) are not all the same person? Wow, too many people were deprived of attention as children.

  144. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    Mayo-fodder…good one, 139 has jokes…

  145. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 4:37 PM

    what’s sham-wow? seriously.

  146. Posted by guest | September 9, 2008 at 4:44 PM

    If shamwow was a financial firm, which one would it be? Why? Please show all work.

  147. Posted by guest | September 10, 2008 at 12:08 PM

    testing: Can we post in older threads?

  148. Posted by Bristol Airport Hotels | April 18, 2012 at 6:32 PM

    f9OziD A big thank you for your blog post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  149. Posted by Lawrence Jaeger | April 19, 2012 at 6:31 PM

    Major thanks for the post. Great.

  150. Posted by free bingo bonus | April 20, 2012 at 4:02 AM

    Thanks-a-mundo for the post.Really thank you! Really Great.

  151. Posted by Freya Swimwear | April 20, 2012 at 10:39 AM

    I am so grateful for your post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  152. Posted by Tim Thomas Jersey | April 20, 2012 at 10:50 AM

    Thanks for the article post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  153. Posted by Radiologist pay | April 20, 2012 at 11:59 AM

    Enjoyed every bit of your article. Fantastic.

  154. Posted by memory foam bed | April 20, 2012 at 9:26 PM

    Major thanks for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

  155. Posted by Cambridge Lasik | April 21, 2012 at 12:47 AM

    I loved your article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  156. Posted by Universitas Terbaik Jogja | April 21, 2012 at 2:36 AM

    A big thank you for your blog article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  157. Posted by red snapper recipes | April 21, 2012 at 3:24 AM

    Thanks for the blog article.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  158. Posted by quinceanera dresses | April 21, 2012 at 4:36 AM

    Hey, thanks for the post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  159. Posted by suchmaschinenoptimierung mit webdesign | April 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM

    Appreciate you sharing, great blog.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  160. Posted by search engine optimization | April 21, 2012 at 10:24 AM

    This is one awesome blog.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  161. Posted by white shark diving | April 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM

    Thanks-a-mundo for the post.Really thank you! Awesome.

  162. Posted by android game controller | April 21, 2012 at 6:28 PM

    Major thanks for the article post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  163. Posted by best girls from budapest | April 21, 2012 at 7:40 PM

    Very neat article post. Keep writing.

  164. Posted by free iPad | April 21, 2012 at 10:05 PM

    Appreciate you sharing, great blog article.Much thanks again.

  165. Posted by China Orthopedic Instruments Supplier | April 22, 2012 at 1:56 AM

    We are a gaggle of volunteers and opening a brand new scheme in our community. Your site supplied us with useful data to paintings on. You may have completed an impressive method and our whole group is often grateful to you.

  166. Posted by boutique lingerie sexy | April 22, 2012 at 12:55 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the article post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  167. Posted by Sex | April 23, 2012 at 11:07 AM

    Appreciate you sharing, great blog.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  168. Posted by Golf Towels | April 23, 2012 at 11:56 AM

    Thanks for the article post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  169. Posted by selling gold | April 23, 2012 at 1:38 PM

    Very good article post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  170. Posted by craft creations | April 23, 2012 at 8:52 PM

    A big thank you for your blog post.Much thanks again. Great.

  171. Posted by national lottery | April 24, 2012 at 1:28 AM

    Thanks-a-mundo for the article post. Awesome.

  172. Posted by Get Facebook Fans | April 24, 2012 at 4:19 AM

    I am so grateful for your article.Really thank you! Awesome.

  173. Posted by music | April 24, 2012 at 5:57 AM

    Really informative blog article. Fantastic.

  174. Posted by hearing aids Long Beach | April 24, 2012 at 7:15 PM

    Thank you ever so for you article. Keep writing.

  175. Posted by lightweight vacuums | April 25, 2012 at 1:39 PM

    Major thanks for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  176. Posted by backlinks checker | April 26, 2012 at 1:58 AM

    I cannot thank you enough for the blog post. Awesome.

  177. Posted by make money from home | April 26, 2012 at 4:47 AM

    wow, awesome article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  178. Posted by Free Sample | April 26, 2012 at 6:24 AM

    A big thank you for your article.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  179. Posted by how to make your ex boyfriend want you back | April 26, 2012 at 8:06 AM

    Really enjoyed this article post. Cool.

  180. Posted by Online Birthday Cards | April 27, 2012 at 7:22 PM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article post.Really looking forward to read more.

  181. Posted by Wedding Invitation | April 28, 2012 at 12:57 AM

    This is one awesome blog article. Will read on…

  182. Posted by Cobalt Accessories | April 28, 2012 at 2:04 PM

    I think this is a real great article post.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  183. Posted by best remortgage deals | April 29, 2012 at 10:58 AM

    I am so grateful for your post.Thanks Again.

  184. Posted by email marketing software for macintosh | May 3, 2012 at 6:22 AM

    Thank you a lot for providing individuals with an exceptionally brilliant opportunity to discover important secrets from this web site. It is often so cool and stuffed with fun for me personally and my office colleagues to visit your web site at minimum 3 times in one week to see the latest issues you have. And indeed, I’m just actually satisfied with all the powerful tips you give. Certain 1 ideas on this page are definitely the most beneficial I have had.

  185. Posted by erectile dysfunction remedies | May 3, 2012 at 8:45 AM

    Thanks so much for the blog article.Thanks Again. Want more.

  186. Posted by causes of erectile dysfunction | May 3, 2012 at 9:25 AM

    I think this is a real great blog post.Really thank you!

  187. Posted by visit now | May 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great article post.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  188. Posted by usa auto parts | May 4, 2012 at 2:56 PM

    I think this is a real great article post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  189. Posted by wedding store | May 4, 2012 at 3:43 PM

    I truly appreciate this blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

  190. Posted by spam-freedirectory | May 4, 2012 at 4:30 PM

    I am so grateful for your article post.Really looking forward to read more.

  191. Posted by Modelagentur Zürich | May 5, 2012 at 7:42 AM

    Very informative blog article.Really thank you! Great.

  192. Posted by how to buy cheap airline tickets | May 6, 2012 at 8:48 AM

    I really like and appreciate your article post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  193. Posted by holistic drug rehab center | May 7, 2012 at 4:04 AM

    Thank you for your blog post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.