• 24 Sep 2008 at 9:27 AM

Spread ‘Em

29.2 basis points on a 10-year treasury CDS. This is either a fantastic opportunity, or the beginning of the end. Salt to your own taste.
US 10-year Treasury CDS widens to record 29.2 bps-CMA [Reuters via Alea]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (81)

  1. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 9:30 AM

    I would short that if it weren’t for the Obama factor.

  2. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 9:32 AM

    @1 here. correction : LONG. I’d sell it.

  3. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 9:32 AM

    sell protection here….because if the US ever suffers a credit event, the likelihood of your counterparty coughing up the required payment is virtually nil….

  4. Posted by Debter | September 24, 2008 at 9:33 AM

    that’s not even 3bps, I wouldn’t run for hills just yet.
    “Credit default swaps on 10-year Treasury debt expanded to 29.2 basis points — its widest ever — from 26.5 basis points on Tuesday, according to CMA, a specialised data provider.”

  5. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 9:37 AM

    1,2 – Can you elaborate? How could either candidate do worse than the incumbent who basically doubled the federal debt in 8 years and is bequeathing his successor with a $440 billion + deficit and likely recession?

  6. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 9:46 AM

    Salt? Forget it. Use Mayo as your spread!

  7. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 9:48 AM

    What doest his mean from a layman’s perspective? I can sell an insurance policy on treasuries for 29.2 cents on the dollar?

  8. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 9:52 AM

    7 100 bp = 1%, so the policy would cost .292 cents (around 1/3 of a cent) per $1, not 29.2 cents.

  9. Posted by IA | September 24, 2008 at 9:52 AM

    It’s sort of nonsensical to even quote a level for U.S. CDS, because if the U.S. defaults, the global financial system is pretty much done anyway. It’s like writing someone insurance on a massive meteor strike – who is going to be around to collect on the policy?

  10. Posted by brokebrokerbrokest | September 24, 2008 at 9:53 AM

    hey # 7 — it means

  11. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 9:54 AM

    CDS aside, who is getting tired of Erin Burnett trying to burnish her credentials as a pundit on CNBC? Put her on Meet The Press once and she thinks she knows what she’s talking about. Stick to trying to read the teleprompter. Same goes for Old Man River Mark Haines. God, what passes for experience and insight today is sad.

  12. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 9:55 AM

    10 check yr math: less than 1/3 cents, not

  13. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM

    @12, 10 is saying the same thing. 1/3 cent per year, but 2.92 cents for the life of the contract

  14. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 10:08 AM

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but @3…if you sold protection, wouldn’t you be the one required to cough up payment in the event the US suffers a credit event?

  15. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 10:11 AM

    14 I think he’s saying that a default by the US would be so apocalyptic that you probably couldn’t (therefore wouldn’t)pay.

  16. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 10:12 AM

    so who buys this stuff – I mean, really an insurance firm or whatever will be there to make good when the US Govt defaults on its debt? there is no end to the stupid bets people will make.
    on another note entirely – anyone else really hate jim bunning, or was it just me thinking he was the biggest jerkoff on that committee yesterday?

  17. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 10:16 AM

    @5, at this point it’s marginal increases in the debt I care about. 440B is sickening.
    Bush and his neo-conservative ideas undoubtedly screwed us.
    I don’t think we need any more government spending no matter how well intentioned it may seem.
    And let’s drop these simplistic assertions that somehow the president and his policies has any significant effect on GDP. That’s like claiming that Clinton caused the 2001 recession. We saddled ourselves with a recession. It’s an inevitable part of the business cycle.

  18. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 10:19 AM

    @16, I suppose you could use it as part of a relative value trade against less creditworthy countries.

  19. Posted by FUNdamental | September 24, 2008 at 10:30 AM

    really? Not a single spread ‘em joke in the whole thread? Im disappointed in everyone.

  20. Posted by IA | September 24, 2008 at 10:42 AM

    @16, Yeah, Bunning was a big douche yesterday! But he once pitched a no-hitter and also struck out 3 guys in one inning on nine pitches.
    Obviously that qualifies him to draft legislation.

  21. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 10:43 AM

    @9
    Agreed. Unless it’s going to be backed by the Japanese government and paid out in Yen.

  22. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 10:49 AM

    @FUN you’re cheeky today!
    ep put it in the title.

  23. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 10:50 AM

    so 3bps is like saying something about the weather. It rained .001 inches of rain, but now its going to rain .005 inches. These reporters have no concept of what they are saying.
    I guess instead of spreading 26 inches she is spreading 29 inches. theres your spread joke

  24. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 11:02 AM

    CDS prices are an absolute tail wagging the dog.They are going to go the way of portfolio insurance.

  25. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 11:22 AM

    @24 what’s wrong with CDS? in a lot of ways, it’s just a more liquid version of a regular ol’ bond
    5 yr interest rate swap + 5 yr corporate CDS = synthetic 5 yr corporate bond

  26. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 11:27 AM

    @25–same thing that’s wrong with monolines.

  27. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 11:35 AM

    I don’t get this contract at all — why would there be any nonzero probability of the US Treasury defaulting? They’ll just inflate their way out anything. Unless that’s somehow built into the contract’s definition of credit event.

  28. Posted by StupidEquityGuy | September 24, 2008 at 11:43 AM

    What was this contract quoted for last summer? Say June or so?
    ~SEG

  29. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 11:45 AM

    By the time the U.S. defaults on its sovereign debt, I’d have long since moved to Paraguay. How do I get in on this?

  30. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 12:02 PM

    By the time the U.S. defaults on its sovereign debt, I’d have long since moved to Paraguay. How do I get in on this?

  31. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 12:10 PM

    By the time the U.S. defaults on its sovereign debt, I’d have long since moved to Paraguay. How do I get in on this?

  32. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 12:44 PM

    Runaway! Runaway!
    pansy

  33. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 12:47 PM

    you’re a dipshit if your answer is to buy it

  34. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 1:08 PM

    @28 – type bank on Bloomberg. The US Gov is #16. Looks like it was around 8 in late June according to the chart.

  35. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 1:22 PM

    @23, The incremental move is significant, not the nominal. 10%…I bet it would matter in a hurricane between 135 mph winds and almost 150 mph, about the difference between a category 4 and 5.

  36. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 1:27 PM

    Been selling it all day. Unfortunately, my Amex is maxed out and my home is under water, but I got Zimbabwe to sleeve me so I could get done with Wachovia.

  37. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 2:38 PM

    @27: Exactly. I don’t get it either. Since all of the US government’s debt is denominated in USD, they can always just print the money. Countries that have defaulted generally had debt that wasn’t in their own currency so inflation wasn’t an option.

  38. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 5:26 PM

    This makes no sense…
    How could the issuer (seller) of the CDS have a better chance of remaining solvent than the government?

  39. Posted by guest | September 24, 2008 at 5:28 PM

    This makes no sense at all…
    How could the issuer (seller) of the US Ten Year CDS have a higher chance of remaining solvent than the U.S. government?

  40. Posted by Bristol Airport Hotels | April 18, 2012 at 3:20 PM

    TOwAVW Thanks again for the post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  41. Posted by the ex recovery system | April 19, 2012 at 5:21 PM

    A big thank you for your blog post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  42. Posted by free bingo online | April 20, 2012 at 3:55 AM

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  43. Posted by Free Classifieds | April 20, 2012 at 8:54 AM

    Thank you for your article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  44. Posted by malware removal | April 20, 2012 at 10:16 AM

    Very informative blog article. Cool.

  45. Posted by Shapewear | April 20, 2012 at 11:12 AM

    Say, you got a nice blog.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  46. Posted by resume builder | April 20, 2012 at 12:25 PM

    Im grateful for the post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  47. Posted by sulfate free shampoo | April 20, 2012 at 7:48 PM

    Say, you got a nice post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  48. Posted by Christine Paz | April 21, 2012 at 12:47 AM

    Im grateful for the blog article. Want more.

  49. Posted by jeux gratuit en ligne | April 21, 2012 at 4:18 AM

    I really liked your post. Great.

  50. Posted by Randolph Gonder | April 21, 2012 at 5:43 AM

    I appreciate you sharing this blog post.Really thank you! Much obliged.

  51. Posted by Detech Fire Alarms | April 21, 2012 at 6:23 AM

    Wow, great article post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  52. Posted by sylvesterleach | April 21, 2012 at 3:26 PM

    Im thankful for the article. Fantastic.

  53. Posted by buy weed online | April 21, 2012 at 7:25 PM

    Thanks so much for the article post.Thanks Again. Great.

  54. Posted by anchor:candida treatment | April 22, 2012 at 1:11 AM

    Thank you for your article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  55. Posted by boutique sexe | April 22, 2012 at 1:34 PM

    Awesome post. Really Cool.

  56. Posted by Tanzania Online Jobs | April 22, 2012 at 2:53 PM

    Major thankies for the blog.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  57. Posted by kerem azer | April 23, 2012 at 1:23 PM

    Wow, great blog post. Will read on…

  58. Posted by Phen375 Reviews | April 23, 2012 at 1:52 PM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article.Really thank you! Want more.

  59. Posted by http://www.10tips.co.il/ | April 23, 2012 at 3:08 PM

    Thanks again for the blog.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  60. Posted by this shop | April 23, 2012 at 7:34 PM

    Enjoyed every bit of your blog.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  61. Posted by Onda Vi40 | April 24, 2012 at 12:45 AM

    Great blog article.Really thank you! Really Great.

  62. Posted by medical lab test | April 24, 2012 at 2:41 AM

    Thank you ever so for you blog article.Really thank you! Want more.

  63. Posted by how to burn belly fat | April 24, 2012 at 3:24 AM

    Im thankful for the article. Want more.

  64. Posted by website design india | April 24, 2012 at 3:59 AM

    I am so grateful for your article. Cool.

  65. Posted by unlock phones | April 24, 2012 at 6:00 AM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great blog post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  66. Posted by internet marketing | April 24, 2012 at 10:23 AM

    Thanks a lot for the blog post.Really thank you! Cool.

  67. Posted by hearing aids Atlanta | April 24, 2012 at 9:15 PM

    Great, thanks for sharing this post. Cool.

  68. Posted by hearing aids Lake Havasu City | April 24, 2012 at 10:34 PM

    Really enjoyed this blog. Will read on…

  69. Posted by royalties | April 25, 2012 at 7:45 PM

    Thank you ever so for you article.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  70. Posted by make money online | April 26, 2012 at 5:30 AM

    I really like and appreciate your blog article.Really thank you! Great.

  71. Posted by hollywood movies | April 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM

    Hey, thanks for the blog post.Thanks Again.

  72. Posted by Anita Sulley | April 27, 2012 at 8:24 AM

    We have created a take note so as to myself to create some thing added good on Thursdays, pending your current check out

  73. Posted by Rail and Air DisplacementSpecialists | April 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM

    I believe what you posted made a great deal of sense. However, what about this? suppose you added a little content? I am not saying your information isn’t good., however suppose you added something that makes people desire more? I mean Spread ‘Em Dealbreaker: Wall Street Insider – Financial News, Headlines, Commentary and Analysis – Hedge Funds, Private Equity, Banks is a little vanilla. You ought to peek at Yahoo’s home page and watch how they write news titles to get people to open the links. You might try adding a video or a picture or two to grab readers interested about everything’ve got to say. In my opinion, it could make your blog a little livelier.

  74. Posted by Coffee | April 27, 2012 at 2:13 PM

    A round of applause for your article post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  75. Posted by Alpen Spotting Scopes | April 27, 2012 at 5:33 PM

    A round of applause for your blog.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  76. Posted by Hawaiian Shirts | April 28, 2012 at 12:23 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this article post.Really thank you! Really Great.

  77. Posted by Mobile App Development | April 28, 2012 at 9:36 PM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic post. Awesome.

  78. Posted by Converse Trainers | April 29, 2012 at 7:24 AM

    This is one awesome article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  79. Posted by free email marketing software free | May 3, 2012 at 6:24 AM

    hey there and thank you for your info – I’ve definitely picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise a few technical points using this web site, since I experienced to reload the website many times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your hosting is OK? Not that I am complaining, but sluggish loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and can damage your high quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Well I’m adding this RSS to my email and can look out for much more of your respective fascinating content. Ensure that you update this again soon..

  80. Posted by Estrella Sandercock | May 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM

    I intended to write you the tiny note to finally say thanks the moment again for these splendid tactics you have shared on this site. This has been so extremely open-handed with you to convey extensively just what a lot of folks would have supplied as an e-book to help with making some money on their own, precisely considering the fact that you might have done it if you ever considered necessary. These tricks as well served to provide a good way to fully grasp someone else have the same desire like mine to grasp a whole lot more in respect of this problem. I am certain there are some more pleasant opportunities up front for individuals that examine your site.

  81. Posted by Alline Gudger | May 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM

    I enjoy the valuable particulars a person provide within your posts. Let me book mark symphony

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.