• 08 Sep 2008 at 10:32 AM

The Doctor Is In The House

Deutsche Bank is holding a conference call right now called on the “Implications of the GSE Rescue Plan.” They’ve mentioned that “Dr. Greenspan” will be speaking 5 times. While I’m on hold, let’s guess what he’s going to say, and whether or not he’s calling from the tub, as is his wont.
10:36: “This is an off the record call.” Awk. What’s the worst they can do to me? (Nervous laughter.)
10:40: “De facto nationalization…But not full nationalization– the effect of Secretary Paulson’s plan is essentially to create an almost but not quite full faith in credit situation.”
10:42: Tranquilizer gun time:
“The case is critical because the financial crisis globally is best described as single issue in the price of homes in the U.S.”
“Equity in those homes serve as the ultimate collateral.”
“So long as price of homes is ambiguous, clarity is difficult to gain in this type of market.”
10:47: “Inability to close very critical LIBOR to overnight index swaps spreads is indication that there is a frozen structure in here which can only be resolved by subbing sovereign credit for private credit.”
10:50 Get excited: “Something like this is going to occur ever 50 to 100 years.”
10:52 “Capital is not the issue!” “Nor is the chinaman!”
Questions and Answers:
Q: Are we at the bottom or close to the bottom?
A: I love that question. I wish somebody had the answer to that.
At this point someone has attached a mic to his his receiver and placed it next to the keyboard and is BANGING THE FUCK out of the keys. Greenspan screams at whoever is doing this and for a second I get scared it’s me. It’s not but wow.
Q: Didn’t hear it. Am working from my apt. today and calling into this thing from my Blackberry, which is getting really hot. Had to put it down for a second. Caught the answer though, which sounds dark:
A: If we leave these wounds open, THEY WILL ERUPT AGAIN.
Q: What’s your vision for Freddie and Fannie in the long run?
A. They should be nationalized (effectively what has been done). After the crisis, split them up into a number of different types of institutions and sell them off into the market.
Q. You’re feeling better?
A. No. I’m feeling a little less worse.
Q: Given that agency spreads have tightened approximately 40 basis points, could you comment on foreign central bank’s appetites to buy GSE debt at these levels?
A: The best way to find out would be to ask them. [He goes on, but as his official editor for today, I unliterally decide to end it there, sparing you the sensation of having your will to live sucked out, and making him sound bitchy and dismissive, which is preferable to obtuse, is it not?]

Comments (121)

  1. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 10:42 AM

    “the right thing to do under the circumstances.”

  2. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 10:43 AM

    “Warren gets Becky Quick. I’ll only take questions from Bess Levin.”

  3. Posted by blndebnker | September 8, 2008 at 10:43 AM

    Greenspan in the tub – That is a vivid image.

  4. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 10:44 AM

    is it me or his he the spitting image of woody allen?

  5. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM

    holy smokes with a screenname like “blndebanker” how do you get anything done, what with all the IM’ing you must be doing?

  6. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 10:47 AM

    Deutsche Bank AG. AKA DBag. Nuff said.

  7. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 10:47 AM

    Too long, didn’t read.
    -Weary Willie

  8. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 10:49 AM

    Greenspan is going to get on the line and just try to sell his book. He’s become the Al Gore of the Fed. Apparently Gore invented the internet, and Greenspan invented the bull market.
    -HEDGEmony

  9. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 10:50 AM

    He’ll have to find a way to squeeze in the fact that he was sounding the alarm on this 4 years ago.

  10. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 10:51 AM

    moved from the tub to the ‘throne’ for this one.

  11. Posted by blndebnker | September 8, 2008 at 10:57 AM

    @5 – Actually the comments have quieted down since I’ve been on the site for a while. That’s not my work handle obviously.

  12. Posted by AJ | September 8, 2008 at 11:01 AM

    Bess, ask him why Lehman’s off 15% while everyone else soars. Poor Dickie Fuld

  13. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:01 AM

    Bess, clone yourself and send me a copy.

  14. Posted by AJ | September 8, 2008 at 11:06 AM

    Also, has London reopened yet?

  15. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:06 AM

    Has a photo of her been found? I’m not dropping 20 a cocktail at Milk & Honey on her if she’s a horseface.
    -HEDGEmony

  16. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:08 AM

    @HEDGE– dude. you have devoted way too many comments to this. email her, ply her with sweet hf tips, and i’m sure you’ll be able to find out for yourself.

  17. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:09 AM

    #12 – spot on. What’s up with LEH? None of the news outlets has any news as of 11:08am, but it has been sinking as if it has concrete shoes the last 25 minutes or so.

  18. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:10 AM

    Why would anyone want to step foot in Milk and Honey?

  19. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:11 AM

    #18 – For the mayo.

  20. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:12 AM

    Hey Bess, ask about UAL too, it’s down 99%.

  21. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:17 AM

    obessurock.

  22. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:19 AM

    stress testing DB. this is a 6 sig event in the DB newsroom/bedroom/porch/whatever.

  23. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:23 AM

    today has a very surreal, “calm before the storm” feel to it.
    Is it just me?

  24. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:23 AM

    Bess, I need a hug.

  25. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:24 AM

    Bess, I need a hug.

  26. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:26 AM

    @ 14 4pm local.
    The world can turn on its axis again. All will be well. LSE’s computers are plugged in again.

  27. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:28 AM

    whoever plugged in the LSE servers unplugged the chicago tribune one, leaving its news feed unupdated at 2002.

  28. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:29 AM

    I like M&H because it is all seating, no god damn B&T standing around walking and crowding everyone inside and outside the establishment. Its also decent about membership to keep out the hoi polloi.
    -HEDGEmony

  29. Posted by AJ | September 8, 2008 at 11:30 AM

    Bess, you continue to be amazing
    UAL story is ridiculous

  30. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:31 AM

    Hey Vince Offer is a doctor.

  31. Posted by blndebnker | September 8, 2008 at 11:35 AM

    People still say hoi polloi?

  32. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:36 AM

    @HEDGEmony– um, genius, anyone with the number can call and make a reservation.

  33. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:40 AM

    use the speaker on your blackberry.
    all that heat is radiation baking your brain cells.
    and you can’t afford to lose any more.

  34. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:42 AM

    Dude, Chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Its Asian-American.

  35. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:44 AM

    #6 – Bear, LEH, Citi, B of A, Merrill…not a lot of big banks left that can throw stones at Deutsche.

  36. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:44 AM

    LEH CLOSED DEAL ON SELLING NEUBERGER

  37. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:45 AM

    -HEDGEmony

  38. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:48 AM

    #35 > #6

  39. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:49 AM

    Accept or it will happen

  40. Posted by Bess Levin | September 8, 2008 at 11:49 AM

    Oh, snap cum stain* @33. I wish I could come up with a response to that but as you have pointed out, I am not smart. And that would make you, a reader and commenter of my site what, exactly? At the very least a good samaritan, taking the time to contribute pageviews despite my special needs.
    *Not a diss!

  41. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:49 AM

    @34
    go away, pussy.

  42. Posted by FUNdamental | September 8, 2008 at 11:50 AM

    blnde – apparently people that want their bars to have memberships still use it.

  43. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:51 AM

    bess, wow, turn the blackberry OFF.
    you poor dear, you’re stressed.

  44. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:52 AM

    Bess is in the house. That’s all that matters.

  45. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:52 AM

    @35: ditto.

  46. Posted by bank_teller | September 8, 2008 at 11:53 AM

    @34 — get it right, it’s “oriental american”

  47. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:53 AM

    @41, have you ever seen The Big Lebowski?

  48. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:54 AM

    @ 47 obviously not

  49. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:55 AM

    Bess, I am #33 and I want to say I’m a big fan of yours.
    Thanks for the reply.

  50. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 11:58 AM

    congrats to all the short covers and buyers this morning.
    you’ve just failed part 3 of the DB Mensa Test.
    bess is the queen of NJ proper.
    -retail

  51. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:00 PM

    Dude, dude, dude…Chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature…Asian American…
    Walter we’re not talking about the fucking guy that built the railroads!

  52. Posted by girl | September 8, 2008 at 12:05 PM

    I dare say old girl @ 40, I admire your thought leadership on cum stains.

  53. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:08 PM

    Donny you’re out of your element! Dude, the Chinaman is not the issue here!

  54. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:09 PM

    @52 – it was a joke.
    Bess dishes it out, she can take it.

  55. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:09 PM

    53, how vulgar and tacky.
    any word on Lehman Bros?

  56. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:09 PM

    53, how vulgar and tacky.
    any word on Lehman Bros?

  57. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:10 PM

    Seriously any market intel on LEH?

  58. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:11 PM

    I prefer Chink to Chinaman.
    But the issue here is the cum stain that Bess is struggling with!

  59. Posted by AJ | September 8, 2008 at 12:14 PM

    Closing in on Neuberger….

  60. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:17 PM

    Brilliant.
    Really enjoyed reading this.

  61. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:17 PM

    @60 – will that be the latest special at the Shake Shack? They can call it the Neuburger if they don’t want to get sued…

  62. Posted by Anal_yst | September 8, 2008 at 12:22 PM

    I love this insightful commentary from former Leh CFO:
    “Additionally, Bernstein analyst Brad Hintz said in a research note LEH
    could spin-off Neuberger Berman, write-down debt and have a capital raise, to
    help it survive”

  63. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:23 PM

    I’m disappointed by Bess’ oh-so-casual use of the derogatory term “chinaman.” You would never throw around the N word would you? So why chose hate just for some cheap laugh?

  64. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:24 PM

    64 = girl

  65. Posted by ratul | September 8, 2008 at 12:26 PM

    can someone tell me how to turn on the speaker phone on a blackberry curve? This shit is way hot.

  66. Posted by KevinB | September 8, 2008 at 12:27 PM

    Bess -
    The expression is as “as is his wont”, not “want”.

  67. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:28 PM

    get a bold you broke fuck
    -HEDGEmony

  68. Posted by girl | September 8, 2008 at 12:34 PM

    @ 65
    a) I only ever post under my handle. So fuck off.
    and b) i’m not surprised that any of you lack a sense of humour, but given my outward love/adoration of Bess, you should have deduced either way that I think thought leadership on cum stains is something every girl (or guy) should aspire to.
    Thanks.

  69. Posted by FUNdamental | September 8, 2008 at 12:35 PM

    3000 years of beautiful tradition from Moses to sandy Koufax

  70. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:36 PM

    HEDGEmony, are you one of those Blackberry wielding douches that walks around talking extra loud so people have to look at your dumbass, all so you can show off how much you spent and to see how important you think you are?
    -Blackberry pearl

  71. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM

    Lehman Brothers needs to merge with Charlie Gasparino’s cum-stained wifebeater in order to survive.

  72. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:40 PM

    69, only an oriental would right ….”I onry ever”

  73. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:43 PM

    What’s wrong with Chinaman?

  74. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:44 PM

    Walk? What is a black car for then?
    -HEDGEmony

  75. Posted by Bess Levin | September 8, 2008 at 12:45 PM

    @64– No, I wouldn’t use the ‘N’ word. Also, buy a vowel: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118715/quotes

  76. Posted by Bess Levin | September 8, 2008 at 12:50 PM

    @HEDGEmony– I don’t need the bold. I’m perfectly happy with the 8830 now that I’ve figured out how to use the speakerphone. Why are you so angry?

  77. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:51 PM

    These men are nihilist, Donny. They’re cowards.

  78. Posted by blndebnker | September 8, 2008 at 12:51 PM

    @FUN – Seriously. What a toolbox and a half. Only REAL cool people go to M&H!

  79. Posted by Suits | September 8, 2008 at 12:53 PM

    Dude, Chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature.

  80. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:53 PM

    Question to all the geniuses here:
    What’s going to happen to all the regional banks who are holding onto FNM/FRE preferred shares as part of their capital base? The shares of those two companies are approaching shamwow value now.

  81. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:54 PM

    Shut the fuck up, Donny! V.I. Lenin. Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov!

  82. Posted by blndebnker | September 8, 2008 at 12:55 PM

    @78 – Bravo Lewbowski. BRAVO.

  83. Posted by TheUpwardlyMob | September 8, 2008 at 12:56 PM

    Bess, he’s mad because the combination of his phat moniker and the promise of Milk & Honey hasn’t been enough to convince you to post any racy pics. He’s got monomania.

  84. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:57 PM

    Bess: So N work is a no-no but chinaman is a-ok. I see you are a student of racial eugenic hierarchy. The Chosen People indeed.
    And funny how fast you got all defensive. A smart woman like you should have the confidence to admit and learn from her mistakes. A bit self reflection here and there is good for your soul.

  85. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:58 PM

    @85– you are a moron. click the fucking link and then slink back here to make another ‘what i really meant was comment.”

  86. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    Thomas Korossy at KBC is out of a job before the court judges

  87. Posted by blndebnker | September 8, 2008 at 1:00 PM

    @85 – Dude seriously lighten up. Can you please explain how Chinaman is offensive when used in that context? And also, the n-word has ALWAYS been derogatory whereas to my knowledge, Chinaman became offensive in the PC era. Everyone is so freaking sensitive. How are you still in finance is that is enough to ruffle your feathers??

  88. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:02 PM

    Chinaman Chinaman Chinaman Chinaman Chinaman
    What?

  89. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:05 PM

    Dear Mr. Anti-Chinaman,
    Why don’t you address your comments to Greenspan: it appears that the original mention of the word was his product (the whole phrase is in quotes – a give-away of citation in English?)

  90. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:06 PM

    @85- click the goddamn link. it’s from a movie (and before you start shouting about a movie further spreading ‘hate,’ the movie goes on to point out that ‘chinaman’ is not the preferred nomenclature).
    “What the fuck are you talking about? The chinaman is not the issue here, Dude. I’m talking about drawing a line in the sand, Dude. Across this line, you DO NOT… Also, Dude, chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature. Asian-American, please.”

  91. Posted by blndebnker | September 8, 2008 at 1:08 PM

    That is such a great movie.

  92. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:10 PM

    like everything else in the hands of wall street youth, this thread started with so much promise and drove itself headlong into the tank.

  93. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:11 PM

    @ 91. That was then. It IS the preferred nomenclature, now.

  94. Posted by FUNdamental | September 8, 2008 at 1:19 PM

    Fuck sympathy! I don’t need your fucking sympathy. I need my fucking Johnson!

  95. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:19 PM

    94 posts and not a single reference to s_ _ _ – w _ _?

  96. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:21 PM

    oh, here we go. monopsychological or whatever; like that scene in Boiler Room where those bozos were parrotting the lines from “Wall Street.”
    bad-feedback-loop alert.

  97. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:22 PM

    Bess is apparently *not* ready for prime time.
    Such talent, too…

  98. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:24 PM

    chinaman

  99. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:24 PM

    chinaman

  100. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:25 PM

    chinaman

  101. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:25 PM

    china, man.

  102. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:26 PM

    CHinaman?

  103. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:26 PM

    CHinaman?

  104. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:26 PM

    CHinaman?

  105. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:27 PM

    what’s the accepted nomenclature for asking, “is there a chinaman in the house?”

  106. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:28 PM

    @ 90: do you think he *really* said that?

  107. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:29 PM

    Bess, please don’t let no “chinaman” tell you what you are and are not ready for.
    I am so ready for you baby.

  108. Posted by Suits | September 8, 2008 at 1:30 PM

    95 – What do you need your johnson for, Dude?

  109. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:30 PM

    @107
    Yes, I do. Bess wrote so.
    90

  110. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:35 PM

    @98- you can’t say cum stain on prime time, though i’m sure charlie gasparino wishes it were so.

  111. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:36 PM

    If Bess wrote, “sham-wow,” would you believe her?

  112. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:37 PM

    @112
    ha ha a good one
    90

  113. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:45 PM

    Bess/Girl: if you licked it off, it never would have stained in the first place.

  114. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:50 PM

    see that, Bess? You play with fire, you get burned. You lie down with dogs, etc….

  115. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 1:55 PM

    @115– what are you talking about?

  116. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 2:09 PM

    blackberry real cheap from a chinman on mott. hurry get good deal.

  117. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 2:14 PM

    @116
    If you live by the sword you die by the sword.
    SPODE

  118. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 2:37 PM

    Bess,
    U looky for good time?
    Dirty Sexy Money

  119. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 3:03 PM

    should be Chinaperson. using man is sexist.

  120. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 3:49 PM

    The use of the word “dude” on this message thread is more offnsive than chinaman.
    -Bendo

  121. Posted by guest | September 8, 2008 at 4:24 PM

    wuttabout “chinadude?”

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.