AllStocksGoUpAlways.png

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (65)

  1. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 7:58 AM

    as i said 24 hours ago – stop the naked shorts and you stop this bullshit
    hedges lost trillions and will lose more – tough shit assholes, tough shit
    dont f*ck with America

  2. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:01 AM

    You don’t work here any more, Carney.

  3. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:04 AM

    Primo. You are going out on top. Good luck to you, JC.

  4. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:05 AM

    Gasbags – looks like a shiteous used car salesman (more than he normally does).

  5. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:06 AM

    Hm…a couple of observations:
    1) It would have been a lot cheaper to kick in a few billion and marry off Lehman.
    2) How capricious is it that Lehman and AIG shareholders got completely wiped out but we don’t see moral hazard in rescuing every other bank?
    3) All of Wall St told us that guy from overstock.com was crazy when he complained about naked short selling. How is this situation different?

  6. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:09 AM

    #1 – I’m not at all a fan of naked shorting – and the banks themselves were the biggest abusers over the years BTW and the whole reason that little loophole didn’t get closed despite many complaints that fell on deaf ears. There are more than a few people out there who consider this poetic justice having it turned on them.
    That said – the real issue isn’t the shorts, it’s that the banks’ balance sheets are shit and overleveraged with deteriorating assets. This is like saying it was the wave’s fault you drowned despite not knowing how to swim and jumping into an ocean during a pounding storm swell.
    Failure in risk management and executive and board members’ stewardship for the shareholders is the issue. The shorting effectively just shines a spotline on them and says “we think you are full of shit.” And management has done nothing to refute that claim besides run scapegoating, God forbid they provide real transparency (they don’t for a reason)…and when someone does get a look at the books, low and behold the emperor really did have no clothes.

  7. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:10 AM

    Carney, best of luck in your new endeavour. The new editorial team will be hard-pressed to top your rice reports from Thai opium dens.

  8. Posted by Seaman Bodine | September 19, 2008 at 8:10 AM

    it would be better if it read:
    US Treasury going to cover all charges at Spellbound Massage for anyone who can prove they work for the following: LEH, MER, …

  9. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:12 AM

    Carney, good luck!! Solid work pays off and you more than earned it last weekend.

  10. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 19, 2008 at 8:13 AM

    seriously, brown suit and purple on purple tie/shirt combo? who dresses that guy?
    in a world where the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay liquid, real analysis is no longer useful…time to walk away from the table for a minute and let the dust stettle (I’m putting the death watch on hold).

  11. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:20 AM

    Carney, you will be missed.
    But don’t let the door hit you on the way out!

  12. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:26 AM

    ciao CArney – see you next week on your new endeavour?

  13. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:26 AM

    What’s the going rate for MBS debt? 22 cents? Are we talking about $500 billion in distressed debt? If the gov transfers all of it for nil value, the taxpayer makes $11 billion immediately, no?

  14. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 19, 2008 at 8:27 AM

    whoa! wtf? did I miss it (was really busy yesterday), where is carney off to? why were there no going away drinks, c’mon now…

  15. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:37 AM

    This is the mother of all short covering rallies

  16. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:39 AM

    Good Bye Carney.
    I hope your new portal venture will go live soon.
    Till then, Take care

  17. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:42 AM

    Anyone read the FT article about McCain’s comments? at no point did they refer to him as ‘loopy’ or ‘insane’ – dissapointing

  18. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:44 AM

    Cluzo…see Bess’ people moving post. Carney is flying the coup…hopefully he will show his face more than Dickie F

  19. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:44 AM

    How Do You Trade The Bailout?
    Posted by John Carney, Sep 19, 2008, 8:17am
    No shorting. RTC to buy mortgage assets at inflated prices. Money market funds get FDIC treatment. Liquidity injections from the Fed.
    So what’s your trading strategy? We notice you can still short the XLF, which probably means a lot of financial stock hedging will go into shorting the XLF. That should result in the XLF trading at a discount to the underlying stocks, which are now unshortable. So go long the XLF and sell any financials you still own, and wait for the shorting ban to end and bring these two back in line. That’s our idea. What’s yours?

  20. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:45 AM

    @6 the swimming analogy is the best by far

  21. Posted by FUNdamental | September 19, 2008 at 8:47 AM

    hey cluz, agreed on the time to let the dust settle. Who knowns when bofa going to share how that countrywide purchase is going, jpm letting us know what’s up with their bear integration or we get an update from spitzer on his syphilis
    And yeah carney is a dead man walking around here, he’s off to write for a more mature blog. I vote Meredith Whitney for the new leader!!

  22. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:48 AM

    that “more mature” comment was pretty dick

  23. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:49 AM

    @19 Long Beard Trimmers and Head Wax

  24. Posted by Investorcluzo | September 19, 2008 at 8:52 AM

    @carney – best of luck, although I take offense on the “more mature” bit. great to have met you at spitzer’s and hope we cross paths again – who know’s I may even take a glance at that “mature” blog.
    @fun – this is crazy, I sold my wb puts when the news came out about mack running scared, was up 250%, but there was more vig to be had.
    @19 – check out the skf and uyg. xlf is already widely used as a hedge.

  25. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:55 AM

    This is fucking bullshit, why the hell is the government bailing out wall street and the mortgage banks, If I opened a donut shop and lost a lot of money would they bail me out???

  26. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:56 AM

    you think this is bad, you better pray nobama and the demonazis don’t control, that will be the end of capitalism…

  27. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:58 AM

    Any one who blames this only on short sellers has never sat on a real trading desk.
    All of our stock is not worth the same amount at the same time. When real long only accounts get the call from fund accounting and start selling… watch out.

  28. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:58 AM

    *****US TREASURY TO REPAIR TOM BRADY’S KNEE, TO PLAY SUNDAY*****

  29. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:58 AM

    800 point swing on short covering BUT SURELY SHORTS HAVE NO IMPACT….
    you fuctards are either stupid or lying
    paulson ROCKSs – well done HP, WELL DONE
    don’t f*ck with America bitches

  30. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 8:59 AM

    The Fed also just confirmed that Elvis is alive. They also just ended world hunger…

  31. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:00 AM

    #25, because no one will buy donuts if we melt this thing and 50% of all donut shops disappear despite their owners being responsible and having had decent profitability before that point. A lot more at stake than donuts too but it works for the analogy. You feel me.

  32. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:02 AM

    Elvis has left the (Lehman) building.

  33. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:04 AM

    @28…i believe.

  34. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:07 AM

    In Rand McNally, people wear hats on their feet and hamburgers eat people!

  35. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:07 AM

    Carney i know it is your last day but what we could use is a piece on whether shorting financial stocks actually increased in the last 10 days.
    MS put out a report this morning (ironic i know) that the shorting in financials was actually off 20% in the last week. And from what i have been hearing from buddies on other trading desks the pressure in finanicals came from long sellers, liquidating based on fundamentals.
    This idea of financial terrorism is getting MSM play and i want someone to call bullshit on this whole idea.

  36. Posted by Henry Ryecroft | September 19, 2008 at 9:10 AM

    You know what, Stuart? I know it’s the shorter sellers. They’re in it with the terrorists. They’re building landing strips for gay Martians.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Giu-_umqjeE

  37. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:11 AM

    Should I buy 500 Jan 2010 at $30.00 strike price WWDAF.X
    Morgan Stanley Calls at $5.00???

  38. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:12 AM

    @35 Call bullshit if you like, but maybe we should investigate first, if that is at all possible.

  39. Posted by Ben_H | September 19, 2008 at 9:13 AM

    We looked at short volume and for financial stocks we looked at short volume as %age of total volume was below normal in last week.

  40. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:16 AM

    If people don’t use this manufactured rally to sell whatever crap they are long, then they are complete idiots and deserve a donkey punch.

  41. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:19 AM

    DONKEY PUNCH…phrase of the day!

  42. Posted by RAW DOG | September 19, 2008 at 9:19 AM

    John Carney – Good riddins. You were never funny and you know as much about finance as one does about the price of eggs in China.

  43. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:20 AM

    @ 34, great episode…

  44. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:21 AM

    Wow the government bailout will cost the taxpayers over 500 BILLION dollars at MINIMUM, you guys think it’s worth it, just to save some bankers????

  45. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:25 AM

    @42
    riddins? really?
    carney knows more about finance than you do about the english language apparently

  46. Posted by Anonymous | September 19, 2008 at 9:26 AM

    Too gone, didn’t read.

  47. Posted by Anonymous | September 19, 2008 at 9:28 AM

    Too gone, didn’t read.

  48. Posted by beentheredonethat | September 19, 2008 at 9:31 AM

    John,
    Where are you going?

  49. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:39 AM

    instead of band aiding wallstreet.. we should start from the root of the problem.. which is the homeowners..
    y not take that 500 billion bailout money projected to spend on wallstreet and help the homeowner a bit.. once the payment starts to flow again into these mbs.. slowly the security will be able to write up its value. boom, no more loses from these toxic wastes. trickle down effect seems to be logical…

  50. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:40 AM

    Question for all.
    Is “financial terroism” the equivalent of “weapons of mass destruction”?
    Something the government makes up to justify harmful action which will have severe unintended consequences.
    For anyone that cares as of end of Sept 1, 2008 – the top 4 on the most shorted list were FORD, WM, WB, GM. No LEH, no AIG, no MER…
    The biggest name on the naked short list SEARS.
    Can we please start to question the unintended consequences of what the hell has gone on this week. I am not for the whole financial system imploding but this wholesale bailout is scarey.

  51. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:44 AM

    Wamu and Morgan Stanley should have been allowed to fail. This is bullshit to main street and the us taxpayer.

  52. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:44 AM

    Enforce the naked shorts rule, good. Okay now let’s get rid of mark-to-market and everything will get back to semi-normal.
    #49 you are delusional. 90% of the “subprime” borrowers obtained their loans through sheer fraud.
    That would be like feeding a corpse.

  53. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:48 AM

    So John, we’re like wild kinky chick you date all through college. Now you’re ready to grow up so you thow us under the bus, and hook up with some uptight respectable chick who you want to be the mother of your children.
    Now I know how she felt.

  54. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:50 AM

    It’s like playing hold-em against an amature. You lose to a 7-2 because your opponent doesn’t know what he’s doing.

  55. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 9:50 AM

    #52
    that’s bullshit the banks were lending out No Income No Asset verification loans
    at high interest rates. All you needed was a pulse and social security number to get a mortgage.
    It’s basically the banks faults for lowering their lending standards.

  56. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:01 AM

    @35 – know the name of the MS report or analyst that published the decline in short trading?

  57. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:02 AM

    @55
    ure basically a moron

  58. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:10 AM

    Not to nitpick, but shouldn’t the headlines in that picture read “ensure”, not “insure”. Unless the government is writing insurance policies on happiness, then I stand corrected…

  59. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:14 AM

    Not to nitpick, but shouldn’t the headlines in that picture read “ensure”, not “insure”. Unless the government is writing insurance policies on happiness, then I stand corrected…

  60. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:22 AM

    58 youre not nitpicking, youre retarded.

  61. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:24 AM

    58 is right, their fucking homophones, moron.

  62. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 10:35 AM

    welcome to the USSA, now we know why there’s so much red in the flag, comrades

  63. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 11:44 AM

    All the best Carney. Your posts were insightful and helpful. Thx mate.

  64. Posted by guest | September 19, 2008 at 1:02 PM

    JC- You should bow out on this headline. Great stuff. Thanks for all your commentary.

  65. Posted by Cheptemn | April 14, 2012 at 8:11 PM

    проверить эту ссылку выпускные детские платья интернет-магазин

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.