Morgan Stanley beat expectations for the third quarter and its CFO said yesterday that everyone just needs to chill because things are getting out of hand but Goy Goldman is apparently feeling a little less unruffled about the sitch this morning. According to CNBC, senior officials are currently considering a merger. And it turns out they might not just be messing with us and pretending to act all freaked out to show us how “silly and irrational” we’re all being.*


morganstanleyselloffindiabig.JPG
Don’t you love sell-offs in India in the morning?
Morgan Stanley Ponders Staying Independent [CNBC]
*If that turns out to be the case– well-played, Morgan Stanley.

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (107)

  1. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:46 AM

    Can we get this to 400 comments Bess?
    Maybe I should move to Mauritius?

  2. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:47 AM

    Sears!

  3. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:47 AM

    gs

  4. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:48 AM

    Any condiment would sound good with Morgan.

  5. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:48 AM

    Wal-Mart!

  6. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:49 AM

    wtf does that screenshot mean?

  7. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:49 AM

    If they don’t start charging Uncle Sugar full freight for these advisory engagements, they will have to merge.

  8. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:52 AM

    goy goldman. hadn’t heard that one before, but if it’s an original bessism i cheer huzzah!

  9. Posted by MostOffensive | September 17, 2008 at 9:52 AM

    I think the combined entity should be called “Morgan Sachs,” to continue the ticker MS and the House of Morgan name.

  10. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:55 AM

    Bess doesn’t know what she’s talking about.

  11. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:55 AM

    Goldman Stanley sounds good too.
    By the way, where are the mayo/shamwow guys? I miss them.

  12. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:56 AM

    companys ticker would be MSG or call the company Morgan’s Sack.

  13. Posted by MostOffensive | September 17, 2008 at 9:57 AM

    I suppose it could also be Goldman Stanley, but I think I prefer Morgan Sachs

  14. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:57 AM

    Have you banned this ebay domain peddler?
    i envision him registering a new bunch of MS-GS domains

  15. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:58 AM

    whats the point of this? i dont get it

  16. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:58 AM

    by the way, both ‘www.goldmanstanley.com’ and ‘www.morgansachs.com’ are taken.

  17. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:58 AM

    Morchovia

  18. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 9:59 AM

    What’s with the graphic?
    - Silicon Valley Idiot VC

  19. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:00 AM

    Have you banned this ebay domain peddler?
    i envision him registering a new bunch of MS-GS domains

  20. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:00 AM

    Ha! How extensive are Morgan Stanley’s operations in India? Mauritius is the favourite routing point for most foreign investment into India, both perfectly legit and shady ill gotten gains (the legit stuff does this to circumvent some of India’s more ridiculous investment laws).
    Every one of those is an Indian company. Mauritius actually shows up as the number one origin country for foreign investment into India.

  21. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:02 AM

    Morchovia

  22. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:02 AM

    Morchovia

  23. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:02 AM

    Ha! How extensive are Morgan Stanley’s operations in India? Mauritius is the favourite routing point for most foreign investment into India, both perfectly legit and shady ill gotten gains (the legit stuff does this to circumvent some of India’s more ridiculous investment laws).
    Every one of those is an Indian company. Mauritius actually shows up as the number one origin country for foreign investment into India.

  24. Posted by Anal_yst | September 17, 2008 at 10:02 AM

    Third the questioning of wtf that graphic – subsequently removed – signifies? Anyone?

  25. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:04 AM

    I don’t get it.

  26. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:04 AM

    Morchovia

  27. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:06 AM

    SCREEEN SHOT WAS LIQUIDATION in INDIAN MARKETS.

  28. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:06 AM

    I love the people sitting in MS offices playing dumb about a big selloff by getting on Bess.

  29. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:07 AM

    chart = liquidation in indian markets

  30. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:07 AM

    a big selloff? hardly. this post confuses me. attempts are sarcasm or something but it baffles me. wtf are you saying?

  31. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:08 AM

    Commerce Stanley…

  32. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:09 AM

    Morchovia

  33. Posted by blndebnker | September 17, 2008 at 10:10 AM

    I think I like Goldman Stanley. Morgan Sachs is good to but you know GS will never allow their name to be last.

  34. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:10 AM

    eBay is the right partner!
    After all, are these guys true free-trade, let-market-efficiencies-determine — fill in the blank with “Healthcare”, “Pensions”, “Education”, etc. — Republicans or aren’t they?
    So let’s auction off MS’s assets on eBay — their portfolio, property, office furniture, and — most importantly – the purloined personal assets these self-involved, egotistical i-bankers bought with bonuses generated by the biggest and most harmful ponzi scheme in history.
    From the frontline bankers and math whizzes who invented new vehicles to the assholes in the corner offices and their ex-Wall Street buddies at the Fed and in Treasury, they knoew for YEARS this day of reckoning would come but they decided to say, “FUCK IT!” rather than act responsibly.
    Does the term “fiduciary duty” mean anything. I know “ethics” doesn’t apply.)
    So now we should say “FUCK YOU! TIME TO DOWNGRADE TO THAT ONE-BEDROOM IN HOBOKEN, ASSHOLE! ENJOY NJ TRANSIT.”

  35. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:10 AM

    More-Gold

  36. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:11 AM

    LET ME PUT SOME PERSPECTIVE.
    THE QUANTITIES SOLD ARE HUGE (IN REGARDS TO INDIAN MARKET LIQUIDITY).
    THIS HAS PREVIOUSLY HAPPENED TWICE IN MY EXPERIENCE
    A. BSC’S LAST DAYS
    B. LEH’S LAST DAYS
    I WOULD SAY THIS IS MIGHTY SIGNIFICANT

  37. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:13 AM
  38. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:14 AM

    Does anyone know what Morgan Bonuses will now look like?

  39. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:14 AM

    Guest @ 10.11 – so basically this is a scramble for liquidity?

  40. Posted by MostOffensive | September 17, 2008 at 10:15 AM

    @ blndebnker– agreed. Next question: would it be a times square or a financial district company? I vote that it retakes the Lehman building (originally MS’s).

  41. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:15 AM

    I think it will be Morgan Stanley, a subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company
    -or-
    Morgan Stanley, a subsidiary of US Bancorp
    WB is done too…they will be acquired by one of the above as well.
    GS can’t do anything…they are just hoping to ride out storm.

  42. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:17 AM

    morgan bonuses have been announced: $0 cash/option grants pending successful merger with XOM

  43. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:19 AM

    Who were the idiots bidding MS up to $32.75 in the afterhours yesterday? They sure got taken for a ride.
    LEH shares down 50% from 30 cents to 15 cents, I hope any employees still holding shares sold out at 0.30 before today’s haircut..

  44. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM

    @41
    BUFFET HAS ASKED WELLSFARGO NOT TO GO NEAR THIS TOXIC STUFF.

  45. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:23 AM

    #34-
    You are sadly mistaken. NJ Transit does not serve the manhattan-hoboken corridor. The Port Authority Trans Hudson railroad, however, does. (This is more commonly known as the PATH.) New York Waterway also serves manhattan-hoboken via ferry service. Your error probably stems from the fact that NJ Transit does, in fact, serve many bedroom communities throughout Northern NJ and the Hoboken Terminal does serve as a terminus for many of these routes.
    Warmly,
    Dante Terrell Smith
    Vice President
    NJ Transit, Commuter Relations

  46. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:23 AM

    Paulson deserves credit for moving the US Treasury from nowhere to the top of the M&A league table in just a few years. I’ll be he really emphasizes that in his year end review.

  47. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:23 AM

    @41
    I think the IB’s DO need the capital from the banks, BUT the banks may have learned their lesson last time around. USB lost a fistful of cash with acquisition of PJC, which they subsequently spun off becuase they don’t like risk.

  48. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:25 AM

    It’s going to be one of the following:
    1) HSBC Morgan Stanley
    2) JP Morgan
    Messrs Glass & Steagall will be rolling in their graves if it is No.2
    But JP Morgan is better of the two as the combined firm can use all the existing JPM stationery. Synergy!
    No way Wells Fargo will get into the I-Banking game.

  49. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:25 AM

    Cramer just mentioned some list that shows what positions have more shorts against than borrowings outstanding. Anyone have any idea where to get that?
    -MS

  50. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:26 AM

    Gold’s makes great horse radish.

  51. Posted by blndebnker | September 17, 2008 at 10:27 AM

    @MostOffensive – Again, I’m thinking Goldman would win that pissing contest and it operations would stay downtown. Maybe get some space in the new WTC?

  52. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:29 AM

    You are all forgotting that there is only one investment bank that will post a healthy profit for 3rd quarter, so try the name LazMor

  53. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:29 AM

    Cramer just mentioned some list that shows what positions have more shorts against than borrowings outstanding. Anyone have any idea where to get that?
    -MS

  54. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:31 AM

    WB is way too damn large to just be “bought” by anyone. We pretty much have to hope they survive.

  55. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:35 AM

    Wells Fargo is not going to be buying any Ibank. The new firm will be JP Morgan.
    Wachovia is too large to legally sell it to anyone big enough to take it over. People keep forgetting how damn big this fucked-up company is.
    WaMu will probably be sold this Friday at 6 PM.

  56. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM

    When is Uncle Sam going to seriously go after the real culprits in this mess? The f’n individual ballers, rainmakers, & execs who actually engineered these toxic f’n securities and who actually pulled the trigger on their sale/purchase, and who actually made fortunes from their f’n ponzi schemes?
    I’m not talking about all the saps who’ve been laid off, no am I talking about the clowns on DB. I’m talking about the really heavy hitters who are still on the job, or who are now infesting other firms, or who have retired, or who are “on sabbatical”.
    Uncle Sam can find out who they are. How many really-serious criminals can there be? A few thousand?
    The Guy from Delaware

  57. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:38 AM

    CIBC Morgan. Woops … CIBC already bailed from Wall St

  58. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:44 AM

    This is all great and all but what will the VP bonuses be at the new entity?

  59. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:45 AM

    How bout “Entitled Jews”

  60. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:46 AM

    Morman Stachs

  61. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:47 AM

    are u trying to rationalize gasparinos reporting? theres nothing exceptional about those trades, sorry to burst the excitement bubble

  62. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM

    @46 HAHAHAHA, good one!

  63. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM

    #55
    Paulson’s Treasury to become the No.1 adviser for US Mergers & Acqusitions by value. (Dislodging Goldman Sachs)
    Paulson’ Treasury to become the No.1 North American FIG M&A adviser by value. (Gary Parr at Lazard will be fuming!)
    Paulson’s Treasury will also become the No.1 Arranger of low-yield junk bonds (Fed bills being planned today).
    Paulson’s Treasury to become the No.1 US Restructuring Adviser by value. (David Resnick & Todd Snyder of Rothschild, and Barry Ridings & Jim Milstein are totally pissed off)

  64. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:50 AM

    are u trying to rationalize gasparinos reporting? theres nothing exceptional about those trades, sorry to burst the excitement bubble

  65. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:51 AM

    @64 #46 is definitely best comment of the year.

  66. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:51 AM

    @55 – Agreed. Genius.

  67. Posted by FUNdamental | September 17, 2008 at 10:52 AM

    I’m thinking gs really likes having gold in the nombre there, so a fair compromise (and best name) would be Stanley golden sachs. Some new…some old, and indicates they all have their bits and pieces gilded!

  68. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:52 AM

    @ 57 you really are an idiot aren’t you. When in doubt always blame risk.

  69. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:52 AM

    morgman sacstley!

  70. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:52 AM

    I understand that the Government of Kosovunistan has already placed a bid on Morgan Stanley…

  71. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:53 AM

    Mor-Gold Sacks

  72. Posted by blndebnker | September 17, 2008 at 10:54 AM

    @66 – I’m going to have to call a shenanigans on that. The best comment of the year was definitely “I don’t make money, I print it.”

  73. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:56 AM

    I can’t wait for the book – “Bridges over Wall Street” By Hank & Paul with intro by Woody Allen

  74. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:58 AM

    TGFD sounds like Pelosi

  75. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM

    I understand that the Government of Kosovistan has already placed a bid on Morgan Stanley…

  76. Posted by blndebnker | September 17, 2008 at 11:05 AM

    @68 – HA. Gilded bits and pieces. Lovely.

  77. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 11:07 AM

    @64….what is associate pay at the FED?

  78. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 11:11 AM

    My dentist’s name is Stanley Goldman

  79. Posted by FUNdamental | September 17, 2008 at 11:12 AM

    Thx blnde. Not sure I agree with the comment of the year though….

  80. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM

    @blndie — that wasn’t a DB comment, “I don’t make money, I print it.” is just the marketing slogan of the new HankBank. Came in just ahead of Citi while they were taking a quick nap.

  81. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 11:16 AM

    candyasses@#69,@#75…
    Just let the criminals go, right? No accountability. Astronomical crime always pays, doesn’t it.
    Let the system teeter, but don’t pursue those who actually caused the f’n problem.
    @#69…You are a fucking idiot.
    @#75…STFU.
    The Guy from Delaware

  82. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 11:17 AM

    GS not going to happen. Cultural issues aside there’s too much overlap.
    Potential buyer list will look similar to preliminary list of who was looking at Lehman, with Barclays and BofA now off the list.
    It’s not a big group of names.
    HSBC. Santander. Unicredit.
    Maybe a French bank. Maybe a Japanese bank. Maybe RBS or Lloyds, but I doubt it.
    In the US, JPM and Wells Fargo are the only names that I can think of, and neither is going to happen.
    US would not let Chinese, ME or Russian money do this.

  83. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 11:19 AM

    Morgan Fed Sachs

  84. Posted by blndebnker | September 17, 2008 at 11:34 AM

    @81 – Yeah but if you remember the whole comment, it was an entire rant that was capped off by that. And it was infamously used (and reused) on DB all spring. Perhaps you weren’t around for it. But it was gold.

  85. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 11:35 AM

    #83
    The French are not keen to do any i-bank deals in the US. They are keen to hire bankers and industry coverage teams to grow organically. But no wholesale purchases.
    I wonder how long Santander can go on the acquiring spree. The Spanish economy is tanking fast and soon they will have to focus on their home market.
    You’re right, Bush, Paulson, and Benanke won’t let Chinese money to buy Morgan Stanley. But the feeling is mutual. Beijing won’t let any of their institutions buy a US i-bank. The feeling that prevails in the upper echelons of Beijing is that the US con’ed them into buying Fannie and Freddie bonds. But CITIC had a very brief look at Lehman a couple of days ago, maybe they will look at doing something with their friends at MS.

  86. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 11:58 AM

    Just gotta say that #46 is hilarious. Well played, sir, well played.

  87. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 12:05 PM

    Morgal Lazard

  88. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 12:55 PM

    Shmasmortion

  89. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 1:42 PM

    #45 (Mr. NJ Transit): you read this shit?

  90. Posted by guest | September 17, 2008 at 1:46 PM

    #45 (Mr. NJ Transit): you read this shit?

  91. Posted by Bristol Airport Hotels | April 19, 2012 at 5:57 PM

    TRSl3p Appreciate you sharing, great blog.Much thanks again.

  92. Posted by cobra amp forged | April 24, 2012 at 8:07 PM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic article. Keep writing.

  93. Posted by Hip Hop Beats | April 25, 2012 at 3:13 AM

    Fantastic article post.Much thanks again. Cool.

  94. Posted by custom goalie sticks | April 25, 2012 at 4:19 AM

    Wow, great post. Fantastic.

  95. Posted by programas sobre facturacion | April 27, 2012 at 6:45 PM

    I really like and appreciate your post.Really thank you! Cool.

  96. Posted by pest control parramatta | April 28, 2012 at 11:45 PM

    Great, thanks for sharing this article post.Really looking forward to read more.

  97. Posted by Reina Hagge | April 29, 2012 at 6:02 AM

    A big thank you for your article post.Really thank you! Will read on…

  98. Posted by Jonathon Acey | April 29, 2012 at 7:26 AM

    Really enjoyed this article post.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  99. Posted by Reliant Senior Care | April 29, 2012 at 4:03 PM

    Appreciate you sharing, great blog post.

  100. Posted by psychic readings uk | April 29, 2012 at 5:37 PM

    A big thank you for your blog post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  101. Posted by goal setting | April 30, 2012 at 4:58 AM

    I cannot thank you enough for the article.Really thank you!

  102. Posted by residual income formula | April 30, 2012 at 6:40 AM

    Thank you ever so for you blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

  103. Posted by Reclaim Payment Protection Insurance | April 30, 2012 at 9:34 AM

    Awesome article. Will read on…

  104. Posted by Home Based Business Leads | April 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM

    I think this is a real great blog.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  105. Posted by lisinopril side effects | May 1, 2012 at 2:47 PM

    I think this is a real great blog post.Really thank you! Cool.

  106. Posted by jailbreak iphone | May 2, 2012 at 1:01 PM

    Thank you for your article post.Much thanks again.

  107. Posted by free cosmetic samples | May 3, 2012 at 1:33 AM

    I really liked your article. Awesome.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.