• 24 Oct 2008 at 9:31 AM

Blind Item

Which midwest hedge fund are Fed officials rumored to be paying a visit to right now, to deal with its impending implosion?
UPDATE, 10:00: Not that we meant Cit necessarily, but a Citadel spokeswoman called DealBreaker to say that the rumors are “Categorically false. Citadel continues to invest and operate business as usual across the globe. The firm’s liquidity remains strong with more than 30 percent of investment capital held in cash.”

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (148)

  1. Posted by VOL IS KING | October 24, 2008 at 9:35 AM

    whitebox

  2. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:37 AM

    Prudential Capital

  3. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:37 AM

    Highlander…

  4. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:37 AM

    Citadel, no doubt

  5. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:37 AM

    Does citadel have an office in the midwest?

  6. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:38 AM

    holy Citadel.

  7. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:38 AM

    obviously citadel

  8. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:38 AM

    #5 – tell me you’re joking. Please go back to Yahoo,or under a rock

  9. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:38 AM

    It’s not Stark.

  10. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:39 AM

    Citadel is a Chicago fund…
    Our floor guys hearing rumors they are blowing out

  11. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:39 AM

    Supposedly the Fed has denied that they are at Citadel

  12. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:40 AM

    I’m the CEO of a hedgefund, what’s Citadel?

  13. Posted by mrpink | October 24, 2008 at 9:40 AM

    Citadel.

  14. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:41 AM

    Highlander…

  15. Posted by StupidEquityGuy | October 24, 2008 at 9:42 AM

    Mr P… TY
    ~SEG
    Thoughts about 30 year? Swap fails? hit me up at hedgingrisk @ aim.com

  16. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:42 AM

    Highlander….

  17. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:43 AM

    Highlander is in TX, that’s not the mid west. Could be FISCO.

  18. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:43 AM

    Citadel is in Chicago so that is the midwest…

  19. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:44 AM

    OMFG Citadel is blowing up. What is the world coming too!

  20. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:44 AM

    jesus christ you morons obviously it’s citadel

  21. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:45 AM

    Sentinel?
    just kidding, Francis.

  22. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:45 AM

    What do you expect?… they’re an hour behind… People in the 2nd City are asleep right now…

  23. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:46 AM

    “There can be only one!”

  24. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:46 AM

    BRK

  25. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:47 AM

    @13 – where did they deny this? Link?

  26. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:48 AM

    I heard JPM is in Washington trying to get the Fed to backstop Citadel. I believe JPM is their biggest prime broker

  27. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:49 AM

    Obviously Citadel.
    Hopefully false.

  28. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:50 AM

    Why would anyone name their hedge fund after a Toyota?

  29. Posted by Seaman Bodine | October 24, 2008 at 9:50 AM

    dunno but, i hear clarium went from +50 to -50 in Oct – maybe everything west of NYC is midwest

  30. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:50 AM

    this is as obvious its citadel as yesterdays quote from “a high insider in the republican party” came from Karl Rove

  31. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:51 AM

    I doubt it is Citadel although I don’t doubt JPM would do some slimy things (the way they acted with Leh, Bear and Amaranth); Stark and BlackRiver seem more likely candidates.

  32. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:51 AM

    I heard that Citadel was winding down their converts book.

  33. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:52 AM

    Citadel. Morgan Stanley is collateral calling them…ALL their collateral. Gimme.

  34. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:52 AM

    Very light trading in SPX options this morning — seems to me the limit down was the result of a forced liquidation reminiscent of the Soc Gen unwinding. Who would have a position large enough to dictate this kind of movement…
    Hmm… I can think of a certain Chicago hedge fund..

  35. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:52 AM

    Deephaven

  36. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:55 AM

    Ken Griffen GO BOOM!

  37. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:56 AM

    citadel done

  38. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:56 AM

    Varde!

  39. Posted by Tau | October 24, 2008 at 9:57 AM

    Correction 32 – everything west OR east of NYC can be accurately described as the “midwest”

  40. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:57 AM

    Sue the T-Rex has the last laugh!

  41. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:57 AM

    Who are these dumbshits saying Highlander.
    How fucking stupid are you if you think Texas is in the midwest.

  42. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:58 AM

    I heard it is in the South, not mid west and it is Highland or Lowland.

  43. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 9:59 AM

    If this is true, this is unreal…

  44. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:00 AM

    @35 There is no bid in converts right now, you can’t really unwind.

  45. Posted by VOL IS KING | October 24, 2008 at 10:02 AM

    Cargill?

  46. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:03 AM

    #46: I wish I could agree with you. But it’s not “unreal”. It’s expected – all these “walk on water” guys, who are all down – of course they are going to get margin calls and redemptions.
    I think DB should take a poll on which big HF is next. AQR? Highland? Fortress? I believe there will be a slew of them.

  47. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:04 AM

    Big Swinging Dick LLC

  48. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:05 AM

    Citadel Citadel Citadel!
    Hey Bess. Here’s a tip if you want to tell us who the hedge fund is “unofficially”: login as Guest and swarm the comments with “Citadel”
    ha! that way, they have no way of asking you to take down the post! Eat dirt Ken!

  49. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:05 AM

    Castle Greyskull – Skeletor has put up some horrible numbers this year!

  50. Posted by Seaman Bodine | October 24, 2008 at 10:05 AM

    given the fact that most major BDs have desks in Chicago where 90% of the revenue is coming from Citadel, easy to see how this rumour gets out fast

  51. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM

    hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe.

  52. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM

    Fed would not bother with anyone but the top 5, so Citadel it is. Holy Shit, I am going to huddle in a fetal position in my bed, hoping I dont wet myself. If they fall, that’s it for the hedgies

  53. Posted by prgy | October 24, 2008 at 10:07 AM

    Hey @ 49 WTF are you talking about? Keep your mindless drivel to yourself. People like you and cluzo are ruining DB.

  54. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:07 AM

    Completely and utterly false.
    A guy in the know

  55. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:08 AM

    Where are the clients’ rumors?

  56. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM

    cluzo, you are popnd scum. Get the hint. You’re a bully and ass kisser. ‘Bessy’.

  57. Posted by Seaman Bodine | October 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM

    if the fed is in Chitown now, it’s probably to beg Ken G to put up the duckats for his CDS exchange idea, pronto, and to immediate attain liquidity by absorbing all of AIGs book

  58. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:10 AM

    the fact that they are taking the time to deny this…

  59. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:10 AM

    “Categorically false” – we know the drill from there.

  60. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:12 AM

    BTW 30% of capital in cash is a total misdirection. I run a (small) hedge fund and am 2.5 x leveraged even now, but have 90% of my capital in cash! How? Um, derivatives. Have you heard of them?

  61. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:12 AM

    @56: how is this “drivel”? This situation is not “unreal” as #49 said – it is reality. It is what happens when you have big hedge funds subject to margin calls and panicked investors redeeming.
    Now you will hear a ton of denials from Citadel and the Feds, so the market doesn’t panic further. But there are other big hedge funds. Remember all those quarterly letters? That big HSBC review? All the -30-50% guys are going to be margin called or redempt-ed out of existence and some of them will be big enough to cause ripples.

  62. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:13 AM

    Citadel is not a hedge fund idiots!! Citadel is a merchant bank…

  63. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:13 AM

    prgy – at it again, GO HOME!!!
    You can make mean comments when you write one(1) well thought out meaninful one, just one good comment.
    GO HOME!!!

  64. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:14 AM

    FWIW: just got this email.
    guy in Credit told me he just got an e-mail from Citadel CFO, saying the rumor is false, and Citadel will issue a press release about it.

  65. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:14 AM

    LMFAO!

  66. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM

    BTW 30% of capital in cash is a total misdirection. I run a (small) hedge fund and am 2.5 x leveraged even now, but have 90% of my capital in cash! How? Um, derivatives. Have you heard of them?

  67. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM

    Prgy=troll=John Mark Karr?

  68. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:16 AM

    Bess,
    PNC BUYS NAT CITY

  69. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:16 AM

    I used to work for a company that had rumors about it all the time. Comes with the territory when you are better than everyone else.

  70. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:17 AM

    @prgy – How many times do we have to say it: go back to Perez Hilton’s board! You’re not wanted here. You are a certified loser with you head so far up your ass you can actually see daylight. If you made one intelligent comment over your lifetime it would surprise even you mom.

  71. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:18 AM

    Does that mean PNC is like the UN saving Darfur?

  72. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:20 AM

    could it be bridge finance. they run a bunch of funds

  73. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:21 AM

    It is udderly false we are structured on cows.

  74. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:23 AM

    Heard the fed is visiting Tim Sykes right now. Very concerned about his impending blow up and how it might roil the markets

  75. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM

    honestly, PRGY is the only voice of reason.The rest of you schmucks sound like cookie cutter financial douche- bag analysts. exception to rule SEG. Cluzo fuck you.

  76. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM

    So…we’re now totally screwed since the other shoe has dropped?

  77. Posted by prgy | October 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM

    Hey @ 73. I contribute more insightful comments on DB than any other person posting here. Who is this Perez Hilton, one of your scorned lovers? Oh, and by the way, take typing lessons.

  78. Posted by Seaman Bodine | October 24, 2008 at 10:28 AM

    speaking of clarium, it’s gayer than peter thiel to be having a board war on DB

  79. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:32 AM

    prgy – which one of these is “insightful” – http://dealbreaker.com/profile/prgy
    NONE
    78 – “cookie cutter financial douche- bag analysts” um, yes we are, this where we hang out. You should join Carney on that board for non-cookie cutter financial douche- bag analysts. You might like it more.

  80. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:33 AM

    Given Cit’s BD operations and the size of their vol desk, if they’re not printing cash in this market they deserve to blow up…

  81. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM

    Brother in law told me Bear Stearns is in trouble.

  82. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM

    # 82 what’s your point??

  83. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:35 AM

    We’re boned.

  84. Posted by prgy | October 24, 2008 at 10:35 AM

    @ 82. Which one is not insightful? I’ll admit the Green Span Backers is a bit goofy but all the others are right on the money.

  85. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:38 AM

    For real? Bear Stearns is in trouble?! I better sell all my BS.

  86. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:40 AM

    I’m on my iPhone at Adams and Dearborn now. I don’t see anything unusual.

  87. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:40 AM

    Citadel has their investor base so locked up their cannot be any massive redemptions.

  88. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:41 AM

    1. Fix
    2. It
    3. FIX IT

  89. Posted by Riskybusiness | October 24, 2008 at 10:42 AM

    @72 -
    you worked at???
    A. Enron
    B. Amaranth
    C. LTCM
    D. Lehman
    E. Titanic

  90. Posted by mrpink | October 24, 2008 at 10:45 AM

    @92:
    I work at E.
    LOL
    So, who wants to join me in the galley for a couple cocktails? The band is still playing out on the deck, and the bartender went running away saying something about the ship is sinking! Free booze!
    -mrp

  91. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:46 AM

    Hey 92…..No, asshole. Aquila.

  92. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:46 AM

    Mahnahmahnah!

  93. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:46 AM

    @83 do you know anything about volatility trading? Most vol traders “sell the skew” the sell OOM Puts because that’s where the juice is. It’s a great business until the market crashes and that vol catches up with you. Just ask Doug Niederlander back in 1987 or D.E. Show/UBS back in 1997. If you think vol is rich you may be in for one of Monty Burn’s “nasty surprises”

  94. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:49 AM

    The market will never crash so long as CNBC keeps feeding dumb money into the meat grinder.

  95. Posted by Phobos | October 24, 2008 at 10:52 AM

    All this in-fighting. Add some bourbon and it’s a regular family fucking reunion.
    I think we should have this out like respectable men and women: Central Park, bathing suits, oil, & wrestling. Greek Style.

  96. Posted by Riskybusiness | October 24, 2008 at 10:52 AM

    @72 -
    you worked at???
    A. Enron
    B. Amaranth
    C. LTCM
    D. Lehman
    E. Titanic

  97. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:53 AM

    @98 Hell yea!
    I’ll bring my hard on.
    SPODE

  98. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:55 AM

    It is Alyeska

  99. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:57 AM
  100. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 10:58 AM

    right on, @96. There is a vol risk premium in the market. You earn that premium in good times. You pony up for it in bad times.

  101. Posted by Riskybusiness | October 24, 2008 at 10:58 AM

    @94 – Didn’t you company get acquired for two lightbulbs and half a kilowatt? have fun in Kansas City and leave finance to the BSDs in NYC.

  102. Posted by Riskybusiness | October 24, 2008 at 10:58 AM

    @94 – Didn’t your company get acquired for two lightbulbs? Have fun in Kansas City and leave finance to the BSDs in NYC.

  103. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:01 AM

    hmmm carney didnt have the original rumor and then 15 mins after the update on this goes up he reprints this post without attribution to db.

  104. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:02 AM

    @103 and of course there’s all that sweet juice in the option portion of the convertible bond unless…oopsie…gotta go now. Margin calls and such…

  105. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:03 AM

    @108 my point was it looks like someone’s shamelessly ripping off db.

  106. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:05 AM

    Morons, listen up. Highland is in Texas, not Highlander. Your ignorance is insane, obviously a bunch of excel users who have n o concepts of the market or its players.

  107. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:08 AM

    Just saw KG taking car bombs at Elephant & Castle….capitulation.

  108. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:11 AM

    at 100 that’s gay.

  109. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:12 AM

    Yo #96…
    Who is “Niederlander?” Did he used to work with John Mericlimate back at Shaloman Brothers?

  110. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:12 AM

    I just saw KG eating a triple at the Billy Goat for breakfast. They call that the widow maker.

  111. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:17 AM

    Ken Griffin just told his investors, “Skeet Skeet Skeet”

  112. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:20 AM

    I might have the spelling wrong. Doug Nederlander[sic] came from old NYC money (they owned a bunch of property including some Broadway theatres) and opened his own hedge fund selling puts via the old O’Connor Captial Markets’ (another Chicago outfit) style: calculate the volatility skew and sell “irrationally” priced options, usually OOM puts. Made good money until the crash of ’87 which blew him up. He was the first poster child for what the “risk” in “risk management” stands for.

  113. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:26 AM

    Are you talking about Victor Niederhoffer you ignorant dope?

  114. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:26 AM

    @ 96 and 103
    Citadel doesn’t track “PhD ROE”, play a role in slmost every distressed HF bailout, try to acquire clearinghouses and isn’t able to pass through all of their operating expenses to investors so they can sell puts/skew. Given their informational advantages coming into this situation, if they came in short vol/skew/correlation then, once again, they deserve what’s coming to them… We’re not talking about Wolverine (no offense to any employees) here…

  115. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:29 AM
  116. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:30 AM

    Midwest?
    You’re all wrong.
    It’s Wayne Enterprises. look it up people. no one is immune.

  117. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:31 AM

    anyone wanna buy 20 yards of converts? how bout 30?

  118. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:33 AM

    118 here,
    “isn’t able to pass through all of their operating expenses to investors ”
    =
    “pass through all of their operating expenses to investors “

  119. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:37 AM

    @110, thank you.
    Highland already blew up, they laid off tons of good people on Wednesday and shut down two funds.
    …And I highly doubt it’s Cargill.
    Just as an aside, I hear that HBK is in pretty murky waters as well (not midwest though).

  120. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 11:38 AM

    @118 I thought those correlation trades were dead long ago. Although mwybe they have some vol/var swaps on their books. You never know.
    And wasn’t it just a few years ago that Amaranth was finding unusual opportunities in OOM Nat Gas options?

  121. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 12:02 PM

    Just heard from a friend at Citadel. He’s flipping out–apparently the feds are pretty much swarming the place.

  122. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 12:08 PM

    Not true – Ken just had his favorite Custard trucked in from Wisconsin to share with the employees

  123. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 12:48 PM

    reliable sources tell me citadel is liquidating their equity book to bet the whole firm on shorting cds, if it widens anymore they are toast

  124. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 12:50 PM

    @110
    We’re quants then?

  125. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 12:53 PM

    =nuveen)

  126. Posted by Suits | October 24, 2008 at 1:07 PM

    Anyone have Citadel Associate numbers?

  127. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:09 PM

    30% cash is low, come on. With 30% cash, you can retain a tremendous amount of risk given how low haircuts are on most risky trades.

  128. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:09 PM

    30% cash is low, come on. With 30% cash, you can retain a tremendous amount of risk given how low haircuts are on most risky trades.

  129. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:09 PM

    30% cash is low, come on. With 30% cash, you can retain a tremendous amount of risk given how low haircuts are on most risky trades.

  130. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:10 PM

    30% cash is low, come on. With 30% cash, you can retain a tremendous amount of risk given how low haircuts are on most risky trades.

  131. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:15 PM

    does anyone know if 30% cash is considered low? given haircuts (mullets, femullets & rat-tails) I’d think the redneck salon market wouldn’t be the most risky of trades.

  132. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:18 PM

    30% cash is low, come on. With 30% cash, you can post a tremendous amount of the same thing given how low intelligence haircuts are of certain posters.

  133. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:24 PM

    30% cash is high, come one. With 30% cash, you can retain and tremendous amount of urine in your pants and still afford a new pair of jeans the next day given the fall in commodity prices.

  134. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:27 PM

    I’m short Marc Faber’s rat tail, long Roubini’s plaster vulvas.

  135. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:32 PM

    @125 – if more than one person posted this I’d believe it. Seemed like an interesting story but not really hearing secondary confirmation from others.

  136. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:48 PM

    It is not Cargill/Blackriver. Those fuckers were notoriously risk averse during the bubble, no chance they are rolling the dice here and now.

  137. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:54 PM

    Strategery Capital?

  138. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 1:59 PM

    @139, yeah, can’t really give you more. I have more friends at Citadel, but I haven’t heard from them today. Will let you know if I get confirmation.
    -125

  139. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 2:13 PM

    @125/142 – thanks. I only have second-derivative friends there (e.g. friends of friends) and all have denied.
    -139

  140. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 2:17 PM

    Rumors circulating Citadel dumping CME seats…

  141. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 3:17 PM

    NO WAY is Citadel dumping CME seats. 144 you win the stupidest comment ever on DB.

  142. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 3:26 PM

    Check CME seat transactions on the day.. traded down hundreds of thousands of dollars through the best standing bids.
    Rumored to be meeting with debt holders @ 2:30 and potentially following with conference thereafter.

  143. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 3:28 PM

    145
    Thank you Mr. Griffin…

  144. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 3:30 PM

    145
    Thank you Mr. Griffin…

  145. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 3:32 PM

    145
    Thank you Mr. Griffin…

  146. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 4:05 PM

    we’re all in, Lan

  147. Posted by guest | October 24, 2008 at 4:15 PM

    Q Investments?
    – Geoff Raynor

  148. Posted by guest | October 25, 2008 at 4:25 PM

    “X to invest and operate business as usual…The firm’s liquidity remains strong…”
    How many times and variations of this have we heard all year from blown-up firms?
    http://www.weeklyta.blogspot.com

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.