Citi Is Mad As Hell And They Are Not Going To Take It Anymore

Sure, there is that whole exclusivity thing, and Wells Fargo's lawyers are "looking over the various papers," but, damnit, Citi, why not just outbid them too? Call it, a hedge. Call it, a two pronged attack. Call it, the second front. Front one, lots of lawyers paid lots of money to enforce what was probably a non-binding agreement. Front two, throw in a higher bid.

Of course, Wells is just playing dumb. "What bid? We didn't know Citi was bidding." Well, ok, it wasn't that blatant. It was more like:

"We're not aware of any merger agreement that has been consummated at the time. And as far as other issues, I haven't seen anything in terms of issues that Citi has or doesn't have. And we feel very confident that this transaction has been done appropriately."

For being the Chairman of a publicly held firm he sure does seem poorly informed.

To add insult to injury, Citi has been "Citi also said it has been providing liquidity support to Wachovia Bank since its announcement Monday." Hah. Ouch.

Rumor: Citi officials are poised to claim "We never wanted Wachovia anyhow, we just wanted to make it expensive for Wells," if they don't win the deal.

Citi challenges Wells-Wachovia deal [Easy Bay Business Times]

Also: Skadden/DPW v. S&C: Boom Goes The Dynamite [Above The Law]

Comments

Comments hidden for your protection. Show them anyway!

Post Your Comment