A lot of people want Wall Street’s current and former inept CEOs, i.e. the supposed architects of this here crisis, to own up to their mistakes, whatever they may be (A: not taking on enough risk). But few if any of them will come out of their figurative bunkers and literal hermetically sealed condoms to do so, so guess what? We’ve got to ambush those mother fuckers. Obviously, the man to lead us in this venture is Bill O’Reilly. CityFile reports that Papa Bear sicced a pack on former Merrill Lynch CEO Stan O’Neal last night as he was leaving his apartment and trailed him for a few blocks, demanding to know if he felt any guilt over collecting $161 million. Say what you will about Loofah Boy, but I appreciate his pioneering effort, which has given me the courage to say ‘to hell with possible stalking and aggravated assault charges, I’m going after these bitches, too.’ Because I’m a one-dimensional thinker the plan of attack is to start with the old [something] on a stick trick. Obviously for Cayne this’ll be a bag of chips, but I can’t figure out what to use for Fuld, so if you’ve got ideas, I’m all ears. Ang. Moz. will be a voucher for a lifetime supply of tanning bed bulbs, which he blows through like nobody’s business. Also soliciting submissions for Greenspan.
Earlier: “It’s You, You Big Fat Toad, YOU!”

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (38)

  1. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:26 AM

    I’m getting a sort of racist vibe from BO in that reach out.

  2. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:26 AM

    O’Neal is kinda old news. Why didn’t O’Reilly try to ambush Fuld instead? I’m sure it has nothing to do with O’Neal permanent tan.

  3. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:28 AM

    O’Reilly should have just called and left him a message.
    @1 second that…he will go after Franklin Raines next

  4. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:33 AM

    Terrible to do this to O’Neal. The guy might be a bad CEO but he did nothing wrong.

  5. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:38 AM

    Go Bill! I hope you get a lot more of these guys…
    @ 4 – doing ridiculous things with a company and pushing it over the edge of prudence so that he can make his bonus is not only wrong, it’s outright disgusting behaviour. And trying to sell it to Wachovia quietly so he can get his ‘change of control’ bonus AFTER he wrecked ML is downright disgusting.
    Stan and Chuck deserve to be lynched in a public square.

  6. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:43 AM

    Raines is too busy being an Obama economic advisor…

  7. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:43 AM

    Obviously you need a BEAR trap for Jimmy Cayne

  8. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:45 AM

    Wow. Do you guys realize that Oneal got the most disgusting exit package of all the banking CEOs? Cayne and Fuld literally lost their shirts (or billions of dollars) and didnt even get massive payouts. Chuck Prince also got nothing close to 161MM dollars.
    Yet, you cannot accuse Oneal of anything because of his color? Talk of racism.

  9. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:46 AM

    Like the idea of dangling (fill in the blank) on a stick for luring these bloodsuckers.
    Fuld – Bananas
    Cayne – definitely Doritos, (Nacho cheese)
    Greenspan – Barbara Walters’ granny panties

  10. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:52 AM

    Posted this somewhere her last night. It was actually quite entertaining. I wondered if the guy was mute. O’Reilly is angrier than we’ve ever seen him. This was just “the first” he promises others to follow. But, if you guys have some ideas or tips for the guy, by all means, send them to him because he will use everything at his disposal.
    See his neighbors are the littler WS folk and there are now foreclosures in his neighborhood and his friends have lost their retirement funds. When it starts to hit home, people are suddenly interested.

  11. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:55 AM

    You guys are fools… He deserves that and much more. He had the foresight to dump that overleveraged piece of crap before it fell into BoA’s hands. Sure he had a hand in it but he recognized how screwed up things got…

  12. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:59 AM

    @ 11 – Stan was gone long before BofA – he was trying to sell to Wachovia on the sly, without even informing his own board. Thain sold it to BofA. Get your facts right before you start your verbal diarrhoea.

  13. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 11:59 AM

    Hey, if the contract they signed with him says they will pay the guy X, that’s the deal he made, and if it’s a strong contract, more power to him. If there needs to be a change made, then that’s different… I do think he doesn’t ‘deserve’ it, but that’s very subjective.
    Shareholders need to get a voice and some cojones, and tie their salaries more directly to performance, and kick out the directors on the boards if they’re offering these guys golden parachutes… but if they make a deal, then that is their deal.
    Sucks that he got paid so much, but as a man of infinite(simal) wisdom once said, “Fool me once, shame on… shame on you… fool me… can’t get fooled again.”

  14. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:00 PM

    @ 11…what’s your point? Are you pro/anti- Mr. O’Neal?

  15. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:00 PM

    BO is just distracting himself by chasing CEOs of financial institutions.
    He will soon be like one of those lonely, angry guys in a bar, pointing and jabbing his finger silently as his drink sloshes out and spills while doing it in a silent rage over the complete political destruction of right wing conservatives in the executive branch. Lou Dobbs will see it and say, “I used to be just like that” to no one in particular.

  16. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:07 PM

    @9
    everyone knows its cooler ranch doritos -not nacho cheese-

  17. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:10 PM

    @ 11…what’s your point? Are you pro/anti- Mr. O’Neal?

  18. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:11 PM

    Like the idea of dangling (fill in the blank) on a stick for luring these bloodsuckers.
    Fuld – Bananas
    Cayne – definitely Doritos, (Nacho cheese)
    Greenspan – Barbara Walters’ granny panties

  19. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:14 PM

    Like the idea of dangling (fill in the blank) on a stick for luring these bloodsuckers.
    Fuld – Bananas
    Cayne – definitely Doritos, (Nacho cheese)
    Greenspan – Barbara Walters’ granny panties

  20. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:14 PM

    For Maestro69 (Greenspan), clearly its condoms.
    Fuld, an advance copy of Brickbreaker 2.

  21. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:16 PM

    stan was the worst thing to happen to merrill. sweet job buying first franklin at the peak of the market
    many people have lost their jobs here because of your arrogance

  22. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:19 PM

    13 = a mind so open it is empty (idiot)

  23. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:25 PM

    I think BO, notice he has the same initials as another BO, can’t believe what is happening. Don’t think he doesn’t have a nice 401K and other investments.

  24. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:26 PM

    anyone know the total amount of people cut yesterday at mer?
    i was one of them

  25. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:33 PM

    $11billion in bonus pool at MS
    +——————————————————————————+
    Morgan Stanley’s Bonuses Get Saved By You and Me: Jonathan Weil
    2008-10-21 04:01:03.0 GMT
    Commentary by Jonathan Weil
    Oct. 21 (Bloomberg) — Wall Street had it wrong: An
    investment bank’s most precious asset isn’t the army of
    employees who head down the elevators each day. It’s the
    paychecks they take with them out the door.
    You can imagine the devilish grins on the faces of Morgan
    Stanley employees last week, after the Treasury Department said
    it would pump $10 billion into the bank. Not only did we, the
    taxpayers, save their company, with the help of a Japanese bank
    named Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. More importantly, we
    funded their 2008 bonus pool.
    Morgan Stanley has accrued $10.7 billion of employee-
    compensation expense this year, almost twice as much as its
    pretax earnings. The vast majority of this remuneration hasn’t
    been paid yet. Now it probably will be, assuming the firm
    survives through next month. Meantime, Morgan Stanley’s stock-
    market value has dropped $34.7 billion, to $21 billion, since
    the company’s fiscal year began.
    The rescue of Morgan Stanley’s bonus pool is an unpleasant
    downside of Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson’s decision to inject
    $250 billion of cash into U.S. banks in exchange for preferred
    stock. It is one thing for a company to pay much more to
    employees than it earns for its shareholders. It’s quite another
    to keep doing it while receiving taxpayer bailout bucks.
    Before securities firms were public companies, a brokerage
    in need of capital would have called on its partners to pony up.
    That’s how it still works at private partnerships, such as law
    firms. The reason they don’t get taxpayer rescues is they can’t
    credibly threaten to take down the world’s financial system.
    Global Threats
    Morgan Stanley can. So can Paulson’s old firm, Goldman
    Sachs Group Inc., which also is getting a $10 billion infusion
    from Treasury. Year-to-date, Goldman has reported $11.4 billion
    of compensation expense, almost twice its $5.9 billion of pretax
    earnings. During the same span, its market capitalization has
    fallen $41.7 billion, to $57.7 billion.
    Morgan Stanley needed Treasury’s cash. Goldman didn’t, but
    got it anyway. As long as Paulson can’t think of any better
    ideas, the government will keep throwing money at an industry
    that pays too many people more than they’re worth, to perform
    services the world has too much of already. The bright side is
    we avoid a global meltdown, for now.
    Here’s all you really need to know to see who lost and who
    benefited most at the Five Families of Wall Street, otherwise
    known as Goldman, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers
    and Bear Stearns. From the start of their 2004 fiscal years
    through yesterday, the big standalone investment banks lost
    about $83 billion of stock-market value. During the same period,
    they reported about $239 billion of employee-compensation
    expense.
    Lined Pockets
    So, for every dollar of shareholder value destroyed, the
    employees got paid almost three. Only a sliver of that money
    went to chief executives such as Goldman’s Lloyd Blankfein, who
    got a $70.3 million package last year, and Lehman’s Richard
    Fuld, who made $34.4 million. Morgan Stanley’s John Mack, by the
    way, received $1.6 million for 2007.
    The Five Families — now down to just Goldman and Morgan
    Stanley — weren’t alone. Citigroup Inc., which is getting a $25
    billion injection from Treasury, has reported $139.3 billion of
    compensation expense since the start of 2004, more than double
    its $62.8 billion of pretax earnings. Its market cap, by
    comparison, has declined by about $168 billion, to $82 billion.
    For all the complaints about outrageous executive pay and
    how little Paulson is doing to curb it, a big reason why these
    firms have been scrounging for capital is they keep blowing huge
    wads of it on their rank-and-file, too. The Paulson plan will do
    nothing to change that.
    In the interim, we continue propping up an industry that’s
    bloated with overcapacity, because we’re all too scared to let
    the market fix it. That’s good for the people getting bonus
    checks at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. It’s not so great
    for the rest of us.
    (Jonathan Weil is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions
    expressed are his own.)

  26. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 12:49 PM

    caine would want funyons

  27. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 1:06 PM

    He’s a chatty Kathy!

  28. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 1:12 PM

    Oh come on Bess, a sack of Bacon Egg’n Cheese McGriddles for Cayne.
    You know that baby!

  29. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 1:25 PM

    SO was fired for discussing sale of ML w/o board approval. Years later the new CEO, JT, sold ML at a fraction of the price and negotiated a $200 million parachute for senior execs. BO ambushed the wrong guy.

  30. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM

    Like the idea of dangling (fill in the blank) on a stick for luring these bloodsuckers.
    Fuld – Bananas
    Cayne – definitely Doritos, (Nacho cheese)
    Greenspan – Barbara Walters’ granny panties

  31. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM

    Like the idea of dangling (fill in the blank) on a stick for luring these bloodsuckers.
    Fuld – Bananas
    Cayne – definitely Doritos, (Nacho cheese)
    Greenspan – Barbara Walters’ granny panties

  32. Posted by peWonderWoman | October 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM

    Wall Street’s current and former inept CEOs should all get a FREE invite to this years Assassin games.
    (http://www.streetwars.net/)

  33. Posted by Tapecracker | October 21, 2008 at 2:10 PM

    I always thought Assassin was played on trading floors by turning out all the lights and having everyone slap each other’s faces in the dark for 5 minutes. When the lights come back on, the ones with the reddest faces were fired.
    My, how things have changed…

  34. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 2:14 PM

    Stan was warned by many about the problems in housing before he bought that piece of crap sub-prime lender.
    The guy is a disgrace and should be exposed.

  35. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 2:48 PM

    A mirror for Greenie and a punching (speed) bag for Fuld.

  36. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 2:49 PM

    A mirror for Greenie and a punching (speed) bag for Fuld.

  37. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 2:49 PM

    A mirror for Greenie and a punching (speed) bag for Fuld.

  38. Posted by guest | October 21, 2008 at 3:02 PM

    Re the multiple postings (BW’s granny panties)
    The server must be going beserk. I post frequently and am familiar with the “one click process”, which I did — and then left the site (and my desk, actually)
    I just returned and it appears BW’s granny panties have a life all their own.
    My apologies for the multiple postings; I’m not sure what is going on. :(

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.