• 13 Oct 2008 at 12:22 PM

Krug-MAHN!

krug.jpg“…having shown the effects of economies of scale on trade patterns and on the location of economic activity.” Wait, seriously? SERIOUSLY?
Paul Krugman Wins Economic Nobel [Dealbook]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (106)

  1. Posted by onetwo | October 13, 2008 at 12:26 PM

    Do we need NDA’s on my jokes?

  2. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:29 PM

    The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2008
    “for his analysis of trade patterns and location of economic activity”
    Paul Krugman
    Copyright © Princeton University
    Paul Krugman
    USA
    Princeton University
    Princeton, NJ, USA
    b. 1953

  3. Posted by arioch | October 13, 2008 at 12:29 PM

    shamwow won’t pick up mayo… now that that stupid shit is out of the way…
    you’re fucking kidding? right?

  4. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:31 PM

    100% political.

  5. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:31 PM

    This is total bullshit. Cramer should have won.

  6. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:34 PM

    Economist, ECOMOMIST?????
    I thought he was a freakin’ political columnist.
    Seriously, what would you expect from a far left org like the Nobel twats?

  7. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:36 PM

    “Monday’s award is the last of the six prizes and is not one of the original Nobels, but was created in 1968 by the Swedish central bank in Alfred Nobel’s memory. Mr. Krugman was the only winner of the award, which includes a prize of about $1.4 million.”
    humility is such a virtue:
    “To be absolutely, totally honest I thought this day might come someday”
    http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/13/paul-krugman-wins-economics-nobel/

  8. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:39 PM

    krugman is a moron.

  9. Posted by FigJam | October 13, 2008 at 12:42 PM

    Wondering when the Nobel prizes for Physiology/Medicine, Chemistry, and Physics will become political also….

  10. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM

    Saavik: Any suggestions, Admiral?
    Kirk: Prayer, Mr. Saavik. The Klingons don’t take prisoners.
    Saavik: Because… there was no way to win.
    Kirk: A no-win situation is a possibility every commander may face. Has that never occurred to you?
    Saavik: No sir, it has not.
    Spock: The Kobayashi Maru scenario frequently wreaks havoc on students and equipment. As I recall you took the test three times yourself. Your final solution was, shall we say, unique?
    Kirk: It had the virtue of never having been tried.

  11. Posted by american bandersnatch | October 13, 2008 at 12:43 PM

    Good star trek reference! A good looking girl that likes sci fi – a pearl of great price.

  12. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:45 PM

    KISS

  13. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:47 PM

    it’s actually very well-deserved and entirely expected among economists. if you fools knew anything about modern economics, you’d know he basically created modern trade theory in the 80s. this award has been a long time coming and it’s got nothing to do with his political views.

  14. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:50 PM

    @13 I bet you believe that Al Gore had something to do with “peace” as well. Best of luck with that.

  15. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:52 PM

    @14 – this is 13, to answer your question, no, but i’m an economist so i actually know what krugman’s early contributions to economics have meant for the field. aah… who cares anyway…

  16. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:52 PM

    Nothing to do with his political views my ass.
    I wonder what Hayek would think of Krugman.

  17. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:55 PM

    Krugman on price of oil, June 27, 2008:
    “Suffice it to say that some economists, myself included, make much of the fact that the usual telltale signs of a speculative price boom are missing.”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/27/opinion/27krugman.html

  18. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    What economics awards are the Iceland central bank giving out?

  19. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    #13. If he would stick to economics maybe he wouldn’t be getting this reaction.

  20. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 1:07 PM

    You can’t even argue that Krugman received the award because he was old. And Krugman’s contribution seems dubious.
    Contrast his work to that of Engle and Granger, Akerlof et al., or Scholes and Merton. They had a substantial impact on academia and industry.
    Whatever.

  21. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 1:19 PM

    Before he as a columnist with whom you may or may not disagree, Krugman was an exceptional economist that is held in extremely high regard, not only for his economic intuition by also quantitative prowess. His contribution to international trade theory is revolutionary to the Heckscher-Ohlin model built on Ricardo’s comparative advantage theory.
    I don’t think anyone who is even passingly familiar with modern economics is suprised by this award. The real surprise is that he has received it at a relatively younger age.
    It’s a pity that many people won’t be able to look past their disagreements with his political views.

  22. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 1:21 PM

    Fama was robbed.

  23. Posted by RamblinWreck | October 13, 2008 at 1:23 PM

    Digging the positive correlation between number of EP posts and internets meme references. Moar of this.

  24. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 1:36 PM

    “Andrea Mitchell tried to uphold the Krugman honor, but—as seen in the screencap—even she couldn’t suppress a smile at the award’s arrant absurdity.
    Joe Scarborough piqued Mika’s curiosity with his teasing of the news, while guest Jim Cramer saw the award as confirmation that America is well on the way to socialism.while guest Jim Cramer saw the award as confirmation that America is well on the way to socialism.”
    http://www.newsbusters.org/

  25. Posted by diablo | October 13, 2008 at 1:44 PM

    I get it.
    EP’s head exploded.

  26. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 1:56 PM

    @6: Yeah, like when they gave the award to that dirty hippie Scholes.

  27. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 2:33 PM

    Steve Cohen should have won it!

  28. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 3:23 PM

    Krugman’s early shit was Trade theory’s equivalent of Black-Scholes c. 1970. NAFTA & EU general frameworks were practically derived from his textbook.
    /b/espoke.

  29. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 3:31 PM

    would love to see the look on krugman’s face when he dies and toddles off to nobel economist valhalla.
    when they hand him his bucket and inform him “the only reason you’re here is that we needed a pissboy. be sure to wait for the shake, genius.”
    krugman is a moronic partisan hack. him getting a nobel is just the last nail in the once-proud nobel coffin. by doing this, even more than honoring gore’s magnificent efforts for “peace”, or rigoberta menchu’s fairy tale whoppers as “literature”, they’ve shown themselves to be nothing more than a joke.
    maybe the math/physics/chem nobels still mean something, *maybe*, but you gotta wonder.

  30. Posted by diablo | October 13, 2008 at 4:06 PM

    @29
    You sound like a moronic partisan hack.
    Gasbag? Get back to work.

  31. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 4:20 PM

    #30 diablo -
    your typing is a little murky and muffled there.
    try climbing out of krugman’s arse before you comment next time.

  32. Posted by diablo | October 13, 2008 at 4:40 PM

    @31
    Are you #29? Because if you are, you just proved my point. If not, go back to
    http://www.freerepublic.com/
    and stay there. And take #29 with you. Ok buddy?

  33. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 5:03 PM

    oh, i’m # 29, windy man. you seem to have this idea your commands ought to be followed. are you kind of a big deal? a bsd? an internet bad dude?
    krugman’s a hack. the nobel committee is a joke. they picked him as yet another partisan slap at bush. history will scorn this pick just as they will the gore pick.
    whether you like it or not. now run along, little man. crawl back into krugman’s tiny little arse, where it’s warm and safe. and stay there. ok, buddy?

  34. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 5:06 PM

    oh, i’m # 29, windy man. you seem to have this idea your commands ought to be followed. are you kind of a big deal? a bsd? an internet bad dude?
    krugman’s a hack. the nobel committee is a joke. they picked him as yet another partisan slap at bush. history will scorn this pick just as they will the gore pick.
    whether you like it or not. now run along, little man. crawl back into krugman’s tiny little arse, where it’s warm and safe. and stay there. ok? buddy?

  35. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 5:07 PM

    oh, i’m # 29, windy man. you seem to have this idea your commands ought to be followed. are you kind of a big deal? a bsd? an internet bad dude?
    krugman’s a hack. the nobel committee is a joke. they picked him as yet another partisan slap at bush. history will scorn this pick just as they will the gore pick.
    whether you like it or not. now run along, little man. crawl back into krugman’s tiny little arse, where it’s warm and safe. and stay there. ok? buddy?

  36. Posted by neward | October 13, 2008 at 5:55 PM

    #13 is absolutely right that Krugman is a well regarded talented economist. Anyone who has taken a basic Trade Theory class has learned about New Trade Theory along with the Ricardian Model, Heckscher-Ohlin , & Stolper-Samuelson. His textbook is widely read and apolitical.
    Krugman as a columnist is a hack and often blindly partisan and shrill. Nevertheless I don’t think it’s a political pick. #29, do you really think the same committee that picks the Nobel Peace Prize picks the prize for Economics? The prize for Economics isn’t even related to the other Nobel prizes, which is the cause of some controversy.

  37. Posted by diablo | October 13, 2008 at 6:19 PM

    #33, #34, #35
    Wow! You prove my point again and I’m even ignoring that you are clueless about the various Noble awards that exist.
    Listen, when you learn how to post in DB come back. Perhaps by that time your IQ will be higher.
    Nah! Enjoy the bigotry at Freeperville. It’s right up your alley.

  38. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 6:54 PM

    why don’t they call it as it is– Nobel Prize in being Anti-Bush.

  39. Posted by evan7257 | October 13, 2008 at 7:10 PM

    Honestly, I think Maureen Dowd was robbed.

  40. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 7:32 PM

    another thing about guys who think they’re kind of a big deal, diablo – you know: the internet navy seals; the self-proclaimed BSD’s – is that they just *have* to get the last word in. try as they might, they just can’t not stop themselves from saying/doing dumb things. (rather like the moronic partisan hack krugman, actually.)(and the feverishly anti-bush nobel committee, it must be added.)
    psychologists often see this as a symptom of deeper mental problems. how else can we explain the “gore, menchu, and krugman nobel laureate” trio of stooges? (i see krugman as “larry”.)
    what do you think, buddy?

  41. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 7:34 PM

    ok EP, you redeemed yourself of that Lehman CDS faux pas over the weekend
    GREAT photo caption, just great, love it

  42. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 10:47 PM

    @17, very nice.
    Another from this fruit loop, four months after 9-11:
    “I predict that in the years ahead Enron, not Sept. 11, will come to be seen as the greater turning point in U.S. society.”
    “The Great Divide”
    The New York Times
    January 29th, 2002
    By Paul Krugman
    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/29/opinion/29KRUG.html

  43. Posted by guest | October 13, 2008 at 11:19 PM

    38 Bush is basically lazy and stupid to the core, so its no challenge being anti Bush. Have you seen his approval rating? 29%? and that was before the economic shit hit the fan.

  44. Posted by guest | October 14, 2008 at 1:28 AM

    Well, Jimmy Carter is also a Nobel laureate, if that counts for something.

  45. Posted by guest | October 14, 2008 at 1:35 AM

    To all those defending Krugman here, have you actually ever read all the utter crap he spews on the NYT? I would have no issues if he were just writing random political stuff. But he actually writes about economics and uses the fact that he is an economist to buttress his completely bullshit logic.
    That guy is a big fucking blot on economics and brings disrepute to it. I do not think you would think highly of any Nobel prize winning physicist if he went onto some wingnut forum and started writing about how the earth was only 5000 years old. Krugman economic does the equivalent on that. It is a gigantic fucking shame. The Nobel committee continue its descent into irrelevance.
    That is the economic equivalent of

  46. Posted by guest | October 14, 2008 at 3:28 AM

    Yay PRINCETON! Whoah PRINCETON!
    Screw you dumbasses at Harvard, Yale, PEnn & MIT.
    PRINCETON is where the ACtion is. Princeton is where I want my kids to go to schools! Princeton is where Krugman teaches.
    Harvard, Yale, Penn & MIT is for PUSSIES!!!
    Princeton is for Nobel Laureates
    Yeah Krugman! Booyakasha Krugman! Whoah whoah Krugman! What a day for Princeton. Booyah PRINCETON!!!!!
    GO TIGERS!!!
    GO KRUGMAN!!!

  47. Posted by guest | October 14, 2008 at 3:30 AM

    Yay PRINCETON! Whoah PRINCETON!
    Screw you dumbasses at Harvard, Yale, PEnn & MIT.
    PRINCETON is where the ACtion is. Princeton is where I want my kids to go to schools! Princeton is where Krugman teaches.
    Harvard, Yale, Penn & MIT is for PUSSIES!!!
    Princeton is for Nobel Laureates
    Yeah Krugman! Booyakasha Krugman! Whoah whoah Krugman! What a day for Princeton. Booyah PRINCETON!!!!!
    GO TIGERS!!!
    GO KRUGMAN!!!

  48. Posted by guest | October 14, 2008 at 7:28 AM

    @47 affirms the notion that Princeton breeds only morons

  49. Posted by web designer | April 18, 2012 at 12:07 PM

    yhlx8l Really enjoyed this blog post.Thanks Again.

  50. Posted by Bristol Airport Hotels | April 18, 2012 at 4:37 PM

    OqqLHB wow, awesome blog article.Much thanks again. Great.

  51. Posted by costa del mar polycarbonate | April 19, 2012 at 3:16 PM

    Awesome article. Really Great.

  52. Posted by free money today | April 19, 2012 at 7:23 PM

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog.Thanks Again. Awesome.

  53. Posted by baptism favors | April 19, 2012 at 8:27 PM

    Fantastic article post.

  54. Posted by web site design | April 20, 2012 at 5:02 AM

    I cannot thank you enough for the blog article.Really thank you! Will read on…

  55. Posted by discount diablo edge driver | April 20, 2012 at 5:39 AM

    wow, awesome article post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

  56. Posted by karma dla kotów | April 20, 2012 at 9:35 AM

    This is one awesome blog article. Much obliged.

  57. Posted by Tim Thomas Jersey | April 20, 2012 at 10:58 AM

    I really enjoy the post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  58. Posted by website design jacksonville | April 20, 2012 at 11:24 AM

    I cannot thank you enough for the article post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  59. Posted by sushi making party for birthday and hen party | April 20, 2012 at 2:50 PM

    Enjoyed every bit of your post.Really looking forward to read more.

  60. Posted by red snapper recipes | April 21, 2012 at 3:30 AM

    Very informative blog. Will read on…

  61. Posted by jeux gratuit en ligne | April 21, 2012 at 3:51 AM

    I truly appreciate this blog post.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  62. Posted by cheap wedding gowns | April 21, 2012 at 4:44 AM

    Hey, thanks for the blog.Really thank you! Will read on…

  63. Posted by Holidays to Algarve | April 21, 2012 at 8:02 AM

    Thanks for the blog.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  64. Posted by iphone 5 | April 21, 2012 at 1:22 PM

    I truly appreciate this blog post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  65. Posted by handwriting analysis New York | April 21, 2012 at 5:23 PM

    Thank you ever so for you post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  66. Posted by android controller | April 21, 2012 at 6:35 PM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog article.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  67. Posted by were to buy weed | April 21, 2012 at 6:52 PM

    Hey, thanks for the post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  68. Posted by were to buy weed | April 21, 2012 at 9:26 PM

    Im grateful for the blog post.Really thank you! Great.

  69. Posted by top rated adjustable dumbbells | April 21, 2012 at 10:39 PM

    I value the article post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  70. Posted by Credit Card Number Verifier | April 22, 2012 at 1:27 AM

    Thanks again for the blog article. Awesome.

  71. Posted by flying during pregnancy | April 22, 2012 at 4:36 AM

    Very neat article post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  72. Posted by boutique du sexe | April 22, 2012 at 1:04 PM

    Major thankies for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  73. Posted by get rid of kidney stones naturally | April 22, 2012 at 2:16 PM

    Thanks for the blog post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  74. Posted by Sexkontakte | April 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic post.Thanks Again. Great.

  75. Posted by Golf Towels | April 23, 2012 at 12:05 PM

    I am so grateful for your blog post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  76. Posted by Phen375 Reviews | April 23, 2012 at 1:22 PM

    I loved your post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

  77. Posted by buy peptides | April 23, 2012 at 9:43 PM

    I truly appreciate this blog post.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  78. Posted by website design india | April 24, 2012 at 3:29 AM

    Say, you got a nice post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  79. Posted by iphone unlock | April 24, 2012 at 5:30 AM

    Great article post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  80. Posted by Windows Mobile 8 | April 24, 2012 at 5:53 AM

    Thank you ever so for you article post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

  81. Posted by EB1A | April 24, 2012 at 10:04 AM

    Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  82. Posted by hearing aids Scottsdale | April 24, 2012 at 8:44 PM

    Im thankful for the blog.Really thank you! Really Great.

  83. Posted by UK SEO | April 24, 2012 at 11:21 PM

    Really appreciate you sharing this article post. Keep writing.

  84. Posted by rdl exercise | April 25, 2012 at 3:36 AM

    Really enjoyed this post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  85. Posted by CDL Test | April 25, 2012 at 8:35 PM

    I cannot thank you enough for the post. Cool.

  86. Posted by backlinkspeed | April 26, 2012 at 2:07 AM

    Thanks so much for the blog article.Much thanks again. Cool.

  87. Posted by make money online | April 26, 2012 at 4:57 AM

    I truly appreciate this blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

  88. Posted by buy cheap backlinks | April 26, 2012 at 8:07 AM

    Enjoyed every bit of your blog article.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  89. Posted by offers | April 26, 2012 at 9:31 AM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  90. Posted by zurich handmade design 925 | April 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM

    Very good article post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  91. Posted by folding pet stairs | April 26, 2012 at 10:20 AM

    I’m not really very superb with Language however i line upward this really leisurely to be able to change.

  92. Posted by Staff & Crews Transport Contracts | April 27, 2012 at 8:17 AM

    I do not leave many comments, however i did some searching and wound up here Krug-MAHN! Dealbreaker: Wall Street Insider – Financial News, Headlines, Commentary and Analysis – Hedge Funds, Private Equity, Banks. And I actually do have a few questions for you if you don’t mind. Is it just me or does it seem like a few of the comments come across like coming from brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are writing at other online social sites, I’d like to follow anything fresh you have to post. Could you list of every one of your community pages like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?

  93. Posted by Advanced Technology Video | April 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM

    This is one awesome article post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  94. Posted by Factoring Company | April 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM

    Thanks for the article post.Thanks Again.

  95. Posted by Rattan Outdoor Furniture | April 28, 2012 at 10:17 PM

    I really enjoy the article post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  96. Posted by Courtney Norman | May 3, 2012 at 11:36 AM

    I loved your post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  97. Posted by teaching English abroad | May 3, 2012 at 8:59 PM

    Major thanks for the article.Really thank you! Keep writing.

  98. Posted by brick pizza ovens | May 4, 2012 at 11:15 AM

    I am so grateful for your article.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  99. Posted by port el kantaoui | May 4, 2012 at 1:33 PM

    Looking forward to reading more. Great post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  100. Posted by part for car | May 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM

    A big thank you for your blog. Really Great.

  101. Posted by high-qualitylinkdirectory | May 4, 2012 at 4:41 PM

    Major thankies for the article post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  102. Posted by video game news | May 6, 2012 at 8:58 AM

    Really informative blog article.Really thank you! Awesome.

  103. Posted by worth the read | May 7, 2012 at 4:15 AM

    Thanks-a-mundo for the article post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  104. Posted by how to overcome premature ejaculation | May 7, 2012 at 8:14 AM

    Appreciate you sharing, great post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  105. Posted by Dione Wallack | May 7, 2012 at 9:20 PM

    Thanks for the chance!

  106. Posted by reviews of companies in the north west | May 9, 2012 at 8:57 AM

    Im obliged for the article post.Thanks Again. Want more.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.