• 12 Nov 2008 at 3:49 PM

C-Level Positions

Citibank has been quietly soiling itself for the last many weeks. Now that it has broken into single the digits it is anyone’s guess where it is headed now. Including, actually, your guess.
You know the rules: Closest to guess the big “C”‘s closing price without going under gets a big hug from Vikram Pandit. Cherish it, people. Think how backwards that is. He probably needs it much more than any of our readers.
clevel.png

Comments (48)

  1. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:52 PM

    The Cid’s gettin canned.

  2. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:52 PM

    $2.50 – 50c more than initial Bear offer for being insomniacs and working that extra hard when we sleep.

  3. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:52 PM

    9.88

  4. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:53 PM

    9 7/8

  5. Posted by Strabo | November 12, 2008 at 3:53 PM

    9.78

  6. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:54 PM

    10 1/8

  7. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:54 PM

    9.42
    Citi Diaper Changer

  8. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:54 PM

    9.42
    Citi Diaper Changer

  9. Posted by legal eagle | November 12, 2008 at 3:55 PM

    9.68

  10. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:55 PM

    9.79

  11. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:56 PM

    9.51

  12. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:56 PM

    9.75
    JU

  13. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:57 PM

    Anyone know whatever happened with the housing inquiry that was delayed till after the election? Wasn’t that supposed to occur within the last couple days?
    I thought that was where we were supposed to hear all about how O is in Fannie/Freddie’s pockets?

  14. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:57 PM

    9.45

  15. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:57 PM

    9.43

  16. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 3:59 PM

    9.52

  17. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:00 PM

    9.52

  18. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:00 PM

    9.69

  19. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:05 PM

    $9.60

  20. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:05 PM

    All Citi (and the rest) have to do is change the status quo and then they win.

  21. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:06 PM

    $1
    The situation is liquid, like my greasy gabagool underpants.

  22. Posted by VOL IS KING | November 12, 2008 at 4:09 PM

    Paulson must be sacrificed to save the market. Take him up to the capitol mount and offer up his entrail to Barney Frank.

  23. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:12 PM

    9.56
    NB

  24. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:16 PM

    i bought at 12.83 my girlfriend gave me some money and i bought her
    100 shares I have been watching the yahoo board and i see it a 15 by next
    week ( not staying) but what is better than this out there right now
    i dont see it.

  25. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:16 PM

    10.01

  26. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:18 PM

    1 shamwow per share

  27. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:19 PM

    @24 the Goldman Sachs puts look rawkus

  28. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:22 PM

    24 what is better right now…
    are you kidding?
    uncle vikky? really?

  29. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:24 PM

    After Citadel blows up this month and both GS & UBS refuse to clear Citadel’s trades, Citigroup will be at US$6.80 and the Dow at 7,000.

  30. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:24 PM

    @24. Have fun funding a new girlfriend.

  31. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:27 PM

    Equity Private knew that C would close at 9.64 at 3:49! I knew the markets were fixed. Is this a Freemasons thing?

  32. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:41 PM

    @31
    Hope your not short, your going to get raped.

  33. Posted by a dead horse | November 12, 2008 at 4:48 PM

    9.82

  34. Posted by bondguy007 | November 12, 2008 at 4:50 PM

    9.65, gettin spanked like a spitzer all nighter

  35. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:50 PM

    @33. 31 here. Not short. Not the grammatical equivalent of a third grader either…

  36. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM

    @36
    Oh snap you totally got me. Eat a dick.
    Check my grammar on that one son.

  37. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 4:58 PM

    @37. Should be a comma after snap.

  38. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 5:05 PM

    @38
    ,
    Happy? Suprised you can type with a dick in your mouth.

  39. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 5:09 PM

    I’m not the one who’s 22% underwater and now in hock to my girlfriend.
    If I was short, what I could do, is cover and close, then take the profits, and take your erstwhile girlfriend out to a dinner you clearly can’t afford anymore.

  40. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 5:12 PM

    FOR THE LOVE OF GOD BRING BAD THE RED UMBRELLA!

  41. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 5:12 PM

    BACK!

  42. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 5:17 PM

    I can’t believe how much effort is being expended here discussing a $283 loss. Lets be serious, $283 is maybe 1/4 of a month’s rent, for one share of a typical east 90′s shithole. Its a healthy weekend of drinking. Its less than the cost of a good pair of shoes. Maybe I’m getting old, but really, in the scheme of things its nothing.

  43. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM

    ef them, they fired me so eff them…

  44. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 5:41 PM

    I piss $283..

  45. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM

    @45 that must be painful

  46. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 7:30 PM

    Short @24 and long @24′s girlfriend

  47. Posted by guest | November 12, 2008 at 8:24 PM

    $283 for shoes? …dude are you kidding? Did you buy them on yahoo while looking at the finance board?

  48. Posted by guest | November 13, 2008 at 4:25 AM

    8.88
    a lucky number for some

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.