So, I'm not saying that Citi senior executives should get bonuses, because they probs shouldn't. But if I were Vickie Pandit or one of the Pandettes it would really frost my cookies to hear Andrew Cuomo suggest that "At the very least, Citigroup should follow Goldman Sachs' lead and announce quickly that top executives will not be receiving bonuses this year." Come on now. They might not be letting on, but Pandit and Co. obviously know they're scraping the bottom of the urinal league tables. Is it really necessary to make this how they're inferior in every way to Goldman Sachs, including not accepting their garbage bags of money? If I'm going to give up a bonus, I'm going to do it on my own terms, not because perfect Lloyd did. And furthermore, let's be honest. Since when does Citi give a shit about what Goldman does? If they were trying to emulate the Masters o' the U, they would've at least made a little money by initiating a buddy system between the prime brokerage and the prop desk in order to facilitate front running of clients. This was poorly thought out on Andy's part. I move for full bonuses, all cash. Drawn off a small bank in Zurich, Switzerland.
Statement from Attorney General Andrew Cuomo Concerning Bonuses to Top Executives at Citigroup [NY State Attorney General]






Posted by guest, Nov 17, 2008 4:47PM
Too Hebe, didn't read.