• 17 Dec 2008 at 12:34 PM

Bonus Watch ’08: GS

From the front lines:

GS sales and trading [analyst] class of ’08 got 20k but prorated since they started in summer so only 10k. After taxes, 5. Happy Hannukah.

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (198)

  1. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:42 PM

    That’s 5K more than a lot of people are getting this year!

  2. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:42 PM

    poor guys…I feel so sorry for them. I am willing to share the prorated turkey I got from my boss. Leg anyone?

  3. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:44 PM

    poor guys…I feel so sorry for them. I am willing to share the prorated turkey I got from my boss. Leg anyone?

  4. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:44 PM

    is that BA’s or MBA’s?

  5. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:45 PM

    Is that associates or analysts?

  6. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:46 PM

    these are associates or analysts?

  7. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:47 PM

    Fuckin disgrace. Might as well go work for the Post Office!

  8. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:47 PM

    Associates

  9. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:48 PM

    Associates

  10. Posted by carrytrade | December 17, 2008 at 12:48 PM

    Bad news either way. Can’t say anyone should be surprised. Bank tellers don’t get big bonuses. http://deltahedged.com/

  11. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:48 PM

    @5: I thought MBAs started in the summer, BAs in Sept. So this would be MBAs

  12. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM

    That better be analysts… and shitty even then.

  13. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM

    An S&T associate. down 30% from last yr. dont know what desk (believe futures)

  14. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM

    What would this bonus typically be?

  15. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:51 PM

    06 stubs were around 45k

  16. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:52 PM

    06 stubs were around 45k – not prorated

  17. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM

    sorry, they are definitely not in a 50% overall tax bracket. maybe 6.5k. feel better now?

  18. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM

    lol 10k. Even my first year as a developer I got a better bonus than that. Better base salary too.

  19. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM

    that must be analysts- it’s the same as 1997 pay!

  20. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:55 PM

    @14 down 30% is not bad, at all

  21. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:55 PM

    $5K wouldn’t pay for a good night at “the Jimmy” in Houston.
    ~Jimmy Krack Corn
    East Texas Gas trader

  22. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:57 PM

    @8 “skills” not transferable to PO.

  23. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:58 PM

    3nd Year Analyst here covering EMEA
    bonus down 60%…I only got 80K..its disgusting….
    look at the gifts I get…cheap chinese shit…will throw it into flush now
    my girlfriend in LN got a good one…to my surprise..she know nothing…but talks nicely…
    The IT folks who sit near our area (apparently from TCS India) are giggling at us. Not sure what they are making fun of us. Its hell here folks in JC office.

  24. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:58 PM

    21, bubble days are over. we are going back to 1990s. Get that delorean ready!

  25. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:58 PM

    What would this bonus typically be?

  26. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:58 PM

    What would this bonus typically be?

  27. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 12:59 PM

    VP level bonuses down 40%, confirmed by friend in Equity S&T. So figure 300-500k VP level bonuses

  28. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:00 PM

    oh and bonuses at GS are heavy stock that vests over 5yrs instead of 3.

  29. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:01 PM

    @19 bonuses are taxed at a higher rate than normal income, 50% doesn’t sound outrageous.

  30. Posted by carrytrade | December 17, 2008 at 1:01 PM

    oh come one, ive heard of worse. @19, I believe bonuses are taxed in a different (higher) bracket.

  31. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:05 PM

    @33, @29: does that mean the $400K number is partly/mostly in stock that vests over 5 years?

  32. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:06 PM

    Adjust your witholdings (i.e. married with 10 dependents) to minimize the affect of the tax on bonuses. In the end it doesn’t matter your federal taxes are on total comp.

  33. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:07 PM

    The last bonus I got (from a different firm) was reduced by 40% in taxes because it was a “lump sum”. Bastards.

  34. Posted by american bandersnatch | December 17, 2008 at 1:08 PM

    Why do you believe that, carrytrade?

  35. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:09 PM

    Everyone that says bonuses are taxed at a different rate has not filed a tax return while working in the industry (more likely: not in the industry).
    Bonuses are *WITHHELD* at a different rate. At the end of the year, they are taxed at the same rate. As 35 said, you can adjust this impact by playing with your withholdings.

  36. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:10 PM

    bonuses are not taxed in a higher bracket, dont be stupid.

  37. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:13 PM

    Who are we still waiting on – DB, CS, any other big banks? Any news yet? Also, what is the word on the MD bonuses, with all due respect – who cares about the first year guys? We want to hear the real pain! I want to know what the $10m guy got.

  38. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:13 PM

    Are you people that stupid or do you just trust your acountant enough that you have no clue how your tax liability is computed?

  39. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:13 PM

    >> 300-500k VP level bonuses
    are you fu(king kidding me ? this sounds too high in current environment.
    Pls clarify

  40. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:13 PM

    Hey boys – hard to pay back that MBA loan on these types of numbers….nice move on going back to school

  41. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:14 PM

    5,000 after taxes…what in God’s name…

  42. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:14 PM

    Who are we still waiting on – DB, CS, any other big banks? Any news yet? Also, what is the word on the MD bonuses, with all due respect – who cares about the first year guys? We want to hear the real pain! I want to know what the $10m guy got.

  43. Posted by carrytrade | December 17, 2008 at 1:14 PM

    ok my mistake – withheld at a higher rate. Still a free loan to the government. So 6.5k it is, but you won’t get it all back until mid 2009. Thank you automatic savings program. http://deltahedged.com/

  44. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:14 PM

    I thought analysts were paid in June – stubs are only for associates.
    Is GS different in that respect?

  45. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:15 PM

    Bitterly crushed.
    Sincerely,
    IRS

  46. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:15 PM

    GS IB associates got $10K this summer (on top of signing bonus) plus a $5K bump in salary. Factor that into the year’s comp.

  47. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:16 PM

    “300-500k bonuses”
    Thats right. Most VPs at GS make 150-175k in base salary. Last year the top guys were getting 700-900k bonuses.

  48. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:17 PM

    a couple of you are having a difficult time understanding that these are ANALYST numbers. Goldman moved their analysts to this stub cycle so they are normalized like all the other levels.
    That being said, 10k prorated looks right for a 1st year analyst. If you look at bonus levels for 1st year analysts in ’02/’03, they’re around 20-30k.

  49. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:19 PM

    @47- yes, they announced this a few months ago, so that they’d be on schedule with the rest of the firm.

  50. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:19 PM

    what was the typical first year bonus of years past?

  51. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:20 PM

    65k bonus for top tier 1st year analysts this past year (so class of ’07).

  52. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:20 PM

    150K Base
    750K bonus ?
    Is this correct ?
    where I used to work (MS), base would be ~200K and bonus would be ~400K. A double is normally the norm ?

  53. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:20 PM

    Look at it from the bright side, this is the last year you’ll get a bonus like this.

  54. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:21 PM

    what are first year associate numbers?

  55. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:22 PM

    5,000 after taxes…what in God’s name…

  56. Posted by Anal_yst | December 17, 2008 at 1:24 PM

    Goldman or wherever, must be nice to get any bonus at all (especially if your desk/group wasn’t exactly “profitable), methinks a little humility would go a long way…

  57. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:24 PM

    CS doesn’t report numbers until mid january

  58. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:25 PM

    Any color on stub or first full year associates much appreciated.

  59. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:26 PM

    @56 Most deluded comment of the entire thread. Things ain’t going back to “normal” any time soon, son.

  60. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM

    56 might have been being sarcastic. 2009 bonus will be even worse than 2008. There will be further 20% staff cut in 2009 as well. there is no going back to 2007 level

  61. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM

    holy shi*.. heard my MD got 2 mm.
    Ofcourse he is class..but isnt 2 mm a bit too much (in todays world) ?

  62. Posted by Suits | December 17, 2008 at 1:36 PM

    @63, maybe that was 56′s point.

  63. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:36 PM

    whats associates and VP numbers on trading desk?

  64. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

    holy shi* , MD seems to have got 2 mm.
    Ofcourse he is a class act, but isnt 2mm a bit too much in todays world ?
    – Treasury Guy

  65. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM

    #65 – I am your MD. Pipe down and get back to changing the bindings on those pitch books from white to black

  66. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:40 PM

    holy shi* , MD seems to have got 2 mm.
    Ofcourse he is a class act, but isnt 2mm a bit too much in todays world ?
    – Treasury Guy

  67. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:41 PM

    @65 – sounds extremely high – what desk?

  68. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM

    @65 – sounds extremely high – what desk?

  69. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:43 PM

    10 k i got more back in consulting. and pe bonusses are flat from last year at least at my sweet firm.
    bye now. PEB

  70. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:50 PM

    PEB, good luck on your carry

  71. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:53 PM

    How is it possible there are 75 posts and no credible information at all on this thread?

  72. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:54 PM

    How about stub year and first (non-stub) year associates in IBD?
    Read that BMO was 35k and 120k, respectively…would appear to be down 40%.

  73. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 1:55 PM

    Any hedge fund bonus numbers?

  74. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:00 PM

    MICHELE CABRERA’S TITS LOOK FANTASTIC TODAY!

  75. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:02 PM

    @78 Hedge Fund bonuses have been redeemed. Sorry.

  76. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:07 PM

    does anyone really know anything? how about one person with some knowledge lay out bonus rages by title… or not.

  77. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:07 PM

    does anyone really know anything? how about one person with some knowledge lay out bonus ranges by title… or not.

  78. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:14 PM

    nothing useful

  79. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:26 PM

    @81
    better yet, let’s lay out bonus ranges by social security numbers!..

  80. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:29 PM

    @81-83 Please refrain from reading/posting on DB.

  81. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:31 PM

    Hearing $135k for full first year associates in coverage.

  82. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:32 PM

    @Analyst – Nailed it. How someone who got an $80k bonus can say it’s “disgusting” regardless of what it was last year when people are losing their jobs daily is beyond me. I would gladly take an $80k bonus if you want to trade.

  83. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:35 PM

    @86, is that mid-point, top of class, etc – any idea?

  84. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:40 PM

    I-Bankers should participate in the following survey this year when it becomes available:
    http://www.wallstreetcomps.com/survey.asp

  85. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:40 PM

    Any numbers for Madoff prop traders?

  86. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:43 PM

    I-Bankers should participate in the following survey when it becomes available after January 1:
    http://www.wallstreetcomps.com/survey.asp

  87. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:44 PM

    @88 Sorry, no clue. I gotta think top though. Anyone have anything more?

  88. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:45 PM

    Any numbers for Madoff prop traders?

  89. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:48 PM

    @89,91,93. Fuck off

  90. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:51 PM

    @92, my guess is that’s not top – I heard MS was a range of $100-$150 and I can’t believe that MS is paying a premium to GS…
    Anyone???

  91. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:53 PM

    @92, my guess is that’s not top – I heard MS was $100-$150 and I can’t believe that MS is paying a premium to GS…
    Anyone???

  92. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:56 PM

    nope! don’t post anything! let these suckers wonder!!!

  93. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:57 PM

    Still waiting on numbers for Barclays Capital analysts. And btw, more analysts read DealBreaker than MDs, so yeah, some of us care.

  94. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:57 PM

    I’m looking to participate in a IB comp survey. Does anyone have a link to a site that would have such a thing?

  95. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 2:58 PM

    Still waiting on numbers for Barclays Capital analysts. And btw, more analysts read DealBreaker than MDs, so yeah, some of us care.

  96. Posted by carl spackler | December 17, 2008 at 3:00 PM

    @94 – I heard 15 to 20 ( as in years )
    Anybody know assistant greenskeeper numbers ?

  97. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:08 PM

    Too dealbreaker’y … didn’t read.

  98. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:14 PM

    96, 100-150k for 1st year associates for 2008? that doesnt seem like much of drop at all from 2007. you sure those numbers are right?

  99. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:17 PM

    @99 – You’re going to be waiting awhile if you’re looking for Barclays Capital. They won’t announce until mid-February…

  100. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:18 PM

    Isn’t “bonus” for Wall Street an oxymoron this year?

  101. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:19 PM

    @104,
    1st year associates received 250k last year (350 all-in)

  102. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:19 PM

    Sounds like a 25% to 50% drop…?

  103. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:22 PM

    @104,
    1st year associates received 250k last year (350 all-in)

  104. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:25 PM

    @99 – You’re going to be waiting awhile if you’re looking for Barclays Capital. They won’t announce until mid-February…

  105. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:25 PM

    @61 – well done.

  106. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:25 PM

    @109,
    350 all-in for fucking it all up. That’s great, Generation Entitlement.

  107. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:26 PM

    @87 – Do The Job. Live in Manhattan. Try to do both on an $80k bonus. It’s not like people work 9 to 5, Mon-Fri with an hour for lunch and 2 union-mandated 20-min smoke breaks and 3 weeks paid vacation per year. It’s high tension, high sacrifice, high risk, high reward, no matter how much you want to believe it’s a do-nothing job where people get $$ showered on them for showing up at cocktail parties. Plus, you generally have to have excelled academically for some time, since high school and even before in many cases, in order to even get to play.
    Go ahead. Point out the inevitable exception you know. Doesn’t make the generality less true. Just because you didn’t bust your ass since before high school to put yourself into a position to make that kind of money doesn’t make it less hard for people who did.
    “Peasants with Pitchforks”

  108. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:27 PM

    @112
    Generation Excellence

  109. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:31 PM

    Soft Dollar Operations @ MS- 2nd year. Got $150k, down 30%.

  110. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM

    @114,
    “Excellence” in fucking it royally up.

  111. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:36 PM

    @113, eat a dick. Remind me why you deserve a big bonus when your company lost $2bn this quarter?

  112. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:39 PM

    @113, do they teach government bailouts at these academically excelling middle school, high school and higher educations? i feel left out that i could not attend one of these schools that could train me to fuck up so bad that i had to have the United States Government come and bail me out. As you said, high risk high reward, could that not be viewed as high risk, high fuck up, low reward?
    -just a common peasant

  113. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:39 PM

    @117 For being more intelligent than you.

  114. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:40 PM

    @117
    “Because we make capital more efficient!” … It was a good racket while it lasted.

  115. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:43 PM

    @117, banks don’t pay their employees bonuses just because they feel like it. These are profit making organisations and pay bonuses to employees who they feel will benefit the firm and be profitable in the future.

  116. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:47 PM

    #113
    You landed the job of your dreams after busting your hump for endless hours each and every week for years and years. Guess what, the world has given you one big shit sandwich. Happens all the time to lots of job sectors. Banking was different for quite a long time. No more. If you don’t like it, look for another job in another line. I did.

  117. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:48 PM

    wow the level of bitterness is amazingly high, even for DB…
    memo to the non-financial people:
    “Bonus” does not equal “special reward for doing particularly well.” Depending on how high you are the the food chain, it equals something more like “2/3 of your overall compensation, which varies highly based on how well the firm/your group/you do”
    At an ibank, if you’re going to get paid 300k /yr, they don’t give you a 300k salary and say “if you’re really good we’ll give you a bonus”, they say “your base salary is 100k. in a good year, your bonus will be 300-400k. in a bad year it will be more like 100k. It will also be 50% company stock that will be locked up for 3 yrs min. Now go work 75 hour weeks.”
    By any reasonable standard, a normal/good year bonus is a lot of money, but a “you get $0 bonus” translates into “you get paid less per hour than the average plumber”
    No one’s asking you to weep for these folks, but the hatred could be toned down a bit…

  118. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:53 PM

    Also, don’t forget Analysts and Associates have almost nothing to do with the decisions that resulted in these huge losses – they are getting paid for long hours, hard work, intelligence and the significant investment required to get a foot in the door.

  119. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:53 PM

    @123: You’re correct – bonus is what keeps you going late at night, and $0 sucks – they deserve more than that. But the sense of entitlement for the huge bonuses is just as bad – I don’t care how much you work. There’s a happy medium. I’ve been there and chose to leave after realizing the system is broken. For every brilliant Ivy league grad who has made a lot of sacrifices to get there, there’s also a lot of middling losers who are only there because they have no life and don’t know how to stand up for themselves.

  120. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:57 PM

    @123: You’re correct – bonus is what keeps you going late at night, and $0 sucks – they deserve more than that. But the sense of entitlement for the huge bonuses is just as bad – I don’t care how much you work. There’s a happy medium. I’ve been there and chose to leave after realizing the system is broken. For every brilliant Ivy league grad who has made a lot of sacrifices to get there, there’s also a lot of middling losers who are only there because they have no life and don’t know how to stand up for themselves.

  121. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 3:59 PM

    @125
    It was a good racket while it lasted. Time to move on to the next gig.

  122. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:01 PM

    @125 (123 here)
    you’re correct, I was just trying to clear the air for the non-financial people who don’t know how things work(ed). Bonus “entitlement” is directly proportional to the pile of money you can point to at the end of the year and say “I made that.” No more, no less. the errors go both ways.

  123. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:02 PM

    @123, cherish the good years, the new cars, houses, whatever it was you picked up the past year ends, this year you shit the bed and wont get it, seems fair right? Its a risk, get paid big in the big years, get paid bad in the bad years, get shit in the shit years. no one feels bad for you, especiall not the plumber who probably lost his job bc the government did not bail him out.

  124. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:11 PM

    129 – there are plenty of people in finance losing their jobs and more. Who did the bailout actually save? No one at LEH, not a lot of people at Citi or MER, so tell me who? Although I agree with your point about enjoying the good years b/c it can never last, but who thought it would end so hard and so fast.
    If you enjoyed reading that last line, you’re welcome.

  125. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:15 PM

    Don’t you guys know? Plumbing is booming.
    Must be all these new houses being constructed!

  126. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:21 PM

    @130, you think the bailout money did not save jobs at banks, autos, insurance companies, etc? job cuts happened, but laying off 10% of your staff vs. bkrpt is not a bad deal. It is annoying to hear someone complain about getting a reduced bonus when there company takes 10b from the gov’t. You were paid when things were up, why you think you should also get paid when they are completely fucked? Hopefully you saved for a rainy day.

  127. Posted by Suits | December 17, 2008 at 4:25 PM

    113, you said it yourself. “High Risk, High reward”. You’re currently enjoying the risk side of that trade-off.

  128. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:43 PM

    Can someone please post ranges for associates and VPs?

  129. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:46 PM

    @133,
    It’s more like: “High bailout, High reward.” Get with the program.

  130. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:52 PM

    @113 You “bust your ass” since “before” high school to become a f*cking banker? Wow, hilarious and so very pathetic at the same time. Sucks to be you.
    -another humble peasant

  131. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:52 PM

    Very ugly out there. At what point do you throw in the towel and decide that its not worth it? 80 hours a week for something thats not terribly fulfilling is a lot of “life cost”, and without a big salary, how do you justify?
    http://freeagents.ning.com/profiles/blogs/free-agent-by-choice

  132. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:53 PM

    I got a $95k bonus last year and a $105k bonus this year. I’m certainly not complaining, but it’s all relative to expecatations so yeah, I’m annoyed not have received $125k.

  133. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:57 PM

    Hey, $5,000 is not going to pay for 1 night of drinks!
    –AJ
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0TGpe2KMUs

  134. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM

    @134:
    Who gives a fuck about associates and VPs? Oops, sorry, I forgot, this is DB.

  135. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 4:59 PM

    @136 – maybe it seemed like a better bet than the high school dropout / dot com millionaire route?

  136. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 5:01 PM

    Guys, I am confused. Please help me out. I work for a hedge fund (struggling this year) and all my friends at banks got laid off.
    When we say “30-40% cut” are we talking about cut from what one made last year or from the previous class?
    For example, let’s assume this:
    2007 bonus only
    1st yr assoc: 250k
    2nd yr assoc: 350k
    3rd yr assoc: 450k
    Now, we have a post up there saying 1st yrs this year got 150k. So let’s assume this:
    2008 bonus
    1st yr assoc: 150k
    2nd yr assoc: 250k
    3rd yr assoc: 350k
    If this is the case, then there is no pay cut in absolute terms. Only discount from what an equivalent seniority made last year. Am I interpreting data correctly? If this is the case then the dollar amount received is essentially flat from last year.
    Please comment

  137. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 5:10 PM

    @142 You have successfully confused the every poster

  138. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 5:14 PM

    @123/128 Thank you for the pedantry but contrary to what you think, us “non-financial people” on DB are not hicks/union-workers/plumbers who need to be schooled on the finer points of your compensation structure. I know exactly it works and how much you contribute to society working 80 hr weeks.
    -LeftWing.
    P.S You seem like a decent person, so no vitriol intended towards you.

  139. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 5:15 PM

    143, you must be a banker if you cannot understand simple logic like that.

  140. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 5:18 PM

    Oh, and no offence to the h/u-w/p etc.
    -144

  141. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 5:28 PM

    144, go make some more copies. Leave thinking to us derivatives traders

  142. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 5:29 PM

    Post 142 Translation: Does a “down 20%” comment mean :
    1) a given 3nd year who was a 2nd year last year received 20% less than he did last year
    2) 3rd years are receiving 20% less than what 3rd years did last year.
    Relative to self + 1 year advancement OR relative to class.

  143. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 5:29 PM

    sorry 144, meant for 143. -147

  144. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 5:44 PM

    Down 20% is describing classes, not people. It’s like saying “2nd year associates are getting 20% less this year.” So if you were a 1st year in 2007, in 2008 you are getting 20% less than what a 2nd year got in 2007.
    It is possible to be “down 20%” but still make more than you did last year. Depends on how much you and the class ahead of you made last year.

  145. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:06 PM

    Any relevant bonus comparison is based on a YOY cohort variance. Basic math kiddos…

  146. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM

    I’m a derivatives trader. I can’t read/type numbers properly.
    -147

  147. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:23 PM

    142 – wish you were correct with your interpretation but you are not. From someone who actually works at GS, in a profitable group, first full yr associates were down yoy vs own 07 numbers…so down an aggregious amount on a % basis from what the associates a class ahead of us got (which would have been much better). Sounds like MS analysts headline #s were a little higher but I assume that includes the weird cash vesting thing + stock. So on a cash basis we probably did the same or better at GS.

  148. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:28 PM

    @153 “egregious”
    Stick to words under 5 letters next time and very slowly work your way higher.

  149. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:28 PM

    “aggregious”…
    Something to do with farming perhaps?

  150. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:28 PM

    153 – So does that mean you did not get $150K? More like $100K? Over or under six figures?

  151. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:32 PM

    cant defend my spelling and wont try but glad we have some liberal arts majors on this thing

  152. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:37 PM

    156- Seems like the 1st yr associate bonus well below $150k on avg…..

  153. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:38 PM

    156- think your second guess is a lot closer to average than your first

  154. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 6:41 PM

    Yes because only liberal arts majors know how to spell words. Well, maybe home-schoolers too.

  155. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 9:35 PM

    The reasoning on why these people deserve bonuses is ridiculous. Selfish pricks 101.

  156. Posted by guest | December 17, 2008 at 10:28 PM

    associates who just finished their first full year havent done shit, 2008 was slow as balls, those who i speak about know its true…06 and 07 were fucking crazy, no time to breathe, 08 was a joke, so dont act as if you deserve tons of money, hours this year were ok and thats fact
    disclaimer: third year assoc talking

  157. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 1:07 AM

    @118
    @136
    @144
    Please get off Dealbreaker – why are you “Main-Streeters” reading a thread for bankers? I and all the other bankers on this thread know why you’re here: you’d never make the cut for investment banking, and you know it, and you’re trying to make yourself feel better. We see your type all the time, spewing hate and self-righteous anger out of all your middle-class, corporate-job pores. Seriously, isn’t it embarassing to be so obvious and ignorant?
    I’ll let you in on the secret: all the bankers on this thread, no matter what seniority, no matter how mad/pissed/offended we are by what our shitty bonuses are this year, know that at the end of the day we made the cut and our careers will continue to rock. Yes, it’ll hurt for a few years but even a “bad” bonus year = money that people like you can only dream of making. So go ahead, tell us how we suck, blah blah blah. Then get in your Camry and go home. Supper’s waitin’ for ya. Don’t miss the commuter train!

  158. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 1:15 AM

    163 I’d be interested in hearing why your career is going to be rocking. Looking forward I see a few lean years with regard to revenue. Doesnt matter that you survived the cut. The golden days are over. There was an internet bubble then a housing bubble. Unless you think of a new scam, theres not gonna be much revenue to share.

  159. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 1:57 AM

    @163
    too douchey – didn’t read

  160. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:07 AM

    Enough with the 80 hours weeks. You know its mostly face time as well as a badge of honor among your peers, esp in this market where nothing is happening. Its as simple as this: if your firm or dept doesnt make money, you dont deserve a bonus. Doesnt matter that a large % of your comp is bonus. Thats just how the game works. What you produced had no value if it didnt generate revenue.

  161. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:26 AM

    Don’t forget the fact that when bankers got paid generously in the good days, they also paid substantial amount of taxes. In absolute amounts, the top 10% of wage earners paid 65% of all federal taxes. Taxes paid by a first year analyst in ’06 were likely higher than what most of the “Main-Streeters” made as all-in income. The money that the banks received from the Treasury was mostly not paid by you. It was never YOUR tax dollars. Seriously, why are you here?

  162. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:34 AM

    @166 – As bad as 2008 has been, both GS and MS came out in the green for the year. So by your criterion they do deserve a bonus. Suckers.

  163. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 5:36 AM

    fuck you all. lawyer baller here

  164. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 5:56 AM

    @136 – after you got the last Wall-Mart Greeter application, what was there left to do?

  165. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 8:48 AM

    You all are idiots. Please don’t lie about and inflate your numbers on a thread like this. You’ve heard what MS is doing this year (for associates, at least)??? Total 2008 comp is 50% of 2007 comp. As in, if your base in 2007 was 100 and your bonus was 120, then your total for 2007 was 220 and therefore your total 2008 comp is 110. Meaning, YOU GOT A BONUS OF 10,000 BEANS OVER YOUR BASE.

  166. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 9:06 AM

    168 The reason that they’re “in the green” is that they’ve cut comp (i.e. salary and bonus) significantly. Jezz, is that so hard to understand? Comp is such a big part of expenses that, through the bonus process, it gets manipulated to make sure that the firm makes money.

  167. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM

    @169 – “lawyer baller”
    Wow.

  168. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 10:19 AM

    @169 – I sincerely hope that you, “lawyer baller”, are not in corporate law. Because your day will come, son… very soon. Your entire existence relies on the finance industry. Feckless nitwit.

  169. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 10:33 AM

    CS said to use illiquid securities to pay bonuses!
    How about this…

  170. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 10:34 AM

    LOL . imagine getting this bonus from CS.
    Credit Suisse to Use $5 Billion of Illiquid Assets for Bonuses
    2008-12-18 15:19:20.118 GMT
    By Christine Harper
    Dec. 18 (Bloomberg) — Credit Suisse Group AG’s investment
    bank has found a new way to reduce the risk of losses from about
    $5 billion of its most illiquid loans and bonds: using them to
    pay employees’ year-end bonuses.
    The bank will use leveraged loans and commercial mortgage-
    backed debt, some of the securities blamed for generating the
    worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, to fund
    executive compensation packages, people familiar with the matter
    said. The new policy applies only to managing directors and
    directors, the two most senior ranks at the Zurich-based company,
    according to a memo sent to employees today.
    “While the solution we have come up with may not be ideal
    for everyone, we believe it strikes the appropriate balance among
    the interests of our employees, shareholders and regulators and
    helps position us well for 2009,” Chief Executive Officer Brady
    Dougan and Paul Calello, CEO of the investment bank, said in the
    memo.
    The securities will be placed into a so-called Partner Asset
    Facility, and affected employees at the bank, Switzerland’s
    second biggest, will be given stakes in the facility as part of
    their pay. Bonuses will take the first hit should the securities
    decline further in value.
    Credit Suisse said earlier this month it would eliminate
    5,300 jobs and cancel bonuses for top executives after it had
    about 3 billion Swiss francs ($2.8 billion) of losses in October
    and November. Unlike larger Swiss rival UBS AG, Credit Suisse
    hasn’t received a government rescue. Banks and securities firms
    are struggling to pay employee bonuses after taking more than
    $800 billion of losses on mortgages and corporate loans.
    Outside Investors
    Credit Suisse is the first to use the debt to pay employees.
    Outside investors may also be permitted to invest in the
    facility, according to the people familiar with the matter, who
    declined to be identified because the plan hasn’t been made
    public. The bank will boost the potential for returns by
    providing leverage to the facility, and will be paid back first,
    according to the people.
    Leveraged-loan commitments on Credit Suisse’s books fell to
    between 2.5 billion Swiss francs and 3 billion francs by the end
    of November from 11.9 billion francs at the end of September,
    Dougan said on a conference call on Dec. 4. He said the bank had
    also “somewhat reduced” its commercial real estate positions.
    Credit Suisse had 12.8 billion francs in commercial mortgages at
    the end of September.
    Fund Management
    Assets in the facility will remain on Credit Suisse’s
    balance sheet and will be held in the company’s fund management
    division, the people familiar with the plan said. The new
    structure will mean that any mark-to-market losses or gains on
    the assets will be offset by identical gains, or losses, on the
    bank’s liability to employees.
    Employees will receive semi-annual coupon payments on their
    investment in the Partner Asset Facility at the London Interbank
    Offered Rate plus 2.50 percentage points. The ultimate value of
    the facility will be determined over the next eight years as the
    loans and securities mature or default, the people said.
    “Cash payments representing distributions of a portion of
    the award may be made to participants in the future contingent on
    the performance of the underlying assets,” Dougan and Calello
    said in the memo. “Cash distributions will not be made for
    several years.”
    The bank said it expects to begin annual payments after five
    years.
    While Credit Suisse doesn’t say how many managing directors
    and directors work at the investment bank, the number is in the
    thousands.
    Credit Suisse said it will also change the cash portion of
    bonuses for all of the bank’s managing directors and for
    directors in the investment bank. Under the new system, the bank
    will have the right to recoup some of the cash bonus in the two
    years after it’s paid if an employee resigns.

  171. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 10:39 AM

    LOL . imagine getting this bonus from CS.
    Credit Suisse to Use $5 Billion of Illiquid Assets for Bonuses
    2008-12-18 15:19:20.118 GMT
    By Christine Harper
    Dec. 18 (Bloomberg) — Credit Suisse Group AG’s investment
    bank has found a new way to reduce the risk of losses from about
    $5 billion of its most illiquid loans and bonds: using them to
    pay employees’ year-end bonuses.
    The bank will use leveraged loans and commercial mortgage-
    backed debt, some of the securities blamed for generating the
    worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, to fund
    executive compensation packages, people familiar with the matter
    said. The new policy applies only to managing directors and
    directors, the two most senior ranks at the Zurich-based company,
    according to a memo sent to employees today.
    “While the solution we have come up with may not be ideal
    for everyone, we believe it strikes the appropriate balance among
    the interests of our employees, shareholders and regulators and
    helps position us well for 2009,” Chief Executive Officer Brady
    Dougan and Paul Calello, CEO of the investment bank, said in the
    memo.
    The securities will be placed into a so-called Partner Asset
    Facility, and affected employees at the bank, Switzerland’s
    second biggest, will be given stakes in the facility as part of
    their pay. Bonuses will take the first hit should the securities
    decline further in value.
    Credit Suisse said earlier this month it would eliminate
    5,300 jobs and cancel bonuses for top executives after it had
    about 3 billion Swiss francs ($2.8 billion) of losses in October
    and November. Unlike larger Swiss rival UBS AG, Credit Suisse
    hasn’t received a government rescue. Banks and securities firms
    are struggling to pay employee bonuses after taking more than
    $800 billion of losses on mortgages and corporate loans.
    Outside Investors
    Credit Suisse is the first to use the debt to pay employees.
    Outside investors may also be permitted to invest in the
    facility, according to the people familiar with the matter, who
    declined to be identified because the plan hasn’t been made
    public. The bank will boost the potential for returns by
    providing leverage to the facility, and will be paid back first,
    according to the people.
    Leveraged-loan commitments on Credit Suisse’s books fell to
    between 2.5 billion Swiss francs and 3 billion francs by the end
    of November from 11.9 billion francs at the end of September,
    Dougan said on a conference call on Dec. 4. He said the bank had
    also “somewhat reduced” its commercial real estate positions.
    Credit Suisse had 12.8 billion francs in commercial mortgages at
    the end of September.
    Fund Management
    Assets in the facility will remain on Credit Suisse’s
    balance sheet and will be held in the company’s fund management
    division, the people familiar with the plan said. The new
    structure will mean that any mark-to-market losses or gains on
    the assets will be offset by identical gains, or losses, on the
    bank’s liability to employees.
    Employees will receive semi-annual coupon payments on their
    investment in the Partner Asset Facility at the London Interbank
    Offered Rate plus 2.50 percentage points. The ultimate value of
    the facility will be determined over the next eight years as the
    loans and securities mature or default, the people said.
    “Cash payments representing distributions of a portion of
    the award may be made to participants in the future contingent on
    the performance of the underlying assets,” Dougan and Calello
    said in the memo. “Cash distributions will not be made for
    several years.”
    The bank said it expects to begin annual payments after five
    years.
    While Credit Suisse doesn’t say how many managing directors
    and directors work at the investment bank, the number is in the
    thousands.
    Credit Suisse said it will also change the cash portion of
    bonuses for all of the bank’s managing directors and for
    directors in the investment bank. Under the new system, the bank
    will have the right to recoup some of the cash bonus in the two
    years after it’s paid if an employee resigns.

  172. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 11:31 AM

    I bet young guys at MS/GS wish their bosses could be as innovative as CS.

  173. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 1:59 PM

    Who cares about analysts? They’re cannon fodder.

  174. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:01 PM

    Who cares about analysts? They’re cannon fodder.

  175. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:06 PM

    @169 “lawyer baller”
    Ha! Lawyers are not ballers. Ever. Lawyers are custodians.
    Guess how many bankers spend their time reading a lawyer thread?
    Zero, even in this market. ‘Nuff said.

  176. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:06 PM

    @169 “lawyer baller”
    Ha! Lawyers are not ballers. Ever. Lawyers are custodians.
    Guess how many bankers spend their time reading a lawyer thread?
    Zero, even in this market. ‘Nuff said.

  177. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:08 PM

    3rd yr associate bonuses are around $150k

  178. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:12 PM

    @169
    Ha! Lawyers are not ballers. Ever. Lawyers are custodians.
    Guess how many bankers spend their time reading a lawyer thread?
    Zero, even in this market. ‘Nuff said.

  179. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:16 PM

    @169
    Ha! Lawyers are not ballers. Ever. Lawyers are custodians.
    Guess how many bankers spend their time reading a lawyer thread?
    Zero, even in this market. ‘Nuff said.

  180. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM

    Just remember….”They are kind of a big deal”

  181. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:35 PM

    I think 183 is about right. If headcount is similar and total comp pool is down 50% then you will have to make 50% less than last year?
    I hear larger % than usual is in stocks that vest over 5 years. is that the case for even VPs and Associates?

  182. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 2:57 PM

    Everyone needs to calm down. The numbers are bad, but not awful. They will be worse next year. And yes, working in finance IS different than working a regular job.

  183. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 3:03 PM

    I agree with 188. 2009 will be worse than 2008. 2010 might be worse than 2009 even. There will be a paradigm shift in finance compensation for good.

  184. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 4:28 PM

    technology first year analysts (joined mid 2007) at GS got no increase in base and less than $6k bonus. that’s almost the same bonus as last year (when our pro-rated numbers came to about that).

  185. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 4:47 PM

    190, Stub should have been about 20k for analysts? that’s still about 11k after tax isn’t it?
    Dont mean to be too technical. Just want to make sure I understand the story right.
    I have been hearing GS people getting about 50% cut from what they received last year. Considering people have been getting about 30% increase yearly the past few years, that is about 70% lower than what they would have received this year under 2007 environment.
    But then 2008 and going forward will not resemble 2007

  186. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 5:04 PM

    191, pretty sure that was either
    a. a joke
    b. he works in IT
    c. he has no clue what he is talking about

  187. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 5:18 PM

    #190 here.
    191 – the answer is b unfortunately. :(
    We got 5-6K each (so around 3-4K after tax), and we hear it was roughly the same all round in tech for our year.
    Which pretty much sucks for us.

  188. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM

    #165
    If you didn’t read it, then how did you know if it was “douchy” (in your elegant prose) or not?
    See, that’s the kind of weak mental arithmetic that sent you to Chico State in the first place.

  189. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 7:32 PM

    From the grapevine, 2nd year GS analyst (class of ’07): 15-30k (“full year”) so about 8-15k prorated. They moved to the stub system to get on cycle with everyone else.
    I guess this is what 2nd years at other banks have to look forward to in june.

  190. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 8:09 PM

    #194
    Have you seen the chicks at Chico State? Thats why I went there.
    -Chico State Coed Baller

  191. Posted by guest | December 18, 2008 at 10:35 PM

    How much did the technology VP’s make this year ?

  192. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 7:42 AM

    How much did 2ns year Associates in Word Processing make this year?

  193. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:35 PM

    heard that top brass in FICC got 100% in stock

  194. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 4:41 PM

    200th

  195. Posted by guest | December 20, 2008 at 12:31 AM

    controllers got 2k

  196. Posted by guest | December 24, 2008 at 10:43 AM

    $700-900k bonus for GS VPs sounds high. Citi at $400-600k in 2007. Is there that much of a differntial in talent? Not sure what to believe on this tread. Maybe GS is where it is at…

  197. Posted by guest | December 24, 2008 at 11:22 AM

    @ 188,189
    Are we sure that bonuses for 09 are going to be worse than 08 across the board? For example, I have talked to people at BB S&T desks who have had record years (FX and Commodities) and their bonuses are only down 15-20% and expect bonuses to be back to ’07 levels in 09 and better than ’07 in 2010.
    Given that the write-downs are over and LIBOR is coming down, won’t the earnings environment for IBD and S&T be better in 09 than in 08?

  198. Posted by guest | December 27, 2008 at 8:21 PM

    2008 Wall Street Comps Survey
    Dear Colleague,
    We are pleased to announce the launch of the Third Annual Investment Banking Compensation Survey (http://www.wallstreetcomps.com/survey_enter_data.asp).
    This survey is to keep you and your peers informed about the compensation trends in the industry. The resulting compensation report will be free and will break down compensation by title, location, groups and banks.
    The survey should take approximately one minute to complete. Individual submissions are anonymous and kept strictly confidential. No personal data is required and the data is used on an aggregated basis only. The survey will only remain open until the end of February, so please participate as soon as you are able to do so. Results will be released around mi March.
    Even though previous participations were already high (available for free download at http://www.wallstreetcomps.com), more submissions will result in more statistically relevant data points from which to draw comparisons and insights. Additionally, we strive to diversify our participant base across firms and tenure. You can help to meaningfully increase the value of the survey by participating and by encouraging your friends and colleagues to participate. The power of the survey is in the depth of participation.
    Thank you.
    The Wall Street Comps team
    Webmaster@wallstreetcomps.com
    http://www.wallstreetcomps.com

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.