• 19 Dec 2008 at 11:59 AM

Deeper and Broader

FGG’s due diligence process is deeper and broader than a typical Fund of Funds, resembling that of an asset management company acquiring another asset manager, rather than a passive investor entering a disposable investment.
[...]
“Operational risk” refers to the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, human resources, or systems, or from external events. Operational failures, including misrepresentation of valuations and outright fraud, constitute the vast majority of instances where massive investor losses occur. Other operational risks include staff processing errors, technology failure, and poor data.
Pricing models, as well as the adequacy, independence, and transparency of valuation procedures, contingency plans, and other trading and settlement procedures are all matters for close scrutiny by FGG professionals.
FGG seeks a sound understanding of whether a hedge fund possesses key controls in the areas of portfolio management, conflicts of interest, segregation of duties, and compliance. FGG carefully assesses the controls and procedures that managers have in place and seek to determine actual compliance with those procedures, often suggesting modifications, separations of responsibilities, and remedial staff additions.

Excellent diagram after the jump.


fgg_due_diligence.jpg
Fairfield Greenwich Group Due Diligence [fggus.com]
Beat Us To It [Long Or Short Capital]

Comments (30)

  1. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:01 PM

    one

  2. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:03 PM

    At least credit longorshortcapital, they had it up yesterday.

  3. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:05 PM

    hahaha… Spitzer was fucked in the ass by Madoff… The Spitzer clan had a bad weekends at Bernies…

  4. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM

    @2- people still read that site?

  5. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:09 PM

    It seems to me that they didn’t do a damn bit of any of these things in the wonderful wheel.

  6. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:10 PM

    I strike again!
    -Charles Darwin

  7. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:21 PM

    The finance community should layoff all the people who have been responsible for retarded charts like this over the years that do nothing but waste coloured ink.

  8. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 19, 2008 at 12:28 PM

    WOW, Chrysler is like a fucking crack whore. They can’t even wait to get their welfare check, before they blow the money, they’ve gotta get a pay day loan advance on their welfare check.
    HA!
    Cerberus says it will put $2 billion from Chrysler Financial into Chrysler’s auto operations to backstop the loan Chrysler is due to get from the Treasury Department. – WSJ
    When Genius Failed II: The great race to the bottom, The Gerbil vs. The Triple Headed Dog
    (three heads, no brain)

  9. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:30 PM

    @2 DB is famous for stealing OPM without hat tips. It is an organizational thing started by Carney that is now too ingrained to ever leave.
    With that said, they do usually do a good job aggregating stories although i’m still disappointed that they haven’t run a story/pictures about former playmate Maria Checa who was involved in the Devlin/Bouchareb insider trading ring.

  10. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:30 PM

    that is so awesome.

  11. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:33 PM

    that wheel is hypnotic…..
    ……yes I will send all of my money to Bernie….

  12. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:35 PM

    @8, Lemmiwinks?

  13. Posted by AJ | December 19, 2008 at 12:35 PM

    Why do I feel like these guys are bigger scumbags than Madoff?

  14. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM

    Of all of eight actions…..FGG did zero.
    What the hell were they getting paid for? It is like a no show job in Latin America, you only show up to take the check……

  15. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:55 PM

    Is that spermatoza attacking the EGG Team?

  16. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 12:55 PM

    Look out the window, bitches, and go home. It’s snowing!

  17. Posted by miami | December 19, 2008 at 12:57 PM

    That is a photo of a Ponzi scheme taken from above right?
    The money flows from the wider bottom up through the donut hole of $$$ already stolen by the people at the top.
    It’s perfect.

  18. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 1:01 PM

    #13 u are right. They are like the clients who use the crooked lawyers who use the crooked private investigators who use the crooked insiders. They knew and they hope they are insulated. It is a very common game.

  19. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 1:03 PM

    @9 I was wondering the same thing. There are enough douchebags + 1 playboy model in that story to make it DB-worthy. Wonder why it wasn’t picked up. Money involved was peanuts compared to Madoff I guess.
    http://www.all-photos.net/pictures/d/100727-2/Maria+Checa+picture+a10.jpg

  20. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 1:21 PM

    SPEAKING OF DEEPER AND BROADER
    I got your mom a pajamagram, and well, we all know where it went from there, fuckers

  21. Posted by Anal_yst | December 19, 2008 at 1:24 PM

    So, let me get this straight, FGG specialized in what, exactly, besides egregious bullsh!t?

  22. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 1:24 PM

    @9- you have to be joking…db is the place people come to rip shit off (bberg, dealbook, clusterfuck). also? i sent db the link to the fgg link. and i didn’t get it from long or short.

  23. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 1:25 PM

    …my two cents…i was turned down by FFG because my strategy wasnt “out of the box”!

  24. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 19, 2008 at 1:40 PM

    Rick Wagoner, Hank Paulson and George W. Bush.
    Harvard Business School has got to get nervous having its whole alumni brain trust all in the same place at the same time. What if a nuke goes off? Who could save capitalism, without the HBS A-Team?

  25. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 1:41 PM

    That chart looks like the work of a consultant.

  26. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 2:24 PM

    @24 don’t forget that Big Ben is Harvard alum as well. May not be the B school but close enough.

  27. Posted by shiphouse | December 19, 2008 at 9:07 PM

    @27 – You are the fucking joke. Granted the FOFs that were invested in Madoff should be ashamed of themselves because they obviously did not do any real work, however, many FOFs do perform the real work and avoided this guy like the plague. It is evident that if you do work at a hedge fund you do not understand the importance of FOF’s, at a minimum they provide capital. Somewhat essential to running your business don’t you think?

  28. Posted by guest | December 19, 2008 at 11:38 PM

    FoF’s are unsustainable. I agree with 27. I work for an endowment. I don’t need to pay the layer of fees on the FoFs. there is not a fund in the world that I can’t access directly now.
    And sure they may not all have had Madoff, but plenty had Bayou, Zwirn, Whitebox, Stewardship etc…

  29. Posted by guest | December 20, 2008 at 1:08 PM

    I would argue that FoF’s in their current incarnation are unsustainable; fees are currently too high for what the FoF’s are supposed to bring to the table. I would see them turning into shops creating bespoke portfolios for institutions/ultra high net worth individuals. The weak ones (bad management, shitty decision making, finger-in-the wind due diligence) will crumple and pass away, or get their distressed portfolios bought out at cents on the dollar by the survivors.

  30. Posted by guest | December 22, 2008 at 1:25 AM

    There are some interesting Madoff updates and takes on due diligence in this blog. Kind of funny:
    http://thecreativedestructionist.blogspot.com/

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.