Picture 319.png
He’s one of the last CEO’s to decide whether or not he’ll accept a few mill this year (or rather one of the last to be told by the board whether or not they’ll toss him a bone). On the one hand, he’s BANKER OF THE YEAR! And shouldn’t that title come with some perks, other than the satisfaction of knowing he’s the least loser-y of the losers? On other other, Bank of America did receive money from the government, and you know how Andrew Cuomo et al feel about executives of those special firms getting zilch. Plus the whole, possibly overpaying for Merrill sitch. So!


And more importantly:


Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (41)

  1. Posted by Private | December 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM

    Ken deserves a bonus, that acquisitions BOA made may not look great now, but will make BOA a powerhouse in the next year and into the future, and Ken should definitely be awarded for the moves he has made.

  2. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 11:48 AM

    100mm Spirit Points

  3. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 11:49 AM

    His bonus should be a half gallon of bojangles sweet tea and a sense of shame from the impending hickification of the thundering herd

  4. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:03 PM

    maybe a few jars of mayo, store brand tho, no brand name stuff

  5. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:08 PM

    In this thorny issue, I propose a compromise: K to the L gets a bonus, but he gets it all in BAC stock and slightly used corporate jets.

  6. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:25 PM

    He should have a retroactive clawback applied.

  7. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:31 PM

    Give the guy a bonus, does anyone realize that a good portion of tax revenue comes from these bonuses that get paid out to the big wigs? Its a no win situation for the tax payers. Although, I like the spirit point idea ;-)

  8. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:35 PM

    No way will he get a bonus. the B of A board will never expose themselves to that.
    It would NOT surprise me if he got something mid-year next year, though. Some options grant, etc. Nothing says a bonus must be paid in December. They’ll wait 6 months. Too hot a potato right now.

  9. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM

    give him Tim Gill as a man-slave

  10. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM

    7- this is why NYC is goign to look like the set from The Warriors in a year- gotta get back to Coney boppers…

  11. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:39 PM

    @3- No blueberry biscuits!? Damn, you’re cold

  12. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:39 PM

    Can spirit points be deducted?

  13. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 12:50 PM

    Somali pirates shopuld violate his booty

  14. Posted by NAS Keflavik boi | December 10, 2008 at 1:01 PM

    @ 10 — Back in ’77, NYC WAS the set for “The Warriors”. It REALLY did suck that much back then, and yes, those days are returning.

  15. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 1:04 PM

    Bonus?! BAC is down 60% YTD… since when did we lower the bar for “good performance” to “the company hasn’t declared bankruptcy”?!

  16. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 1:09 PM

    this man is clearly made of Spam…reminds me of a Chicago broker I once knew.

  17. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 1:22 PM

    Give him treasury shares vested for 10 years. He doesnt mind.
    Or does he?

  18. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 1:22 PM

    The only one that sucks the least is Jamie Dimon…he got fire sale prices for Bear Stearns and WaMu.

  19. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 1:39 PM

    Since when does mediocrity get rewarded? No bonus KL…

  20. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 2:07 PM

    I’d give him some out of them money stock options. He did three major, potentially transformational deals this year that will make the stock price go up (ML, Countrywide, and the China bank) or he didn’t. If he didn’t, he shouldn’t get paid extra cash. If he did, he deserves to be put in the Jamie category.
    Whether anyone wants to admit it or not, MER was the best acquisition of this whole finance yard sale spree in terms of best-in-class at anything. Bear? Not best in class, when the story finally gets told it will be about how they got a cheap new headquarters a bit closer to the subway. WAMU? Good deposit base, sure, but not exactly something that has value beyond that. Countrywide wasn’t a good idea, and I have no idea on the China increased stake thingy, but it’s hard to think that demographically long term that will suck. People have wanted the MER brokerage network for two generations, and it has never been available. Ken gets it–yes, he overpaid, but this is a pure example of a unique asset. You won’t find anyone in financial services who doesn’t think it’s the best asset of its kind.
    Throw him a fricken’ bone, people.

  21. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 2:07 PM

    Spirit points are taxed like ordinary income.

  22. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 2:13 PM

    1 year ago RBS paid $100 billion for ABN Amro.
    For this amount, one could now buy:
    Citibank $22.5 billion
    Morgan Stanley $10.5 billion
    Goldman Sachs $21 billion
    Merrill Lynch $12.3 billion
    Deutsche Bank $13 billion
    Barclays $12.7 billion
    And still have $8 billion in change……for which one would be able to pick up GM, Ford, Chrysler and the Honda F1 Team
    BofA looks great using this comp

  23. Posted by Tapecracker | December 10, 2008 at 2:16 PM

    @22
    Holy shit dude… awesome post

  24. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 2:31 PM

    22 – if you’re going to blatantly re-post something from a month ago, dont do it to a dynamic post where the facts change on a minute by minute basis
    Citi – $44bln now
    MS – $14
    rest..who cares, not enough time

  25. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 2:31 PM

    nice post 22
    prob. best to hold on to the 100 billion

  26. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 2:32 PM

    15 – You’re absolutely right. If you argue that you deserve it in the good years, you have to take the hit in the bad years. He’s the leader and the stock has tanked. If the purchases work out, then pay him when they work out, not now. Total joke what these mediocre CEOs expect.

  27. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 2:55 PM

    Ken Lewis will eventually be revealed as a guy in way over his head– for example, when he fumbles the ML integration, after overpaying in the first place. He has already been working hard this year to destroy the USTrust franchise, and his conumer banking and credit card businesses are so poorly run that they are alienating customers every day

  28. Posted by Goldman Sachs Neophyte | December 10, 2008 at 4:30 PM

    Lewis does not deserve a bonus, though I want him to get one anyways. Though he will not recieve one. Also, he definately overpaid for Merrill. I want Lewis to get a bonus and in a surprise move…give half of his bonus to Thain!When I mean give, I mean I want Lewis and Thain to go to a BofA branch and have Lewis wire transfer the money to Thain. It would be even better if Gasparino was standing beside them on the phone with his “sources”.
    PS: the only two CEO’s that deserve a bonus, though they want get one are: Lloyd C. Blankfein (of course) and Jamie Dimon.
    - that guy from Goldman Sachs (a.k.a.: TGFGS)

  29. Posted by Goldman Sachs Neophyte | December 10, 2008 at 4:34 PM

    Lewis does not deserve a bonus, though I want him to get one anyways. Though he will not recieve one. Also, he definately overpaid for Merrill. I want Lewis to get a bonus and in a surprise move…give half of his bonus to Thain!When I mean give, I mean I want Lewis and Thain to go to a BofA branch and have Lewis wire transfer the money to Thain. It would be even better if Gasparino was standing beside them on the phone with his “sources”.
    PS: the only two CEO’s that deserve a bonus, though they want get one are: Lloyd C. Blankfein (of course) and Jamie Dimon.
    - that guy from Goldman Sachs (a.k.a.: TGFGS)

  30. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 7:36 PM

    isn’t the stock down 60+% this year? no spirit points can subsidize the shareholder value he has destroyed. credit card portfolio is going to blow up next.

  31. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 8:10 PM

    Lewis is a dangerous CEO who is doubling down at the risk of the shareholders, the employees’ future and now the taxpayer’s money. If you think that he deserves a bonus, then my guess is that you think BAC has nothing to do with the current situation. I believe he deserves a bonus…a severence check.

  32. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 8:12 PM

    BofA and MER are both awful. They will fail together.
    Have they revoked summer offers of MER folks yet from IBD? I heard of a buddy who got his yanked this week.

  33. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 8:33 PM

    Would you give a bonus to the CEO of Chrysler if he was buying GM and Ford thinking he is buying market shares? or would you say that this is just insanity?

  34. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 8:34 PM

    Lewis should be required to give Pandit a tutorial on negotiating a merger at a fair price and in good faith.

  35. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 10:43 PM

    Ken Lewis is a clown; despite his time at finishing school to polish his outward appearance and lingering chip on his shoulder, he does not have the horsepower to operate in the league he now finds himself in, nor do his NCNB confidants. While I would be happy to be proven wrong, he has made his own bed with the collection of acquisitions he lobbied for / completed in the recent past (as a disciple of Huge McColl, he certainly has never seen a deal he doesn’t want to do), and my guess is that he shits it in grand fashion. No bonus for Ken.

  36. Posted by guest | December 10, 2008 at 10:57 PM

    @11,
    They are called bo-berry biscuits.

  37. Posted by guest | December 11, 2008 at 9:33 AM

    Ken Lewis needs to take that money (if he receives any) and use it to keep his freaking employees. This Goliath is going to get too big and it seems to me that he’s going to piss off quite a few people. When he needs them to come back…that bridge will have burned and poor poor Ken Lewis will be left sucking his thumb in the corner with his half-gallon of sweet tea.

  38. Posted by guest | December 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM

    urtak.com is really cool, too.

  39. Posted by guest | February 10, 2009 at 5:33 PM

    I’m sorry Ken Lewis is an embarrassing example of a “banker”. His legitimacy and his credibility is as farcical as his face is ugly. He’s literally the last guy I’d like to have a beer with, he deserves a boogers.
    signed,
    too lazy to create a damn account just to pewst

  40. Posted by guest | February 10, 2009 at 5:33 PM

    I’m sorry Ken Lewis is an embarrassing example of a “banker”. His legitimacy and his credibility is as farcical as his face is ugly. He’s literally the last guy I’d like to have a beer with, he deserves nothing but boogers.
    signed,
    too lazy to create a damn account just to pewst

  41. Posted by guest | March 11, 2009 at 10:52 PM

    Just in case he doesn’t get a bonus, I’ll send Ken Lewis the my severance package that I got when I lost my job in November…oh wait, I didn’t get a severance package. Oh well, no soup for you Ken, but at least you got to keep your job.
    I could send Ken the signing bonus that I got when I accepted the offer for my new job…oh wait, I still don’t have a job. My special thanks to Ken and his peers for screwing up the economy and job market so bad that I can’t find another job.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.