The best financial tabloid readers in the world (that’s you) aren’t buying Goldman’s Made-off denial. Some of the comments we’ve gotten include:
“Guess my memory of 7 years ago isn’t what it used to be. They are being disingenuous though. They did extensive due diligence on Tremont repping other buyer, side by side with Oppenheimer. Their buyer, Rabo or ABN, made multiple offers before dropping out.”
“Goldman is full of shit. Their client put multiple bids in. What a bunch of hacks.”
“Either Mr. Du Vally was not around in 2001 or he is misinformed. Goldman’s client made several bids on Tremont before Opp. won the bidding. They lost they auction – they were an active bidder.”
“I think Goldman is engaging in a bit of revisionist history. This is too bad because it is an easy lie to catch them in.”
We quote, you decide.
First!
-perez
First Bitches! #5 eats my holiday ass.
SPODE
his (hilarious) bbg biog says he’s only been there since ’04
THIRD!
No – I meant first.
Damn.
GS is trying to hide something.
G I G O
FIRST!
Great @1, 2 & 4 – Glad to see you attempting to count. Here let me help you: @2 – you’re second. @4 – You’re fourth.
There, I feel better.
The fundamentals are sound!
Thank you,
Michael DuVally,
Golden Sacks
Lets all act shocked that GS has many things to hide.
Firsty!
Mike Duvally, “Goldman Sach did not have due diligence relations with the that firm…”
@8
Cut the revisionist clap trap. We know who’s first.
We can now add the word Du Vally to the DB lexicon, as in Goldman’s 2nd Q results laid another steaming Du Vally.
Fourteenth!
@12 – You’re right, as long as Goldman looks foolish, everybody wins. I like that.
I thought Du Valley was an importer / exporter.
can’t find on BB… therefore he doesn’t exist
Wait, I thought GS employees weren’t allowed to read/comment on DB. Why is it that these GS-related posts generate a disproportionately high amount of comments?
@19- Because the server is in the Ukraine.
Wow, Goldman has Madoff on its face.
@19 – Because GS assclowns like DuVally say stupid shit.
@19- have you noticed they’re all about how gs sucks and likely aren’t coming from inside gs?
Was the author being sneaky on purpose or not:
Possibility #1: Showing posession (could be read “The Memory of Goldman is being challenged”)
Possibility #2: Making a statement (could be read “Goldman is memory challenged”)
I choose #2!
I’ll give the author the benfit of the doubt.
@24:
Shut up and go back to studying for the GMAT.
Don’t work @ GS
- the new killin it
Not working @ NYC
-the new killin it
@26
Working at GS is the new equities in Dallas.
This is how the Internet is changing how business is done and what people deserve or don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Because Monica Noel says they live in a “cottage” and her kids went to public school – debunked. Because Goldman lackey says GS’ client did not bid on FGG – debunked. All in a matter of moments. 10 years ago, it would have taken an investigative reporter and a lot of effort to get the “real” story out. Awesome.
@29 2002 called. It wants its punchlines and “paradigms” back…
@30
The ’90s called. They want their tired and lazy joke structure back.
@31
The jerk store called and they’re running out of you!
@32 I had sex with your comatose wife.
@32
Make like a tree and leave.
Does anyone know if Du Valley fishing is expensive? What if I run into a good salesman?
@32 LMAO
Du Vally, girl.
Gag me with a spoon.
Totally.
@32 TITS or GTFO
@33 Michael Richards called. Andrew Dice Clay wants his unfunny bone back.
Last!
A lot of marketing individuals i know lookup for #tags associated towards the niche after which hope that within 3 days they will abide by them and if not, un-follow them. This will help grow your network of twitter followers, if you use this technique, you may want a separate personal twitter account.