House Approves Auto Bailout Bill (AP via NYT)
237-170, roll call here.
Cox Takes Capitalistic Stance (Reuters)
There's been quiet a bit of talk lately about whether or not the U.S. government can gracefully retreat from the positions it's taken in various corporate entities, and moreover, whether it will seek to do so. Cox taking an important step, namely the first one, in leading us to believe that the Government does in fact have ever intention of actually withdrawing:
"Cox said if prolonged, this will threaten private ownership, which is directly tied to America's dedication to individual freedom and its rise to being a global superpower.
"Maintaining the arm's length relationship between government, as the regulator, and business, as the regulated, is essential," Cox added."
Occasionally hearing the patently obvious from the people drawing their salary from tax dollars isn't a bad thing: it reassures us that they do in fact understand the patently obvious.
Swiss Bank Cuts Rate To 0.5% (Bloomberg)
"The Swiss National Bank's Governing Board in Zurich, led by Jean-Pierre Roth, lowered the three-month Libor target by 50 basis points, matching the median of 18 estimates in a Bloomberg survey. The rate for borrowing francs for three months in London was at 1.14 percent yesterday."
AIG Announces Possible Delay In Asset Sales (Reuters)
AIG CEO Liddy is looking to slow down the firm's current plans to sell off $152B worth of assets world wide. The issue is one of timing: (roughly) the same shit that got AIG into this mess is creating an environment whereby AIG can't sell its units for anything resembling fair market value - the liquidity issues and capital requirements are causing firms that would normally bid to sit quietly.
Goldman To Change Retirement Rules (FT)
Goldman's retirement formula has worked like this: You get restricted stock that vests over a three year period (you get to keep it if you leave, vested or not) as a majority of your bonus. If you age and years of service combine to 55 (40, 15 years with the company, etc) then your stock vests immediately on retiring. Goldman is upping the "Rule of 55" to 60 after this year - thus gently prodding some of the more Sr. members of the staff to the door.
It could be worse: they could be telling you to just get the fuck out.
Morgan Stanley To Post Second Quarterly Loss Of The Year (Reuters)
For the second time this year MS is expected to post a quarterly loss, with analysts expecting the loss to be "as high as $1.15 a share, or nearly $900 million". According to Fox-Pitt, Kelton analyst David Trone, the quarterly loss can mostly be attributed to "$4.3 billion in private equity losses and fixed-income write-downs, partly offset by an accounting gain from the falling value of its debt".
Shrinkage Is Often Difficult To Deal With (Bloomberg)
According to Eurekahedge Pte the global hedge fund industry lost $64B in November, owing $18B to pure market losses and $46B to redemptions. The YTD across funds (including redemptions) is only down 13% however, leaving one to believe that some managers are handling their shit a little better than others.
IEA Warns Of Substantial Oil Cuts (FT)
OPEC is threatening to make substantial cuts in the production of oil during their next meeting, as oil demand is expected to contract for the first time in 25 years. While cuts would most certainly push barrels a little higher, a good point is made:
"But many argue that until Opec shows it is better adhering to the 2m b/d cuts it has already announced, the market is likely to see any announcements of further cuts as empty rhetoric and prices are likely to fall."
--William Richards






Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:20AM
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. will this week lay off as many as 250 European staff, with most cuts coming in London, according to two people close to the situation, as part of a plan to reduce its global work force by 10%.
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:21AM
doesn't raising the number to 60 make it harder for people to retire?
Posted by NAS Keflavik boi , Dec 11, 2008 8:26AM
@ 2 -- yes I think it makes it more difficult to get the benefit -- It looks more like an AIG-like "golden handcuffs" incentive to force people to stick around
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:26AM
Not if the change is effective at some point in the future and you can leave under the 55 rule before that time.
Encourages people that qualify for 55 and not 60 to leave.
Posted by Seaman Bodine , Dec 11, 2008 8:31AM
f this - start the cliff ass thread again
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:31AM
#4 is wideclops
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:39AM
#5 id Seaclops
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:43AM
Shrinkage is terrible to deal with! all you guys know what i'm talking about, you had to much to drink, think you feel fine, take the bitch home, undress her, reach for your steel and...nothing...
So painful..
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:47AM
Hi, Bess... Under the heading "Moral Outrage,", this might interest you...
http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/12/how-sam-zell-and-tribune-management-screwed-employees
In particular:
"...Sam Zell financed the buyout deal partially by borrowing against the employees pension plan and using this money to buy them stock."
Un-Effing-Believable.
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:51AM
@9
you shouldn't be 'morally outraged' at Zell for trying, but at the board for accepting it...
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:51AM
#5 is Suckman Bodine
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:52AM
Moral? I don't.. understand..
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:54AM
The Senior Employees were on the accelerated 25-year program. Now they just have nothing left to give.
http://despair.com/retirement.html
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 8:55AM
Annus horribilis, the hedge fund edition:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/12112008/gossip/pagesix/tv_sage_caught_in_illicit_kiss_143571.htm
Posted by Seaman Bodine , Dec 11, 2008 9:15AM
@11
wazzup? did your girl give you HPV? i'm sure she didn't mean to suck that dude's cock.
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 9:16AM
@10, great point...sounds like Zell read from the book of Gekko
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 9:18AM
@15
wazzup?!? what are you, an original member of NWA?! fo shizzle, clown
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 9:21AM
http://www.nypost.com/seven/12112008/business/hedger_asness_flames_blog_over_layoff_it_143683.htm
Posted by bittergreen , Dec 11, 2008 9:37AM
"You're too old you 40 old long toothed bastard. Get out!"
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 9:44AM
@16 consider it a professional disease, i work in pe..
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 9:50AM
(this is @9)
Well, I'm outraged that messing with a pension plan (promised future earnings) is not wholly illegal. It shouldnt be veiwed as a company asset, it should be viewed as an *employee* asset held in trust by the company.
Zell should be ashamed for thinking of messing with it, the board should be held liable for *actually* messing with it.
And I do acknowledge that in a free market, 'all's fair'... but it might be noted that Zell wasn't acting 'on behalf of his shareholders, in their best interest,' he was acting on his OWN behalf. He has no 'fiduciary responsibility' behind which to hide.
Returning to proper Dealbreaker etiquette:
People who mess with pensions suck ass.
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 10:20AM
@20, @ 16 here, touche'
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 10:28AM
Not being snobby here, but it is hard to take this writing seriously when the author uses "you're" multiple times when it should simply be "your."
Once, I can understand -- typing fast and get it wrong. Many times -- you clearly do not know how to use language. It's pretty basic.
Posted by guest , Dec 11, 2008 10:44AM
Short any country whose central bank head is named "Jean-Pierre".