Color us surprised. Citadel has frozen withdrawals in their two largest funds until March (for starters).

Investors who asked to withdraw money at year end from Kensington and Wellington, with a combined $10 billion in assets, won’t be allowed to, the Chicago firm said in a letter on Friday. Otherwise, $1.2 billion would have come out, complicating Citadel’s attempt to resuscitate its performance following its hedge funds’ worst-ever year.
The move follows repeated assurances from Citadel that redemption requests wouldn’t pose a problem. The firm’s total assets have shrunk to about $13 billion from $20 billion at the start of the year. Mr. Griffin says in the letter that “in today’s highly volatile markets, maintaining financial flexibility must be a priority.” (Emphasis ours).

Well, I suppose the redemption requests did not actually pose a problem. For Citadel, that is.
Citadel Freezes Its Funds Through March [The Wall Street Journal]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (67)

  1. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 8:47 AM

    0wned!
    i thought they were invincible???

  2. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 8:48 AM

    Put a fork in him: he’s done.
    How’s that IPO thingy workin’ out for ya, Toastboy?
    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

  3. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 13, 2008 at 8:52 AM

    How To Make $13bn In The Stocks Market
    by Ken Griffin
    Start with $20bn
    The End.

  4. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 9:53 AM

    First!

  5. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 10:02 AM

    “OMG they killed Kenny”
    “You bastards!”

  6. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 10:22 AM

    “Visionary organizations don’t chase the impossible; they focus on extending their reach to achieve the possible. We don’t let up in the face of challenge, and we don’t call it a day when an answer isn’t readily at hand. Relentless effort, relying on our teammates and colleagues, and remaining open to unconventional solutions are the keys to the Citadel approach.”
    -Kenny G (not the musician)
    I’ll throw down a challenge that needs an unconventional solution Kenny: Would it be possible to get that $1.2b by reducing your exposure?

  7. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 10:23 AM

    2 weeks ago they said they had 7bn in excess cash, now they cant meet the 1.2bn redemption request, sounds like a collapse or maybe worse…is ken related to madoff?

  8. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 13, 2008 at 10:30 AM

    By the way EP your fixed fortification thesis is retarded. You’re leaving out all of the attacks, skirmishes and wars that never took place because the fixed fornications acted as a sufficient deterrent.
    Of course no strategy works perfectly but to suggest fortifications have no value is ludicrous. Its the classic “CIA Problem” the failures are easily remembered the success we never even know about.
    That said the Gerbil is still a moron, and his original convertible arb model he stole in the first place.

  9. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 10:38 AM

    No price is too high for fixed fornications

  10. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 11:27 AM

    @7,
    They’ve got plenty of cash, they just don’t want to give it back.

  11. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 11:49 AM

    I think the problem is that the cash supplies are getting so low that if they allow redemption Ken will no longer be able to go for his daily money swim.

  12. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 11:52 AM

    @8 – Two words for you: Maginot Line.
    You might earn more respect from your comments if you refrained from throwing around insults.
    “Retarded,” indeed.

  13. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 13, 2008 at 12:04 PM

    @12:
    and i need respect because…..?
    Yes, the maginot line was a poor fortification. The fortifications around Byzantium were not. These examples neither prove nor disprove anything. Of course you can find examples of success or failure for any tactic. However, the most successful fortification is the one so imposing as to discourages the enemy from even contemplating attacking at all.
    P.S. Fuckface.

  14. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 12:06 PM

    Hey, I was just reading this interesting commentary by a registered financial advisor that his on cnbc and bloomberg alot http://thefinanceprofessor.com/welcome.php?article_id=78

  15. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 12:06 PM

    Have others noted that J. Ezra Merkin was wiped out by Madoff scam. Merkin is the Chairman of GMAC, and deeply involved in Cerberus buyouts of Leumi bank and other deals. The 1.3 Billion in Merkin’s Ascot Partners LP is “gone” in his own words as substantially all of it was with Madoff.
    Highpower Houston attorneys for Merkin’s coinvestors are studying litigation against Merkin. Merkin’s other funds and investments are obviously at risk for complete redemption and liquidation.
    If Merkin goes down, Cerberus will be tugged along by the backwash as the 3 headed dog are co-investors in so many deals. The Madoff wealth destruction will take Chrysler out.

  16. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 12:08 PM

    In the age of JDAMs and Bunker-Busters, you fail.

  17. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 13, 2008 at 12:16 PM

    discourage
    p.p.s. And as such the most successful fortifications are the ones which are least likely to be first to mind , since no major battles were fought there at all. Hadrian’s wall comes to mind.

  18. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 12:24 PM

    @15, great point. Is there a master list of victims yet? EP should consider starting a thread where the list is expanded on. The news is going to be full of these events dribbling out for days and weeks.
    The market most likely will have a sell mode in it, as people exit what is left of their market exposure after deducting Madoff lost exposure.
    If you had 75% of your fund with Madoff, you can not allow your last 25% to be exposed to the market. Lots of formally wealthy people are going to have to cash out of the markets in the next few weeks.

  19. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 1:38 PM

    Unrelated:
    Why does Goldman Sachs Asset Management have the shittiest fund performance I’ve ever seen?

  20. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 1:56 PM

    @19 because it’s just a place to dump all of the bad trades done in the partners’ investment vehicles.
    Goldman IPO goes bad? Have the GSAM funds buy it above the offering price.

  21. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 13, 2008 at 2:04 PM

    @20
    True that. Same thing for PIA

  22. Posted by carrytrade | December 13, 2008 at 2:18 PM

    @2, good point on the hedge fund IPOs. But there are more! FIG, OZM…they’re all looking real good. And who was one of the lead hedge fund bankers making millions in the process? Erin Callan, of course (who also coincidentally exercised her LEH options above 20 cents). Not that I believe in conspiracy theories…
    http://deltahedged.com/

  23. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 3:16 PM

    @3
    hilarious

  24. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 3:41 PM

    so the real question is whether they will continue to clip their management fee during the next three months on the 1.2 B which isn’t leaving?

  25. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 3:45 PM

    Ford will do okay once GM and Chrysler go under. It won’t be pretty. Ford has been the least retarded of the three, and deserves to live.

  26. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM

    Anybody beside Paulson making money in this market?

  27. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 4:03 PM

    @24, also unlike most funds, Citadel charges all their expenses to their funds. So the investors left are getting hit with approximately twice the amount of expenses compared to a year ago.

  28. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 4:47 PM
  29. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM

    Don’t follow all you brainiacs who apparently went to War College.
    I;m just hoping they pull a Masada.

  30. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 5:06 PM

    @28…too long; didn’t read

  31. Posted by Billy Ray Human | December 13, 2008 at 5:14 PM

    I love the tag, EP.

  32. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 5:28 PM

    Stefan Judisch
    BIOGRAPHY
    Mr. Judisch seems to have been demoted to the Chief Commercial Officer (Supply)(what?)) of RWE Supply & Trading GmbH, a wholly owned subsidiary of RWE AG. Founded in April 2008 as a merger of RWE Trading GmbH, the RWE Gas Midstream is the number six of about eight by volume in the European gas supply business, the company manages the RWE Group’s international energy procurement and wholesale energy trading activities. He once tried as a to work in banks but now finds utility business a better change for his suitability.

  33. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 13, 2008 at 5:53 PM

    Fuld, still in denial…. the only “firm” he’s going to be associated with is the firmness protruding from his cell mate. Plus I thought he hated “fucking bankers”. Why doesn’t he use is sweet commercial paper trading kills and start a money market fund.
    The Financial Times
    Fuld weighs comeback with advisory boutique
    By Francesco Guerrera
    Dick Fuld, the former chief executive of Lehman Brothers, is planning a comeback and has told friends he might launch a small advisory firm to harness his contacts in US companies once the dust settles on Lehman’s bankruptcy.
    People close to the situation said Mr Fuld’s plans were neither firm nor immediate because the legal and political fall-out from Lehman had still to play out.
    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5022fd98-c89a-11dd-b86f-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1

  34. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 6:05 PM

    Storm the Citadel!

  35. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 6:16 PM

    Aux armes, citoyens,
    Formez vos bataillons,
    Marchons, marchons !
    Qu’un sang impur
    Abreuve nos sillons !

  36. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 6:24 PM

    Perhaps we should say that fixed fortifications in the age of gunpowder are a monument to the stupidity of man.

  37. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 6:37 PM

    lol @35
    Axes flash, broadswords swing
    Shining armors’ piercing ring
    Horses run with polished shield
    Fight those bastards ‘til they yield
    Midnight mare, blood red roan
    Fight to keep this land your own
    Sound the horn and call the cry
    How many of them can we make die?
    Follow orders as you’re told
    Make their yellow blood run cold
    Fight until you die or drop
    A force like ours is hard to stop
    Close your mind to stress and pain
    Fight ‘til you’re no longer sane
    Let not one damn cur pass by
    How many of them can we make die?
    Guard your women and children well
    Send these bastards back to Hell
    We’ll teach them the ways of war
    And they won’t come here anymore
    Use your shield and use your head
    Fight ‘til everyone is dead
    Raise the flag up to the sky
    How many of them can we make die?

  38. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 7:35 PM

    What about Garrison Capital?

  39. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 7:46 PM

    Fortress Investments?

  40. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 8:16 PM

    Access International – 1,400 mil
    Fairfield-Greenwich – 7,500 mil
    Private [Merkin] – 1,800 mil
    Santander Banque – 3,091 mil (US)
    Lappin Charitable – 8,000 mil
    Union Bancaire Privee – 844 mil (US)
    Notz, Stucki & Cie – 928 mil (US)
    Kingate Management – 2,800 mil
    Yeshiva University – ???

  41. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 8:40 PM

    I’d like to see Palm Beach Country Club file for bankruptcy. I’m looking for for a piece of oceanfront property that runs all the way to the ditch… everyone knows the real money in palm beach is at the glades club

  42. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 10:07 PM

    Griffin = douche

  43. Posted by guest | December 13, 2008 at 10:28 PM

    guess the merkin co-investors were not as well covered as they thought …

  44. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 5:03 AM

    JAMIE DIMON JUST BLEW A LOAD OF WARM, STICKY CUM ON KEN GRIFFIN’S FACE. KENNY BOY IS SWALLOWING THE LITTLE SEMEN THAT IS TRICKLING INTO HIS MOUTH FROM JAMIE DICK.
    AFTER THIS DIMON IS GOING TO BEND KEN GRIFFIN OVER, LUBE HIS OWN DICK WITH KY-SELECT, AND THEN PROCEED TO THRUST DEEP INTO KEN GRIFFIN’S ASS THEREBY BUGGERING HIM.
    FUUCK KEN GRIFFIN. HE’S TOAST.
    JUST A MATTER OF DAYS BEFORE CITADEL BEGINS AN ORDERLY LIQUIDATIOON!
    BOOYAH BOOYAH KAHSA… YAY YAY YAY!!!

  45. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 5:26 AM

    @44
    Fuck you.
    Ivanka Trump

  46. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 8:34 AM

    If merkin goes down my crotch will be bare

  47. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 8:58 AM

    Citadel freezing redemptions? I can guarantee you that wealthy investors are smelling Ponzi everywhere and want to take their cash now.

  48. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 14, 2008 at 9:48 AM

    GIMLI
    Helm’s Deep! They flee to the mountains when they should stand and fight. Who will defend the LPs if not their Gerbil?
    ARAGORN
    He’s only doing what he thinks is best for his investors. Shorting volatility has saved Helm’s Deep in the past.
    GANDALF
    There is no way out of that ravine.
    Griffin is walking into a trap. He thinks he’s leading them to safety. What they will get is a massacre. Griffin has a strong will but I fear for him.

  49. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 10:29 AM

    Jimmy Cayne needs to start a fund.
    I’d invest.
    He’s probably great at bridge financing.

  50. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 11:46 AM

    I would be hiring a few armed bodyguards right about now, if I was Ken.

  51. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 12:04 PM

    Who audits Citadel? Firm name?

  52. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 12:22 PM

    @49
    Awesome.

  53. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 12:25 PM

    @ 51, lets hope it was not Friehling & Horowitz…

  54. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 12:41 PM

    @53…agreed. But who does audit Citadel.

  55. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 12:52 PM

    @54
    PricewaterhouseCoopers

  56. Posted by VOL IS KING | December 14, 2008 at 12:57 PM

    @55
    Who were worldcom’s auditors? Seems to me auditors do as they’re told.

  57. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 1:19 PM

    @56
    Arthur Andersen LLP (RIP)

  58. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 1:32 PM

    Somehow, the market is going to be up tomorrow.

  59. Posted by Madmartigan | December 14, 2008 at 2:53 PM

    I guess its true, monkeys do pick stocks better than professionals.

  60. Posted by guest | December 14, 2008 at 4:00 PM

    @58 Wouldn’t be surprised at all if that happens. Treasury yields near zero and equities meandering higher. Truly a bizzaro world.

  61. Posted by Anal_yst | December 14, 2008 at 9:22 PM

    While I don’t necessarily agree, but is it a surprise that Auditors don’t always find the problems until after its too late, especially when there is an intent to deceive, which is when they’re needed most?
    Those perpetrating the crimes often know the business better than the auditors, know the firm better, blah blah yadda yadda…

  62. Posted by Franrose O | December 15, 2008 at 1:29 AM

    The mortgage and consumer credit giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, were given enormous stimulus packages a couple months ago in order for them to stay afloat during the hard hits of the recession. In Washington DC on Tuesday, December 9th, the mortgage firms were subject to a hearing by the House Oversight Committee where they were grilled by Congress over their corporate strategies that led to the near destruction of their companies. What had apparently happened was that the leadership of those companies had invested in mortgage backing for their cash flow. So they basically bought other people’s debt, thinking that it meant instant cash flow, especially when they raised the interest rates on the mortgages that they purchased. Borrowers who had borrowed money from irresponsible lenders started defaulting on their loans, thus, the companies that had bought their debt began to stagger towards the brink. House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman called their action irresponsible, especially after senior risk managers had questioned the call to make and invest in such loans. This shocking incident emphasizes the importance of being extremely responsible with your finances. Budget properly, practice smart spending habits, save money, and don’t put money into anything that looks too good to be true. If you need some help with a sudden emergency expense, payday loans are available at a reasonable rate to keep your finances above water until your next payday. Click to read more on Fast Payday Loans.

  63. Posted by guest | December 15, 2008 at 2:56 AM

    Redemptions are 12% of AUM, their cash position is 25-30%, so what is the justification for gating? Evidently they don’t have the excuse of shielding remaining fund investors from fire-selling assets at bargain-basement levels…all redemptions can be met with cash

  64. Posted by guest | December 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM

    @46 – Don’t worry, at least I got it.

  65. Posted by guest | December 15, 2008 at 11:36 AM

    61 Yes, in cases where the fraud is complex. Here two very simple rules were violated: the person investing the money shouldn’t be responsible for 1) holding the assets 2) measuring performance. The fact that there was no independent trustee (holding the assets and measuring performance) was enough for some to walk. A lot of others were apparently charmed by a personal relationship or some felt kinship as a result of being fellow alta kockers.

  66. Posted by guest | December 15, 2008 at 11:41 AM

    Amen, #63. I don’t understand this action…how can any fund manager not be prepared for 10%ish type redemptions? There are three scenarios which make me think that something is rotten in Denmark (or Chicago in this case). 1. Kenny G needs to suspend redemptions in order to not trip covenants with his Prime Brokers or derivative counterparties who would have the right to unwind (descend like vultures) if his NAV (withdrawals PLUS percentage decline) was greater than say 50%, which is right about where it would be now on a gross basis (fees charged to investors make the net worse than this gross, most people estimate that Citadel’s historical fee level was around 7-8%). 2. Same theory, but applied to their public debt 3. The nefarious one–HIS MARKS ARE WRONG! Even though he can pay his redemptions out of cash, doing so would make the cash cushion so small that if he were to actually mark his positions properly at year-end, he’d be toast.
    The more I think about it, the more I think it’s likely: Kensington and Wellington are gone. Game over, Ken. No joke.

  67. Posted by guest | December 15, 2008 at 1:39 PM

    The auto industry will be viable by March. Maybe this will all blow over by then.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.