• 07 Jan 2009 at 1:03 PM

Bonus Watch: Morgan Stanley

Picture 513.pngThough we were pretty sure the cannoli surprise back in October was intended to be a hint as to what employees at Morgan Stanley could expect come bonus time, it seems as though John Mack has come through yet again for the Mackettes. The following numbers are apparently confirmed, for “a blend of industry and product bankers” (they do not include base pay, and it’s unclear what the mix of cash vs. deferred cash vs. stock is). According to one of the happy government workers at 1585, “I was surprised how high they came out, but given who’s left (the A-team), not surprising that they are being taken care of.”


Picture 512.png

Comments (68)

  1. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:07 PM

    I’ll take the cannoli

  2. Posted by Lowly Assistant | January 7, 2009 at 1:10 PM

    Get off the cross; we need the wood.

  3. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:11 PM

    seems high…

  4. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:12 PM

    rough gig getting those numbers

  5. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM

    why not just screw everyone below MD, especially given taxpayer involvement? it’s not as if they would jump ship in significant numbers (given that all ships are sinking)… adverse selection not a concern here

  6. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM

    why not just screw everyone below MD, especially given taxpayer involvement? it’s not as if they would jump ship in significant numbers (given that all ships are sinking)… adverse selection not a concern here

  7. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:15 PM

    VP’s are pretty tight within tiers YoY

  8. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:18 PM

    A year from now number will be half that.

  9. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:21 PM

    This is versus what last year? Are these numbers half/a third/a quarter of what people used to get?

  10. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:21 PM

    these numbers are too high.

  11. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:22 PM

    these are wrong

  12. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:22 PM

    Danny Deutsch, Alcoa, BoA, Merrill and now Julie Alexandria of WallStrip…where will the madness stop?

  13. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:22 PM

    these are wrong

  14. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:24 PM

    i’d heard ms bonuses trumped gs’s this year, these numbers seem legit.

  15. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:26 PM

    @5
    You can’t screw the people who actually do the work. We’ll just make them look like an uneducated jack asses in the next meeting.

  16. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:27 PM

    what ever happened to bonuses based on how much cash (no not profit, CASH) you generate, like, you know how things work in the real world.
    I look forward to the day when all of these guys get shorted out of existence.
    I’m doing my part to fuck their forex desks………how about you

  17. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:30 PM

    what were last year’s #s ?

  18. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:30 PM

    i call bs.

  19. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:32 PM

    @17 – good luck with that. Aim for the holes where the monitor wires go down to the outlets . . .

  20. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:32 PM

    what about stub??

  21. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:42 PM

    not a chance these are real numbers

  22. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:42 PM

    by way of comparison–Feb 08 bonuses for top tiers at bulge brackets:
    1st yr assoc-$275k
    2nd yr assoc-$350k
    3rd yr assoc-$450k
    1st yr vp-$550k
    2nd yr vp-$650k
    3rd yr vp-$800k
    So the Feb 09 bonuses are down 30-50% from the peak a year ago, which makes sense given how many layoffs there have been as well

  23. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:44 PM

    Skeleton we are so close, but you have got no body so why do you insist on wearing clothes?
    BULLSHAT

  24. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:48 PM

    Skeleton we are so close, but you have got no body so why do you insist on wearing clothes?
    BULLSHAT

  25. Posted by Anal_yst | January 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM

    These seem pretty high imho, but wtf do I know

  26. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:51 PM

    Those aren’t dollar amounts it’s the number of MS shares they get.

  27. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:52 PM

    Getting cannoli’s for bonuses is the new killing it

  28. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:57 PM

    Is it possible that this year “top tier” means top 5-10% vs. 30% last year (or whatever the exact numbers are)? Just a thought.

  29. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:09 PM

    These numbers are BS! The top tier is close but no cigar….below top tier they got paid waaaaaay less……

  30. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:17 PM

    Posting from my sweet sidekick II in the poohouse @ 1585. The #’s above are BS. Legit data below:
    1st yr assoc- 1 blumpie
    2nd yr assoc- 2 handies
    3rd yr assoc- 3 a-rapes

  31. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:25 PM

    Does anyone know what Prime brokerage CSR’s get?

  32. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:27 PM

    these are confirmed. sucks to be gs, i guess.

  33. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:29 PM

    @16 cute kid. I like your spirit.

  34. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:31 PM

    These are accurate

  35. Posted by cy | January 7, 2009 at 2:35 PM

    17-
    Can you please explain exactly what you’re doing to “fuck their forex desks?” Unless you’re the treasurer of a multi-national corporation, a central banker, or in charge of an 11 figure hedge fund, I don’t deem this to be likely. However, I’m always ready to learn something.

  36. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:40 PM

    these are right

  37. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:48 PM

    What’s the breakdown of these figures? Anyone know yet… what is cash/stock/deferred, etc.

  38. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:50 PM

    What’s the breakdown of these figures? Anyone know yet… what is cash/stock/deferred, etc.
    My bonus this year was that my firm still employs me… :(

  39. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:51 PM

    What’s the breakdown of these figures? Anyone know yet… what is cash/stock/deferred, etc.

  40. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:54 PM

    Crap….sorry for the triple post.

  41. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM

    Bonuses?? Interesting! Where I work in MS we didn’t get 2 cents!!We were told all the blah, blah about what a tough year we were having. Not a single cent in a raise or a bonus. Nice to know that MY tax dollars are helping out.

  42. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    Anyone have info on what GS 1st year associates got?

  43. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    @43 – El Shafto!

  44. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 4:05 PM

    These seem low

  45. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 4:09 PM

    Cannoli is for closers!

  46. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    What percent of people move from one tier to another from year to year? It would suck to go from top tier one year to middle tier the next year and take a pay cut despite giving another year of your life.

  47. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM

    These numbers are too low. Reality is that they were a bit higher.

  48. Posted by miami | January 7, 2009 at 4:44 PM

    MS has a forex desk?
    Isn’t that a little like saying Jimmy Cayne was a hard worker?
    I guess captive hedgies gotta trade with someone.

  49. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM

    WHAT ABOUT STUB???

  50. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM

    WHAT ABOUT STUB???

  51. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 5:00 PM

    @42 – IT doesn’t count.
    ~LexSteelz

  52. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 5:13 PM

    Wow. Good to see our tax dollars at work.

  53. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 5:18 PM

    What is base pay for these government-subsidized prima donnas?

  54. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 5:21 PM

    Stub bonus at MS was $25k… and GS stub was a healthy $5k

  55. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 5:22 PM

    Stub bonus associate at MS was $25k… and GS stub was a healthy $5k

  56. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 5:29 PM

    Seems tooo high. Doubt these numbers. After having taken TARP money this just seems ridiculous if they are true.
    Having a job is the bonus in this environment!

  57. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 5:32 PM

    To those saying these are too high… they may not be “nuclear winter” levels but are well below what some boutique firms paid this year.

  58. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM

    @58, maybe not “well below” but can verify boutiques are paying very well this year.
    1st yr boutique associate here, bonus is $140K (and yes, base salary is same as BB).

  59. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 6:27 PM

    @59 A first year bonus of $140k qualifies as “very well”? That number sounds more like “down 50%”.

  60. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 7:11 PM

    Here come the “P-w-P” comments again . . .

  61. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 8:17 PM

    wrong wrong wrong..
    not to mention the tier distribution shifted most to low tier

  62. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 8:17 PM

    wrong wrong wrong..
    not to mention the tier distribution shifted most to low tier

  63. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 9:58 PM

    @55/56
    GS changed their analysts to align with everyone else – the figure you have is a stub first year ANALYST who has been on the desk 3 or 4 months. Not really comparable with your MS figure…

  64. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 10:22 PM

    There is not a chance at all that these numbers are correct. Always was curious like #32 to find out what the PB reps pull though…anyone know

  65. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 10:37 PM

    @65- have you asked someone at ms? then obviously you really have no idea if they’re correct or not.

  66. Posted by guest | January 8, 2009 at 10:11 AM

    i’m curious what PB reps pull in too!! Anyone got any clues??

  67. Posted by guest | January 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM

    60 – I would say 140K is “very well” THIS year, most BBs won’t pay that much in bonuses for a 1st year associate.
    Sh*t is down and f*cked up all over…

  68. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 9:57 AM

    @52 – NOT in IT

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.