I'm not saying definitively that Charlie Gasparino's latest column for the Daily Beast can be chalked up to excessive consumption of Italian delicacies, such as sopressata and braciole, which, while delicious, are filled with toxic nitrates that when OD'd on can cause imbalances in the brain, but I am saying it's a possibility. According to Chaz, boy toy CEO Jamie Dimon is going down. But let's backtrack for a sec. There are apparently a few reasons why JPMorgan is the current king of the Street. They include the fact that Bearpont Morgan Mutual's team fucks up the least ("[JPM's] management team is among the most competent group of people you're going to meet on Wall Street"), because Dimon really gets this shit ("he reads balance sheets and understands just about ever nook and cranny of the investment business") and because not unlike Joey from the neighborhood, he'll take the time in the middle of the day to crack your testicles. Sayeth Gasparino:
...the main reason JP Morgan is on top is Dimon...maybe most of all [because] he's a ball buster. "Some people don't know how to take Jamie because in the middle of the day, he'll call you up and break your balls asking you a million questions about your business," said one former Dimon manager. "And it works. You get to know your business better and where the bodies are buried. And if you don't like it, you can leave, and he'll get someone else who does."
Nice work if you can get it, but, according to Chaz, Dimon is losing his grip and fast. CG, of course, qualifies his bold statement significantly, but that's neither here nor there:
Yet for all of his acclaim, skill, and accomplishment, Jamie Dimon is set for a fall. Not a fall on the scale of Lehman Brothers' Dick Fuld or Bear Stearns' Jimmy Cayne. But a fall that will put into question his current status as the King of Wall Street.*[...]
Dimon is feeling that heat...from analysts, who believe his firm will post a lost this quarter, the first since he became CEO in 2006; from fellow CEOs, who believe he took advantage of competitors during the height of the financial crisis in mid-September; and now even some of his own board members, who believe their straight-talking CEO spoke a little too straight in a recent CNBC interview when he described in graphic terms the problems facing JP Morgan and the rest of the financial business. Following Dimon's remarks, which he then repeated in a speech, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell nearly 200 points, and shares of JP Morgan were among the biggest losers, tanking nearly 10 percent.
We would never for a second suggest that CG was wrong for fear of busted knee-caps, but it seems there may be a chance his judgment is being clouded (by smoke originating from a grav-bong):
Already I hear the schadenfreude picking up: When I asked one Wall Street CEO to assess Dimon's performance he pointed to the nearly 40 percent drop in JP Morgan shares since the beginning of the fourth quarter. This executive believes JP Morgan will now join other banks and experience problems beyond the fourth quarter and well into next year as credit card debt, student loans, and other debt on the bank's balance sheet begin to falter. "The market is telling you something is wrong," the executive said. "The stock market is saying one thing, and his image in the press is saying something else."
*This is beautiful, really, because the "fall" is now defined as anything from just short of running a bank into the ground to tripping down the steps of 270 Park and then looking around quickly to see if anyone noticed.






Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 9:42AM
JPM is a minion of the Federal Reserve. Dimon failing? maybe as a long shot, but JPM, ha!! Whattayugot! Nutin'!
CNBC off to a good start on sensationalism for 2009...
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 9:45AM
I smell b.s. I wouldn't at all be surprised if this "Wall Street CEO" assessing Dimon's performance was none other than one of Goldman Sachs. Yes, please, let's all try to take down JPM now by decimating investor's trust. Where have I seen this shit before?
Screw them, Dimon's the shit.
Posted by VOL IS KING , Jan 05, 2009 9:49AM
Dimon went to HBS, therefore its only a matter of time before he runs JPM into the ground. Its a law of nature.
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 9:59AM
Bess - Welcome Back and Happy New Year. You have been missed - BADLY!
Posted by Lowly Assistant , Jan 05, 2009 10:01AM
"[...]can be chalked up to excessive consumption of Italian delicacies, such as sopressata and braciole, which, while delicious, are filled with toxic nitrates that when OD'd on can cause imbalances in the brain, but I am saying it's a possibility."
Alright, what's the o/u on Chuck sleeping upside-down using le bowflex, like batman?
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 10:04AM
can someone please photoshop some handcuffs and an orange jumpsuit on Dimon in that picture?
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 10:32AM
Why is he wearing U.S. Marine Corps cufflinks? Hello? Someone?
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 10:32AM
Why is he wearing U.S. Marine Corps cufflinks? Hello? Someone?
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 11:00AM
No nitrates in braciole. Let's get the important details right.
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 11:10AM
There is no question that Jamie's policies on increasing costs of clearing crushed the investment banks to his own benefit and they are trying to get back at him. He took advantage of the weakness of the banks and dramatically increased their clearing haircuts thus squeezing their already impaired liquidity positions.
It can be argued that it was Dimon's moves that pushed ML into the arms of Band of America, and also knocked Lehman out. Apparently in the Fed meetings that fateful weekend (and this was confirmed by people within JPM), Mack referred to Jamie to his face as a "F------ bastard" when Jamie told John Thain that he would not be taking his name in the derivatives market the following week.
I don't think this is coming from Goldman. Jamie is a bully. He is an effective bully, however.
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 12:32PM
sounds like a lot of whining. isn't your job as a CEO to look out for your company and its shareholders? Since when did part of the CEO's mandate become making sure your competitors stay in business? Rock on Jamie.
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 12:38PM
Zorba the Banker cries too many crocodile tears while he ruthlessly crushes his competition.He was an architect of the clusterfuck known as Travellers Citigroup,so it's not like he's immune from overreaching.
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 1:24PM
@6: enjoy... whipped this up in 10 minutes.... not a work of beauty clearly...
http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/7097/jumpsuitjamiecopyme4.jpg
Posted by Investorcluzo , Jan 05, 2009 1:59PM
here's a clip of chaz trying to make his story "newsworthy". notice the end where the other talking head have to nuance his nuanced story (7:30). what an a$$clown. I love how kernan makes fun of his picture and calls it a mug shot (too bad they cut that part)...
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=985244367&play=1
Posted by guest , Jan 05, 2009 2:17PM
Christ, CEOs get busted when they aren't candid enough. Then they get rebuked for telling it like it is about the recent massive implosion of their own industry and the ensuing consequences thereof. Can't win I guess.
Are other former CEOs really crying about Dimon "taking advantage" of them? Didn't know JPM was the party responsible for grossly overleveraging BSC, LEH and ML. I'm no JPM fan, but that's sour grapes if I've ever heard it.
Posted by guest , Jan 07, 2009 11:00AM
I don't have a feeling one way or the other about Dimon or Gasparino, but I have learned some interesting things about JPM's financials by reading the pdf research note on Reggie Middleton's BoomBustBlog.com
http://boombustblog.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Amid-the-rally-I-look-at-the-Doo-Doo-32-and-their-receipt-of-the-TARP.html&Itemid=92
It some serious analysis to the extent of "toxic" debt that JPM acquired as well as some potential inconsistencies in the numbers provided.
Posted by guest , Jan 17, 2009 1:00AM
What?
"He took advantage of other CEO's (he won too big?, hurt egos?), analysts think JPM will post a loss (they didn't), and he was too honest in discussing challenges facing banks (dampening expectations so he can beat them)"???
S-t price fluctuations during the worst economic crisis in 70 years doesn't mean s---.
There's no substance here. This ain't news.