Picture 533.pngCNBC’s David Faber reports that Citi and Morgan Stanley are in “deep” talks about a merger of their brokerage operations. It would be apparently be structured as a joint deal but would “involve a payment from Morgan Stanley to Citi of an undisclosed sum that would give MS the larger stake.” According to Faber, that “could mean 51 percent” but Morgan would have a right over a period of years to increase it’s stake, making it effectively “a long term sale of Smith Barney to Morgan Stanley.”

Comments (97)

  1. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:38 PM

    Another dumb move by both idiots.

  2. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    Will it be known as S&M, BS or BM ?

  3. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:41 PM

    oh, the sweet, sweet synergies this will create.
    unemployment 10% by june…

  4. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:42 PM

    Bargain Smithley

  5. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:44 PM

    whats the quote from?

  6. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:44 PM

    Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Smith Barney. If length of name were a measure of awesomeness, they would be way above Sham-wow, slightly better than mighty putty, but just below Snuggie.

  7. Posted by Anal_yst | January 9, 2009 at 3:44 PM

    absolute hogwash

  8. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM

    Sounds like at least another 10-20,000 redundancies/layoffs and still no profits on either side.

  9. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:45 PM

    Motto: “We lose money the old fashioned way — falling off the tiger and being eaten by it.”

  10. Posted by Investorcluzo | January 9, 2009 at 3:49 PM

    pandit is about to drop his load (of brokerage business) on mack…for pay? isn’t solicitation illegal?

  11. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:51 PM

    hey we’re both shitty individually..lets just put our BM’s together

  12. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:51 PM

    11 again. The more I think about this the more I like it.

  13. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:52 PM

    @11: then the sale, and Rubin resigning, bodes pretty ill. Not trying to flame, but brush up the resume.

  14. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:53 PM

    @11: I thought that the credit card group was the only one keeping you guys afloat.

  15. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:53 PM

    Note to Mack: buying a pig and putting on the farm does not make it a steer…..

  16. Posted by e_anthony58 | January 9, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO WITH PRIMERICA?!?!
    SAVE PRIMERICA!!!

  17. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:56 PM

    best movie reference EVER.
    that just made my day.

  18. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:56 PM

    is this an orderly liquidation of Citi assets because they are STILL in trouble???

  19. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    @14
    My job is secure, and so is pretty much everyone I work with, with perhaps the exception of some back office folks. Thanks for your concern, though

  20. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM

    I DON’T THINK SO.

  21. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:00 PM

    @20 Did you drink the kool aid or something? Or are you doing lines of coke off of Pandit’s ass cheeks?

  22. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    Guess I’ll cancel my order of onions and Limburger cheese, heh heh

  23. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM

    WTF is PRIMERICA?!

  24. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM

    If all else fails sell SSB brokers to MS. Last ditch effortby Pandit to raise capital by selling useless cattle to another firm.

  25. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM

    Aaaahh the circle of life. One dude sets up shop…it grows and it fold into a bigger firm which is then take over by a bigger fish which becomes a mammoth in no time…which then spins off some shit and its eventually broken off into pieces.

  26. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:03 PM

    If all else fails sell SSB brokers to MS. Last ditch effortby Pandit to raise capital by selling useless cattle to another firm.

  27. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:05 PM

    WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO WITH PRIMERICA?!?!
    PRIMERICA IS THE MOST PROFITABLE SUBSIDIARY. AT LEAST THAT IS WHAT SOMEONE AT PRIMERICA TOLD ME.

  28. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:06 PM

    Pandit winner, Mack loser….wait they are both losers….

  29. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM

    WHAT IS THE QUOTE FROM

  30. Posted by Clown Capital | January 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM

    Way to go Mack…
    I guess when your neighbor gets addicted to crack, it’s a probably a good time to ask how much he wants for that expensive watch he owns. Just keep feeding that addiction…

  31. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:10 PM

    The quote is from a movie called “Wet Hot American Summer”

  32. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM

    Primerica is part of Citi? I thought it was a front for the Mormon Church.

  33. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM

    I don’t like this story anymore. It tastes like burger.

  34. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM

    @22
    I’m a high producing broker with a growing book of business. They don’t fire guys in my line of work, ass clown.

  35. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM

    Primerica is sort of a borderline Pyramid Scheme. Person A recruits persons B,C,D to sell Citi products for him (usually cold calling or relatives/friends. Person B,C,D makes for example $100 per deal. Since Person A is their supervisor/manager, he gets $100 also per person. Your goal is to get into Primerica, make money, then recruit. So in a few years time, Person B,C,D will each recruit another 3 people and Person A will get a share of their sales as well. You can make a lot of good money on it, but mostly the employees are younger grads looking for a job quickly. In this environment now, I can’t really see many people spending money buying CITI products

  36. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM

    I don’t like this story anymore. It tastes like burger.

  37. Posted by Clown Capital | January 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM

    Primerica = Ponzi scheme similar to Madoff

  38. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM

    I don’t like this story anymore. It tastes like burger.

  39. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM

    I don’t like this story anymore. It tastes like burger.

  40. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:16 PM

    @38 and 40: You can’t do what I do.

  41. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:16 PM

    Loving the “Wet, Hot, American Summer” Quote!

  42. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:17 PM

    pandit: Arty, I need you to do me a favor. I need you to take a shower today.
    mack: OK.
    pandit: ‘Cause your parents are coming tomorrow, and I don’t want to get in trouble.
    mack: Sure.
    pandit: You haven’t taken a shower once this summer. Not once in 8 weeks.
    mack: I will.
    pandit: You’re covered in dirt. Take a shower.

  43. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:19 PM

    @38 and 40: You can’t do what I do.

  44. Posted by Seaman Bodine | January 9, 2009 at 4:19 PM

    i keep saying this, but brokerage ROA is under 80bps (and losing roughly 10bps a year)…it’s essentially a slow train wreck
    MS knows they can’t build a bank fast enough to compete with BAC, WFC etc. but they figure if they can pile up a massive brokerage biz, the gov’t will let them continute to write FDIC backed paper, which they need to survive
    this is a smart trade for Vik, because he gets some money know, and in the event there’s some upside to brokerage, he can get a piece of that
    and it’s 10000 less pikers to deal with

  45. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:20 PM

    @38 and 40: You can’t do what I do.

  46. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    OMFW 37 STFU

  47. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @38 and 40: You can’t do what I do.

  48. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @35 probably works for primerica, Payday Loans, in your home…

  49. Posted by Clown Capital | January 9, 2009 at 4:23 PM

    What about…
    “Primerazoff Scheme”??? BRILLIANT! Somebody put that in Wiki and give me my due credit!!!

  50. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:27 PM

    Morgan Stanley + Smith Barney = Morgan Blarney.

  51. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM

    Great another fiasco waiting to happen. MS does not need the wisdom on idiots of smith barney a total disgrace for Mack what is he smoking? Certainly nothing good

  52. Posted by e_anthony58 | January 9, 2009 at 4:29 PM

    Maria Bartiromo’s favorite movie is Mamma Mia.
    You are NOT a dancing queen, Maria.
    You are…….what’s the bad guy from Thundercats???

  53. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    @52 more like Morgan Stanley + Smith Barney = Morgan Stanley

  54. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    @54 – Mum-Ra?

  55. Posted by e_anthony58 | January 9, 2009 at 4:43 PM

    YES! MUM-RA!
    all she needs is blue skin and snakes in her hair. lol.

  56. Posted by Anal_yst | January 9, 2009 at 4:43 PM

    Anyone heard from Sally Krawczek recently?

  57. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM

    Loving the “Wet, Hot, American Summer” Quote!

  58. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:47 PM

    Vikram: What about tall debbie?
    Mack: Too tall.

  59. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM

    Wasn’t there a similar “Get Into My Belly” quote just waiting to be used?

  60. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:58 PM

    When will this shit stop?

  61. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 4:59 PM

    Best movie quote ever.

  62. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 5:22 PM

    Another years pay not to change jobs…love this shit let the consolodation continue. so much better than reseach
    retail broker

  63. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 5:29 PM

    I am a retail broker. What is Morgan Stanley?

  64. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 5:35 PM

    I am Vikram Pandit. What is a failed captive hedge fund?

  65. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 5:53 PM

    Funny. They were JUST starting to get some traction on integrating Smith Barney and Salomon. Now Smith Barney and Morgan? Hilarious.

  66. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 5:57 PM

    they should just give all new employees snuggies with the new firm name embroidered on the back, “Madoff Securities”

  67. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 5:57 PM

    Like rats crawling all over each other to keep their heads above water on the Titanic…..

  68. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 6:02 PM

    @19 C is a zombie that just won’t stop moving around and letting pennies fall out of its pocket.
    It is a joke that this company has not been liquidiated and a travesty that govn’t capital continues to be invested in an enterprise that was insolvent more than a year ago.

  69. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 6:06 PM

    @39
    It is a pyramid scheme, not a ponzi scheme clown. There is a distinction.

  70. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM

    @35: Equities in Dallas..

  71. Posted by Anal_yst | January 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM

    @67
    Ha no sh!t, 20+ year system integration/data migration project right there, and that’s absent procedural/cultural/etc issues!
    @ 71
    Bingo.

  72. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 7:58 PM

    MS and Smith Barney systems have very different client bases and client profiles. MS distributes more in-house / captive funds, SB sells more individual securities and typically has larger accounts. SB more like ML than MS. Probably good overheads savings while bringing something to both, including more channel conflicts and culture conflicts. Wouldn’t want to watch that w/o having some strong drinks on hand.

  73. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 8:17 PM

    John Mack:
    1. passed over by the MS Board in favor of a guy from Sears
    2. fired by Credit Suisse after accomplishing nothing more than creating the LGBT Committee and championing the hire of several prominent women, in his lame attempt to redress the culture he created at MS, which was sued as he left by groups of gays and women
    3. back at MS, driving it into the ground
    he’s begged the last 2 President’s to be Treasury Secretary, but even an idiot like W can tell a narcissistic, power-hungry freak from a Secretary of the Treasury.

  74. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 8:18 PM

    John Mack:
    1. passed over by the MS Board in favor of a guy from Sears
    2. fired by Credit Suisse after accomplishing nothing more than creating the LGBT Committee and championing the hire of several prominent women, in his lame attempt to redress the culture he created at MS, which was sued as he left by groups of gays and women
    3. back at MS, driving it into the ground
    he’s begged the last 2 President’s to be Treasury Secretary, but even an idiot like W can tell a narcissistic, power-hungry freak from a Secretary of the Treasury.

  75. Posted by guest | January 9, 2009 at 8:18 PM

    John Mack:
    1. passed over by the MS Board in favor of a guy from Sears
    2. fired by Credit Suisse after accomplishing nothing more than creating the LGBT Committee and championing the hire of several prominent women, in his lame attempt to redress the culture he created at MS, which was sued as he left by groups of gays and women
    3. back at MS, driving it into the ground
    he’s begged the last 2 President’s to be Treasury Secretary, but even an idiot like W can tell a narcissistic, power-hungry freak from a Secretary of the Treasury.

  76. Posted by guest | January 10, 2009 at 12:04 AM

    You’d think Mack learned his lesson after the craptabulous Dean Witter purchase. Complete moron …

  77. Posted by Seaman Bodine | January 10, 2009 at 7:48 AM

    @74
    you really think there is a “culture” amongst brokers? they are paid exactly the same, and 90% of them spend most of their time distancing themselves from the “brand” they’re working for, to keep their books portable
    the most idiotic part of this is that I bet there’s 80% overlap in branchs…meaning, this isn’t even a new market kind of play, just trying to buy assets, and keep brokers from defecting
    even more stupid, these broker dealers have been trying to pitch themselves as bank alternatives for years, but their moronic handling of the auction rate securities has left the really deep pocketed customers that they fucked over totally immune to the “consolidated” account pitch
    20,000 knuckle draggers…thank god for the do-not-call list

  78. Posted by guest | January 10, 2009 at 10:42 AM

    so tarp money buys troubled assets! citibank is a complete disaster. ms would be brought down by this deal. not only will these dumb ass sb brokers demand “retention” bonuses, but most of the good ones will just jump ship and use this as excuse to get their clients to leave now!
    why didn’t they nationalize that train wreck citi when they had the chance in november? so they can do “joint ventures” with another tarp participant at inflated market values.
    does anyone think that brokerage is going to make more money this year? or the next?
    if ms had any real balls they would just buy some small regional banks over time and build up the deposit and lending base. that would be too smart though and take some time and real effort. buying into another “distribution model” that has been decimated by years of consultants, management changes, segmentation, integration, product disasters and on and on at smith barney is the nuclear option for ms.
    20,000 knuckle draggers is too much of a compliment!!!

  79. Posted by guest | January 10, 2009 at 1:38 PM

    I heard Win Bischoff is doing an LBO of Citi’s comissary operations.

  80. Posted by guest | January 10, 2009 at 2:49 PM

    &54…e_anthony58. For a while there, I began the belief that you had something between your ears other than a vacuum. What the Hell do Maria Bartiromo have to do with an article that began with something David Faber commented on. Stick to the program.

  81. Posted by guest | January 10, 2009 at 10:02 PM

    …and the review of the “merger” of Smith Barney and Morgan Stanley – which was simply a two word review – “Shit Sandwich”!

  82. Posted by guest | January 10, 2009 at 10:28 PM

    Guys its become pretty fucking apparent what is transpiring within the financial world, either figure your shit out or you are toast…the days of spending a few hundo or grand a night out are over. If you don’t have a stash, then I suggest to be weary. This downturn will be more severe than most think. The strongest will survive. You are either one step ahead of the game or you aren’t!
    FYI…Grads entering 2009 for a position in the financial world (US Firms) are toast for 2009 GL!!! I suggest thinking European or even Asian firms…can’t be picky

  83. Posted by guest | January 11, 2009 at 12:06 AM

    Too Zoe Cruz. Didn’t read.

  84. Posted by Anal_yst | January 11, 2009 at 12:57 PM

    Even if this is mostly a financial deal (i.e. little/no operational combination, etc) it still doesn’t make much sense. Both firms could just streamline their individual b/d’s individually (there’s plenty of room for improvement, lets not kid ourselves) at each.

  85. Posted by COB | January 11, 2009 at 2:46 PM

    @30 @32 @43
    I believe the quote is paraphrase from an Austin Powers movie spoken by the Fat Bastard character.
    “I want you in my belly!”

  86. Posted by guest | January 11, 2009 at 2:50 PM

    @87- wrong, dumbass. it’s a quote from wet hot american summer:
    Coop: [as Katie walks away] I want you inside me.
    Katie: What did you say?
    Coop: Oh hey… from before…
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0243655/quotes

  87. Posted by guest | January 11, 2009 at 3:46 PM

    They still won’t make any money. You know why? Because they have nothing to sell.

  88. Posted by guest | January 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM

    The deal is primarily for the purpose of reducing the expensive broker ‘recruitment’ that severely dampens profitability at ML, MS,SB and UBS’ retail units.
    Some of these firms are paying brokers up to 200-300% of their T-12 gross commission (upfront checks in many cases). That amounts to a hefty payday for brokers who had $500k+ in commission (not unusual for those with $90MM+ in assets under management. Deals like these take years to produce positive returns- and that’s assumming the broker can bring most of his assets over.
    If this current pace of poaching continues, the entire brokerage model will quickly become unprofitable.

  89. Posted by Anal_yst | January 11, 2009 at 8:39 PM

    @90
    They WERE paying 2-3x production, but not any more. Just like a still-employed banker can’t jump ship with a fat signing bonus due to supply/demand, neither can a broker. Sure, the top of the top may be able to, but that’s hardly the thing hampering profitability champ.
    If the deal goes through, how much attrition do you think is gonna happen, between people who want no part in the experiment, and those whos brokers get laid off and don’t wanna have their accounts transferred to someone they’ve never met?
    Anyone who thinks this deal makes any sense other than giving the gov’t and/or other idiots the impression that Citi is actively trying to shore shit up is retarded.
    I will, however, swallow my words if someone can come up with a legitimate rationale for the transaction, although I’d be quite surprised if anyone could.

  90. Posted by guest | January 11, 2009 at 9:56 PM

    89 don’t be dumb…they are the only one’s making money and will continue to do so in 2009 because of their fee structure

  91. Posted by guest | January 11, 2009 at 10:17 PM

    Retail brokers are “pikers” and/or “second career losers” who farm-out assets out to professional money managers because they don’t know how to do it themselves. They are a dying breed because there is absolutely zero value-add.

  92. Posted by guest | January 12, 2009 at 11:13 PM

    none, 0, nada. no legitimate rationale for the deal. did a lot of brokers save MS during the credit crisis? did lack of brokers hurt GS? no,no. this is just an orderly liquidation of assets before the govt takes over the shit assets that pandit/prince/weil/rubin and so-on piled onto the carcass that is citi. lesson 1. if your stock goes down when you sell an asset that means you are getting faced. but the bastards at citi can’t get anyone to buy the thing even after leaking the thing on friday and giving someone, anyone, the weekend to make a bid. the shiti that never sleeps!

  93. Posted by guest | January 13, 2009 at 9:11 AM

    this is another govt orchestrated deal; this isn’t a strategy

  94. Posted by guest | January 13, 2009 at 9:11 AM

    this is another govt orchestrated deal; this isn’t a strategy

  95. Posted by guest | January 13, 2009 at 9:12 AM

    this is another govt orchestrated deal; this isn’t a strategy

  96. Posted by guest | January 14, 2009 at 8:15 PM

    Citi Morgue.

  97. Posted by guest | January 14, 2009 at 8:20 PM

    A lot of you don’t understand, Dean Whitter and Smith Barney (the retail arms of the firms) are the only thing that is profitable (in 2008 and going forward).
    Morgan Stanley is genius. They are building up a very strong Global Wealth Management unit, and will sell that shit off in 5 years.
    It’s a part of the restructuring on Wall Street.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.