madeoff.pngLet the games begin:
2:06 pm: Or… not.
2:08 pm: Ok, fine. We’ll start. If you insist.
2:10 pm: Let’s start right up with some procedural hitches… Spencer Bachus R-Alabama You know, since the 110th Congress has closed session, the Committee doesn’t actually exist. The record isn’t even official. (Oh, I love it).
Barney Frank, (God, is this guy everywhere or what?): Yeah, so?
2:23 pm: Now if only we hadn’t taken all that money away from the SEC….
2:24 pm: Bachus: Hey, hey now, that’s not what happened. The SEC had more funding than ever for the year in question. Duh.
2:28 pm: So far an incredibly drab bunch of rambling.
2:36 pm: Frank: It isn’t the job of investors to detect fraud. (Uh, isn’t it? Relying on anyone else (including the SEC) to do that work is everything wrong with the current system. Ugh).
2:39 pm: Oh no, Ron Paul. The fractional reserve banking system is a Ponzi scheme! So is Social Security. (Oh boy). We don’t need the SEC!
2:56 pm: Dean Heller: Manners and expensive suits do not equate to integrity. Hah!

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (50)

  1. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM

    Bachus totes trying to cockblock. Watch Barney go.

  2. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:23 PM

    Too unofficial. Didn’t read.

  3. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:23 PM

    I’d like to remind you peeps that Mr. Frank ran a male brothel out of his apartment in the ’80s. Discuss.

  4. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:24 PM

    Why can’t this idiot pronounce Markopoulos?

  5. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:25 PM

    @4:
    Why can’t Bush or Pailin pronounce Nuclear?

  6. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    why don’t they mention the overspending on the palace?

  7. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    #3. That is why no one can say anything too bad about him.

  8. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:29 PM

    @4:
    Why can’t you spell Markopolos?

  9. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:31 PM

    Is Ruth in the house? Perhaps out on the steps suckin a ciggy?

  10. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:34 PM

    can I sue the federal government for wasting all of my tax dollars, I would rather see my tax money go into making more nukes then listen to the big BF talk about how he is going to gum his next boyfriend on the house floor.

  11. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:34 PM

    someone needs to tell Frank to shut the fuck up

  12. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:36 PM

    Maybe BF is just posturing to attend Madoff’s conjugal visits.

  13. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:38 PM

    I would have voted for Ron Paul in a second, long live the weed king!

  14. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:40 PM

    Did he just call the fed a ponzi scheme, I love this guy…and social security.

  15. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:44 PM

    @4:
    Why can’t you spell Markopolos?

  16. Posted by Anal_yst | January 5, 2009 at 2:44 PM

    Anyone see that stats from Harvard Prof outside the Hilton? Somehow, me thinks they’ve got the digits wrong…Tribune with a $250bn revolver? Whoops!

  17. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    @14 He sure did! You should look up his speeches from the floor of congress on YouTube, pretty interesting stuff… Talk about calling a spade a spade!

  18. Posted by Clown Capital | January 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    …Ron Paul arguing against the potentiality for the government to respond to the Madoff scandal through the creation more “oversight agencies” to preclude fradulent activity…
    Apparently he doesn’t understand the fundamental element of our economy. Allow me to recap…
    First Mr. Paul, to quote the government scholar Sarah Palin, it’s all about “job creation”. And not just any jobs, but complex, extensive sinecures…

  19. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:48 PM

    Too bad nobody will ever listen to Ron Paul.

  20. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:51 PM

    @19 Well my only hope is that the one silver lining out of all of the nationilizing that is going to be thrust upon us over the next couple of years; is that maybe, just maybe, the pendulum will swing quite swiftly the other way to true free market principles and to the return to gold backed currency.

  21. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM

    Someone please put a cork in BFs mouth

  22. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM

    @19
    Thank god no one will ever listen to Ron Paul. He is a lunatic who doesn’t understand basics of the economy or monetary policy.
    His main defense of going back to the gold standard is “well, uh, it worked 100 years ago”. A guy won a Nobel Prize in medicine for the invention of the lobotomy 90 years ago, doesn’t mean that we still do that shit.

  23. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:56 PM

    @8, @15
    Look it up. That’s how the man spells his name. Markopoulos. http://tinyurl.com/7waloz

  24. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 2:58 PM

    “I’m not a crook!” What an ass, I cannot take this guy.

  25. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:01 PM

    Q: How many Senators does it take to make the following points:
    1. (20% of their time) Thank you blah, blah, blah …
    2. This is bad, he did a bad thing
    3. Lots of people lost there life savings, people were affected
    4. This was a Ponzi scheme.

  26. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:09 PM

    @5
    Why can’t you spell “Palin”?

  27. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    Having behind us the producing masses of this nation and the world, supported by the commercial interests, the laboring interests and the toilers everywhere, we will answer their demand for a gold standard by saying to them: You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.

  28. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    25 – zero, they’re not senators

  29. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    25 – zero, they’re not senators. but thanks for playing

  30. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    25 – zero, they’re not senators. but thanks for playing

  31. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:16 PM

    my bad on triple post (sitting the next one out)

  32. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:22 PM

    Frank missed his afternoon retroviral cocktail dose to be there

  33. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:31 PM

    @21 – he sure would like that. Oh wait. . . you said “cork.” My bad.

  34. Posted by Clown Capital | January 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM

    Apparently,
    Rep. Paul Kanjorsky wants justice for the not-so-rich-anymore people who were victimized by Madoff and the American public who suffered through the obsessive media coverage of the scandal(in that order), not tomorrow, but by the end of todays session…lol

  35. Posted by Anal_yst | January 5, 2009 at 3:38 PM

    More importantly, how the fuck does SIPC expect to be effective if the Madoff thing (with relatively few investors) would drive the thing into massive bankruptcy?

  36. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:44 PM

    SIPC pays brokerage claims. Essentially protects you if your broker has run off with securities from your account. For which in fact there are tons of controls, making the SIPC insurance sort of like earthquake insurance in NY. Madoff scheme is a whole diff thing. SIPC’s not going to pay out a cent there.

  37. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:52 PM

    Jeezus Christ. I used to like Ron Paul but on this issue he is a fucking idiot.

  38. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Put him in the oven

  39. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 4:03 PM

    Representative Mel Watt is proving the point that this is not an official hearing. He is wearing a fleece vest over a mock turtleneck. he looks like he is going fishing with the Madoffs after the hearing.

  40. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 4:12 PM

    Is this Rep. for real ? Is he really this stupid ? SIPC is not an investigative body !!!
    WHO ELECTS THESE F*&%$NG PEOPLE !?!

  41. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 4:14 PM

    Did he really say “duhhh …”
    What a scumbag.

  42. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 4:15 PM

    @40, the uneducated public… the scary thing is the more motivated uneducated public did the electing. The other 40% losers couldn’t be bothered.

  43. Posted by PhilSeltzer | January 5, 2009 at 4:16 PM

    Gary Ackerman Rocks!
    That was his, “duhhhhhh”, right?

  44. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 4:29 PM

    Who is this mysterious client who lost his mortgage payment?

  45. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 4:30 PM

    @42 and you are the least educated of all the members of the public.

  46. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 4:41 PM

    Ruben Hinojosa (aka Miyagi) at the Madoff hearing:
    Ponzai!!!

  47. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 5:11 PM

    Several House members are ripping on Kotz for his intent to do post-facto reporting. But it seems that Kotz believes that he didn’t need to do his analysis until after this meeting (how many times did he say “Yes sir, I’ll follow up on that?”)
    I’m not sure who is right about today’s agenda, but this seems like a pointless meeting.

  48. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 5:15 PM

    @39 – Mock turtlenecks are actually fashionable…in 1995

  49. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 5:17 PM

    Michael Bienes is a cheap hustler and immoral swindler who along with his partner in crime, Frank Avellino, has enriched himself by funneling money to Bernie Madoff for over 35 years. There is evidence to suggest his relationship with Madoff never ceased after the 1992 SEC investigation which revealed his firm to be unregistered. It appears he has merely moved his operations overseas. According to other recent reports, Avellinohas continued to swindle investors by funneling money to Madoff under cover of a sham operation.
    http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2008/12/michael_bienes_tied_to_bernard_madoff.php
    http://mehtafiscal.wordpress.com/category/madoff/
    http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Misc/misc.invest.stocks/2008-12/msg00878.html
    http://postmanpatel.blogspot.com/2008/12/frank-j-avellino-bernie-madoffs-partner.html
    http://www.ack.net/Avellino123108.html

  50. Posted by guest | January 5, 2009 at 6:19 PM

    This fraud could not be detected? Bullshit. plenty of people knew it was a fraud.
    For years. The SEC ignored the signs and many people who invested ignored them as well.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.