• 28 Jan 2009 at 3:51 PM

Oopsies!

From the mailbag:

WFC 8K says misstated book value in press release this morning:
On January 28, 2009, the Company issued a press release regarding its results of operations and financial condition for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2008. The press release incorrectly reported book value per common share of $23.43 for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2008. The correct book value per common share for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2008 is $16.14.

Comments (28)

  1. Posted by lehaigbsc | January 28, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    clerical error

  2. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    The situation is fluid

  3. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 4:03 PM

    Too Fargo didn’t Wells

  4. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM

    the number was only supposed to be *approximate*.

  5. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 4:18 PM

    Forgot to include in the denominator all the shares they issued for WB?

  6. Posted by Investorcluzo | January 28, 2009 at 4:20 PM

    these guys are a fraud…how many banks over $10 billion in market cap have pre-recorded conference calls? not to mention, how the hell is the bvps going to jump by 62% in a quarter after they lost $11 billion?
    perhaps if they made time for a little Q&A we would find a few other errors in their logic. like why they refuse to mark down their loan portfolio to more realistic levels…seriously, non performing loans went from 1.53% of total loans in Q3 to 1.05% in Q4 (and that’s after picking up wachovia’s crap). something’s rotten in san francisco!

  7. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 4:30 PM

    this is fantastic… $7 per share difference… ahahha…

  8. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 4:30 PM

    DOH!!!!
    UH, hey what’s our book value, does anyone know?
    $23.43 oh wait, $16.14 AH who the h%$# cares, we all know as does everyone else that no one knows what book is.

  9. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 4:32 PM

    Too Manfran, didn’t Gay Area

  10. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 4:34 PM

    Hey!
    They both have a four in them. The rest is an innocent typo. God, everybody’s so paranoid these days.

  11. Posted by CapitolCapital | January 28, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    @8: I guess not, WFC up 31% today.

  12. Posted by Investorcluzo | January 28, 2009 at 4:42 PM

    how many day traders jumped in thinking they were getting a steal at $16? tangible book on this bad boy is south of $11 – no bank with that much exposure to ca and fl mortgages should trade at 2.00x tang book (assuming the book is “real”). shorts got squeezed today, let’s see what happens tomorrow.
    @8 – I can see it now:
    CFO – WTF?!?
    Analyst – so 4 minus 3 is 1, then you reverse the 4 and the 3, that gets you 14. then you take the 3 minus 2 and you get 1, now you’re left with two threes, so add them together and you get 6. so you see, it’s a pretty innocent mistake, anyone could have made it…

  13. Posted by Lowly Assistant | January 28, 2009 at 4:43 PM

    9,
    I didn’t even fully understand, but it’s still a quality comment.

  14. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 5:29 PM

    let’s be honest, the book value is $0 just like every other bank in the us.

  15. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 5:35 PM

    @14: That’s being optimistic. It is possible (and in the case of US banks, quite probable) to have a negative book value.

  16. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 5:47 PM

    Too $23.43, Didn’t $16.14.

  17. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 5:51 PM

    Some first year auditor is getting his arse chewed out right now for not T/O the press release properly.

  18. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 6:43 PM

    @2 winner, @16 second, thanks all and goodnight.

  19. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 8:51 PM

    What is bank equity?
    (and who is Equity Private)?

  20. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 9:44 PM

    Damn – As meager as it is (down 97% from it’s re-stated down 90%), I hope they did the math right on my bonus that’s supposed to hit the bank account tomorrow – seriously F-ing ridiculous!
    - WellsFarChovian Assoc.

  21. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 10:55 PM

    @20 — I prefer WellsFargovian over WellsFarChovian. What do you think about Wah-Farll-Go?

  22. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 10:56 PM

    @20 — I prefer WellsFargovian over WellsFarChovian. What do you think about Wah-Farll-Go?

  23. Posted by guest | January 28, 2009 at 10:56 PM

    @20 — I prefer WellsFargovian over WellsFarChovian. What do you think about Wah-Farll-Go?

  24. Posted by merkin capital partners | January 29, 2009 at 12:11 AM

    21-23 what do you think about hitting post once?

  25. Posted by guest | January 29, 2009 at 8:15 AM

    Don’t worry, Warren Buffett has a stake in Wellsfarvia. You’re guaranteed to make money!

  26. Posted by NotNasser | January 29, 2009 at 9:38 AM

    hitting “post” only once??? what a concept!

  27. Posted by guest | January 29, 2009 at 9:47 AM

    hitting “post” only once??? what a concept!

  28. Posted by guest | January 29, 2009 at 9:47 AM

    hitting “post” only once??? what a concept!

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.