animated siren gif animated siren gif animated siren gif drudge report.GIFBy which they mean the millions of dollars worth of “Hannukah gifts” he mailed out while under house arrest, not the $50 billion Ponzi scheme. Also likely indicative of a lack of respect for the “rules” is that sitch with the barnyard animals and Cool Whip, but that’s not pertinent to our case. What Mades may be locked up for, if prosecutors successfully get bail revoked, are the 13 watches, a diamond necklace, an emerald ring, 2 sets of cufflinks, a diamond bracelet, Cartier and Tiffany watches, four diamond brooches, and a jade necklace that he and wife Ruth still claim were merely sent to family members as holiday gifts, and not to hoard assets. The defense has til the end of the day to turn in what should be a delightful argument as to why big boy shouldn’t have to bunk with Bubba.

Comments (40)

  1. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:04 PM

    No $hit

  2. Posted by cy | January 7, 2009 at 12:13 PM

    What’s sad is that the prosecutors are not really worried about Bernie posing a threat to the rest of society. (I don’t think anyone is cutting him a check if he calls.) And if he’s a flight risk, he probably would have bounced already.
    The prosecutor just wants to be the guy who revoked bernie’s bail to look good for future political purposes.

  3. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:13 PM

    I’d be monitoring his payPal account as well, or is that set up using Junior’s email?

  4. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:15 PM

    can i get on his gift list WOW

  5. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:18 PM

    @4 I’m with you. Hey Bernie, send me a watch, I’ll never snitch.

  6. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:24 PM

    Dear Bernie,
    I would like you to gift me 1ea Patek Philippe timepiece, 1ea Mercedes Benz S600, Any F/IF/VS1 DEF color diamonds.
    Drop these off with Bess we can sort the rest out later. Best of luck in prison.

  7. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM

    Dear Dad,
    Thanks for the watch! Don’t worry, once the economy picks back up you’ll be out and well be doing business again in no time. but this time lets give them 8% in stead of 15%, you got a bit greedy last time. why did you give mark the nicer watch? Can i get the apt?
    -Andy

  8. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:27 PM

    Ruth could at least have mailed out a signed copy of the Kosher Cookbook.Cheapskate!

  9. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:31 PM

    OY VEY!

  10. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:34 PM

    Dear Uncle Bernie,
    Thanks for the Hannukah Mittens. They are kind of scratchy though – it feels like some small stones are sewn into the bottom of each seam – am I supposed to tell Mommy or is this one of our double-secret gifts? Like the Barbie Aunt Ruth sent me last month – why is her handbag so lumpy?
    Your loving Niece

  11. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:35 PM

    The ironic thing is — he should have been in jail in the first place. Whats 1 Million dollars after one has ripped off Billions?

  12. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:40 PM

    @11:
    Why rip off billions when you could rip off millions???
    ooh ooh ahh ahh ahh

  13. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:40 PM

    s/b hoard not horde like the multi-millionaire mob with pitchforks coming to get this slithering excuse for a man

  14. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:49 PM

    s/b whored not hoard like the multi-millionaire mob with pitchforks coming to get this slithering excuse for a man

  15. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM

    And this slithering excuse of a Man is not long for this world either. Could be gone, in one way or another, by Jan 31st. The Russian Mob does not forgive.

  16. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM

    Your honor, my cliets have been totally cooperative, they are paying for the cost of their house arrest and have complied with all restrictions on their persons. They continue to be cooperative. In fact your honor, my clients have been merely doing some long planned gifting to close relatives and friends. There was no intent to disregard this court’s order and the gifts were fully disclosed. As there was no intent to violate the law there is no need to change the court’s present orders. My clients’ flight risk profile has not been affected by their making these gifts. There is no risk of any assets being lost.
    I believe the court’s original orders correctly assessed the circumstances of this case. I would therefore ask that the court continue with it’s present orders with regard to my clients.
    However, in the interests of all concerned all deliveries and removals from my clients property should be examined and pre-approved appropriately.

  17. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:55 PM

    It is pizza bun night at Rikers this evening!

  18. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:57 PM

    Cool HWIP.
    whip.
    HWIP.
    whip.

  19. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 12:58 PM

    So that means, @15, the Russian Mob will accomplish what the FBI, SEC and American Criminal Justice System will not be able to?

  20. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:03 PM

    Here’s their defense:
    Package was sent Dec. 28. Ruth agreed to freeze her assets Dec. 30. These were Ruth’s items. Therefore, since it was before 12/30 – she was entitled to send them.

  21. Posted by mrpink | January 7, 2009 at 1:03 PM

    @19-
    don’t forget the Colombians. They don’t like their coca money being “lost”.
    -mrp

  22. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:05 PM

    Dear Pop,
    Thanks for the diamond encrusted Patek and Submariner, which will serve me well at the Congressional Hearing and on bonefishing trips respectively.
    Your faithful son,
    Andy
    btw this Russian mob thing is freaking me out. I am talking to the Feds and may be entering the witness protection program and moving with the kids to Idaho. I hear the fishing there ROCKS!

  23. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM

    As long as they don’t take away his straw so he can continue to drink diet coke.

  24. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 1:17 PM

    Andy Boy: you’d better break out those Goyim Disguise kits NOW! Those Russians have definitly become players in this story. You can run but you can’t hide from them, especially in New York!

  25. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:25 PM

    Can we just put this f*cker in jail now?
    I can’t believe he is still out on bail or that no one has beat the shit out of him yet.

  26. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:38 PM

    YET is the definitive word here. Bernie’s beat-down is coming. The longer he waits for it, the bigger and more brutal it will be. He probably won’t even make it to the prison gang bang.
    Don’t the Russians have silencers on their Glocks these days?

  27. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    Columbians or Russians; whoever is first. Either way, he’s Dead Man Walking.

  28. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 2:54 PM

    If Bernie goes to the Big House, it’s on the taxpayer’s dollar. I’m fine with him under house arrest, as long as they put Ruth on house arrest too. They have documents with her name on them, right? And she’s sending out millions in jewelry, right?
    Let them imprison themselves at their own expense, says I.

  29. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 3:01 PM

    @28 – that scenario won’t last long. He would actually be safer and live longer in prison.

  30. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 3:02 PM

    It won’t be long before their “prison”, at Park/64th, goes on the selling block, along with any other assets. What then?

  31. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 3:06 PM

    @29,@30. @28 here. I did not mean forever. I meant – until he is convicted. I would rather him not be eating at my expense (though the thought of him in jail is highly amusing) until necessary. Once convicted, he HAS to go to jail. ALl I am saying is: until then, let him pay for his own security/jail.

  32. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    Yeah, so sale of the Park Ave. digs are inevitable, and the $$$ will go toward retribution in this “fund” they are trying to create for victims. The point here is that this fucker and his wife probably won’t make it to the trial/conviction/sentencing/serve time stage anyway. Once they are knocked off (or disappear, although getting knocked off is more likely at this point) the Park Ave Palace will fall into the hands of The People first. The chances of them getting as far as eating 3 squares a day on the taxpayers dime are very slim at this point.

  33. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    28 Weird logic. Assume it takes a year to convict and that it costs maybe $100,000 per annum to house a prisoner. Seems like a small price for the public to pay to see some satisfying revenge.

  34. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 3:42 PM

    @27– don’t you think that Daddy Noel, who’s retained some(all?) his ill-gotten wealth, would apply that towards making his son-in-law’s coca customers whole rather then wave his son-in-law and brood off to the witness protection program?
    does he really want to see those pure bred blondes go brunette or ginger for the rest of their lives, referred to as names like jane, dorothy or eunice?

  35. Posted by Anal_yst | January 7, 2009 at 4:37 PM

    @33
    Somehow I think the $100k is a little high (not too high though), also, I think the people who’ve been taken (some by their own idiocy of course) would rather see a more “natural” form of revenge…

  36. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 4:44 PM

    Can’t take their house, assbags. That’s why OJ was bankrupt but lived in a $15mm palace in florida (which angry doosh ron goldman couldn’t get).
    - not hiding from russian or columbian gangsters. The new killin it.

  37. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 4:46 PM

    34 After paying back legit claimants, do you really think there’s going to be enough of that wealth left to satisfy the coca crowd?

  38. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 4:47 PM

    36 That’s true in Florida. Anyone know the rules in CT?

  39. Posted by guest | January 7, 2009 at 5:53 PM

    @37– seems to me the coca claimants are “senior subordinated.” you pay them back first and foremost, plus tip them next year’s 10%!

  40. Posted by NotNasser | January 7, 2009 at 7:22 PM

    Can I get on the list for his upcoming mailing of Martin Luther King Day presents?

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.