January 27, 2009Dear Stark Investor,
If necessity is the mother of invention, then distress must be the grandmother of necessity. For it is distress that begets the necessity for action which, in turn, begets an invention to address that necessity.
As we all know far too well, Grandmama Distress went nuts over the past year, leaving opportunity in her wake. Issues regarding liquidity, financing, and redemptions forced
many good organizations to suspend fund redemptions and consider strategic options. In the Tundra sections of the past few monthly commentaries we have alluded to such situations with increasing specificity. That is because for the past several months we have been in selective communication with a number of managers with the goal of determining if some action could be taken, some invention if you will, that could be mutually beneficial to both their and our investors. In particular, discussions with one fund took on increased seriousness over time.As a result of those discussions, analysis and due diligence by both sides, we are pleased
to announce that we have reached an agreement with Deephaven Capital Management. Although there are certain closing conditions that must be satisfied, we currently expect that the transaction will close at the end of February.
Pursuant to this agreement, the investors of the Deephaven flagship funds, the Deephaven Global Multi-Strategy Funds (the "Deephaven Fund"), will be given the option to become investors in Stark Funds by contributing their proportionate share of the positions in the Deephaven Fund portfolio. Some of these positions, where appropriate, will go into the Stark Master Fund portfolio. The remaining positions, based primarily on their liquidity characteristics, will be put into a side pocket to which the current investors of Shepherd and Stark Investments LP ("SILP") will not have exposure.In a sense, we have "purchased" for Shepherd and SILP a part of the Deephaven Fund portfolio by taking on investors from the Deephaven Fund. The Stark organization will manage the orderly wind-up of those investments that will be placed into side pockets
and the resulting cash will be transferred to Stark Master Fund as new capital on behalf of
the former Deephaven Fund investors. In addition, Stark has offered to assist with the management of the wind-down of the remainder of Deephaven's funds.For those of you unfamiliar with Deephaven, its background is strikingly similar to our
own in several respects. Like Stark, Deephaven is a global multi-strategy, multi-asset
alternative investment manager. Founded 14 years ago, Deephaven has similar
midwestern roots, headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and has managed billions
for qualified institutional and individual investors. Also like Stark, Deephaven evolved
from its inception as a single strategy manager in convertible arbitrage, via the gradual
addition of further strategies and geographic exposures, to a diversified multi-strategy
approach. Indeed, it was the substantial degree of overlap, historically, culturally and
strategically, that made this transaction relatively easy to analyze by both parties.Like all good agreements, we believe that this one is beneficial for both sides. The
primary benefit of the deal for our investors is that it allows Shepherd and SILP to
acquire a portfolio concentrated in areas that are a current focus of investment
opportunity for the Funds. Moreover, this acquisition is being made without having to
deplete the Funds' existing store of excess liquidity.Another benefit is the augmentation of the Funds' NAV during a period of widespread
decline across other funds due to redemptions and performance issues. This is the
clearest possible signal to our financing and counterparty relationships that Stark will be
one of the survivors of the industry consolidation, and we believe will thereby further
significantly strengthen those critical relationships that have been a key source of our
success to date.Finally, the deal should provide Stark with an opportunity to open the door to additional
opportunities in similar situations to acquire attractive portfolios and, potentially, investment talent.For the Deephaven Fund investors, the deal provides them with the opportunity for
continued management of their assets in the context of a stronger entity. In addition, the
similarities between Stark and Deephaven permit them to replicate in many respects the
type of investment profile they had originally sought through Deephaven.
Of course, the Deephaven investors are likely unaware of what's awaiting them in terms
of the monthly investor commentary. But nobody said this was going to be a free lunch.
The advantages we enjoy as a large, experienced firm have been magnified by the current
consolidation in the industry. Accordingly, we believe we have the tools and the team to
put us into a position to be successful in the current environment, and this deal
demonstrates the potential benefits that may accrue from our positioning. We believe
that the potential for other attractive situations exists, and we will continue to be on the
lookout for opportunities that complement our strategic plan. Be assured that we have taken this step prudently and with your best interests at theforefront. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.As always, it is a privilege to manage your capital.






Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 10:37AM
Is Grandmama Distress from the same family as Aunt Jemima?
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 11:01AM
"Accordingly, we believe we have the TOOLS and the team to put us into a position to be successful in the current environment, and this deal
demonstrates the potential benefits that may accrue from our positioning."
Your entire firm is a bunch of complete tools, so yes you do have the tools. However, a bunch of tools running a hedge fund is not going to result in success. This firm is in a postion to make a Cleveland Steamer on the people who gave it cash.
The DeepDoDo Fund looks like what you find in Grannies Depends. Who gave Granny corn?
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 11:09AM
Who the hell taught these idiots to write? I guess fund managers and analysts deserve such big bonuses since they work 80-hours per week producing grandiloquent turds like this.
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 11:31AM
this is hilarious. no wonder these clowns are in deep sheeat.
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 11:33AM
Who names a fund "Stark"?
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 11:36AM
isn't distress the grandmother of invention?
Posted by american bandersnatch , Jan 27, 2009 11:41AM
#6 - Correct. They guys are idiots of the highest quality.
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 11:42AM
If necessity is the mother of invention, then this investor letter is its afterbirth.
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 11:46AM
Sounds like Deephaven investors are going to get molested by their new foster parents.
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 12:04PM
As a complete noob to finance, I have to ask, "Is this a completely fictitious letter?"
The fact that Ironman's hedge fund is discussing Grandmama Distress's psychiatric health has got to be a joke. High-net wealth people can't seriously keep their money with someone so flippant about the financial crisis, can they?
(Deephaven sounds comical as well (possibly run by Nick Fury?), but I did find that on Google.)
Lol @ 2.
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 12:27PM
Photo from the tool shed:
http://coweb.sv.publicus.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071001/FACETOFACE/70928004/1021/TOC
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 7:48PM
@5-"who names a fund Stark?"
Brian Stark does - you jackass
Posted by guest , Jan 27, 2009 11:07PM
dealbook is so slow it's embarrassing:
http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/deephaven-to-sell-flagship-fund-and-exit-business/#more-30811
Posted by I am a Dude , Jan 27, 2009 11:38PM
@13
just shows dealbook is still part of the gray lady. this guy writes an entire article based on the dealbreaker post with no mention of "first reported by" and refers to michael roth as "mike" as if they played squash together.
The NYT and dealbook suck ass.
Posted by guest , Feb 08, 2009 9:22PM
Stark is in deep distress of its own. Other than losing its shirt with its private investments in China (counting on IPO's that will now never materialize), it was ripped-off in the real estate arena by a bank named First American to which it loaned boatloads of money at the height of the market...money that Stark will never see again. If I were invested in Stark, I would be clamoring for my money and running for the exits.
Posted by guest , Feb 12, 2009 2:32AM
#15? Really? I haven't heard about those losses. I know their side pocket losses are bad. But what about credit? Aren't they a good convert shop?