We understand that technology can be difficult, and that some members of the finance community, newly liberated from the chains of their investment banking masters, have heretofore only limited experience with Dealbreaker, web browsers, the network of tubes that is the interwebs and instructions not delivered above 110dB. The curse of web blocking software has deprived an entire generation of financiers the ability to properly browse. Now at home in their pajamas, many are learning for the first time, the wonders of open comments on the forums. As an aside, won’t you please give to the United Finance Workers Proper Browsing Fund? Every little bit helps.
Accordingly, periodically, we post these comment submission instructions, for the benefit of the community at large.
Step 1: Open new tab (tab 1) in browser.
Step 2: Browse to desired Dealbreaker posting.
Step 3: Enter comment text. (Use spell check, grammar check and idiot check feature of browser / frontal lobe, if required. Please note: Racial slurs, stalking the editors, or threatening violence- when not solicited by the editors- are all likely to get your comment removed. Repeated offenses will get your IP range banned).
Step 4: Review carefully. (Hint: If you don’t get the joke, you are probably alone. Telegraphing this in comments is probably unwise before others have gone before you. Short, meaningless missive like “TLDR” or “FIRST” will not amuse the editors. Particularly if the post is short and your comment is not first). Press “Post Comment.”
Step 5: Open new tab (tab 2) in browser.
Step 6: Continue browsing via tab 2. DO NOT OBSESS OVER THE STATUS OF YOUR COMMENT.
Step 7: After at least 90 seconds, close tab 1.
Step 8: Lather, rinse, repeat.
Commenting is a privilege and an awesome responsibility. Use it wisely.

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (115)

  1. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:51 PM

    Comment removed by moderator.

  2. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:51 PM

    Comment removed by moderator.

  3. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:52 PM

    Comment removed by moderator.

  4. Posted by StillNoCouch | January 15, 2009 at 1:53 PM

    Comment removed by moderator.

  5. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:55 PM

    Comment removed by moderator.

  6. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:55 PM

    Comment removed by moderator.

  7. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:55 PM

    Comment removed by moderator.

  8. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM

    Post Comment

  9. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM

    As a member of the financial community, I have improved the efficiency of your system.
    Step 1: Post comment
    Step 2: After 5 seconds, Hit F5
    Step 3: Jizz in your pants as the internet community revels in your comments glory, or kill self as the internet community condemns your lack of humor analysis.
    By waiting 5 seconds rather than your alotted 30, this allows for much faster hate spam between Mayo-slingers and Sham-Wowers

  10. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:59 PM

    1-7= Jew

  11. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:59 PM

    This is a really kickass site but you guys need an update to your servers and software. The comments here are some of the best anywhere in finance but its brutally difficult to post here.

  12. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 1:59 PM

    double post

  13. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:00 PM

    double post

  14. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:00 PM

    too common sense, ignoring

  15. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:00 PM

    double post

  16. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM

    Lather, rinse, repeat

  17. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:01 PM

    Lather, rinse, repeat

  18. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:02 PM

    too big brother, didn’t vote obama

  19. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM

    too common sense, ignoring

  20. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM

    too common sense, ignoring

  21. Posted by Anal_yst | January 15, 2009 at 2:04 PM

    With great power, comes great responsibility

  22. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:05 PM

    No really I am serious. Where are the daily memos?

  23. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:07 PM

    FIST! I mean 28th.

  24. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:08 PM

    ?donde están mis pantalones?

  25. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:09 PM

    Why don’t you just fix the problem in the code instead of coming up with this (albeit brilliant) workaround?

  26. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:09 PM

    too common sense, ignoring

  27. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:09 PM

    Step 9: Realize that there will always be a percentage of people who are new and/or ‘tarded and will double post. Fix software to prevent double posts.

  28. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:12 PM

    Boy, this IS a long story. Maybe I WILL get something to eat.

  29. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:12 PM

    Those are some pretty snarky instructions for a broke ass posting system. Stop jiggling Bernie’s schvantz and fix it.

  30. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:12 PM

    I repeatedly lather myself all the time.

  31. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:14 PM

    First

  32. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:14 PM

    Re: Step 3, assuming no prohibitions on discussions of EP-guest-BL sandwiches?

  33. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:16 PM

    I love lamp.

  34. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:16 PM

    Maybe if this crap wasn’t hosted by blogspot or whatever ghetto platform it may be, this would not happen…

  35. Posted by Lowly Assistant | January 15, 2009 at 2:16 PM

    To be fair, the TLDR guy/gal did create a phenomenon, unlike any other preceding limecat. Let’s be honest.

  36. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:18 PM

    Sorry EP, but you should have expected these responses.
    Sincerely,
    Did not post above

  37. Posted by Lowly Assistant | January 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM

    (addendum, regarding limecat v. TLDR: in the blogosphere, not specifically DB)
    —TLDR Closet Fan

  38. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:22 PM

    hey bitches did TGFD die or ran out of cash to pay for minutes in teh internetcafe, i haven’t read any of his retarded posts for a while..

  39. Posted by Pay It Forward | January 15, 2009 at 2:22 PM

    FIRST, bitches!

  40. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:23 PM

    @41- if it were hosted by blogspot, it would be dealbreaker.blogspot.com, you dumbfuck.

  41. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:24 PM

    1 – post in browser a
    2 – open browser b; navigate to post location and keep refreshing until your post shows uo.
    3 – close browser a

  42. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:24 PM

    I always assumed most double posts were people mocking the original post in an attempt to make them look even more foolish.

  43. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:25 PM

    1 – post in browser a
    2 – open browser b; navigate to post location and keep refreshing until your post shows uo.
    3 – close browser a

  44. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:26 PM

    Slow news day, huh?

  45. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:26 PM

    Or y’all could get yourself one of these.
    Ezzie

  46. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    Slow news day, huh?

  47. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    I always assumed most double posts were people mocking the original post in an attempt to make them look even more foolish.

  48. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:30 PM

    #11, you must work in local government

  49. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:30 PM

    Slow news day, huh?

  50. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:30 PM

    Whenever I hit “Post Comment” it gives me the same feeling as when I’m talking to girls at Fashion Meets Finance. I crap my pants and get a boner at the same time….like right now!!

  51. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:32 PM

    Or y’all could get yourself one of these.
    Ezzie

  52. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:34 PM

    Or y’all could get yourself one of these: http://xkcd.com/481/
    Ezzie

  53. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:36 PM

    OR maybe dealbreaker can update their own technology/bandwidth.
    Other less-known, less-trafficked, and less-financed sites seem to have better “Comments” features.

  54. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:37 PM

    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks
    EP sucks

  55. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:38 PM

    Stalking is such a dirty word. I prefer the term “persuing 1′s interest with pashon and commitment”. “Know” means “know” unless you have a stake knife in you’re hand.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9SUuHcbngc&NR=1
    SPODE

  56. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:41 PM

    to tutorial – took a nap

  57. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:43 PM

    EP where’s my TPS report

  58. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:49 PM

    1. Write comment
    2. Post comment.
    3. Take a nap.
    4. Read a book.
    5. Check to see if it posted.
    6. Take a crap.
    7. Check again to see if it posted.
    8. Wonder why DB comments take forever to post.
    9. Brush my teeth.
    10. Take a shot with my wife.
    11. Pound sand as instructed.
    12. Go to bed.
    13. Wake up.
    14. Check to see if it posted.
    15. Have breakfast.
    16. Take a crap.
    17. Go to work.
    18. Check to see if it posted.

  59. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:51 PM

    Clearly written by girls…

  60. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:52 PM

    It’s not stalking, it’s just unsolicited friendship.

  61. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 2:52 PM

    What number am I? ———————————–>
    Hell yea Bitches!
    SPODE

  62. Posted by Tahoe | January 15, 2009 at 2:59 PM

    That’s what I’m talking about! Maury Ballstein, Balls Models. Tushy squeeze!

  63. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:00 PM

    My god, dealbreaker: FIX YOUR CRAPPY SOFTWARE!!!!! Every other site I frequent has it right, why can’t you?
    [99.99% of internet forums]: Type a comment, press ‘submit’ and the page refreshes in a few seconds with your comment on it.
    [Dealbreaker and Above The Law]: Type comment, press ‘submit’ and watch your browser go on hiatus for more than a full minute, with the ‘page loading’ icon spinning around. (optional) Back up a page or hit refresh because you think the lack of a response means your computer malfunctioned or your internet connection was interrupted, and accidentally generate an obnoxious DOUBLE POST!)
    Seriously, FIX YOUR SOFTWARE. IT IS BROKEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  64. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:01 PM

    “FIRST” is too missive. That’s why you need to add “Bitches!” Now you’re cooking with gas.
    First Bitches!

  65. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:02 PM

    This blog is so much better than ATL since Lat left. Thank you EP, BL, and guests!

  66. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM

    C’mon everyone – CGI is the best technology that 1997 had to offer!
    Other than that — great site.

  67. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:06 PM

    First

  68. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:08 PM

    Bess and EP, I think you need me more than you think you do. The fact is without me there wouldn’t be a second poster.
    Think about it. Really get in there and mull it the fuck over.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciG-Xs7mBwU
    Kissing Grandma’s

  69. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:11 PM

    Probably more obnoxious than the posts is the downgrade in content since Ron Blarney left the site. I’m not saying he’s better, i’m just saying this site became significantly less informative and much more “Current Affair”ish give or take the exact moment he left. Just sayin.

  70. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    too gay — need to gargle

  71. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:14 PM

    I swear Bess and EP are sitting there looking at each other and mouthing “assholes”.

  72. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    Before I even clicked on the comments, I knew half of them would be double posts. Yep, I have the typical DB’er pegged.

  73. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM

    Comment removed by moderator.

  74. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:20 PM

    Wasn’t surprised by the top level comment deletions either. Some of the posters are HUGE Assholes.
    I’m outta this one.

  75. Posted by Bess Levin | January 15, 2009 at 3:20 PM

    @79- you couldn’t be more wrong. it’s ‘cocksucker,’ not ‘asshole.’

  76. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    Got an error: Connection error: Too many connections at lib/MT/ObjectDriver/Driver/DBD/mysql.pm line 49
    at lib/MT/ObjectDriver/Driver/DBD/mysql.pm line 49

  77. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    @81
    That would be original if you’d chosen the right font.

  78. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM

    2009 DB resolution- “clean this place up.”

  79. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM

    My fantasy is one night of carnal pleasure with ‘girl’ wearing my Gene Simmons outfit. She throws me out the next morning and I spend the next day JO&Cing & listening to Stay With Me (Lorraine Ellison’s version) over and over and over.
    (It’s not stalking if the love is real.)

  80. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM

    @77- Just sayin’, that is a joke of gigantic proportions. Since Carney left this site has broken more news than ever, and has probably the best hedge fund sources around (since I know you read clusterstock, Carney actually wrote that of DB in a post last week). The only thing that’s changed since Blarney left has been less tripe from him, such as his completely made up stories that begin “we were having drunks with a goldman exec last night. as he dipped his fingers in his dirty martini and then licked away the juice, he remarked, ‘wall street, as we know it, is dead.’”
    Know how you know DB’s superior to JC + Clusterstock? The percentage of stories he shamelessly rips off from this site.

  81. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    Spend some money and fix your technology. This platform is brain-dead.

  82. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:27 PM

    I’m 92. Here’s the error I got after I pressed “Post Comment” (it took a while to get this error):
    Publish failed: Renaming tempfile ‘/var/www/html/domains/dealbreaker.com/2009/01/index.php.new’ failed: Renaming ‘/var/www/html/domains/dealbreaker.com/2009/01/index.php.new’ to ‘/var/www/html/domains/dealbreaker.com/2009/01/index.php’ failed: No such file or directory
    Bullshit error.

  83. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:29 PM

    @83
    I hear that. This thread will go down as the biggest train wreck of the week.

  84. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:31 PM

    @93 too 010101010101010 did not compute

  85. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:33 PM

    @81, I guess I’m the only one noticing 15 Madoff posts a day when i didn’t give a shit about the first one.
    This sites contacts were there before Blarney left. They’re not loyal to any writers, (maybe bess), they’re loyal to the site.
    This site is so over posted it’s obnoxious.

  86. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:36 PM

    Go away 97.

  87. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:45 PM

    Nothing is fucked here.
    -BeckyBootFan

  88. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    @94 No, wrong. Dealbreaker did not have the contacts when Carney was here. They did not break as much news when Carney was here, and they NEVER posted investor letters, or performance letters.
    “This sites contacts were there before Blarney left. They’re not loyal to any writers, (maybe bess), they’re loyal to the site.” This comment reveals your stupidity. Bess IS Dealbreaker. You understand that, right?

  89. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:50 PM

    There are tabs in browsers? Who else knew about this?

  90. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:51 PM

    @94 “I guess I’m the only one noticing 15 Madoff posts a day when i didn’t give a shit about the first one. ”
    No, you’re just the only 3 year-old with the inability to ignore something he doesn’t like and pay attention to something he does. There are PLENTY of non-madoff posts on this site.

  91. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM

    Somone please post a link to Bess’ first grade yearbook photo & EP’s home address. (Would that violate #3 above? Aw, schucks…)
    77 – right on.

  92. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 3:58 PM

    re this is DB better or worse rif: I think that since the s!!t hit all that’s been happening is a lot of trouble: layoffs, madoffs, bonus cuts, really bad returns and other disappointments. Boring because its the same old bad news every week, with only slightly different twists. Not much getting done, we’re simply in survival mode and its not all that interesting vs. the times when you actually got a rush from work.

  93. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:03 PM

    @100– why are such a little bitch troll? honestly, if you hate db/the editors so much, why are you here?

  94. Posted by Pay It Forward | January 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM

    @69
    Spode, you’re the shit.

  95. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM

    Why not fix the code to make the user experience better? Programmers always say bugs are a feature and making an app dummy-proof is not their responsibility. Those programmers get fired eventually.

  96. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:20 PM

    102 – Don’t hate DB, interesting info shows up here from time to time. The editors can be babies. Carney clearly has more knowledge than EP. EP comes off as a less interesting Bess. Bess can be mean in her post and then has thin skin when called out on it.
    Posting posting instructions is stupid. Making a silly joke about posting instructions was amusing to me.
    Why do you come here? To get your “Hater on.”
    Now go back to New Jersey…

  97. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:26 PM

    Too Long, Didn’t read

  98. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:26 PM

    Can’t you gals just take the L across the river and find some unemployed hipster blogger who will fix your crappy software for a 6-pack of PBR?

  99. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:26 PM

    Too Long, Didn’t read

  100. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:26 PM

    Too Long, Didn’t read

  101. Posted by miami | January 15, 2009 at 4:29 PM

    Look, it’s not ‘stalking,’ it’s ‘Shadow Dating,’ alrite?

  102. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    Gentlemen, please remember this is a free service, so since you’re not paying a dime to use it, while don’t you all just step out for a second and grab a glass of ‘shut-the-fuck-up’
    Peace.

  103. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM

    @113, agreed.
    @105- It’s amusing how taken you are by Carney’s soap-box bull shit (most of which is made up, or ripped off). And you didn’t make a joke about the posting of instructions, you made uninformed comments about the quality of DB post-JC. DB has improved remarkably since he departed, and that shows in the news they break, and in the sources they’ve gained (example: while Carney was at DB, the site had zero information on SAC, and then they were the first news source to report the firm going to cash, and the only one to routinely post its funds’ performances). Also, in Bloomberg, etc citing DB, the NYT admitting to ripping of DB, etc. Seen clusterstock mentioned anywhere? No. I agree that this particular post was stupid, but your spewing your own brand of stupidity doesn’t change that.

  104. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 4:52 PM

    You guys do realize that double/repeat postings was the obvious angle. Way to be original, douchebags.

  105. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 5:00 PM

    Onay oubleday ostingspay, ouyay ouchebagsday.
    Enoughway alreadyway.

  106. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 5:01 PM

    You guys do realize that double/repeat postings was the obvious angle. Way to be original, douchebags.

  107. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 5:19 PM

    TITS OR GTFO!

  108. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 5:19 PM

    TITS OR GTFO!

  109. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 5:44 PM

    FIRST

  110. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 6:02 PM

    121

  111. Posted by guest | January 15, 2009 at 6:12 PM

    Too many rules. Ignored.

  112. Posted by guest | January 16, 2009 at 6:40 PM

    test

  113. Posted by guest | January 16, 2009 at 10:07 PM

    maybe its your technology, not your customers?

  114. Posted by Anal_yst | January 16, 2009 at 11:56 PM

    Ladies ladies ladies, perhaps dealbreaker ALREADY IS in the process of upgrading, they’re just waiting to surprise all of you, just a thought…

  115. Posted by oem software | May 1, 2012 at 5:15 PM

    y14z2m Thank you ever so for you post. Keep writing.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.