Question: What is a Side Pocket?
To: Our Investors and Other Interested PartiesRe: Mid-Quarter Update - Establishing Special Investment Portfolio
As our investors know, we have made every effort to steer clear of the common problems in our industry in these unusual times. We responsibly managed liquidity during the 2008 market downturn and timely honored investor redemptions exceeding 35% of capital in January 2009, rather than exercising our "gates" or suspending redemptions, because we have always understood the value of investor relationships. We have also made a special effort to keep our investors informed of how we are navigating the current environment.
We also note that 2009 has started well for each of our funds. We have seen the rebound of certain long positions that were greatly oversold last year plus continued success with short positions. We are cautiously optimistic that 2009 will be a year that rewards those still willing and able to take calculated risks. A down market will surprise no one and we believe the panicky swings of 2008 should be less severe and less likely.
As unjustified as it strikes us, however, our efforts to navigate these trying times without disadvantaging our investors has left us in the position of being a source of liquidity while many other funds exercise gates or suspend redemptions. For now we therefore continue to see considerable redemptions. For JANA Master Fund, investors plan to withdraw a further 20% of capital, approximately, at the end of the first quarter. For JANA Piranha Fund, such indicated redemptions exceed 30%. Nevertheless, we still consider the gating or suspending of redemptions to be unwarranted given the good overall liquidity profile of our portfolios, which we will work to maintain.
However, to ensure fair treatment of all investors, we have determined that it is necessary to segregate some less-liquid investments in our overall portfolio. Even within the context of a very liquid overall portfolio, if we were to permit these investments to grow as a percentage of capital due to redemptions, this could restrict our ability to invest for optimal results and leave our continuing investors overly concentrated in such less liquid investments.
Therefore, we intend to establish a side-pocket or "Special Investment Portfolio" as of March 31, 2009 comprised of some thinly-traded equities, private financings and distressed positions. The total amount of side pocketed positions following this action will not exceed 15% of capital in either JANA Master Fund or JANA Piranha Fund, in conformity with our previously established caps on side pockets. These investments were all conservatively and fairly marked at December 31, 2008 and the marks will be reviewed once again before establishing the Special Investment Portfolio. It should not be assumed that these are "problem" investments; they are simply positions we believe should be retained until an appropriate liquidation event occurs rather than sold at adverse prices to meet redemptions. We will provide more detail when we finalize the Special Investment Portfolio at the end of the quarter.As a result, investors redeeming at March 31 will receive timely cash distributions except for the portion attributable to their interests in Special Investments and standard audit holdbacks. Our mandate will be to work out of the investments in the Special Investment Portfolio as appropriate liquidity opportunities arise and then make distributions directly to redeemed investors and back into the fund on behalf of continuing investors.
We understand the inconvenience of side pockets and have reached this decision reluctantly as the relevant considerations have clearly changed. We stand by our portfolio liquidity rules which have been consistently applied since day one and allow us to hold a certain amount of less-liquid positions provided the expected returns are great enough to justify the sacrifice of liquidity. Overall, such less-liquid positions must be monitored and will not exceed 33% of capital in any of our funds. These rules have served us very well but given the extreme level of redemptions we are experiencing we believe these additional measures are needed to protect our investors' interests.
More than ever, we appreciate your support and understanding. Please feel free to contact JANA Investor Relations at (212) 455-0920 with any questions about the foregoing matter.






Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 2:59PM
Jana Piranha?
Sounds like she could bite a dick off!
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:01PM
Non-consensual, you mean?
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:02PM
Non-consensual, you mean?
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:02PM
It's a holding vehicle for troubled investments
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:06PM
In billiards, everyone knows you have to bend over to get in the side pocket.
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:06PM
"our efforts to navigate these trying times without disadvantaging our investors has left us in the position..."
Hey, why don't we get someone who speaks English to read this document before we send it. We'd hate to look (more) like dumbasses.
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:11PM
A side pocket is simply "private equity" within a "hedge fund."
An asset doesn't have to be troubled to go in a side pocket, just illiquid. It used to be they were valued at cost, but mark-to-market means they are marked-to-model these days.
Think of a hedge fund that plays in publicly traded technology names, but also segregates some portion of its capital to doing VC in tech start-ups. They would want to side-pocket the VC stuff.
Now, a fund that doesn't discuss side pockets in its documents, and only puts items into side pockets AFTER redemption requests, certainly should expect some criticism and skepticism that it is trying to hide a loss.
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:13PM
Bess,
More Stanford please.
See here:
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/02/27/first-to-be-charged-in-stanford-case-laura-pendergest-holt/
and here:
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2009/02/27/53052/from-investment-fraud-to-massive-ponzi-scheme/?source=rss
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2009/02/27/53053/new-details-on-that-massive-ponzi-scheme/?source=rss
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:15PM
@6, it sounded fine to me. what was wrong with it (other than being drawn-out and beating around the bush)?
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:20PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9c9lAfXQHs
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:28PM
fuck your uncle everyday, unclefucker!
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:29PM
I recommend a "Whadaya Gonna Pick?" tag for this post.
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:29PM
bess- you are the best!
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:30PM
Dear Investor: Have you heard about our new side pocket? It's a side pocket of the side pocket contained within one of our existing side pockets.
Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide Pocket.........
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:40PM
Isn't a side pocket a derogatory term for one of Erin Burnett's new breasts?
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:45PM
@9 Our efforts (plural) has (singular).
- Class Pedant
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:51PM
Dead Pocket!
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 3:59PM
@15
There are no such things.
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 4:18PM
When are they going to tell us about the part where they take out 5 years worth of side-pocket management fees up front?
BTW, JANA Piranha Fund? Anybody who invests in something with a name like that shouldn't be surprised when the fund eats out the investors' asses.
The Guy from Delaware
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 4:20PM
the situation on Ms Burnett's fun bags remains fluid
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 4:23PM
@1
Wasn't she in the remake of Deep Throat?
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 4:35PM
@7 Good work
Posted by Seaman Bodine II , Feb 27, 2009 4:36PM
i am liz clamans tits, what is spellbound massage?
i am high def TV, what is CNBC thinking?
Posted by guest , Feb 27, 2009 5:49PM
# 20
Erin Burnett's ETF is still the same @ 34.
This weekend, I'll check how wide the spreadsheet is after one week of "no trading"!
Posted by guest , Feb 28, 2009 1:29AM
Did anyone else find the Jim Gaffigan reference hilarious?