Press Secretary Gibbs said Friday that the White House is all about a private banking system BUT one senior administration official, while reiterating that line, seems to be trying to send Andrew Ross Sorkin a message. What is it girl? Rahm’s fallen down the well?

“We absolutely believe that our private banking system is best off being in private hands and we are trying our best to keep it that way,” said one senior administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. But, he continued, the government is already deeply involved in propping up the banking system and may have no choice.
Officials said they were bracing for the possibility of new problems that might indeed require the government to take a more aggressive stance.
“Given our involvement at this particular stage, there is an element, a possibility over time, that we will end up with some ownership of these institutions,” the official said. “This is really about aggressive anticipatory action. It is an acceptance that the future is uncertain, but that we can plan on a certain basis for it.”

Comments (7)

  1. Posted by guest | February 24, 2009 at 9:58 AM

    1
    2
    3
    GO!

  2. Posted by guest | February 24, 2009 at 10:02 AM

    The market is down to 1997 levels. I was back in undergrad during 1997. On CNBC this morning they played Spice Girls’ “Tell Me What You Want” which was popular back then. In 1997, Monica Lewinsky was barely a glint in the eye of President Clinton (Note to President-keep your gnarly paws off of my girl Becky Quick!). The CRA (Community Reinvestment Act), anti-red lining laws were barely a year old. Was Obama a Community Organizer back then? I think OBL might have still been in Saudi Arabia back then? WOW! Does anyone else remember where they were 12 years ago?

  3. Posted by Lowly Assistant | February 24, 2009 at 10:10 AM

    If Lassie climbed into that well, Rahm would shank her in the throat for good measure.

  4. Posted by Suits | February 24, 2009 at 10:47 AM

    “Gov Dipping Toe In Idea Of Nationalization?”
    Gov playing “Just the tip” with nationalization?

  5. Posted by guest | February 24, 2009 at 11:50 AM

    @2
    Yahoo or freeper spammer.

  6. Posted by guest | February 24, 2009 at 12:12 PM

    THE BAILOUT BOYS ARE BACK IN TOWN
    (The Boys Are Back in Town, Thin Lizzy)
    WilliamBanzai7
    Singalong link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FmPhJkdTwU
    Guess who just got back today?
    Those wild-eyed Bailout Boys of AIG, GM and CITI that had been away
    Havent changed, havent much new to say
    But man, those cats can keep generating Billions and Billions of losses
    They were asking if Uncle Sam is around
    How his TARP wallet was, where he could be found
    I told them he was hiding somewhere downtown
    All the Wall Street bankers driving him crazy
    The Bailout Boys are back in town…
    The Bailout Boys are Back in town…
    You know that Hank Greenberg used to dance a lot
    Every day he’d be on the NYSE floor shaking what AIG got
    Man when I tell you he was cool, he was red hot
    I mean AIG was steaming
    That night over at Vikram Pandit’s palace
    Sandy Weil got up and slapped Chuck Prince’s face
    Man we just fell about the place
    That Chuck did’nt want to know, forget him
    Friday night in Detroit theyll be dressed to kill
    Down at dinos bar and grill
    The drink will flow and blood will spill
    If GM and the UAW boys want to fight, you’d better let them
    That jukebox in the corner blasting out my favorite Banzai7 Bailout Song
    The nights are getting warmer, it wont be long
    It wont be long till the Bailout summer of 2009
    Now that the Bailout Boys are here again
    The Bailout Boys are back in town….

  7. Posted by guest | February 25, 2009 at 4:24 AM

    12 years ago I was good looking and bulletproof. Still had a glint in the eye and a head full of ideas. Was running 3 of my own tech-related companies at the age of 20. Them days were the best

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.