Picture 725.png

Paulson & Co., the hedge fund run by billionaire John Paulson, may have made as much as $67 million in 25 minutes today as Lloyds Banking Group Plc lost about 5.9 billion pounds ($8.5 billion) in market value.
Lloyds fell the most in 20 years after saying HBOS Plc, the U.K. lender it took over last month, would report a 10 billion- pound ($14.5 billion) pretax loss. The shares plunged as much as 43 percent in less than 25 minutes of London trading.

But seriously: adopt me.
Paulson May Have Made $67 Million in 25-Minute Lloyds Plunge [Bloomberg]

Comments (41)

  1. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 2:43 PM

    HOW DARE HE MAKE THAT MUCH MONEY! SHARE IT WITH THE MASSES! REDISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH!

  2. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 2:51 PM

    Too contrarian, didn’t bull (shit).

  3. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 2:53 PM

    Did he use taxpayer money?

  4. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 2:54 PM

    Give him an award. He outsmarted many lying CEO’s.

  5. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 2:55 PM

    @4- learn to detect sarcasm.

  6. Posted by Investorcluzo | February 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM

    perhaps we should just give paulson the tarp money. he seems to be able to make some nice short term profits.

  7. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 2:58 PM

    Lets say for argument sake Paulson is worth $4 billion and he made $67 million in the fund off this trade and he charges 20% of profits. 20% of 67 million is 13.4 million. As a percentage of his $4 billion net worth, 13.4 million is 0.003%. I doubt he even cares.

  8. Posted by Investorcluzo | February 13, 2009 at 3:04 PM

    @7 – you’re missing the point. it’s not just about him, it’s about his investors making money while others lose theirs.

  9. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:05 PM

    @7- who said anything about what JP cares about?

  10. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:09 PM

    That’s too much money. He shouldn’t be allowed to make that. Someone tax the shit out of him so he becomes disincentivized to pull a stunt like that again.

  11. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    It’s time to jump ship from one losing hedge fund to a winning hedge fund.

  12. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    Erin Burnett masturbates with a fork.

  13. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:14 PM

    This is an unrealized gain. However under existing accounting rules we are required to report it. Over the term of the investment we expect to make a unreasonable return.

  14. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:15 PM

    I once flipped a coin heads 8 times in a row.

  15. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:15 PM

    He will be next in from of the Kangaroo Congress.
    Elmer Fudd will be yelling – preposterous and unmitigated….

  16. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:17 PM

    @13
    whats wrong with you?

  17. Posted by Investorcluzo | February 13, 2009 at 3:20 PM

    @7 – since you seem to be in touch with the numbers, would you mind annualizing that return for us?

  18. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:22 PM

    @7 I think it is more like 0.3%. But more importantly, 13 million is still 13 million.
    Thats how you become a billionaire; 13 mil, one half hour at a time.

  19. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    I think @13 is probably correct. astute observation.

  20. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:29 PM

    @13 How much for the fork. Can I use TARP money?

  21. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    @20, too retarded to use the google machine?

  22. Posted by Anal_yst | February 13, 2009 at 3:45 PM

    @19
    Exactly! That’s how I’ve been doing it for the past 4 seconds

  23. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 4:23 PM

    @ Cluzo
    100% of the dips on the board would give a nut for that “tiny” one day return.

  24. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM

    @24- stop pretending to have any idea who’s on here…some more important ppl than you might think…note the lack of a certain story about 2 hedge funds today.

  25. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 4:51 PM

    @25
    Please be more specific. Which hedgefunds and what story?

  26. Posted by NotNasser | February 13, 2009 at 5:09 PM

    @26,
    I believe @24 is referring to GLG and Och-Ziff.
    And this story from Bloomberg today:
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aWi4Z8671nvw&refer=home

  27. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 5:11 PM

    will put said fork on ebay. starting bids?

  28. Posted by KevinB | February 13, 2009 at 5:22 PM

    too max, didn’t water

  29. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 5:23 PM

    Paulson=Badass

  30. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 5:23 PM

    Paulson=Badass

  31. Posted by Novice | February 13, 2009 at 6:11 PM

    @10 Yes, we have all realized that moving the top marginal tax rate from 36% to 39.6% is pure socialism. Well, the first 3.4% was fine, but that last 0.2% increase? Socialism.

  32. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 7:02 PM

    Hey “Novice”, did you not learn how to compute percent differences in high school chemistry?
    Going from 36% to 39.6% is not a 3.6% increase, it’s a 10% increase you dolt.

  33. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 7:06 PM

    What I want to know is why all these people are talking their books YTD. You all lost 40% last year, and you’ll lose 40% this year. Just give up, and send our money back.
    Thanks.

  34. Posted by guest | February 13, 2009 at 7:34 PM

    @32- um, and what about “capital gains” vs “ordinary”- care to define that one for us, Genius?

  35. Posted by Big Q | February 14, 2009 at 9:05 AM

    Paulson possess the rare combination of genius (or at very least extreme intelligence), incredible work ethic and humility. He is a very nice person. It is hard to rationalize anyone making so much money, but if anyone deserves it, it is he.

  36. Posted by danasti | February 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM

    Prison!
    Why not Treasury Sec?

  37. Posted by guest | February 14, 2009 at 6:25 PM

    @37- because they were being sarcastic, halfwit.

  38. Posted by guest | February 16, 2009 at 9:47 AM

    @36 – “It is hard to rationalize anyone making that much money” WHAT??
    It is hard to rationalize someone being able to take a round bat, swing it at a round ball moving towards them at 90+mph, and then hit that ball several hundred feet over a wall.
    But just because not everyone can do it doesn’t mean some people shouldn’t be allowed to, there is no “rationalization” of it necessary. He took a swing, hit a home run and deserves what comes of it. Would it be hard to “rationalize” if he struck out?
    I think we still live in America, right? Or wait, do we . . .

  39. Posted by Cincinnatus C | February 16, 2009 at 4:20 PM

    #33: it depends on if you express it percentage terms or in basis points. he wasn’t necessarily wrong.

  40. Posted by Cincinnatus C | February 16, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    #33: it depends on if you express it percentage terms or in basis points. he wasn’t necessarily wrong.

  41. Posted by guest | February 17, 2009 at 12:56 AM

    OZM is a piece of shit firm. All of the money is wasted on the Solo 57 address, etc.
    The Master fund is garbage. Over 500 positions, down over 20%, pure shit.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.