• 18 Feb 2009 at 10:11 AM

Long And Deep

green3.jpgAs you may know, the Maestro spoke at the Economic Club of New York yesterday, predicting that the present recession would “surely be the longest and deepest” since the one that crafted The Greatest Generation. (I know, I know, they’ve been insufferable ever since with their long walks to school up hill both ways through gray, dust bowl snow drifts. Now at least we have something to reply with. I mean seriously, you try going on without a flat screen TV after the BMW has been repossessed).

Answering a question after his speech on whether he would have done anything differently during his tenure as Federal Reserve chairman to try and prevent the housing bubble, Greenspan said, “I think it would be desirable to find a way to suppress asset bubbles. But I am skeptical that it can be done.”

But the spanner of the green didn’t stop there. He also told the Financial Times that bank nationalization may be inevitable. Oh, the humanity!

“It may be necessary to temporarily nationalise some banks in order to facilitate a swift and orderly restructuring,” he said. “I understand that once in a hundred years this is what you do.”

Recession will be worst since 1930s: Greenspan [Reuters]
Greenspan backs bank nationalisation [The Financial Times]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (77)

  1. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:15 AM

    Can someone please explain to me what exactly the Federal Reserve is for? I thought it was created to try and prevent financial panics from happening and judging from the 1930s and 2000s they are 0-2

  2. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:15 AM

    that title gave me a raging hard on
    PEB

  3. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:16 AM

    Can’t he and Clinton just go away.

  4. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:17 AM

    Why doesn’t he just retire to Boca Vista already?
    Get that man a plaid shirt, some black socks and sandals.

  5. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:18 AM

    it is agreed, we can now call the recession the “Greenspan facial”…..

  6. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:18 AM

    Greenspan went to the dark side many moons ago after being a loyal disciple of Ann Rand. He, above all people should know that your reputation is the most value asset you own. If you lie, cheat, or steal, your reputation should be forever destroyed (see Alex Rodriguez).
    You do not ever, under any circumstances prop up failing institutions. This is what President Thompson would do (or is doing).

  7. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:18 AM

    @1 – Maybe they are actually 10-2, but you just don’t know it. (ok, probably not)
    …so do we need a Federal Reserve Reserve?

  8. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:19 AM

    @2 Me too, until I panned down to old scrote face. Wow, did they pull him directly out of a nursing home for this lecture?

  9. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:20 AM

    Greenspunk is a moron. Very typical of Americana you hold some out as shinning beacons to be looked up to. The veneer cracks …
    I believe Greenspunk is Richard Nixon’s evil twin.

  10. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:21 AM

    the randian cabal wants nationalization. it will hasten the breakdown of the system. then and only then will the men of the mind re-emerge and assume their rightful place in society.
    viva greenspan and his free money policies.

  11. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:23 AM

    @6 try spelling her name right if you are going to try to sound smart. You clearly haven’t even read her works.

  12. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:25 AM

    @1 i’d answer your question, but you’re not smart enough to understand the answer.

  13. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:25 AM

    @ 11. duh, it was her nom de ploom

  14. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:26 AM

    I think we do need a Federal Reserve, but not in the capacity that they currently operate. Would anyone out there want Barney Frank (responsible for the New Depression) or Co-President Nancy Pelosi (responsible for the coming Great Inflation) running money supply?
    This is not 1913, the shadows and secrecy must give way to transparency. There is no reason to have delayed minutes. Second, I want to know who are the owners of the Federal Reserve. It is not the US Federal Government, at least not exclusively. Who is dictating our money supply? Really?
    Third, trying to set interest policy is insane. They are almost generally incorrect and lag the markets. There has to be a better way, perhaps tying money supply to a basket of currencies or gold/oil.

  15. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:26 AM

    Deep, Long, Hard, Brutal, Pounding – the recession is your bubba, bitch

  16. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:28 AM

    But what about the bond holders then?

  17. Posted by Anal_yst | February 18, 2009 at 10:28 AM
  18. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:29 AM

    Andrew Jackson was right…

  19. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:30 AM

    Greenspan is an ass.
    Like everyone, he is talking his book – Pimco owns a lot of government debt, you know.
    I’d like to hear Greenspan and Bill Gross come out and tell us how bonds are going to crater when supply really hits the street – but I think this is all just a prelude to their argument that the Fed needs to buy agencies to effect quantitative easing.
    Oh, we have those at Pimco? Oh, nice.

  20. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:37 AM

    19 nailed it

  21. Posted by Equity Private | February 18, 2009 at 10:46 AM

    Actually, I think Pimco has less to do with it than Paulson & Co. Nationalization would do wonders for shorts / puts on financial stocks. And, the spanner of green happens to be a Paulson consultant at present.

  22. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:47 AM

    “I think it would be desirable to find a way to suppress asset bubbles. But I am skeptical that it can be done.”
    How about we try TURNING OFF THE FUCKING PRINTING PRESS, YOU FUCKING FUCK?
    That man is either in the grip of a serious personality disorder and thinks he’s really Francisco d’Anconia (which would actually be very cool) or is the most incompetent hypocrite ever to fill a government office. Assuming you consider being Fed Chair to be a government office.

  23. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:52 AM

    “I think it would be desirable to find a way to suppress asset bubbles. But I am skeptical that it can be done.”
    How about we try TURNING OFF THE FUCKING PRINTING PRESS, YOU FUCKING FUCK?
    That man is either in the grip of a serious personality disorder and thinks he’s really Francisco d’Anconia (which would actually be very cool) or is the most incompetent hypocrite ever to fill a government office. Assuming you consider being Fed Chair to be a government office.

  24. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:54 AM

    Is the US Postal Service hiring?
    I’m sick of this shit.

  25. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:54 AM

    “Once in a hundred years” sounds like the next time I get a bonus.

  26. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:54 AM

    @18, Howard Johnson is right!

  27. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:03 AM

    @23 EPIC!! I picture Antonio Banderas as a good Frisco!
    G’span, too Mr. Andrea Mitchell.

  28. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:03 AM

    A rod, Blago, Clinton, Greenspan… nobody wants to admit and take blame for doing wrong. Just admit what you did.

  29. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:11 AM

    Saying “irrational exuberance” certainly worked wonders on pets.com, et.al. A similar turn of phrase might have had a similar effect on New Century, Countrywide, and others – sparing us this hell.

  30. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM

    @23: I think he is Francisco d’Anconia.
    From his book: “The new world in which we now live is giving many citizens much to fear, including the uprooting of many previously stable sources of identity and security. It is indeed an age of turbulence and it would be imprudent and immoral to minimize the human cost of its disruptions.” (p. 18–check google books if you don’t believe me.)
    He has thrown the looters and moochers under the bus, and God bless him for that.

  31. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:26 AM

    Too bad they will never make a movie of Atlas Shrugged.
    Maybe people would realize that the Messiah is just going to make things worse.

  32. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:33 AM

    Bart: “Well, can’t you see that’s the last act of a desperate man?”
    Howard Johnson: “We don’t care if it’s the first act of “Henry V,” we’re leaving!!”

  33. Posted by rollformer | February 18, 2009 at 11:33 AM

    @31: I read somewhere the guy who owns the movie rights has said something to the tune of “There is no point of making a movie that CNN is showing live.”
    I kind of agree.

  34. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:34 AM

    @31. Agreed. Unfortunately, with the exception of a few actors/actresses, I believe a great many of them support the forces that the book opposes. The latest is Ralph Lauren said he would do set design, clothes etc (Source: Vanity Fair). Actors: Brad Pitt is interested, Angelina Jolie wants to do Dagney Taggert, and possible Russell Crowe as Hank Rearden (source: Wikipedia).

  35. Posted by rollformer | February 18, 2009 at 11:36 AM

    @31: I read somewhere the guy who owns the movie rights has said something to the tune of “There is no point of making a movie that CNN is showing live.”
    I kind of agree.

  36. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:36 AM

    Angelina as Dagny Taggart is the greatest irony of it all.

  37. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:44 AM

    Say it! What’s holding you back?
    “Greenspan was not a true believer. He was a sell out.”
    Feel better now? I know you would.

  38. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:50 AM

    Angelina is too hot for Dagny. Unless they put her in a pony tail, glasses, and paint covered overalls, she wouldn’t work.

  39. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:55 AM

    Messiah did not count on this chigger emerging from the woodpile so soon!

  40. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 11:56 AM

    Atlas Shrugged is garbage. Douchebag American males in their 20′s that actually believe in that crap are a dime a dozen on Wall Street.

  41. Posted by rollformer | February 18, 2009 at 12:03 PM

    @40: If they really get it, they wouldn’t be on Wall Street. See Francisco’s money speech.

  42. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 12:04 PM

    @40: That is totally irrelevant. The point is, either Greenspan is secretly identifying with the major characteristics of a character from the novel, or he’s a hypocritical scumbag. There is no option C in our scenario. Don’t like it, get your own scenario. We’re workin’ this side of the street.

  43. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 12:14 PM

    Everyone who has their panties in a bunch about this $75 Billion plan remember this:
    What’s the true value of the debt gurantees the gov has given to Citi? Not the preferred stock.
    $75 Billion. Damn and nobody bitched about that.

  44. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 12:42 PM

    Hey folks:
    The government already repoed all this shit at way more than it is worth. Sorry to say but we already own it unless they can someone reflate all the assets.
    Now we need to take our lumps instead of giving out free money to banks, servicers, lenders, borrowers and other scum of the earth who caused this whole thing.

  45. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 1:26 PM

    I bet Andrea Mitchell hasn’t seen it “long and deep” in friggin DECADES…

  46. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM

    @40
    Go back to law school. Ayn Rand is better than the bible.

  47. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 8:28 PM

    Speaking of someone who arouse from the dead.

  48. Posted by guest | February 18, 2009 at 10:43 PM

    @40 -

  49. Posted by DanicaK | April 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM

    Economic recessions are a normal part of the economic cycle. Looking back through history you can see that we’ve had 7 recessions since 1967. Recession is a challenge to all of us that we have to face and overcome. This is also a way to remind us that we can’t live “high on the hog” all the time. For the past years, many people have lived on credit, but now that the recession is here, what is happening? People are returning to good financial practices of saving, and living on less than they earn and aside from that they also stop using credit cards. At the moment, where most of the companies are cutting a vast number of their workforce many people find themselves struggling and on the brink of financial collapse. Thankfully, the Sologig.com is here and they have good news for us. Sologig.com targets the unemployed, underemployed, or those who want to work as they see fit without some stuffy office manager breathing down their neck all the time. You don’t even need an online cash advance to sign up, and you can find subcontractor jobs in a myriad of professional fields, such as engineering, legal and paralegal, healthcare, finance and accounting, and so on. You search based on location, but you do have to register in order to get into the service. A series of good temporary jobs through Sologig.com could really help a person with debt relief if they are underemployed. Read more at http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/04/17/sologigcom-helps-contractors-consultants-work/

  50. Posted by Bristol Airport Hotels | April 19, 2012 at 10:19 AM

    ILFgzh Major thanks for the article.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

  51. Posted by chrome rims exchange | April 24, 2012 at 2:24 PM

    Very good blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  52. Posted by Hip Hop Beats | April 25, 2012 at 3:09 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.Much thanks again. Really Great.

  53. Posted by custom hockey stick | April 25, 2012 at 4:15 AM

    Very neat article post.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  54. Posted by ephedrine | April 25, 2012 at 4:10 PM

    Very neat blog post.Much thanks again. Cool.

  55. Posted by Backlinks kaufen | April 25, 2012 at 8:14 PM

    I think this is a real great blog article. Want more.

  56. Posted by for sale by owner | April 26, 2012 at 7:06 PM

    I really liked your blog article.Thanks Again.

  57. Posted by Pets | April 27, 2012 at 9:03 AM

    I appreciate you sharing this article.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.

  58. Posted by odżywki | April 27, 2012 at 9:36 AM

    I really liked your post.Really thank you! Want more.

  59. Posted by sales video | April 28, 2012 at 12:38 AM

    Fantastic article post.Really thank you!

  60. Posted by math worksheets | April 28, 2012 at 1:47 PM

    Fantastic blog post. Really Great.

  61. Posted by How to monitor computer activity | April 28, 2012 at 5:16 PM

    Very informative blog.Really thank you! Much obliged.

  62. Posted by Multivitamin Effectiveness | April 28, 2012 at 9:58 PM

    wow, awesome blog.Thanks Again. Want more.

  63. Posted by Candida Llorens | April 29, 2012 at 6:59 AM

    Very neat blog. Much obliged.

  64. Posted by christmas lottery | April 30, 2012 at 3:07 AM

    I really like and appreciate your blog. Really Cool.

  65. Posted by Links | April 30, 2012 at 4:13 PM

    I appreciate you sharing this blog post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.

  66. Posted by party | April 30, 2012 at 5:40 PM

    I value the blog post.Much thanks again. Great.

  67. Posted by Pest Control Irwin PA | May 1, 2012 at 9:00 AM

    Major thanks for the blog article.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

  68. Posted by Structured Water | May 1, 2012 at 6:21 PM

    Great, thanks for sharing this post.Thanks Again. Really Great.

  69. Posted by Tampa investment properties | May 1, 2012 at 7:25 PM

    Very good blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.

  70. Posted by Business MArketing | May 1, 2012 at 11:43 PM

    I really like and appreciate your blog article.Thanks Again. Will read on…

  71. Posted by twitter followers | May 2, 2012 at 2:06 AM

    Enjoyed every bit of your article post.Thanks Again.

  72. Posted by Beats Extend Cable | May 2, 2012 at 5:06 AM

    This is one awesome post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

  73. Posted by PPI | May 2, 2012 at 9:10 AM

    Very informative article.Much thanks again. Awesome.

  74. Posted by best penny stocks | May 2, 2012 at 2:22 PM

    Very informative article post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  75. Posted by Calculette Pret Immobilier | May 2, 2012 at 8:21 PM

    I truly appreciate this blog article.Really thank you! Will read on…

  76. Posted by Cars | May 3, 2012 at 6:16 AM

    Thanks for the blog.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  77. Posted by Digestive Cleanse | May 8, 2012 at 6:51 PM

    Enjoyed every bit of your article.Much thanks again. Cool.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.