Picture 750.pngAnd when I say “shoot this poison into your face,” you shoot this poison into your face. Or don’t, it’s really your call. Only those of you interested in finding/keeping a job should listen. You wanna be a working girl, boys? You’re going to have to start acting like one. In a fabulous piece of service journalism today, the Financial Times suggests that you, my little boy(girl)s, hightail it to the nearest plastic surgeon and get yourselves some Botox.
According to Peter Burling gainful employment is all about “look[in] good– fresh and bright” and not “tired and stressed out.” And if you don’t think your competition is already there, how wrong you are. By cosmetic surgeon Cap Lesesne’s estimate, “There are definitely more business guys coming in and they have very focused demands. They are worried about their job futures and their professional longevity. [Typical male patients] might be in their mid-forties. They’re fairly successful and they’re looking to work into their sixties.” And if you really want to guard against joining the unemployment line, start dressing like a total whore, and remember, no one ever lost their job, or didn’t get a call back, for accidentally shoving their breasts in the boss’s, or interviewer’s face.
Use the photo above as a guide, Men of Dealbreaker. That should be you on the left.

Comments (33)

  1. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:14 PM

    Is tht why nancy pelosi’s neck is colored to look like hair?

  2. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:15 PM

    Am I gay if this post made me horny?
    Sal Sharton

  3. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:15 PM

    Anything that brings back trading assistants like Salomon used to have is a good thing. Nothing wrong with a winsome young lady providing some morale boosting on the trading floor with the use of a short skirt and push-up bra.

  4. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:18 PM

    Bess, you have fantastic legs. I’m impressed.

  5. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:19 PM

    @3- you a little slow today? this is about MEN getting botox/dressing like they mean it, not women.

  6. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:26 PM

    They’re fairly successful and they’re looking to work into their sixties – losers
    And what’s up with the guy’s shoes in the picture? Typical american wanker.

  7. Posted by Anal_yst | February 19, 2009 at 1:27 PM

    does that mean we go long armani/zenga/whatever and short jos a bank/syms, or vice-versa?

  8. Posted by Anal_yst | February 19, 2009 at 1:29 PM

    So, short Zenga, long Syms/Jos A Bank, or vice-versa, I’m not quite sure which, but certain its one or the other…

  9. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:30 PM

    “and they’re looking to work into their
    sixties”
    I’m pretty sure that doesn’t describe anyone here Bess…

  10. Posted by Lowly Assistant | February 19, 2009 at 1:41 PM

    But my tether will show.

  11. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:45 PM

    @9
    You have inadvertantly stumbled upon the whole cause of the mess we now find ourselves in. The whole idea of “I’m going to retire in 30′s, 40′s, etc., and then “do what I really want to do” is the root cause of a ridiculous compensation system on Wall Street that led a whole generation of self-seekers to believe it is attainable on a large scale without inflicting imbalances. It is not. Not that long ago, when the word “firm” still had the meaning it implies, they were partnerships that provided a very comfortable living, but the cash-out was not until retirement in your sixties and seventies.
    But that was back when the word “work” was defined as “work.” I see no victims anywhere, only just desserts.

  12. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:46 PM

    Zegna…not Zenga. Anal_yst, I am disappointed, I thought you were gay.

  13. Posted by Anal_yst | February 19, 2009 at 1:51 PM

    @12
    1. Typo
    2. Sorry to disappoint, I am not.

  14. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:55 PM

    What a bunch of Nonsense!!!

  15. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 1:57 PM

    nope. naw. *hells* no, it just ain’t gonna work. guy takes his oxblood loafer off and rubs his sweaty socked foot under the table on the leg/crotch of the guy/gal sitting across from him?
    yecch. you know how it’s adorable and really ultra-hot in a ‘come do me now’ sort of way when a woman wears a mens button-down shirt and little white socks and nothing else? or when a babe drinks milk from the bottle and erotically spills it down her front, like in ’9-1/2′ weeks? or when a babe does that sexy little semi-orgasmic ‘hug herself’ move? or – if she’s feeling bold and frisky – rubs a seductive finger over the rim of her glass; runs a sexy finger over her blood-red lips; twirls an evocative finger into her warm pretty little mouth? “yum”, right?
    yeah, well, if a *MAN* were to do any of that, he’d just look like freakin’ IDIOT. or a will farrell sketch on saturday night live. (or so i’m told. i of course have no personal knowledge of this.)(my story, and i’m sticking to it.)
    it cracks me up when women whine about how tough they have it nowdays.

  16. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 2:02 PM

    nope. naw. *hells* no, it just ain’t gonna work. guy takes his oxblood loafer off and rubs his sweaty socked foot under the table on the leg/crotch of the guy/gal sitting across from him?
    yecch. you know how it’s adorable and really ultra-hot in a ‘come do me now’ sort of way when a woman wears a mens button-down shirt and little white socks and nothing else? or when a babe drinks milk from the bottle and erotically spills it down her front, like in ’9-1/2′ weeks? or when a babe does that sexy little semi-orgasmic ‘hug herself and shiver a little’ move? or – if she’s feeling bold and frisky – rubs a seductive finger over the rim of her glass; runs a sexy finger over her blood-red lips; twirls an evocative finger into her warm pretty little mouth? “yum”, right?
    yeah, well, if a *MAN* were to do any of that, he’d just look like freakin’ IDIOT. or a will farrell sketch on saturday night live. (or so i’m told. i of course have no personal knowledge of this.)(my story, and i’m sticking to it.)
    it cracks me up when women whine about how tough they have it nowdays.

  17. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 2:08 PM

    @16- “yeah, well, if a *MAN* were to do any of that, he’d just look like freakin’ IDIOT. or a will farrell sketch on saturday night live.”
    really? cause i thought this post was being totally serious in its suggestion that male dealbreaker readers start dressing slutty and shoving their BREASTS in the boss’s face.

  18. Posted by Lowly Assistant | February 19, 2009 at 2:18 PM

    15/16,
    What do you think this is? Penthouse Letters? My screen’s foggy like a Snoop Dogg video.

  19. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 2:26 PM

    @17 ITS TRUE ONLY IN THE COLONIES WOULD PEOPLE WEAR THAT KIND OF UGGGLY SHOES

  20. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 2:29 PM

    I am a laid off MD at a prestigious bulge bracket bank, I want to look like this http://blogs.news.com.au/images/uploads/jacko_thumb.jpg

  21. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 2:30 PM

    @20
    Finally a Brit with an attitude. Normally they do nothing but shit on themselves and their country. Welcome to the colonies. How’s the old bitch in the palace? What about her kids? Such overachievers……

  22. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 2:41 PM

    Paranoia developed among the older workers, who would dye their hair to look younger so as not to be laid off.
    http://culturesocietypraxis.org/index.php/csp/article/view/57/54

  23. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 2:42 PM

    Why has nobody ripped on #11, or Wilford Brimley, yet?
    Are your diabetes acting up again? Go eat some Quaker Oats, fall asleep to Matlock and shut the F up.

  24. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 2:52 PM

    Don’t be dissin’ my man Matlock. He’s one Thoreauian dude.

  25. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 2:55 PM

    I am not sure my boss would enjoy it if I shoved my breasts in his face, but what the hell, I’ll give it a shot.

  26. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    Ty Webb: “I was born to love you / I was born to lick your face / I was born to rub you / but you were born to rub me first /… What do you say we take this out on the patio?”

  27. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 3:28 PM

    In all fairness and disclosure…..Maria Bartiromo has better looking legs.

  28. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 3:34 PM

    @20, brown shoes + blue non pin-striped suit is actually workable

  29. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 3:37 PM

    29 Absolutely, but they need to be expensive brown lace up dress shoes, not bass weejuns like in this pic.

  30. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 4:28 PM

    It’s the color of the shoes more than the style, though I agree with banning Bass and Payless.
    Light brown and tan shoes are not to go with navy suits. Only dark brown, laces or no, though I go with laces.
    And the guy’s pant’s are 2 inches too short at the inseam.
    Oh, and for the Brit, nice teeth.

  31. Posted by guest | February 19, 2009 at 4:59 PM

    29/30/31 Either you are women or doing a great job of playing the part.

  32. Posted by guest | February 20, 2009 at 2:17 AM

    @32 with that attitude, it will be a long time until you get to be with a woman you didn’t pay for.

  33. Posted by guest | February 20, 2009 at 10:19 AM

    @23: have you even read that article? I can’t believe it got published in a “journal,” even one written and “peer-reviewed” by Cal State Monterey Bay students. It wouldn’t even get a B- in a freshman writing class at any legitimate university, that’s for sure.
    It’s that kind of intellectual laziness and lack of rigor that makes all these post-colonialist leftists into parodies of themselves.
    http://culturesocietypraxis.org/index.php/csp/article/view/57/54

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.