Schwarzman Tells Victor Stuyding Is Overrated.jpgSteve was kind enough to take some time out of his day to ruminate on the financial crisis over a seafood platter. In summary: This blows, thanks to ratings agencies and mark-to-market accounting, but Geithner is on the case, so don’t worry.

Private equity company Blackstone Group LP (BX.N) CEO Stephen Schwarzman said on Tuesday that up to 45 percent of the world’s wealth has been destroyed by the global credit crisis.
“Between 40 and 45 percent of the world’s wealth has been destroyed in little less than a year and a half,” Schwarzman told an audience at the Japan Society. “This is absolutely unprecedented in our lifetime.”

45 percent of world’s wealth destroyed: Blackstone CEO [Reuters]

Comments (18)

  1. Posted by miami | March 10, 2009 at 4:16 PM

    So, actually 5% better than the 50% of stone crab claws in the world he’s ingested?

  2. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 4:28 PM

    Translates to 100% of worlds wealthiest are 44% poorer.

  3. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 4:37 PM
  4. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 4:41 PM

    Nothing like being pompous and egocentric.
    Whats the definition of wealth? I guess acording to SS it is stock portfolio and RE holdings.
    Or is he saying that 45% of the worlds core commodities have been destroyed? (45% of oil, precious metals, etc.) or perhaps 45% of the worlds art and other collectibles? 45% of all farmers crops land and livestock? or maybe 45% of ouir life expentancy?
    I’d wager a greater % of the world will be effected vastly more by local politics and the weather than by this ‘global economic meltdown’.
    Yet another reason to be disgusted at the arrogant [Wallstreet] pricks present company somewhat included, that believe everything in world revolves around their viewpoint.
    Apres Moi….
    -C

  5. Posted by Anal_yst | March 10, 2009 at 4:42 PM

    the man is truly committed to high watermarks, eh?

  6. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 4:56 PM

    SS strumps his dumps on all of us

  7. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:08 PM

    Isn’t destroyed a little too strong a description?
    Maybe deflated (like a balloon)
    or disappeared (like a mirage)
    or collapsed (like a house of cards)
    or wiped away (like a ShamWow)
    ….

  8. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    45% of the Bubble is gone. It was never wealth and he knows it. But he was able to cash out big time as he helped to blow it up.

  9. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:44 PM

    @7 disappeared like a mirage.

  10. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:45 PM

    SlapChop!

  11. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM

    IF wealth
    EQUALS leverage financed multiple expansion
    THAN yes
    Apparently a whole lot of people were really benchmarking their wealth to the “greater fool in perpetuity” theory.

  12. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:56 PM

    Phuuulz. Shrimpy has about as much legitimacy as big Ken. Next.

  13. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:58 PM

    @7 You win for today.

  14. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 7:34 PM

    where is the section where SS takes responsibility for being so excellent and fukcing his LPs over with lame, overleveraged buyouts?

  15. Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 8:07 PM

    wasn’t his birthday the jump-the-shark moment for the economy?

  16. Posted by Finnegan | March 10, 2009 at 9:55 PM

    @8 hits it on the head. Bubble wealth is not wealth.
    Rather the fake value of assets is being replaced by the true value.

  17. Posted by guest | March 11, 2009 at 7:57 AM

    It’s a zero sum game, somebody wins, somebody loses. Money itself isn’t lost or made, it’s simply transferred from one perception to another.

  18. Posted by guest | March 11, 2009 at 11:12 AM

    @17
    Money isn’t some sort of indivisible fundamental particle. It’s lost and made all the time. Just check various measures of the money supply.
    And the implicit assumption is that most of that wealth was actual money. #7, #8, and #11 are closer to the truth: credit is a claim on money, but not necessarily money, and de-leveraging such as we’ve seen in the past few months indicates that an awful lot of those claims aren’t going to be met. A lot of people were chasing their shadow, and now the sun has gone behind a cloud.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.