• 10 Mar 2009 at 2:44 PM

Dear Highbridge Long/Short Equity Fund Investors

By Equity Private

The estimated net month-to-date return through March 6th, 2009 is (6.22)%, bringing the net year-to-date return to (7.88)%.
Sincerely,
Highbridge Capital Management, LLC

Comments (27)

  1. 1
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 2:55 PM

    Highbridge = levered JPMorgan mutual fund
    wait ’til the PMs all leave

  2. 2
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 2:58 PM

    losing 1% per day is the new killing it

  3. 3
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:04 PM

    Hedge fund people are smarter than the rest of us. Just ask one.

  4. 4
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:04 PM

    Jefferies analysts unanimously disagree.

  5. 5
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:09 PM

    I am the CEO of a hedge fund. What is “killing it”?

  6. 6
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:19 PM

    meredith whitney is looking a tad haggard … not getting enough sleep whilst running the new shop

  7. 7
    Posted by Anal_yst | March 10, 2009 at 3:20 PM

    at what point do you just say “f-it,” how many down months?

  8. 8
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:22 PM

    hedge fund = nehd fudge

  9. 9
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:23 PM

    @7 jpm bot highbridge to create product for their high net worth clients because the existing jpm asset mgmt products sucked (still do) … with clients po’d, doesn’t do them much good

  10. 10
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:24 PM

    @5 it means you’re the fastest kid in the special olympics…you won, but you’re still retarded

  11. 11
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    Meredith still suckin’ it … still suckin’ it out …

  12. 12
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:29 PM

    @6 & her nose is brown..bad make-up or did Ratigan get a rusty trombone last night?

  13. 13
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM

    which fund? Otherwise the returns info is worthless…

  14. 14
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:34 PM

    @12,,,brutally well played

  15. 15
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:34 PM

    Bess
    Why don’t you at least give the name of the specific Highbridge fund instead of this misleading post that isn’t actually true for the firm overall?
    I appreciate the HF performance data but am starting to question its validity and value.
    Between you and EP’s reporting and the censorship yesterday, starting to seem like you’d like only the Yahoo folks to hang around here.

  16. 16
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:38 PM

    @12 what’s a rusty trombone?
    - Barney Frank

  17. 17
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 3:43 PM

    Dealbreaker censors comments?

  18. 18
    Posted by Bess Levin | March 10, 2009 at 3:46 PM

    @15- you’re starting to doubt it’s validity? how unfortunate for you, considering this communication comes directly from Highbridge.

  19. 19
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 4:02 PM

    “@15- you’re starting to doubt it’s validity? how unfortunate for you, considering this communication comes directly from Highbridge.”
    haha. just like the fund performance reports communicated directly from Madoff and Standford.

  20. 20
    Posted by Bess Levin | March 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM

    @19- Hah, while that may be the case that Highbridge is lying, I believe 15 was implying we were pulling numbers/fund names out a hat and putting them together to form posts. We only do that on Fridays (similarly on Wednesdays we pull the numbers out of your ass).

  21. 21
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 4:42 PM

    @15 What part of “Highbridge Long/Short Equity Fund” don’t you understand?

  22. 22
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 4:45 PM

    Not sure about validity, but for additional hedge fund performance figures go to Zero Hedge.
    http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/
    The link for the performance numbers is
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_FM71j6-VkNE/Sbaw8wXd7II/AAAAAAAABU0/iXfADTIOd_w/s1600-h/FebruaryHFs.jpg

  23. 23
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM

    zerohedge@22- that’s tacky. cut it out.

  24. 24
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:07 PM

    @Bess
    No. I’m just saying if you post something that says: “Dear Highbridge Investors” and don’t specify a fund it is misleading. Multiple funds managed by Highbridge are up YTD and you CHOSE the one that is down and implied that it was “Highbridge” not “Highbridge Long/Short”.
    I’m satisfied with the post as it is now. That is quality reporting.

  25. 25
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:11 PM

    highbridge employee@24/15- your firm is down for the count. sorry no one’s talking about the one fund that’s up 2 percent for the month.

  26. 26
    Posted by guest | March 10, 2009 at 5:23 PM

    @25 Guess again.

  27. 27
    Posted by guest | March 11, 2009 at 2:23 PM

    @21
    Why don’t you pay attention. 15′s post was the REASON WHY IT WAS CHANGED.
    Do your homework next time.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.

   or