bilde.jpgYou knew AIG was going to be shedding assets as quickly as humanly (or inhumanly) possible. You also knew that some of this stuff was going to go at firesale prices. Be this as it may, the panic sale of AIGs buildings is something of a surprise:

Six months ago, sources had estimated that 70 Pine St. could command between $310 million and $385 million, in part because the Art Deco Tower with its lovely architectural details and relatively small floor plates would have made an ideal condo conversion. At this point, however, it is highly unlikely anyone would want to convert the tower in a deepening recession that has already sent apartment prices reeling and left a vast number of units vacant.

Ouch.
AIG HQ to sell at fraction of price [Crains New York]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (22)

  1. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:05 PM

    I bid $150 mil., contingent upon a Treasury guarantee.

  2. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    Thats not 70 Pine. Does it look like “an Art Deco Tower with lovely architectural details”?

  3. Posted by Lowly Assistant | March 18, 2009 at 3:14 PM

    ‘Tis true. I’m moving at the end of this month, and rental prices are down ~10% – ~15%. Downtown (financial district, at least) is going to be an absolute wasteland /ghosttown in 1 year.

  4. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:16 PM

    Oh, it’ll go condo eventually: it’ll be a Jo-burg Conversion Special.
    See: http://www.whiskeyandgunpowder.com/side-trip-to-soweto-sprawl/

  5. Posted by Lowly Assistant | March 18, 2009 at 3:19 PM

    Well, or (due to 9/11 tax incentives and low rent) corps pick up and leave midtown for windy, cold downtown. Should be interesting. Either/or will take it on the chin, I’d guess.

  6. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    Are we talking about 70 Pine or 175 Water? Someone didn’t do their homework. Either way, as long as Flavors stays put I’m happy

  7. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    @2, Really? That’s not art deco? I’ll make sure to let Frank Gehry know that your considerable architectural skills are available.

  8. Posted by NAS Keflavik boi | March 18, 2009 at 3:29 PM

    @ 7 — that’s a pic of the Water St. HQ, which is decidedly NOT art deco.
    Chrysler Building, Empire State, Chanin Bldg — THOSE are art deco.

  9. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM

    @7 – you’re an idiot
    @8 – exactly. Also, 30 Rock and 70 PINE

  10. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:32 PM

    Too Art, couldn’t Deco…

  11. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:34 PM

    They’ll sell both of the buildings and won’t even cover their guaranteed bonuses… sweet!

  12. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:35 PM

    8,9 and don’t forget one of the best of all, the old American Radiator Company (now American Standard) Building, south side of Bryant Park, now a hotel, which was the precursor to 30 Rock. Same architect, Raymond Hood.

  13. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:37 PM

    Why would you do a sale-leaseback on a vacant property? The article is goofy – they claim AIG’s HQ is vacant. I think they got all the properties mixed up.

  14. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:42 PM

    They’re going to sell the buildings at fire-sale prices to some distressed firm, write CDS’ against the formerly assessed full value and end up losing an assload of money on the deal.
    Who wants to bet?
    -2StopShop

  15. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 3:44 PM

    @9, Apparently your skills at detecting sarcasm are poorly developed. Best you go back to your spreadsheet for the next great RE deal you’re undewriting.

  16. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 4:17 PM

    I live in 15 CPW. So what?
    Suck on my prestige.

  17. Posted by MarshallStack | March 18, 2009 at 4:32 PM

    If the gubmint buys it they’ll get 300 million – we always pay 100 cent on the dollar.

  18. Posted by Alderfly | March 18, 2009 at 4:43 PM

    Condo conversions in lieu of cash bonuses. Problem solved.

  19. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 4:44 PM

    i was head of AIG financial. i’ll write the default insurance. send the check here…
    http://maps.google.com/maps?li=rwp&q=32+Minute+Man+Hl,+Westport,+CT+06880

  20. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 4:52 PM

    16 Don’t you think 15CPW is overhyped? A condo is at the end of the day just a condo. Anyone can get in. Also, how can a truly great building have on its ground floor branches of Best Buy and West Elm. The later being Pottery Barn’s answer to IKEA. If money were no object, there are a dozen other buildings that are preferable. Problem is you need to first get by their pesky co-op boards.

  21. Posted by guest | March 18, 2009 at 6:18 PM

    @ 3 – Yep, seems like Downtown is going back to the post-9/11 days. They’ve already foreclosed on the two 30+ story apartment buildings they started building across from the new GS building in June. Took the crane away over the weekend, leaving maybe two stories above ground partially completed.

  22. Posted by Lowly Assistant | March 18, 2009 at 9:42 PM

    21,
    In terms of residential, I read in the times (maybe 2 weeks ago) that Battery Park/Financial District was the new Park Slope. Bodegas galore, food shops open late, plenty of space, and on and on. Perfect for babies! I’m sorry. I work down there, and the place is lights-out after 7 pm. If anything, I think you’ll see a lot of post-university students moving into the area, as it’ll be dirt cheap and somewhat accessible (trains, buses; pretty similar to midtown (see: Hell’s Kitchen, late 90′s)). Per usual, read it in the newspaper and the trend has been dead for 6 months.
    In terms of commercial, it’s really up in the air. Like I mentioned, there’s plenty of reasons to move down there due to crazy tax incentives (9/11) and cheap, cheap rent.
    I used to be kind of upset about the length of time it’s taken for the Freedom Tower (or whatever bullshit name they’ll settle on) to be erected. But now…jesus, what the hell is the use? I mean, I’ve seen the project most productive just in the last 2 years (sans moving the PATH from Church to W. Broadway — I didn’t get it, and I still don’t). And the new Goldman building boggles my mind. What will 85 Broad/NYP become? Another Hanover? Good luck with that, given the outlook for the next few years.
    Midtown eats shit or downtown dies. One of the two. It’s not a good time for New York.
    Here’s to hoping a lot of the guys “released” this past year start funds or other shops, and rent some of this space. Personally, I’d like to see more VC people in NY, poaching the media types for ideas and connections. Talk about killing two (unemployed) birds with one stone.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.