So here’s the scoop:
A “whistleblower” says that Barclehs is planning to “dodge taxes.” Maybe it is the reporting style in the International Herald Tribune, or the fact that Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs representative doesn’t know the difference between tax evasion and tax avoidance (one might explain this away by pointing out that the distinction and usage of the two terms is less clear in the United Kingdom) or, perhaps, we have actually gotten to the point where an allegation of tax planning is enough to fire up the investigative machine.

“We have received papers relating to allegations of tax avoidance in the banking industry which we are studying carefully,” HM Revenue & Customs said.
The Guardian newspaper reported on the weekend that the documents reveal the existence of a scheme codenamed Project Knight, which appeared to be an attempt to obtain tax relief in different countries.
The newspaper said the 2007 plan was created by a team within Barclays Capital, a subsidiary of the bank, to legally avoid tax.
Barclays said that the project was voluntarily and fully disclosed to the tax office.

Lesson #1: In this environment, do not give your legal tax avoidance plans secret sounding codenames like “Project Knight.”
Barclays investigated for alleged tax dodging [The International Herald Tribune]

Comments (8)

  1. Posted by guest | March 17, 2009 at 10:32 AM

    They aren’t doing anything Timmay didn’t do (And look where it got him!).

  2. Posted by guest | March 17, 2009 at 10:50 AM

    How about “Project Dark Knight”, they put all their money in a pile and set it on fire.
    That is sort of what AIG is doing (And look where it’s getting them)

  3. Posted by PatrickBateman | March 17, 2009 at 11:12 AM

    I don’t understand. Tax avoidance is legal. If you find a tax loophole and exploit it legally, the respective taxation organization has no recourse against you. This is race baiting in corporate form.

  4. Posted by guest | March 17, 2009 at 11:33 AM

    I like it how the IHT calls it a “scheme”.

  5. Posted by guest | March 17, 2009 at 11:35 AM

    Just because it is legal doesn’t mean it should be. The group’s head was called Roger the Dodger fer chrissakes.

  6. Posted by guest | March 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM

    @4, so what, the Brits call merger agreements “schemes” as well

  7. Posted by Novice | March 17, 2009 at 12:24 PM

    @6 The British tendency to use names and vocabulary that, to an American, sound replete with sophistication and daring has really bitten them in the ass.

  8. Posted by guest | March 17, 2009 at 4:04 PM

    @6 and 7, “scheme” has a negative connotation here in the colonies, hence Al Gore’s frequent use of the pharse “risky tax scheme” to describe the flat tax.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.