There are fewer relationships stranger than that between Saudi Arabia and the United States. Of course, who knows if Reuters is actually even close to the mark when they connect Barack Obama's call to King Abdullah with Saudi's recent announcement that present supply cuts would be quite enough, thank you very much, but no one seems to mind if the credit is laid at the feel of Obama and AT&T. (Seems Bush's oil connections aren't actually a prerequisite to get King Abe on the ring-a-ding).
OPEC Secretary General Abdullah al-Badri was rather pointed about the change in tenor: "I don't want to say that I voted for Obama, but we can see a different tone ... that we didn't see in the past."
Ever the United States, the gesture was followed up with a big "piss off" in the form of promises that the United States would never spend a bloody dime on that black sewage or sully its hands coping with the tar pit of the Middle East again if given even half a chance to quit the habit.
Saudi princes were, meanwhile, heard quipping ironic proverbs about not bleeding a man too dry if you wanted blood again next week.
OPEC bows to weak economy, Obama effect [Reuters]






Posted by guest , Mar 16, 2009 5:30PM
that the middle east has any say in global affairs is a laughable, without oil they are nothing. they have no respect for basic human rights and are in it for themselves. once all the oil is gone, which will be soon, it will just be a sandy, stinking, hot hole in the desert with a load of hairy men who get way too touchy feely with each other. bam bam can see this and is keeping his distance. bush was happy to invade iraq on human rights issues, amongst other things, so why didn't he send some F15's into riyhad where human rights abuses are some of the worst in the world? (rhetorical question!)
Posted by Lowly Assistant , Mar 16, 2009 5:44PM
1,
Dude, he was saving the women so they could remove their burkas and host wet t-shirt contests! Weren't you paying attention in 2003?
Posted by guest , Mar 16, 2009 6:10PM
Bess...We love you. Dealbreaker is the best. Everybody is here, and everybody knows it. There is no way your operation is hurting for ad revenue or eyeballs. We would know. But did the editorial staff really proof this headline and blog before it launched ?
the tribe
Posted by guest , Mar 16, 2009 6:24PM
@3- bess didn't write this post, you moron.
Posted by shalimar , Mar 16, 2009 8:36PM
Lovely, as usual.
Get back.