siren.gifsiren.gifsiren.gifsiren.gifsiren.gifsiren.gifsiren.gif

Regulators have told Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc. that the banks may need to raise more capital based on early results of the government’s so-called stress tests of lenders, according to people familiar with the situation.
The capital shortfall amounts to billions of dollars at Bank of America, based in Charlotte, N.C., people familiar with the bank said.
Executives at both banks are objecting to the preliminary findings, which emerged from the government’s scrutiny of 19 large financial institutions. The two banks are planning to respond with detailed rebuttals, these people said, with Bank of America’s appeal expected by Tuesday.

We are given to understand that BAC will be objecting on the grounds of “shrinkage” (Lewis was in the pool), which gave us an inaccurate representation of things, and Citi’s yet to come up with something. Do Vikram Pandit a solid and offer a good excuse now. He’ll pick the best one from comments in the morning.
Fed Pushes Citi, BofA to Increase Capital [WSJ]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (30)

  1. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 12:26 AM

    i

  2. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 12:30 AM

    What a surprise

  3. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 12:35 AM

    Sextuple dome light. Hot, Bess, hot.

  4. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 12:43 AM

    baahahahaha
    Nothing is Fucked

  5. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 12:43 AM

    Darling Bess do you ever sleep? As always nice tags…

  6. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 12:49 AM

    KL’s rebuttal: The situation is fluid.
    VP’s rebuttal: What? No love for cutting the snackie-poo?

  7. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 12:57 AM

    @3 there are 7 lights. You’re in finance, really?

  8. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 12:58 AM

    @7- there were 6 before.
    -not 3

  9. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 2:17 AM

    nothing is fucked dude.

  10. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 5:39 AM

    They’re gonna have to sell a whole lotta hogs out in Charlotte to raise that capital

  11. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 6:44 AM

    I thought the flashy blue and red thingies were a warning that Swine flu is ahead.

  12. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 6:52 AM

    @11- guess you thought wrong.

  13. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 6:53 AM

    @11- The word you’re searching for is “siren.”

  14. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 7:02 AM

    @13 If you look closely you will note that those are lights not sirens. They emit no sound. Flashy Blue and Red thingies is quite appropriate in this case.
    si⋅ren   /ˈsaɪrən/ [sahy-ruhn]
    3. an acoustical instrument for producing musical tones, consisting essentially of a disk pierced with holes arranged equidistantly in a circle, rotated over a jet or stream of compressed air, steam, or the like, so that the stream is alternately interrupted and allowed to pass.
    4. an implement of this kind used as a whistle, fog signal, or warning device.

  15. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 7:06 AM

    @14- sure they do. are the speakers on your computer not working?

  16. Posted by Investorcluzo | April 28, 2009 at 7:35 AM

    @15 – FTW!
    why does wells only get a passing mention at the end of the story. without the FAS 157 chicanery, their TCE ratio would be lower than BofA…it’s a buffett conspiracy (second only to gs) – where are you maxine?

  17. Posted by AJ | April 28, 2009 at 8:09 AM

    Does CNBC not get the WSJ? They’re too busy talking about swine flu and Chrysler to mention Citi and BofA’s failure.

  18. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 8:16 AM

    @15 – my speakers are always off so that I can checkout stuff on http://www.redtube.com

  19. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 8:19 AM

    THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS.

  20. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 8:21 AM

    @19 knows what’s up

  21. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 8:31 AM

    See ya Vikram, thanks for playing. Will the next sucker please step up to the line.

  22. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 8:43 AM

    @19. Good TNG reference.
    Perhaps that’s the solution too. With the right Cardassian “incentives”, maybe we will find out there is ample capital at C after all.

  23. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 9:04 AM

    Vik: ” Hold on -as soon as the Raymond photo of me sells we will be fine..”

  24. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 10:50 AM

    Who’s buying the special edition “Playmates of Citibank” issue? First copy is mine.

  25. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 11:38 AM

    @19 – beat me to it!
    but might i make a suggestion in style? perhaps somethings like:
    “There…are…four…lights!”
    -JLP
    would have packed a stronger punch(or would it be “JP”?) In any case, just a matter of preference.
    I have too much time on my hands…I wonder if Diana Troy still gives me a boner…

  26. Posted by NotNasser | April 28, 2009 at 11:51 AM

    16,
    “…it’s a buffett conspiracy (second only to gs) -”
    The Buffett conspiracy was obviously hatched by the conspiratorial parrots of Margaritaville.
    If you watch Sourth Park, you know just how crucial Margaritaville Backed Securities have been.

  27. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 12:19 PM

    @22 wrote: “With the right Cardassian “incentives”, maybe we will find out there is ample capital at C after all.”
    Are you suggesting Kim Cardassian can exert some effect on Citi? I had no idea she was that powerful. Big ass, too. I asked our quants about the financial influences of Kim Cardassian (news to me!!) but even they didn’t know.

  28. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 1:35 PM

    Vikram says: Hey! Look behind you! There is a sick pig coming your way! Of course you think its about the flu epidemic, but really its just his company. In the meantime he uses his new “reach around” technique and lifts your wallet.

  29. Posted by guest | November 8, 2009 at 2:52 PM

    those blinking lights are killing my eyes… I’m gonna have seizure. bondage porn

  30. Posted by Oakley Lifestyle | May 3, 2012 at 9:15 AM

    What would be your next topic next week on your blog.;;”*-This is the proper blog for anybody who wants to find out about this topic. You understand a lot its nearly hard to argue with you (not that I truly would need…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just nice!

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.