• 28 Apr 2009 at 3:27 PM

Cherchez l’Homme

sisters.jpgWell, now that you men have completely trashed the financial system, banking and, basically, the entire global economy, we women are going to have to (as usual) clean up the mess. First Iceland, now this. This time, however, there are going to be a few changes around here- that is, according to people familiar with the matter.

Would the world economy have got into such a mess if more women had been in charge? It’s a difficult question to answer.
The economic crisis, though, could put a spotlight on what women offer as leaders who could help repair the damage.
“We’d love to think it would make a difference,” said Ruth Sealy, deputy director of the International Center for Women Leaders at Cranfield University.
Sealy said the crisis is bringing to light academic research, which includes studies showing that mixed management teams make better decisions and are more innovative.

Can women managers reduce your business risk? [Reuters]

Comments (35)

  1. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:31 PM

    EP and Bess 2012

  2. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:34 PM

    Technically, of course, the answer is no- we would not be in this economic mess if more women were in charge. We would still be stuck in gas crisis of the late 1970s and there would be no internet although revenue for tissue companies would be astronomical.

  3. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:35 PM

    How about trannyes?

  4. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:38 PM

    Cherchez la femme!

  5. Posted by alphadog | April 28, 2009 at 3:39 PM

    to quote Michael Lewis, “We’ve all been hearing a lot lately about the dangers of testosterone. A preposterous idea is gaining traction: that the problem with Wall Street is that it is run exclusively by men. News flash: Wall Street always has been run exclusively by men. If this crisis is worse than previous ones it may be because, for the first time in financial history, women were let in. Remember Erin Callan, Zoe Cruz, Sallie Krawcheck”

  6. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:39 PM

    These comments are gonna be great…

  7. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    Two words:
    Erin Callan

  8. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM

    @7 Two More Words
    Zoe Cruz!!!!!
    Yeah, Chicks would do better….NOT!!!

  9. Posted by NAS Keflavik boi | April 28, 2009 at 3:42 PM

    Funny, but I didn’t notice any of the gals in Reykjavik turning down the any of the luxuries during their bogus boom years…

  10. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:44 PM

    Actually, if women were in charge we’d still be living in mud huts

  11. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:44 PM

    Two words: Mirant Corporation

  12. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:45 PM

    @5 Great observation. Chicks watered down the Testosterone and screwed us all but good (figuratively!).

  13. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:47 PM

    One word, LOBSTERTRANNY

  14. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:48 PM

    HP’s Fiorina and Dunn !!

  15. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:53 PM

    Dealbreaker

  16. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    Midgets?

  17. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:57 PM

    @10- Actually, according to my 401k, I can now only hope to one day retire to a mud hut.

  18. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    Yeah that mixed team of Hill/Billy really hit a homer. If only we could mix it up agian. Maybe we could get Hill’s medical coverage program passed the paper napkin phase?
    Or Pelosi? She is doing a bang up job. Or Feinstein (fuckin loser) or Palin (what a let down).
    Caroline Kennedy anyone?
    I dont think its a sex thing both sides seem to have their own bad apples.

  19. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 3:59 PM

    Apparently a PM at SAC thought the same way…

  20. Posted by Anal_yst | April 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM

    I can’t wait to read all the comments that come out of this, although I’m sorry to disappoint in not adding anything inflammatory myself other than to refer to LoSC’s analysis of Pomegranate Capital
    http://longorshortcapital.com/pomegranate-capital-thinks-women-can-run-money-better-is-wrong.htm

  21. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 4:17 PM

    SWINE FLU

  22. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 4:25 PM

    This entire mess started some 30 years ago with the Iron Lady of Lombard Street, Margaret Thatcher, before Mr. Supply Side, Ronny Reagan, even made it to the White House. Gender’s got dick to do with it…

  23. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM

    This is just another example of gender bias and the feminization of America – maybe the world. A few men got out of hand and a whole bunch of us now have to pay for their party but that doesn’t make it a “man” thing that happened.

  24. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 4:47 PM

    This is just another example of gender bias and the feminization of America – maybe the world. A few men got out of hand and a whole bunch of us now have to pay for their party but that doesn’t make it a “man” thing that happened.

  25. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM
  26. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM

    I would like to get Rebecca Mark back into the mix. She would know what to do.
    http://www.apfn.org/ENRON/skilling-mark.jpg

  27. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 5:22 PM

    Ruth Madoff would be a good CFO selection, and how about CodePink’s Medea Benjamin for Investor Relations VP?
    The Guy from Delaware

  28. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 5:35 PM

    I’m not sure how women can find the time to contribute in a leadership role.
    There’s not enough time as is to make my dinner, wash my clothes, keep my apartment clean, grab me a cold one from the fridge on game days, and do whatever it is they do with the rest of their time (i.e. hair, nails, read magazines, ‘work-out’, weddings, talk on the phone constantly, etc).

  29. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 5:37 PM

    That’s right ladies! Tie us up and make us tell the truth!

  30. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 5:48 PM

    A successful man is one who can earn more money than his wife can possibly spend.
    A successful woman is one who can find that man.
    A successful male CEO is one who can earn earn more than his shareholders can possibly expect.
    A successful female CEO is one who can inherit such a company.

  31. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 6:23 PM

    I am going to buy my daughter the Lisa Lionheart doll.

  32. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 6:42 PM

    @31
    Is that pre or post clueless valley girl sayings added?

  33. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 7:12 PM

    @31 “like oh my gawd, post of course, math is hard”

  34. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 7:27 PM

    Dinner better be ready by the time I get home

  35. Posted by trojan | April 29, 2009 at 2:25 AM

    I’m a man who discovered the wheel and built the Eiffel Tower out of metal and brawn. That’s what kind of man I am. You’re just a woman with a small brain. With a brain a third the size of us. It’s science.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.