• 23 Apr 2009 at 12:33 PM

The Playboy Stimulus Plan

Picture 1168.pngRemember a million years ago (real time: back in October), when Playboy put the call out for “Women of Wall Street” to help tackle the financial crisis by taking their clothes off? The feature was supposed to run in the February issue, but that came and went with nary a peep of financial services T&A. We assumed it was ’cause no one in the field was willing to get naked, despite the fact that it was for the good of the economy. Apparently, not so much! The spank rag’s May issue features the promised Wall Street spread. I’d say what follows is probably NSFW,* unless you happen to work at SAC, in which case consider this a guide to career advancement. Later today we’ll post the vintage (August 1989) WoWS feature, for comparison’s sake.
*Though we did cover the most intimate areas with a familiar face.


Picture 1179.png
First up we’ve got Tara DeGregorio, a “former executive assistant” at “an elite Fortune 500 company.” Tara’s business wisdom: “I was a rule breaker. I liked high stilettos and cute skirts. I tried to abide by the rules, but I pushed the envelope whenever i could, especially in the summer.”
Picture 1171.png
Next, Regina Chapman, a branch-bank VP. Says Chaps: “I deal with men who have been in the business for years, but I prove I know what I’m talking about.”
Picture 1172.png
Here we have Alicia Taylor, a managing member at Mortgage Solutions. Before the markets tanked, she was “literally about to buy a plane.” Alicia’s motto is, “If you stay ready, you’ll never have to get ready.” Taylor seriously adds, “I never want to get caught with my pants down.”
Picture 1180.png
Above, Georgia Anderson. She’s a broker at Global Futures.
Picture 1181.png
Here we have Tinea Smith, casually getting out of a cab. She’s a financial advisor at Charles Schwab.
Picture 1182.png
At left, Katherine Bhuckdwonges. She used to be a credit manager at Wells Fargo, until they laid her off. Ridic! According to Katherine, WFC “hires the best looking people.” At right, equities trader Maria Pearson. A year ago, she had “four computers and three phones” at her desk and they were “going crazy.” She didn’t have time to “get up for a second,” or pose for spank rags. Now, “not so much.”

Comments (106)

  1. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM

    too bate, cudn’t master

  2. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM

    Who do I see about making a deposit?

  3. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:45 PM

    What comes to their minds when I say “shocker”?

  4. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:47 PM

    Heh, he. My guess is that @1-3 are unemployed. Thus opening NSFW entries. Losers.

  5. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:48 PM

    Looking at air-brushed cuties never gets old.

  6. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:49 PM

    Can June issue be “Women of Business Schools”, please? I need to raise some money to finance my MBA.

  7. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:49 PM

    er, like yourself @4?

  8. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:50 PM

    I like how some of the job descriptions are in the present tense, as if they’re posing for Playboy while still working at the company.
    And only the last one can potentially make the case that her job had anything to do with Wall Street. The rest are boring retail-side folks. “Buy a plane”? Who’s she kidding?

  9. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:50 PM

    too fake, didn’t whack

  10. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:50 PM

    Too jerk, couldn’t off.

  11. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM

    @8- what the fuck did you expect? you think it’s some breaking insight to say that no one currently employed with a real job on wall street would pose for playboy? get over yourself.

  12. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:51 PM

    very fine work.
    still, the definition of what qualifies as “wall street” has gotten pretty loose.
    executive assistant has definitely posed nude before.

  13. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:52 PM

    @1,9,10: Yawn, old.

  14. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 12:55 PM

    Too Charles, couldn’t Schwab.

  15. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:00 PM

    Too Bhuckd, couldn’t wonges

  16. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:02 PM

    @11: Were you in Special Ed. in school? First of all, they’re not, and never were, employed on “Wall Street” or in high finance. Secondly, it was a critique of the magazine’s inconsistent/incorrect descriptions.
    Now shut the fuck up and get back to job hunting.

  17. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:03 PM

    too astro, couldn’t glide

  18. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:04 PM

    @16- you dumb fuck. my point was that it was an idiotic thing to point out. really, these girls don’t work on wall street? holy shit! I thought it was going to be goldman sachs managing directors posing for this thing. Playboy totally misled us!

  19. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:06 PM

    @8- really? you see a picture of a naked chick and your response is to start bitching about how these women “don’t really work on Wall Street”?

  20. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:07 PM

    Bess, you fascinate me. Now I need a cold shower.

  21. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:10 PM

    @18: 16 here, no wonder you got fired. You’re stupid as shit and can’t even stay on topic.

  22. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM

    @16-what the fuck are you talking about? I stayed precisely on point. You said:
    “I like how some of the job descriptions are in the present tense, as if they’re posing for Playboy while still working at the company.
    And only the last one can potentially make the case that her job had anything to do with Wall Street. The rest are boring retail-side folks. ”
    My response was that you’re a tool and master of the obvious for going off on Playboy for not having legit finance people POSE NAKED for them. No one actually thought that was going to happen, except maybe you.

  23. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM

    Bess,
    Wouldn’t your position at DB qualify you as one of the “women of Wall Street”?
    What happened?

  24. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:14 PM

    Too hairy. Couldn’t palm.

  25. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:15 PM

    @24: Who wants to see small tits?
    @22: Shut up already.

  26. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:16 PM

    goddamnit curry!

  27. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM

    anyone know where i can get a massage?
    - second year Boston med student

  28. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:17 PM

    frankly they aren’t even hot. Is this the Staen Island admin issue?
    When do we get the DB edition Bess? EP?

  29. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:20 PM

    @29- I know, wtf? I’m so shocked they could only get low-rent, trashy girls to pose for Playboy.
    –forehead slapper.

  30. Posted by merkin capital partners | April 23, 2009 at 1:22 PM

    bloomberg has a maria pearson formerly of e-trade australia….says she resigned to make Goo Guzzlers 12: It Came from the Planet Butt.

  31. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:28 PM

    @26 Your mom has small tits. I am still banging her.

  32. Posted by FUNdamental | April 23, 2009 at 1:33 PM

    Ms chaps – since you appear to be the most familiar with the crack spread can you explain it to the group?

  33. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:38 PM

    @32, Shut up Dad, you had too many at lunch…

  34. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:44 PM

    -@33
    Crack spreads quantify relationship between crude and product, difference basically being refining margin. If the spread wides, rifiners are making more money, and vice versa. They are quoted as crude:prod1:prod2 i.e. – a 5:3:2 sread is 5 parts crude to 3 parts gasoline and 2 parts heating oil.
    -oblivious to double entendre guy

  35. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 1:44 PM

    I spit my water when I finally realized what you were using for pasties. Well done.

  36. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 2:31 PM

    where are the Noel sisters????

  37. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    where is Lynn Tilton from Patriarch Partners? She would have posed for free.

  38. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 2:51 PM

    Chicken from Global Futures has some GLOBES!!! HEYOOOOOO

  39. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 2:53 PM

    @39 FTW

  40. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 2:57 PM

    the pic you used to cover up the crotch shots/nips = full of win

  41. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 2:57 PM

    the blocks of gold next to chapman are pretty hilarious.

  42. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 3:08 PM

    #6
    I would be more than happy to assist you with said endeavours, I do of course require your modeling portfolio and a conduct a rather ‘lengthy’ interview process.
    The fact that everyone else on here seemingly overlooked your attributes leads me to wonder about their priorities.
    A capite ad calcem,
    -C

  43. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 3:14 PM

    Does being a mortgage broker really qualify as a “woman of wall st”?
    http://www.mortgagesolutionsnv.com/agents/agent.rad?id=8625

  44. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 3:18 PM

    the 1987 version has much hotter women (including the cover babe)
    No suprise there.

  45. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 3:21 PM

    They are hotter than the MD wives i see

  46. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 3:32 PM

    What? No Erin Callan? And what about Erin Burnett? I have to beleive she would have loved to show off her brand new store bought fun bags.

  47. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 3:42 PM

    I was hoping for a B&W arty/tasteful topless shot of Karen Finerman.

  48. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 3:43 PM

    @46 i would still hit it with any of these babes if i had the chance.
    chapman has a backside you could wreck a 3-storey parking structure with.

  49. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 3:46 PM

    @46 so? i would still hit it with any of these ladies if i had the chance.
    chapman has a backside you could wreck a 3-storey parking structure with.

  50. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 4:15 PM

    And they all mow the lawn

  51. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 4:17 PM

    I want to have a threesome with Bess and Karen Finerman.

  52. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 4:26 PM

    I’m sure one of these “ladies of wall street” ended up at FoxNews — time to investigate? In HD?

  53. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 4:31 PM

    Does anyone think Chapman has a backside with which you could wreck a three story parking structure?

  54. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 4:48 PM

    Which of these young lovelies would be most welcoming of a good old fashioned cleveland steamer?

  55. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 5:26 PM

    Just jerked off on the pics on the empty floor. who else did already?

  56. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 5:28 PM

    @35: Ha, check out her bio on that link:
    “My experience includes, but is not limited TOO…”

  57. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 5:42 PM

    The only cute one is Maria

  58. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 6:57 PM

    Katherine is cute too in the face.
    and Georgia doesn’t need to be with swingers like that!

  59. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM

    @8 what did you expect? Someone who works at a top hedge fund to pose?

  60. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 8:27 PM

    Actually, they all give the rusty trombone. Why can’t I post Bess is really a man, BABY!!!!

  61. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 8:29 PM

    er, those cause those of us who’ve actually met her know it’s not true, freak show who keeps posting @63.

  62. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 8:31 PM

    the last two are super cute

  63. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 8:32 PM

    the last two are super cute

  64. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 8:32 PM

    the last two are super cute

  65. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 8:32 PM

    are those things on georgia real?

  66. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 9:11 PM

    Those things on georgia aren’t real.

  67. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 9:21 PM

    katherine is a cutie

  68. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 9:21 PM

    katherine is a cutie

  69. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 9:21 PM

    georia’s could be real

  70. Posted by Last Man Standing | April 23, 2009 at 10:14 PM

    @59
    thanks for pointing out, almost missed it.
    I noticed her bio wasn’t professionally written.
    Administration is also spelled wrong.
    “In addition to a bachelors degree in Business Adminstration from UNLV, I’ve served as an Assistant Vice President for Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and an Area Manager for Conseco Finance to name a few”
    Pathetic. good thing PLAYBOY was hiring.

  71. Posted by guest | April 23, 2009 at 10:20 PM

    @LMS- does it make you feel like a big man to critique the relative professionalism of a chick WHO POSES FOR PLAYBOY?

  72. Posted by Last Man Standing | April 23, 2009 at 10:28 PM

    @74
    that wasn’t a critique

  73. Posted by guest | April 24, 2009 at 11:35 AM

    Georgia and her twins have their own imdb page.
    http://us.vdc.imdb.com/name/nm1851698/
    and she has a website.
    http://www.georgiaanderson.com/home.html

  74. Posted by guest | April 24, 2009 at 9:51 PM

    @53 – I thought I was the only one with a Finerman thing going on

  75. Posted by guest | April 24, 2009 at 10:19 PM

    I actually might get fired for looking at that. A little more warning would have been nice. Jeez.

  76. Posted by guest | April 26, 2009 at 1:01 AM

    @74: I think you’re probably Alicia Taylor and you’re getting defensive. There’s no need, really.

  77. Posted by guest | April 26, 2009 at 5:01 PM

    I wonder how many of you could actually pose nude for ANY publication, and make it look as good as these girls do. While you all are sitting on your asses criticizing some of these women in your ambiguity I bet not one of you is as accomplished as these ladies are….Quit hating.

  78. Posted by guest | April 26, 2009 at 5:22 PM

    “I bet not one of you is as accomplished as these ladies are”
    er, um, these women are basically bank tellers, so yeah, I’d say most people are more accomplished than them. whether or not we’d look good in playboy is another story.

  79. Posted by guest | April 26, 2009 at 5:22 PM

    @79- the fact that you were told what follows was from playboy, and that it was NSFW wasn’t enough?

  80. Posted by guest | April 26, 2009 at 7:02 PM

    To you 81. I know the mortgage broker and she is accomplished. The woman’s firm has been extremely successful in the home lending business. Furthermore, the woman looks great in the shot. Let’s see what YOU look like in the same shot!
    The funny thing about the Net is that plenty of people have opinions about everything and know NOTHING about the things they comment on.
    You people are the JOKE.

  81. Posted by guest | April 26, 2009 at 7:43 PM

    “whether or not we’d look good in playboy is another story.”
    Yeah….I’ll bet! *snicker*

  82. Posted by guest | April 26, 2009 at 7:45 PM

    @ 81 “whether or not we’d look good in playboy is another story.”
    Yeah….I’ll bet! *snicker*

  83. Posted by guest | April 27, 2009 at 7:37 PM

    @49 53 77 ohh yea I’d make her some fast money

  84. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 8:56 PM

    Regina chapman is beautiful. Perfection on the body.

  85. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 8:59 PM

    I agree! Regina is the only pretty one. She looks more like a playmate!

  86. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 9:05 PM

    Regina chapman is beautiful. Perfection on the body.

  87. Posted by guest | April 28, 2009 at 9:10 PM

    Chapman is the only wall street qualified. Beauty and brains!

  88. Posted by guest | April 30, 2009 at 1:12 AM

    Chapman is the only exotic one. she is very pretty and I love the smile. Nice job Playboy.

  89. Posted by guest | May 16, 2009 at 6:26 PM

    http://www.vegasnews.com/5944/local-mortgage-broker-alicia-taylor-featured-as-one-of-playboy’s-women-of-wall-street.html
    “A local business powerhouse”… Looks like she’s pretty darn successful.

  90. Posted by guest | May 29, 2009 at 5:29 PM

    MAJOR CABLE NETWORK CASTING
    NYC WALL STREET DOCU-SERIES
    We are currently looking for intelligent, articulate and vibrant women to participate in a docu-series for a major cable network illustrating women fighting to keep up with the shift in the economy.
    The ideal candidate would be a woman with a Wall Street background herself, or is/has been involved in a relationship with a Wall Street businessman.
    With the recession, this woman is for the first time cutting coupons, looking at price tags, and explaining to her friends and family that she is no longer living that Wall Street lifestyle.
    If you appear to be in your mid 20s to late 30s and fit the criteria above please send us a brief description and photo of yourself to [email protected]
    http://www.vinniep.com

  91. Posted by allthat | February 10, 2010 at 7:21 PM

    tara degregorio dated a dude on the NY islanders

  92. Posted by allthat | February 10, 2010 at 7:23 PM

    tara degregorio dated a dude on the NY islanders

  93. Posted by allthat | February 10, 2010 at 7:23 PM

    tara degregorio dated a dude on the NY islanders

  94. Posted by clkamg7 | April 4, 2010 at 9:09 PM

    i met tara shes a cool chick hot too

  95. Posted by dean | June 12, 2010 at 10:05 PM

    nice firm assets…i’d give them mine any day to play with.

  96. Posted by Nick | June 15, 2010 at 11:31 AM

    Nice professional titles for their real job of PROSTITUTES…

  97. Posted by Women of Wall Street SNAKED « ModelSnaked | June 17, 2010 at 2:00 AM

    [...] Snaked Wall Street [...]

  98. Posted by mets07 | November 15, 2010 at 2:31 AM

    tara looks like the only playmate here

  99. Posted by joey | September 16, 2010 at 2:18 AM

    the blonde is the hottest

  100. Posted by UFO | January 11, 2012 at 1:01 AM

    Thank you, Bess

  101. Posted by leveriched finance | January 12, 2012 at 4:45 PM

    Bess for President

  102. Posted by Proudlove | January 25, 2012 at 5:01 AM

    This is the best financial reporting I've read for a long time

  103. Posted by Tammi | September 8, 2012 at 10:09 PM

    There was a time when i would become capable of finding good advice out of your web sites.

  104. Posted by bookmarking submission | September 9, 2012 at 2:24 PM

    xgWAte A round of applause for your post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on…

  105. Posted by crork | September 21, 2012 at 9:02 AM

    KFLa0k Thanks so much for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  106. Posted by cheap seo services | September 24, 2012 at 2:57 PM

    kgdgAG Major thankies for the article post.Really thank you! Awesome.