• 06 Apr 2009 at 10:59 AM

Throw The Stress Ball

So you know those stress tests all the big guys took? Yes, you do. Don’t play dumb. The ones that were based on awful economic assumptions intended to be a “worst case” scenario analysis about what would happen if things got “this bad?” Yes, the one that had unemployment at 8.4% for a baseline “this sucks” scenario (we’ve already exceeded that- Go Team!). Well, grading time has begun:

Top federal bank regulators plan to meet early this week to discuss how to analyze the results of stress tests being conducted on the country’s 19 largest banks, people familiar with the matter said.
Regulators announced the tests two months ago as part of an effort to determine how much assistance big banks might need to continue lending if the economic downturn worsens. The government is wrestling with how to bolster the lenders without appearing to prop up banks that are beyond repair.

So what do the results of the stress tests mean? Well, we are really, really, for sure not going to let a bank that takes the test fail…

The announcement of the tests in February drove down bank stocks, as investors fretted that the government might use the tests to shut down or nationalize lenders. The Obama administration has said it won’t let any of the banks undergoing the tests to fail.

…and we seriously aren’t going to let the results leak out. Seriously. We promise.

“I think serious efforts will be made to respect the confidential nature of the test and its results,” he said, but added that “there is a real danger that the results of the stress test are uncovered and this roils the markets.”

It is the return of Double Secret Probation! Wipe that smirk off your face, mister. This is serious business.
More, after the jump.




Officials Prepare to Analyze Stress Tests
[The Wall Street Journal]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (6)

  1. Posted by guest | April 6, 2009 at 11:05 AM

    Are they going to be graded on a curve?

  2. Posted by guest | April 6, 2009 at 11:10 AM

    Senator Blutarsky is on the job.

  3. Posted by guest | April 6, 2009 at 11:19 AM

    Toga Toga Toga

  4. Posted by guest | April 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM

    fuck it. lets go bowling.

  5. Posted by guest | April 6, 2009 at 12:55 PM

    Mr Mack two C’s, two D’s and an F. That’s a 1.2. Congratulations, Kroger. You’re at the top of the Wall Street pledge class. Mr. Lewis? Zero point two… Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son. Mr. Dimon, Leader on Wall Street? One point six; four C’s and an F. A fine example you set! Edward Liddy… HAS no grade point average. All courses incomplete. Mr. Pan – MR. PANDIT… ZERO POINT ZERO.

  6. Posted by guest | April 6, 2009 at 12:55 PM

    Mr Mack two C’s, two D’s and an F. That’s a 1.2. Congratulations, Mack. You’re at the top of the Wall Street pledge class. Mr. Lewis? Zero point two… Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son. Mr. Dimon, Leader on Wall Street? One point six; four C’s and an F. A fine example you set! Edward Liddy… HAS no grade point average. All courses incomplete. Mr. Pan – MR. PANDIT… ZERO POINT ZERO.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.