Just wanted to pop in and tell you not to fear that tomorrow’s business leaders will get us into another sticky situation, ’cause Harvard MBA students, like the ones above, are now taking an oath promising not to do anything wrong, like some alums from their school.
The MBA Oath FULL VERSION Preamble
As a manager, my purpose is to serve the greater good by bringing people and resources together to create value that no single individual can build alone. Therefore I will seek a course that enhances the value my enterprise can create for society over the long term. I recognize my decisions can have far-reaching consequences that affect the well-being of individuals inside and outside my enterprise, today and in the future. As I reconcile the interests of different constituencies, I will face difficult choices.
Therefore, I promise:
We think Credit Crisis II or Credit Crisis 2.0 has a much nicer ring to it than “W recovery” or some other charting nonsense. (We’re partial to the “M recovery”). Whatever we call it, we may get the chance to revisit old themes. Everything new is old and suchlike. Or so says Reuters:
The global financial crisis may morph into a second, equally virulent phase where borrowing costs rise again, hobbling an embryonic economic recovery, debilitating cash-strapped banks, and punishing investors all over again.
Early warnings signs of this scenario include surging government bond yields, a slumping U.S. dollar, and the fading of the bear market rally in U.S. stocks.
The reality is that the United States has quite a bit of housecleaning still to do. High beta stock rallies spur “green shoots” talk, but trad-weeds will grow anywhere for a time, but have no real staying power. Rising U.S. bond yields may spark Credit Crisis II [Reuters]
Are we surprised that the only big insider trading case in quite a while is somewhere outside of the SEC’s jurisdiction? We seriously doubt whether there is a dearth of large insider trading cases in the United States, but they certainly seem to have fallen by the enforcement wayside. Instead, and it pains us to say this, the SEC seems to be too busy tagging the likes of Mark Cuban to get its shit together.
On January 14 last year Berndale seized control of the account of How Trading, the account Mr Waterhouse held with Berndale to trade options, because it had breached its agreed margin-call levels.
After gaining control of How Trading, Berndale used it to short-sell $51,634,606.22 of blue-chip Australian shares — primarily the major banks and BHP Billiton. On January 17 last year Berndale then used How Trading to short-sell a further $4,260,850.63 of Commonwealth Bank shares.
On January 18 — or January 17 in New York — Merrill Lynch announced a $US9.83 billion fourth-quarter loss, including a $US16.7 billion write-down associated with subprime mortgage losses. Sharemarkets and bank stocks around the world tumbled on the news. In the three trading days after the Merrill Lynch announcement, the S&P/ASX 200 Index fell more than 10.5 per cent.
Have Representative Michael Capuano accuse you of gang banging a bunch of girl scouts? Sit there while Rep. Elijah Cummings makes you feel like a bad person for treating your employees to $200,000 worth of facials? All the while knowing once you’re finally allowed to leave and get back to the office, Hank Greenberg will be hiding behind the door ready to jump out and shout about how none of this was his fault? Today is your lucky day! As previously mentioned, Ed Liddy announced last week that he’ll be getting the hell out of AIG just as soon as they can find a replacement for chairman and CEO (roles that are being separated to spread the love around) and apparently that day cannot come soon enough. Efforts are being ramped up to find two people willing to take on the sweet gigs, led by board member Dennis Dammerman and Big L himself who, wanting out of there a-sap, has said the process should take no more than a few months, tops. Lids told Reuters he expects the person picked as chair will be “someone familiar with the workings of government,” while the CEO post should go to a masochist willing to commit up to five years to the job. Who’s interested?
Pleading, urging, begging, whatever. Call it what you will, this one isn’t going to drift by as “easily” as Chrysler. But then, the Chicago machine is just getting warmed up, isn’t it? Either way, we continue to be amused by the (1 – 0.65) reverse spin on the debt holder (dis)approval numbers.
Advisers to General Motors Corp bondholders representing $27 billion in the automaker’s debt urged investors on Friday to support a debt swap negotiated over the past week with the Obama administration.
Bondholders have until Saturday to register their support for the terms of a deal that would give them up to 25 percent of a reorganized GM. That offer is contingent on the U.S. Treasury determining that enough investors have signed on in support.
Investors representing at least 35 percent of GM’s bonds are expected to support the sweetened offer from the U.S. Treasury, which will be the automaker’s largest shareholder and creditor.
In a conference call open to GM bondholders, advisers to an ad hoc committee representing institutional investors urged other bondholders to offer their support for the deal.
But we wonder if the real story here isn’t this:
For the government to be repaid in full, GM would have to have an enterprise value of $69 billion based on its expected 72.5 percent stake in the company, Siegert said.
Really, the jobs we are “saving” are getting obscenely expensive. What happened to a “bridge loan” and the rough backhand pimp-slap that Treasury and company were supposed to deliver to a GM that was not viable by the deadline?
Paulson never would’ve let this go down on his watch.
Dartmouth College, which was stripped of its triple-A rating this week, is one of the first victims. Both Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Moody’s Investors Service cited investment losses by the Hanover, N.H., school’s endowment and significant debt issuance in their decisions to knock Dartmouth’s rating down a notch.
For those of you holding your breaths, breathe easy:
Borrowing money doesn’t necessarily affect a school’s credit rating. This week, for instance, Moody’s affirmed Harvard’s triple-A status and stable outlook. The ratings firm said despite Harvard’s investment declines, which university officials project at 30% for the current fiscal year, it can still count on significant, if reduced, donations and has the ability to boost revenue by admitting more students.
As for the rest of you, better luck next time, and perhaps think about using your heads and trotting out some tasty freshman treats next time the ratings guys show up to perform on-site diligence.