Day late, dollar short?
The situation is fluid.

Comments (46)

  1. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 2:37 PM

    The value of my labor will never be worth that of a UAW retiree. Remember the ‘good ole days’, and welcome to our world, auto workers. I am not happy to see you here, but my husband was a Teamster, and deregulation put him on the street, after 31 years of service, perfect attendance and no accidents, he gets $810 per month from his local in the IBT. You don’t have it half bad.

  2. Posted by EvilBuzzard | May 26, 2009 at 2:40 PM

    A lot of people who retire from a company that later goes bankrupt get way less. Like $0.00!

  3. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 2:44 PM

    WSJ saying Taxpayers will get 70% of the company, in exchange for “massive” continuing aid.
    In other news, this weekend, I stopped by a GMC/ Pontiac/ Cadillac dealer and couldn’t find a single car that I actually liked. Even if it was given to me free.
    So I’m kind of pissed that my tax dollars are going to work supporting this pig.

  4. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 2:48 PM

    So #3 go to your Chevy dealer and get a Corvette! I like their cars but I own two cars already and intend to keep them a long time.

  5. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 2:52 PM

    Wow I read 1 and got confused…thought maybe I messed up alt-tabbing and was still on salon.com
    Where did you come from sweetheart?

  6. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 2:56 PM

    Didn’t GM, Chrysler and Ford executives make those old nefarious contracts with the unions? Their MBAs and engineering degrees were from where?

  7. Posted by wcburrs87 | May 26, 2009 at 2:57 PM

    Anyone want to dress up in pink on go protest in front of the car dealers out on 11th?

  8. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 2:59 PM

    6 They did. It was a form of deferred comp – rather than grant pay raises they gave away super retirement benfits. And now its time to pay the piper. And the people howling here are the same ones livid over their own deferred comp arrangements being gored as a result of the bankruptcy of their firms.

  9. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:03 PM

    All 3 bigshot natural gas traders in Omaha drive Corvettes because they hold their value and Corvette insurance in Omaha is like 50 bucks a month or something ridiculous like that.

  10. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:08 PM

    What’s Omaha?

  11. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    yeah guys ummm…vettes ummm suck shit.
    If they had 4 doors and were painted yellow they would be taxi cabs.

  12. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:13 PM

    this is a joke, let GM and all the other bloodsucking companies fail

  13. Posted by wcburrs87 | May 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM

    This is not true. WSJ has it wrong. The benefits will be linked to a weighted average of the credit ratings of the major automakers.

  14. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:19 PM

    @8: Since when is $30/hour for manual labor requiring of “raises”? The only reason wage levels got to that point (when manufacturing in the U.S. was moving to Mexico and then offshore) was the cudgel of the union. So they jacked up the cost of their own constituency, and now it is THEY who are howling. GM had a choice in the ‘good old days’ – workers at $30/hour + a promise in the future, or workers at $50/hour and never making a profit.

  15. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:27 PM

    Didn’t they have a “no strikes until 2015″ clause? Which really improves the quality of vehicles on the line.

  16. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    I live a very comfortable life in Houston. 3500 sq ft, wife, and a Lexis.
    All in all, I am very content.

  17. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    14 15 You’re ignoring the original point, which was that management agreed to all this and therefore don’t blame the union.

  18. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:32 PM

    Union folk know how to negotiate better than Harvard educated MBAs.

  19. Posted by wcburrs87 | May 26, 2009 at 3:32 PM

    @17, Unions are an easy scapegoat for poor management.

  20. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:33 PM

    @17 with 17% ownership does not the Union become Management?

  21. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:34 PM

    Thank god this situation is fluid. Now where is that damn silver bullet, Tim?

  22. Posted by Tax Chick | May 26, 2009 at 3:34 PM

    @8 – I think many bankers here were upset at the prospect of having their entire bonus clawed back (99% tax bill proposed by the House) after having been paid it (and presumably spent a considerable amount of it), not at the prospect of having their retirement benefits cut (that the stockmarket did without any government involvement).
    I fail to see how retroactive taxation and the reduction of retirement benefits are the same.

  23. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:34 PM

    @16 must be a BP North America propane trader.

  24. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:39 PM

    @22 The most insane and bloated pensions around -> government employees

  25. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:43 PM

    No, @ 16 is R. Allen “I am not a Ponzi Schemer” Stanford.

  26. Posted by merkin capital partners | May 26, 2009 at 3:50 PM

    @16 is Lexis your wife?
    /Louie Veeton

  27. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:51 PM

    @1, @2: but the UAW are voters … oh the humanity

  28. Posted by Tax Chick | May 26, 2009 at 3:51 PM

    @16 is Ross Perot

  29. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    @ 5, my mommy.

  30. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    @11 – Yeah, the 2009 ZR1 has a terrible HP to cost ratio.

  31. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    @16 – You are embarrassing our great state.
    Person from Dallas

  32. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 4:03 PM

    Did @16 say he has a 3500 sq ft wife? Must have married a day girl from Gigi’s Caberet on 290.

  33. Posted by miami | May 26, 2009 at 4:11 PM

    Ah, the Equities in Dallas crew has arrived.

  34. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM

    Too Short – Didn’t Read

  35. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 4:17 PM

    I think her name is aLexis

  36. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 4:29 PM

    This person from Houston is an idiot. I weep for the people of Texas.

  37. Posted by merkin capital partners | May 26, 2009 at 4:31 PM

    Ha, an Equities in Dallas joke from someone in Miami.
    Shouldn’t you be at da club? Or playing paddle ball with boi’s?

  38. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 4:38 PM

    I live in houston.. Cost of living is dirt cheap.. there’s a reason for that.

  39. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    They have 3500 sq ft women in Houston? Jesus H Christ. I thought Charlotte was bad.

  40. Posted by Uptown Blumpkin | May 26, 2009 at 4:48 PM

    The Lexis/Houston bit is from Above the Law. guest beat it to death on that site, so I guess it’s been imported to DB.

  41. Posted by Anal_yst | May 26, 2009 at 4:58 PM

    Where are all the Ibankers pensions?

  42. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 4:59 PM

    Lexis is spelled Lexus if you are talking about the car. Idiots.

  43. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 5:03 PM

    41 These pensions that everyone is getting all excited about have an NPV of around $250,000. Want to give up Ibanking for that?

  44. Posted by guest | May 26, 2009 at 5:08 PM

    Pensions are for pussies.

  45. Posted by Anal_yst | May 26, 2009 at 5:30 PM

    @43
    It was a joke, firstly, and secondly, if I didn’t have an expensive education, one which I’ll be further advancing shortly (and at relatively great expense), never ever had to work more than 35 hours/week with insane benefits for my entire family until I die, etc, etc ad nauseum, then sure.

  46. Posted by EvilBuzzard | May 27, 2009 at 12:04 PM

    @27 – I wish I could join the UAW and be considered humanity as well. Then again, I wouldn’t join any club that would be dumb enough to have me!

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.