• 05 May 2009 at 10:02 AM

Chinese Wife Swap

china.jpgAlmost unnoticed (almost) China has been quietly making provisions to avoid the three-way-conversion from local currency to dollars to yuan when dealing with Central and South American trading partners. This should lift eyebrows in the United States, but so far it hasn’t. This might help:

China replaced the United States to become Brazil’s biggest trading partner, said Brazil’s Ministry of Development, Industry and Exterior Trade on Monday.
According to the trade balance released by the ministry, the sum of Brazil’s exports and imports with China reached 3.2 billion U.S. dollars in April, over the 2.8 billion dollars in its trade with the U.S.
Trade Minister Welber Barral said the change was “historic,” as the U.S. has been Brazil’s biggest trading partner since the 1930s.

Though the trade pacts are being sold as a way to unfreeze trade during the global economic slump, but the arrangements could well be the beginning of a larger effort by China engage in a little trade partner swapping. China already has put in place a $10 billion currency swap with Argentina, as well as deals with Malaysia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Belarus, Indonesia just in the last five months.
Is anyone paying attention over at Treasury?
China surpasses U.S. to become Brazil’s biggest trading partner [China View]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (21)

  1. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:06 AM

    This is serious business. Really though…can we get Bush back already?

  2. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:07 AM

    We Are The Ones We’ve Been Waiting For

  3. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:14 AM

    These currency swaps are less than meets the eye. The yuan isn’t convertible an won’t be for a long time. I can assure you that when a crisis hits rich Argentinians and BraIlians want dollars. Yuan are relatively useless to them. This is just a way for China to lend people dollars but not lose an ass-ton of money (in yuan terms) when they inevitably have to stop manipulating the currency and let it appreciate. Of course they will lose an ass-ton on treasuries when that happens, but they married themselves to that position a long time ago.

  4. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:20 AM

    @1
    Bush didn’t know what a currency was.
    @3
    Absolutely.
    Anyway, the Chinese has been dealing with countries like Brazil as those countries are sources of raw materials that the Chinese can use. As the US has declined its manufacturing base (or transferred it to China), the US has less use for those materials. This has been happening for years.

  5. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:23 AM

    Does this mean more rainforest gets cut down and therefore already endangered pygmy marmosets could be extinct in a few years?
    This is not good. Not good at all.

  6. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:24 AM

    Me Chinese
    Me play joke
    Me put peepee
    In your Coke

  7. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:26 AM

    @7
    you must have been the funniest kid in kindergarten. loser.

  8. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:26 AM

    But EP, what about secured creditors?

  9. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:29 AM

    @7 = loser, probably NYU grad

  10. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:30 AM

    @6 Nice marmot…

  11. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 10:46 AM

    -@6
    yeah, and dont forget the tree skipping flowerfukker monkey and the blue winged assbiter moth. They too will be gone soon now.

  12. Posted by miami | May 5, 2009 at 10:55 AM

    5 – go back to reading the Slate Bushism of the day.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jt5dY3vVoZ0
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDJSVPAx8xc

  13. Posted by Ops slave | May 5, 2009 at 11:14 AM

    Me thinks EP do not trust the chinese…

  14. Posted by EvilBuzzard | May 5, 2009 at 11:19 AM

    Oh relax, The Chinese had tea parties at least 1,000 years before Samual Adams was a gleam in daddy’s horny little eye.

  15. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 11:35 AM
  16. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 11:41 AM

    Fuckin’ fascists. Oh, wait …

  17. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 12:07 PM
  18. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 12:41 PM

    @16
    On a balance of trade basis, the deficit in US exports of goods have increased 747% from 1992 to 2008.

  19. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 1:15 PM

    @19, so? If you’re saying change in net exports, the US trade deficit was much smaller in 1992 than 2008, so sure. But that is the change in the difference between imports and exports. Not a figure representing any sort of total volume.

  20. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 4:36 PM

    @20
    On a monthly basis the exports of goods peaked in July of 2008. As of February of 2009 the volume has gone down 30% from the peak.
    Now lets justify why trade deficits don’t matter. You can have a high export volume but if your import volume is much higher, then you have to borrow to pay for it. The Chinese are our lender to finance our purchases of Chinese goods and even more, according to Setser.
    The economic debacle may even soften the trade deficit over the near term as the increase in the imports of goods slow down, but will the trade deficit start to grow again when (or if) the economy recovers?

  21. Posted by guest | May 5, 2009 at 7:04 PM

    I love the word “ass-ton.” Is there a rough definition of how much that is or is it like “grillion?”

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.