Picture 1348.png
I hope when the days comes (and mark my words, for the CEOs in the audience, it will) that one of you finds your position in jeopardy on account of some harmless topless photos (though in Lewis’s case they’ll be crotch shots), someone in power (Tim Geithner) will be so kind as to do the same.
“Carrie will remain Miss California,” Donald Trump – the Miss USA owner – said in a press conference on Tuesday [Access Hollywood]

Comments (53)

  1. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 12:38 PM

    i’d have a threesome with her

  2. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 12:38 PM

    Too skinny for love.

  3. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM

    you, her, and the Donald I assume…

  4. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 12:40 PM

    She has that sort of “part Jillian Barberie part Ann Coulter” look to her.
    Look alive Marino!

  5. Posted by Anal_yst | May 12, 2009 at 12:44 PM

    I’d f*ck the stupid/intolerance/etc outa that broad in a heartbeat

  6. Posted by Lowly Assistant | May 12, 2009 at 12:44 PM

    4,
    Totally. Her hair needs to thin out a bit more to achieve full-Coulter capabilities. Her chest (above the sugar) looks like a xylophone. Yikes.

  7. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 12:45 PM

    Who does #2 work for!?
    -M. Walters

  8. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 12:46 PM

    @Anal_yst – if there’s one thing i can’t stand its intolerance. That and all these homos wanting to get hitched.

  9. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 12:53 PM

    9 here, that came out wrong. I meant the problem of spending all this time on this bullshit controversy.

  10. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 12:55 PM

    As per the Trump rules, Ken Lewis can have his male member enhanced by TARP money but no crotch shots, please!
    What stupidity and absurdnes!

  11. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:08 PM

    That twat is just another goldigging strumpet with the all-about-me attitude. WhyTF else would she continue to swear that those f’n “racy” photos were taken when she was just 17?
    Not TGFD’s type at all.
    If you clowns know what’s good for you, she wouldn’t be your type either.
    The Guy from Delaware

  12. Posted by HAM05 | May 12, 2009 at 1:10 PM

    @lowly – xylophone chest, perfect.

  13. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:16 PM

    I kind of agree with her, but not completely. Marriage should be between a woman and a man and another woman.

  14. Posted by trojan | May 12, 2009 at 1:17 PM

    in socal, we called these girls bro hos. they screw any dude with a cool myspace and rides motocross

  15. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM

    @9
    ummmm what about lesbians? why does everybody forget the hot showtime lesbians

  16. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM

    How much?
    -Dent

  17. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:34 PM

    What’s with all this crap about the greatness of “same sex marriages”? I’ve been married 20 years and all I have is the same sex. Believe me, “same sex” marriages ain’t so great after 20 years.

  18. Posted by blndebnker | May 12, 2009 at 1:34 PM

    I might think she’s an idiot, but she is entitled to an opinion. I don’t see why they were threatening to take her crown at all. Blah blah racy photos blah blah. All of these bitches are posing naked. And why wouldn’t she? She’s drop-dead.

  19. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:35 PM

    @9 you should have just stopped at 8

  20. Posted by Anal_yst | May 12, 2009 at 1:37 PM

    @blndebnker
    I’d disagree. There seems to be this concept that everyone is “entitled” to their opinion, but I don’t believe that to be the case. Everyone may be entitled to a remotely informed opinion, but idiotically spouting off nonsense from a position of extreme ignorance I just don’t feel is a right (i.e. a fist/palm to face is warranted).

  21. Posted by blndebnker | May 12, 2009 at 1:46 PM

    @Anal_yst – How about a compromise? She’s entitled to her ridiculous opinion but not the stage on which to unleash it on the world? I would agree that she probably shouldn’t be allowed to spread her ignorance to the masses. But then again, she lost even after undergoing emergency breast augmentation so you know she’s smarting from that.

  22. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:49 PM

    @21,
    Is that the same position of extreme ignorance regarding same-sex marriage as President Obama & Sec. State Clinton? Just askin’ if they warrant a fist/palm to the face too?

  23. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:52 PM

    @18 – I hear you, but I don’t think most of the toddlers on this board get the joke.
    - Bill Clinton

  24. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:57 PM

    Sorry, three or four major religions are against gay marriage. And marriage as a concept is strongly associated with religion so tough luck.
    I’m sure civil unions are more popular. No one wants gays to go without tax benefits, visitation rights, right to sue each other on separation.
    Its the other stuff attached to legally married status that society doesn’t like or is nervous about.
    1. If legal marriages are gay marriages, are churches allowed to refuse to rent their premises to same-sex marriages? There have been churches sued on this who only kept the right based on the fact that gay marriages weren’t legal.
    2. Do gay couples get same ranking as straight couples in the adoption queues or in disputing custody in a divorce?
    3. Do you allow gay couples family reunion under immigration law? And if so how to do you verify genuine status on gay couples from a location which doesn’t have a legal gay marriage? Poorly managed this a backdoor to a broken immigration system.
    4. Do companies automatically have to cover gay spouses or be guilty of anti-discrimination?
    5. Once you establish anti-discrimination based arguments can be used to review marriage law without popular support, how do you stop the legalization of bigamy? A major religion (Islam) allows it. Religious status is a more clearly protected criteria than sexual behaviour.

  25. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:59 PM

    The stage on which she has unleashed her ridiculous opinion was earned. Your problem is how WE value this girl.

  26. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:00 PM

    Anal_yst (Perez)..
    You’re a fucking idiot…She was asked a question and she answered it.
    You just don’t like the answer she gave.
    Eat a dick (or more of them)

  27. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:06 PM

    Guest@#26…
    TGFD places her value at less than $2 per share. You know, same as GM.
    Guest@#17…
    TGFD thinks your wit went right by the tools. Great post.
    The Guy from Delaware

  28. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:09 PM

    Please keep the comments coming about the body and mind of the beauty queen only lol
    @18 and 24. I m probably 30 years younger than you and I totally agree!! 20 years with the same women!! seriously?? I change cars every 3 years!!

  29. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:11 PM
  30. Posted by blndebnker | May 12, 2009 at 2:13 PM

    @26 – I absolutely have no problem with how anyone else values her. I already said she’s freaking gorgeous. I’d do her. But she still is a moron, in my opinion. I think the worst part is that a lot of these pageants try to masquerade as a forum for smart women who happen to be pretty to advance when I think it’s pretty obvious by several of the fallen beauty queens that that isn’t the case. If these girls want to parade around and win contests for being beautiful, than they absolutely should. Do what you’re good at.

  31. Posted by blndebnker | May 12, 2009 at 2:15 PM

    than = then

  32. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:24 PM

    @ 26
    Value this girl?? hmm how about a kiss on the cheek and slap her ass and ask her make a sandwich! OK she’s beautiful but what else? 90% of the people in this forum deserve more recognition than a 6ft and 70 lbs chick who carries weight on her bag so she doesn’t get blown away by the wind.

  33. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:26 PM

    P.S. I ‘stripped’ my way through community college.
    Blndebnker

  34. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:27 PM

    @ 26
    Value this girl?? hmm how about a kiss on the cheek and slap her ass and ask her make a sandwich! OK she’s beautiful but what else? 90% of the people in this forum deserve more recognition than a 6ft and 70 lbs chick who carries weight on her bag so she doesn’t get blown away by the wind.

  35. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:30 PM

    I meant stripped without the ”. Don’t know what I was thinking.
    Blndebnker

  36. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:40 PM

    @30, i just pissed myself

  37. Posted by Anal_yst | May 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM

    @27
    Aw poor baby, don’t like them “homos” eh? Afraid you might be one of them?
    I was speaking generally in @21, I wasn’t commenting on that specific question assclown.
    Now go back to denying your inner fag and stop jumping to conclusions.

  38. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM

    Although I don’t agree with Miss Cali’s views, guest@23 does make a valid point — where the fuck is the outrage from the left over BHO’s stance on gay marriage?
    Go back and watch the debates when Obama and Biden were finally cornered into a yes or no answer.
    Barry and Biden gave the same answer as Palin and Prejean.
    Now THAT’S pathetic.

  39. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:47 PM

    ANAL_CYST
    Why is it that fags try to insult others by calling them fags?
    27 & 30.

  40. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:53 PM

    @4 love the Nutrisystem reference. If it weren’t for Nutrisystem and the AARP, CNBC would have no ad revenue.

  41. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:58 PM

    so which one:
    Prejean or Becky Quick?

  42. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 3:06 PM

    She’s beautiful. In this culture, that permits her the forum to speak about basically anything she wants.
    In ancient Greece, the qualifications were different. In Muslim countries today, they are different still.
    That’s all I’m saying. Sometimes it sucks, yes. So, what are you going to do to change it? Stop shaving your legs?
    26.

  43. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 3:14 PM

    At least she is good looking… except for the fake boobs part. That makes her more valuable to my weiner than any female banker that I’ve met in my life.

  44. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    I think 44 just made my point better than I ever could have.
    26.

  45. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 3:45 PM

    mehh… I’ve never been much of a ‘face guy’ (vs. body). The face does one, maybe two things for me.
    – Nomore Vinnys

  46. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 4:54 PM

    i bet she has nice feet

  47. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 5:00 PM

    I was so lonely in college that I used to shave one leg to try to get the idea of what sleeping next to a girl feels like.
    ~Lehman Risk Expert

  48. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 5:15 PM

    @37…Glad you enjoyed it…
    30.

  49. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 6:57 PM

    I’m confused by this picture. Are those pre or post boobs? Purchase-wise, I mean. We ain’t got nuthin’ ‘long those lines down here my way.
    TOGFD

  50. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 7:26 PM

    She shoulda got the crown for answering that pickle sniffer like that. kudos bitchez.

  51. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 7:28 PM

    You have iPhone,iPad, Facebook and Twitter.Now you same sex marriage.What is all about these?
    I’m confused!
    -Maxine Waiters-

  52. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 7:28 PM

    Trump would take it A2M for a hot chick.

  53. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 9:50 PM

    This is a free country. She has a right to her opinion and was willing to lose her crown over it. Trump already bowed down to the gay community during his celebrity apprentice show this year. Marriage is for a man and a woman. Civil Unions are what the majority of Americans feel comfortable with. The dumb judge who asked the question with his million dollar blog is so full of himself that he is becoming a total bore.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.