And lots of ‘em, it seems! [via AdamsOptions]

Dennis Kneale
: Macke let’s start with you…Patty Daum is talking about how the credit markets tonight are really thawing tonight…and her sources tell her it’s going to be helping the stock market. What do you think of that?
Jeff Macke: I have no idea Dennis…I’m going to talk to you like a child…if you understand what I’m saying, just say ‘yeah.’
DK: Okay, yeah.
JM: Yeah…see…you’re what happens when you’re trying to talk to car people at like half an hour ago…I dismissed these people as idiots YEARS AGO. And not that I finally try and engage them, they have no idea what I’m talking about.
DK: Okay…
It continues.

Comments (88)

  1. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM

    WTF

  2. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM

    Jeff Macke is the man.

  3. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM

    what a tool, add guy adami to the list of losers too, bunch of strokes

  4. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM

    Exactly why I don’t drink until at least 2:36 PM

  5. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    @5- this was last night, after Fast Money (7ish).

  6. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:30 PM

    CNBC commentators and guests now requiring a 5 drink minimum to be on with DK.

  7. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:30 PM

    Wow! SauceClops!

  8. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:31 PM

    you need at least 3 beers to tolerate watching this shit, I’d imagine 7 to take part i it.

  9. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM

    wow.

  10. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:38 PM

    Alcohol doesn’t explain the weird twitchiness.

  11. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:39 PM

    I like Guy Adami. You are all idiots.

  12. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:41 PM

    @12- we’re not talking about Guy Adami, ‘tard, see yourself out of this conversation.

  13. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:43 PM

    @11- seems like it was a coke cocktail

  14. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    Fucking hilarious. That guy is on the CHRONIC.

  15. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM

    @13 – I am sorry. I was responding to @3. I feel like such an idiot.
    12

  16. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM

    this is how CNBC should be all the time, it’d at least provide some (entertainment) value.

  17. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:46 PM

    that’s a typical dartmouth grad for you.
    –Hank Paulson

  18. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:47 PM

    Paulson@18- I never let a drop of alcohol pass my lips during my Hanover days.
    - T. Geith

  19. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:49 PM

    Maybe he’s jewish.

  20. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:50 PM

    Holy crap. That was weird. I hope CNBC has a rehab specialist on their payroll.
    I think someday we’re gonna find out that CNBC circa 2007-2009 was a lot like SNL during the Belushi/Akroyd/Radner era.

  21. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:50 PM

    @20- what the fuck would that have to do with it?

  22. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:51 PM

    I just snorted coke out of my secretary’s ass before I pounded her ass to next Tuesday.
    Dyzzle Ratigan

  23. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:55 PM

    @23- great! now conquer leaving an actually funny comment.

  24. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 2:57 PM

    it sounds like he definitely mixed some coke into those drinks.

  25. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:01 PM

    This is what happens when you can’t handle your shit. I only cut him like three rails.
    - Larry Kudlow

  26. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:03 PM

    @23 – That was not funny. You are not worthy of this website.

  27. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:05 PM

    hmmm mark haynes just ended his program “and the polar bear’s hair are transparent, see you tomorrow”. What does that mean?

  28. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:08 PM

    I think he was having a blood sugar low. My son is diabetic and sounds just like that when his blood sugars get too low (

  29. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | May 20, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    @24
    Did you learn your grammar at Brown?

  30. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:18 PM

    @24 – Are you Jeff Macke?

  31. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:19 PM

    @31- sorry the joke you left as ‘guest’ wasn’t funny. there are no grammar errors in that comment.

  32. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:23 PM

    @33
    Not 31 here. Please re-read 24, it has a blatant grammatical error.

  33. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:29 PM

    @34- I’ve read it. “now conquer leaving an actually funny comment.” as in, conquer the task that is leaving a comment which is actually funny, and not what you, mistakenly think is funny. please point out the error, if there is one.

  34. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    @22 – You are a racist pervert.

  35. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:33 PM

    fuck coke, sounds more like acid. i wish i could zoom in on his pupils, i bet they are dialated wide as frying pans

  36. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    Yup, that was as uncomfortable as an interview with Joe Namath on the sideline

  37. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:41 PM

    shows he’s smart in my opinion. CNBC not worth his time. might as well get drunk!

  38. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:41 PM

    shows he’s smart in my opinion. CNBC not worth his time. might as well get drunk!

  39. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:43 PM

    See, I never just did things just to do them. Come on, what am I gonna do? Just all of a sudden jump up and talk to CNBC like their kids, like it’s something to do? Come on. I got a little more sense then that.
    Yeah, I remember talking to CNBC like their kids.

  40. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:44 PM

    @34
    Not 35 or 24 here. Comment 24 has no grammatical error.

  41. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:45 PM

    shows he’s smart in my opinion. CNBC not worth his time. might as well get drunk!

  42. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | May 20, 2009 at 3:46 PM

    @33
    You sound like a Middlebury grad.
    The sentence should read, “now conquer leaving a comment that is actually funny”.
    33, I can’t believe you made me enter into this petty argument…I will always hate you for that.

  43. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:46 PM

    when he says “I haven’t been on the rails in two days,” that’s an obvious lie.

  44. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:48 PM

    cocksuckeringreenwich@44- no, that would simply be another way of putting it. both are correct. you should hate yourself for not thinking to pull the dick out of your ear, which is clearly affecting your brain functions.

  45. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:50 PM

    definitely one of the stranger conversations I’ve witnessed – and I was raised by hippies.
    Tax Chick

  46. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | May 20, 2009 at 3:51 PM

    @46
    Sounds like the humor of someone who went to state school.
    I don’t get it.

  47. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:52 PM

    Fast Money is like The Shield.
    Fat bald guy named Macke hanging out with criminal Armenians

  48. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    @44 – that’s just another way of writing the sentence, there is no error in the original, dumbass

  49. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    @50– this isn’t Fast Money, but please, continue your racist comments.

  50. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | May 20, 2009 at 3:58 PM

    I’m done on the grammar debate.
    Watching you guys reply is like watching a monkey fucking a football.

  51. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:01 PM

    @andrew– you do realize you were actively taking part in the debate/monkey fucking, right? right.

  52. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | May 20, 2009 at 4:04 PM

    @55
    Sometimes a good monkey fuck is exactly what the doctor ordered.

  53. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:06 PM

    definitely one of the stranger conversations I’ve witnessed – and I was raised by hippies.
    Tax Chick

  54. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:14 PM

    @30…Comment of the day!

  55. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:16 PM

    #44 – For future reference, periods go inside a quotation mark, not outside it. “is actually funny.”

  56. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:17 PM

    Would like to bang tax chick w/ dooshbag-from-bridgeport/greenwich’s monkey shaped football.
    How’s that (grammatically, I mean)?
    Silly twoots

  57. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | May 20, 2009 at 4:20 PM

    @59
    This is a comment board on a blog. Who really cares about grammar?
    IRONY!

  58. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:21 PM

    @60 – for what purpose, because you can’t get it up yourself?
    TC

  59. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:23 PM

    andrew@59- um, you do!

  60. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | May 20, 2009 at 4:25 PM

    @63
    That was the ironic part.
    Idiot.

  61. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:31 PM

    Negs. Scared tax chick is actually Johnny the 17yr old from my neighborhood who routinely waxes his carrot to vogue magazines using sweet butter for lube.

  62. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:36 PM

    @65 – you need to get out of your mother’s basement more often.
    TC

  63. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:38 PM

    @64 Owing to the fact that you are a douchebag, your days on DB with that moniker are numbered. Start posting anonymously like the rest of us or stop being…(nevermind, scratch the ‘or’ part)

  64. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:40 PM

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  65. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:41 PM

    AndrewfromGreenwich, loves to bash state schools, middlebury etc. but cant understand simple grammar. posts ~10 times in 1 thread. please stfu and go away

  66. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:42 PM

    tax chick puts the lotion in the basket…

  67. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:43 PM

    @69- you forgot to add “backtracks by adding that he was being ironic” to the list.

  68. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM

    Andrewingreenwich, #59 here. #63 is a bit literal. I thought your comeback was pretty good.

  69. Posted by girl | May 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM

    @ Tax Chick: I think all the graduating seniors from University of Northeastern bumblefuck who didn’t get jobs in finance figure that posting on DB from the sweet dial-up connections of their childhood bedrooms is the next best thing.
    Hence the commentary.

  70. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:47 PM

    59 Not if its a Brit writing: “This comma and period inside the quotation marks business is strictly American usage. The British don’t do it that way. They are inclined to place commas and periods logically rather than conventionally, depending on whether the punctuation belongs to the quotation or to the sentence that contains the quotation, just as we do with question marks and exclamation points.”

  71. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | May 20, 2009 at 4:51 PM

    @72
    At least one person got it.

  72. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:54 PM

    @AIG- just stop posting.

  73. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM

    @girl: Usually the commentary is a bit less pre-adolescent teenage pocket rocker. Perhaps the lack of jobs has increased the basement traffic. I have noticed an uptick in the ass-banging-desk-hugging comments. Should have put me on notice. Sad testimony for DB.
    TC

  74. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM

    Macke
    smokes
    blunts
    pot head

  75. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM

    Macke
    smokes
    blunts
    pot head

  76. Posted by Investorcluzo | May 20, 2009 at 5:01 PM

    travel for a couple of days and all of the sudden there are a bunch of degenerates on here. @girl – are you not able to hold down the fort? what gives?

  77. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:02 PM

    @77, totally agree, there used to be intellegent commentary, and humor that used innuendo/sarcasm/irony instead of 3rd grade stuff. Instead of reposting the same type of comment on every board, everyday. Where have all the smart people gone?
    78-86 makes my point nicely

  78. Posted by AndrewInGreenwich | May 20, 2009 at 5:05 PM

    @ 87/88
    I’m with you guys.

  79. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:06 PM

    not making yourself look like an idiot on DB is the new killing it

  80. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:07 PM

    @77- then be a grown-up and don’t read the comments.

  81. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:09 PM

    In other news unrelated to retarded commenters and commentary about retarded commenters– Macke seems pretty lucid on Fast Money right now.

  82. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:10 PM

    88 I think the problem may be that things have not been that interesting. The news is too few transactions and too much failing banks and autos or ponzi schemes. On the personal side its more dull work with less resources. Theres a pall over the social scene too. A few friends are unemployed or hanging by a thin wire, so any extravagance seems evil. I know these are not real problems like world hunger(except for the umemployment), just silly ones, but it does change the game. What think the rest of you?

  83. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:10 PM

    Moron @89,
    You are definitely part of the said juvenile crowd.

  84. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM

    @78-86 kill yourself

  85. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    @91 they used to be written by adults, that’s what made them worth reading

  86. Posted by GoodAsGoldman | May 20, 2009 at 5:12 PM

    @94
    I’m with you, pal.

  87. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:14 PM

    @96- My point is, if you don’t like something, instead of complaining about it, do something (in this case, read the posts– not the comments–and that’s it).

  88. Posted by guest | May 20, 2009 at 5:17 PM

    Fuck yo couch..Dennis.