Picture 1402.pngOh, don’t think for a second this mean he’s finished with Nouriel Roubini, he’s just spreading the love/hate around. To recap: last month Cramer said that Roubs was “intoxicated” with his own “prescience and vision.” Roubini responded with “Cramer is a buffoon,” and the alleged court jester, who loves it when you tell him he sucks, invited Dr. Doom onto his show to say it to his face. Then, two weeks ago, Cramer suggested Roubini was in bed with the shorts. Perhaps ticked that the doctor hasn’t given him the satisfaction of a response, JC again attempted to provoke something, anything, at the very least a “go fuck yourself” today. Probably figuring that Roubini won’t take the bait but a certain wrestling-loving firecracker just might, he threw Meredith Whitney into the mix. Which, we have to say, was smart.

Oddly, the people who are saying it tend to be the same ones who declared the recession over in March. I always have to remind these people they have it quite wrong: the depression ended in March, where deflation seemed unstoppable. That was when Citigroup (C) , Bank of America(BAC) , U.S. Bancorp(USB) and Wells Fargo(WFC) had their obituaries written by the two most implacable forces at the time in the investing universe — Professor Roubini and Meredith Whitney. (Because I am a harsh critic of the scene, I now dub them “Professor and Maryanne [sic],” who would turn the millionaire and his wife into paupers.)

Roubini And Whitney: The Professor And Maryanne? [TRB via Clusterstock]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (75)

  1. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 9:53 AM

    Cramer needs to be taken out back and shot.

  2. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 9:56 AM

    What island in hell…

  3. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 9:59 AM

    Ugh, this is a tough one. Which one do I hate more, I cant decide. I can live with Cramer I guess, I wanna see Meredith Whitney ruined. She is a slob who got lucky on one call and has been wrong ever since

  4. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:02 AM

    OK so Ginger or Maryanne?

  5. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:03 AM

    Wow, tough crowd. The guy tries to add some literary references to his show, and everyone jumps all over him.

  6. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:05 AM

    @5- who are you and what rock did you crawl out of without the frame of reference that Cramer sucks, pop culture references or not?

  7. Posted by Seaman Bodine II | May 21, 2009 at 10:05 AM

    @3
    You just described 99% of the hedge fund managers I’ve ever worked with (and there’s been a few), not to mention almost every Founder / CEO of a tech company. Many careers are made on a wild gamble (which was usually preceeded and followed by many wrong calls).
    Start with my list with George Soros, and it with Paul Allen.
    Whitney’s story is at least admirable, in that she’s not your typical candy-ass Ivy League douche with a secret love for corn-holing.

  8. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:08 AM

    @4, MaryAnne, most definately. Low-maint…and gotta love those kinkykountrygals.
    -BeckyBumpkinBlumpkinFan

  9. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:09 AM

    @seaman– nice try, but we all know why you dislike Soros (probably has something to do with the fact that he doesn’t share your wing-nut, racist viewpoints).

  10. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:11 AM

    Douche at 7, lets not compare Meredith Whitney to George Soros, Bill Gates and the like. That is laughable to say the least. Her firm will be a mere memory by next year and she will be thrown into the Blodgett pile.
    The analyst game is the biggest crock in any wall st firm, most are throwing darts on a board and they constantly contradict themselves.

  11. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:11 AM

    @5 “Gilligan’s Island” is not literature. It’s a TV show. Are you really that dumb?

  12. Posted by american bandersnatch | May 21, 2009 at 10:12 AM

    @seaman – You’re right, Soros is just lucky. Lucky for him, he’s lucky about 98% of the time, decade after decade.

  13. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:14 AM

    And this, right here folks, is why anything uttered by Seaman Bodine II should be immediately disregarded as the rantings of a rightwing idiot. Seriously, dude? You’re going to compare George Soros to Jim Cramer? Get the fuck out.

  14. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:15 AM

    @12- thank you.

  15. Posted by cowtippincricket | May 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM

    I think Macke and Cramer need a half hour forum every night after their respective shows to vent on CNBC. Drinking obviously required, and maybe Kudlow can stop by with some blow.

  16. Posted by Seaman Bodine II | May 21, 2009 at 10:32 AM

    @12
    Soros’ career was built on a great trade, which was essentially a great bet. Sorry if you think otherwise, but anyone around that shop over the years will tell you its true.
    @10
    Analyst game is a crock. But if you actually worked in the hedge fund business, you’d know it’s a crock too. That’s my point.

  17. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:35 AM

    Porter Stansberry’s scrotum on your forehead.

  18. Posted by Anal_yst | May 21, 2009 at 10:37 AM

    @cowtippincricket FTW!
    Also, @ AB
    That may be true of Soros, but
    1. How involved in the fund has he been the past I dunno, 5 or even 10 years? (not implying anything, asking)
    2. While certainly not an expert on the man (soros), I’m routinely puzzled how the Fund co that bears his name does so well given his often insane political/philosophical beliefs and rants. Any idea?

  19. Posted by Seaman Bodine II | May 21, 2009 at 10:38 AM

    @9
    How do you know Soros isn’t a racist? For that matter, how do you know I am?
    Seriously, because I don’t suck on a Prius talepipe, I’m a racist.
    Or is because I asked if Vikram Pandit drinks his own urine?

  20. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:39 AM

    @20- because I’ve read your comments.

  21. Posted by american bandersnatch | May 21, 2009 at 10:40 AM

    Anal_yst
    #1 – Quite involved
    #2 – Don’t know

  22. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:42 AM

    @3
    At least Whitney was right once which is a hell of a lot more than I can say for Cramer. And, she would have been even more right (if there is such a thing) if C, BAC, et al hadn’t been bailed out.
    Her comments were “Citigroup cannot survive without the addition of serious capital”. $45B and another $100B+ in guarantees sounds like some serious capital.
    You’re an idiot who doesn’t realize how fucked the financial system is. Note “is” … not “was”.

  23. Posted by NotNasser | May 21, 2009 at 10:42 AM

    The sad thing is that Cramer probably does think an allusion to Gilligan’s Island is hip, or literary … or anything other than assinine.

  24. Posted by Seaman Bodine II | May 21, 2009 at 10:43 AM

    @22
    way wrong…thanks for clarifying your igonorance

  25. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:47 AM

    @7
    You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. Soros has put up numbers for almost 40 years.

  26. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:49 AM

    @23 = MW

  27. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 10:49 AM

    Racism is a dish best served cold, with fried chicken.

  28. Posted by Seaman Bodine II | May 21, 2009 at 10:51 AM

    @26
    Soros made a huge bet, which could easily have gone wrong. He then leveraged that success in order to raise a fair bit of capital, and from that point on, he gamed the system, not by trading “reflexivity”, but by hammering sales desks who wanted the flow.
    If you’ve ever actually read any of his stupid, insipid, truly sophmoric books, you’d know the man to be quite a jackass.
    And knowing the revolving door of COOs his firm has had over the years, I can tell you for a fact that his returns haven’t been anywhere near what his reputation suggests.

  29. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 11:00 AM

    so soros’ long term returns
    which are far above index….were made simply by hammering sales desks
    get real

  30. Posted by american bandersnatch | May 21, 2009 at 11:03 AM

    I feel like I’m arguing with a creationist …

  31. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 11:05 AM

    @AB- you are. I think SBII is actually worse than a creationist. Avoid engaging at all costs.

  32. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 11:08 AM

    @29, you are a jerkoff. Whos the idiot that hired you. Paulson and Soros are forward thinking and are usually at least one step ahead of the game. Paulson’s short call on housing wasn’t even genius it was plain common sense, he just had his eyes opened. Go back to sleep
    Would love to know what “fund” you work for, they are probably taking the place apart as we speak

  33. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM

    @28- (Funny) Sinner.

  34. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 11:10 AM

    @33- If Soros were a rightwing nutbag, SBII wouldn’t be claiming he was an idiot. He paints anyone that is left of extreme far right as a chump who just got lucky (and usually throws in a “and he’s gay” for good measure).

  35. Posted by Seaman Bodine II | May 21, 2009 at 11:14 AM

    @30
    back that up

  36. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 11:39 AM

    One thing very tough to discern is how Quantum Fund can post those returns with such a vast array of diverse positions.
    Concentration and a catalyst are the elements needed to shoot the lights out.
    From looking at his quarterly filings it is tough to discern much of anything. Perhaps his alpha is derived from that which he does not have to disclose to the SEC. Disclosed holdings look like an index ETF.

  37. Posted by american bandersnatch | May 21, 2009 at 12:06 PM
  38. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM

    Cramer, -13% from 2002-2008 in Action Alerts.

  39. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 2:08 PM

    we all want to pound that bitch with the yellow fuck-me-pants.

  40. Posted by guest | May 21, 2009 at 2:37 PM

    @ 36
    here is your backup
    “Warren Buffett, from 1965-2005, has produced an annual average return of 21.5%, which is double the return of the S&P 500 – including dividends – over the same period of time. George Soros – the man that broke the Bank of England – generated an annual return of 30% through his Quantum Fund from 1970-2000, nearly three times the average return of the S&P 500. ”
    http://www.lycos.com/info/george-soros–quantum-fund.html

  41. Posted by Bristol Airport Hotels | April 19, 2012 at 9:08 AM

    90qkSc Great, thanks for sharing this blog article. Keep writing.

  42. Posted by where can i find money | April 23, 2012 at 9:09 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this post.Much thanks again. Great.

  43. Posted by Jay-Z | April 24, 2012 at 4:08 PM

    Thanks-a-mundo for the article.Really thank you! Cool.

  44. Posted by weight loss foods | April 25, 2012 at 8:19 AM

    Fantastic blog. Fantastic.

  45. Posted by day trading psychology | April 26, 2012 at 1:21 PM

    Really enjoyed this blog post. Will read on…

  46. Posted by http://www.henrymakow.com | April 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM

    Thanks-a-mundo for the post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

  47. Posted by buy backlinks | April 27, 2012 at 5:30 AM

    Im obliged for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.

  48. Posted by faux fur throw | April 27, 2012 at 10:35 AM

    Wow, great article post.Thanks Again. Want more.

  49. Posted by electrovoice | April 27, 2012 at 1:02 PM

    Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog.Much thanks again. Fantastic.

  50. Posted by Robin Figura | April 29, 2012 at 1:32 AM

    I really enjoy the post.Thanks Again.

  51. Posted by mens urban fashion | April 29, 2012 at 8:29 AM

    Great, thanks for sharing this post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  52. Posted by wonga promo code | April 30, 2012 at 7:14 AM

    Major thankies for the article post.Thanks Again. Keep writing.

  53. Posted by home insurance | April 30, 2012 at 8:37 AM

    Im grateful for the article.Really looking forward to read more.

  54. Posted by PPI | April 30, 2012 at 9:29 AM

    Thank you for your article. Fantastic.

  55. Posted by lisinopril side effects | May 1, 2012 at 2:43 PM

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog article. Awesome.

  56. Posted by top web hosting for small business | May 1, 2012 at 10:45 PM

    Thank you ever so for you article.Really thank you! Cool.

  57. Posted by beats from dr dre | May 2, 2012 at 2:48 AM

    I loved your post. Cool.

  58. Posted by wedding gift registry | May 2, 2012 at 6:37 AM

    Great, thanks for sharing this blog.Thanks Again. Great.

  59. Posted by battery powered heating robe | May 2, 2012 at 7:07 AM

    Thank you for your blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.

  60. Posted by Celebrities online | May 2, 2012 at 11:14 PM

    Hey, thanks for the article.Really looking forward to read more.

  61. Posted by ways for getting pregnant | May 3, 2012 at 4:37 AM

    Say, you got a nice article.Much thanks again. Cool.

  62. Posted by celebrity wallpapers | May 3, 2012 at 7:47 AM

    Great post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

  63. Posted by winchester safes for sale | May 5, 2012 at 12:49 AM

    Fantastic article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

  64. Posted by Snapback Wholesale | May 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM

    Really appreciate you sharing this to me.Welcome to visit my blog too! My blog is about how to buy cheap snapback hat from factory and how to find snapback wholesale factory,the most importand is how to earn $150 each day.

  65. Posted by swinging | May 7, 2012 at 8:24 AM

    A big thank you for your blog article.Thanks Again. Want more.

  66. Posted by buy hgh pills | May 7, 2012 at 2:37 PM

    Really appreciate you sharing this blog article. Fantastic.

  67. Posted by Troubled Teens | May 7, 2012 at 4:41 PM

    Great post.Really thank you! Great.

  68. Posted by get more facebook likes | May 8, 2012 at 2:39 AM

    A round of applause for your post.Much thanks again. Cool.

  69. Posted by insefatemarkt | May 8, 2012 at 3:40 AM

    I really enjoy the article post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  70. Posted by seascape art | May 8, 2012 at 4:18 AM

    I loved your blog. Fantastic.

  71. Posted by Leonard J. Walden | May 8, 2012 at 8:40 AM

    wow, awesome post. Fantastic.

  72. Posted by prom dresses | May 8, 2012 at 1:15 PM

    Very good blog article.Much thanks again. Will read on…

  73. Posted by veena | May 10, 2012 at 5:36 AM

    Really appreciate you sharing this blog article.Much thanks again. Great.

  74. Posted by gvo | May 10, 2012 at 7:08 AM

    I truly appreciate this article. Really Cool.

  75. Posted by Affiliate Marketing Strategies | May 10, 2012 at 7:14 AM

    This is one awesome blog.Much thanks again. Cool.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.