• 13 May 2009 at 12:50 AM

Love Gov Hasn’t Yet Decided His Position On Prostitution

By

Rachel Maddow: Do you think prostitution should be legal?
Eliot Spitzer: No. I, umm…these are…not victimless crimes, I know there is that argument. Right now we’re going through it in other contexts…marijuana…other areas sort of where they’ve been at the boundary of criminal conduct from a prosecutorial perspective…I…umm…perhaps I’m not the right one to pass judgment at this point.
Related: Ball Park It. Are We Talkin’ Like Calling Up Prosties Once In A Blue Moon To Blow Off Steam Or Were You Bangin’ Hooks On The Reg-U-Lar For The Past Decade?

    Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

    Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

    — Advertisement —

    Comments (10)

    1. 1
      Posted by guest | May 13, 2009 at 1:01 AM

      hell yes!

    2. 2
      Posted by guest | May 13, 2009 at 1:02 AM

      so his answer is yes.

    3. 3
      Posted by guest | May 13, 2009 at 1:04 AM

      i predict 250 comments when DB decides to make a post about it: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124215896684211987.html#mod=testMod
      no more money for bankers. makes me feel much better about getting canned.

    4. 4
      Posted by guest | May 13, 2009 at 1:10 AM

      awkward…

    5. 5
      Posted by Lowly Assistant | May 13, 2009 at 1:15 AM

      “[...] it’s really invaluable to have your insight.”
      Yes. Truly. Thank you for the following information: Wall St. failed this nation.
      Outstanding. Insightful. New! Fresh!
      Please fuck off.

    6. 6
      Posted by guest | May 13, 2009 at 1:25 AM

      @3
      more like restricting things to 2003 levels, and forget about 2007 and its $120K+ bonuses for analysts. at least we can say we got paid wayyyyyy more than both our predecessors and ‘progeny’, and we’re still young enough to find the NBT. chin-up, buddy, and wipe that jizz off your face!

    7. 7
      Posted by Lowly Assistant | May 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM

      Yes, because having the United States Government dictate how people should be paid is tolerable. Yes. Yes.
      Yes.

    8. 8
      Posted by guest | May 13, 2009 at 7:53 AM

      Umm, hes obviously for it, thats a stupid question. If he hadnt gotten caught he’d be rollin out of the Four Seasons right now with a smile on his face. God bless him, finally a politician who is honest. hes got my vote.
      @6, whats the next best thing? Please enlighten us you retard. Im sure you will have the background for it coming from this industry. Go back to sleep

    9. 9
      Posted by guest | May 13, 2009 at 8:53 AM

      I gurantee you he offered Maddow $50 for a rusty trombone the minute the cameras were off.

    10. 10
      Posted by Bristol Airport Hotels | April 19, 2012 at 8:09 AM

      90GskP I really like and appreciate your blog post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

    Leave a comment

    You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.

       or