Or keeps his team waiting, or so much as suggests they submit to such pedestrian measures as the signing of a nondisclosure agreement prior to rifling around another firm’s underwear drawer. I’m not going to go so far as to say rookie moves like this are why Bear Stearns no longer exists but I’m not not going to say it. And a future note to those of you who may find yourselves in the throes of a weekend bailout at some point in the near future– if you should so much as dare not have bagels and lox waiting upon the Goldman guys’ arrival, along with your entire prop desk book on scented paper, you’ll be looking at the business end of a hissy fit to end all hissy fits. I am not fucking around on this point. I swear to god you people sicken me. Buy a vowel.
From Kate Kelly’s Street Fighters:
Picture 1343.png
Picture 1345.png


Picture 1346.png
Picture 1347.png

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (54)

  1. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:07 PM

    what a bunch of assholes

  2. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:07 PM

    “I’m not going to go so far as to say rookie moves like this are why Bear Stearns no longer exists but I’m not not going to say it.”
    What kind of an asinine sentence is this?

  3. Posted by Equity Private | May 12, 2009 at 1:12 PM

    You meant “rookie sentence” right?

  4. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:13 PM

    @2- you’re an idiot.

  5. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM

    @2- you’re pretty stunningly stupid. it’s really something to behold.

  6. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:16 PM

    @2- um, it’s actually a pretty standard joke. “im not going to say x, but i’m not not going to say x.” is this your first day on planet earth?

  7. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:18 PM

    @2 – Die already.

  8. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:19 PM

    @6 — Thanks. I’m Swiss so I guess it was lost in translation!
    #2

  9. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:20 PM

    @2- you need to eat a dick, as does goldman sachs.

  10. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:22 PM

    honestly, who the fuck do they (gs) think they are? assholes.

  11. Posted by Anal_yst | May 12, 2009 at 1:25 PM

    Sounds like the GS guys were just chillin and using it as a good excuse to get away from the desk for a bit, maybe snag some free grub and such

  12. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:28 PM

    @ 11 — yes, over the weekend they just wanted to get off the desk.

  13. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:28 PM

    This may be a dumb question…
    Is that Jacob Goldfield the same one that allegedly used Goldman’s access to LTCM’s books to allegedly short LTCM’s positions into the ground? Or is this a different Jacob Goldfield?

  14. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:31 PM

    Is this Jacob Goldfield the same former-Goldman trader that allegedly downloaded LTCM’s positions during Goldman’s possible buyout of the fund and allegedly used that data to short LTCM into oblivion? Or is this a different Jacob Goldfield?

  15. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:33 PM

    “I suppose you expect us to sign a confidentiality agreement.”
    what an asshole.

  16. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:35 PM

    @14/15
    the question isn’t dumb, the double post is

  17. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:35 PM

    Umm…what are you doing?
    I dunno. What are you doing?
    Beats me. What are yoiu doing?
    Can’t answer that. What are you doing?
    World class dealmakers right there.

  18. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM

    why does it mean when a word is crossed out in the text

  19. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM

    @16
    what are you whining about? they held all the cards, why be nice?

  20. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:38 PM

    @20- are you joking? on what planet does someone think they’re not beholden to a NDA if they want full access to someone’s books?

  21. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:38 PM

    @19
    it means that if you wonder what it means your dick will shrink 2 inches. hope you have some left.

  22. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:39 PM

    i’m not not licking toads

  23. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:40 PM

    @22 – #19 here….got plenty to spare.
    -Not actually #19

  24. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:41 PM

    Well that is it! I am not inviting GS to any of my Saders

  25. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:41 PM

    Rule #1 in trading: Never stay in a losing position so long that you have to show your books to your competitors.

  26. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:45 PM

    @8 dont be swiss

  27. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:46 PM

    fake jew@25- it’s sEder, tard.

  28. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:50 PM

    @21 a planet on which the propriety of the information contained in said books is going to be worth exactly zero in less than 24 hours when the firm goes bankrupt.

  29. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:50 PM

    I heard Warren ran into the same schoolyard crap when he sent Charlie over to check out Goldman. No Cherry Coke and whatnot.

  30. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:51 PM

    @21
    its not a law that you need to sign an NDA now is it?

  31. Posted by Lowly Assistant | May 12, 2009 at 1:54 PM

    28,
    So when you’re not home and you’re somewhere kind of newish, the odds are, don’t look far, ’cause they’re Jewish too.
    -Don’t Make Me Kutz a Bitch

  32. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM

    WhereTF would Goldman be today were it not for TARP, and more importantly, for their conversion into a “regular” bank?
    I dare say they’d be Bear/Lehman, Jr.
    The Guy from Delaware

  33. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:57 PM

    All I have ever wanted to do since I was a child is to bang a secretary in her ass on the rooftop of 85 Broad at sunset.
    A boy with a dream.

  34. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 1:58 PM

    LOL at all the former Bear workers commenting.

  35. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:00 PM

    @2 – what’s worse is the line, “… were summoned to meet with the them…” at the top of page 201.
    Did no one proofread this thing?

  36. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:13 PM

    @33 — You’re a tool. GS is no where near the cesspool of scum that Lehman and Bear were.
    GS and MS will still be around in another 100 years from now.

  37. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:21 PM

    I sincerely hope that GS and MS fade away into oblivion within a decade. GS employees are full of themselves, and I would gladly see that firm battered to shit.
    Please let it happen, or better yet let Jamie Dimon make it happen.
    - JPM employee

  38. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:21 PM

    All what GS traders wanted to do is to have access to Bear’s boobs. Why the hate?

  39. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM

    @38: Jealous much?

  40. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM

    Anyone see the youtube vid of all the spineless little GS bastids knockin over old ladys costanza style in from of 85 broad the day yobama did the AF1 fly-by? good x and a proud day for the MOTU’s

  41. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:24 PM

    so what does it mean when you strike out text?

  42. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:27 PM

    @41 link?

  43. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:28 PM

    JC Flowers was playing GS off against Bear and no one knew the score.Earlier reports had Bear skeptical about Flowers, and seems, they had good reason.However, Cohn is an asshole for taking that stand;he’s a total vulture,so when his name appeared as key player in marking down BSAM CDO assets and Bear cried foul, Bear had good reason to think that Goldman would push BSC to the brink if they could.
    Why should anyone doubt that they didn’t now refuse their repos and help to fuel the run on the house,although Cohn and Blankfein deny it?

  44. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:32 PM

    @41 link or its not true

  45. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 2:39 PM

    bear stearns more like dare to earn
    The Guy From Delaware

  46. Posted by american bandersnatch | May 12, 2009 at 2:44 PM

    JC Flowers lost his mojo prior to the BSC fiasco.

  47. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 3:30 PM

    @31, yes there is, it’s called the Sherman Act.

  48. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 3:41 PM

    @31, Regulation FD, among others.

  49. Posted by Carbonara | May 12, 2009 at 3:48 PM

    How is this an antitrust situation? Reg FD seems more relevant….

  50. Posted by Anal_yst | May 12, 2009 at 4:02 PM

    @12/13
    Clearly you don’t know anyone who works or has worked @ Goldman.
    Here’s a hint: Lots of people work on the weekends, apparently you’re not in that group, either.

  51. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 4:05 PM

    @anal_yst- just admit defeat. you’re a big enough man.

  52. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 4:39 PM

    Why sign a standard CA if its low probability? Most CAs disallow hiring of anyone from the target company.

  53. Posted by Anal_yst | May 12, 2009 at 5:13 PM

    @52
    Admit defeat over what? Sure maybe they were actually enjoying their weekend, maybe they were working anyway, who knows, do you?

  54. Posted by guest | May 12, 2009 at 9:16 PM

    When I got invited back for my second round at Goldman I achieved an erection that lasted longer than four hours.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.