Witness.jpgIn a convincing victory for justice, the former CEO of a Gen Re subsidiary was sentenced to the equivalent of a mild warning from a substitute teacher for his part in defrauding AIG investors of $597 million. John Houldsworth pleaded guilty in 2005 to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and then testified on the government’s behalf to help convict 5 other executives involved in the fraud. In light of his “truly extraordinary” cooperation and heartfelt apology, Houldsworth’s sentence was a crushing 2 years probation, $5,000 fine and 400 hours of community service.
Gen Re’s Houldsworth Avoids Prison in AIG Fraud Case [Bloomberg]

Sign up for the Dealbreaker newsletter

Subscribe to our free daily email and get breaking news, financial headlines, commentary, and analysis from Dealbreaker.

— Advertisement —

Comments (9)

  1. Posted by Phobos | June 16, 2009 at 2:31 PM

    No one likes a rat.
    @Greg,
    Getting better — keep plugging away/good work.
    -phobos.

  2. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 2:32 PM

    Good work if you can get it.

  3. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 2:45 PM

    greg you do improve, but you start from a very low base..
    do something about the pics – there is no excuse for that clipart shit

  4. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 2:49 PM

    That has to hurt. $5000 could buy a lot of mystic tans.
    -A. Mozillo

  5. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 2:52 PM

    Who says crime doesn’t pay!!!!

  6. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM

    Mr. Anus,
    Your prose induces waves of nausea to course through me. Thank you for being you.
    Front Office

  7. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 3:01 PM

    @5
    you’re surprise is pitiful.

  8. Posted by Novice | June 16, 2009 at 3:01 PM

    Angelo, you were always playing small ball.
    -Ghost of Ken Lay

  9. Posted by guest | June 16, 2009 at 6:57 PM

    How did AIG investors get defrauded out of $597mm?
    AIG inflated its loan-loss reserves by $597mm. Yes that is a crime and AIG investors were certainly harmed because the company appeared healthier than it was, but there is no way you can put a
    $597mm price tag on that.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.