Matthew Goldstein says yes, as evidenced by the fact that no cruel or unusual restrictions or regulations are placed on them in the financial regulatory reform package (early drafts stated that managers had to appear on Power Lunch and interface with Dennis Kneale at least once a week, in addition to requiring them to wear fishnets and heels while trading or, in the case of firms that would welcome such attire, banned anything deemed “chick garb”). Obviously some hedge fund leading light is responsible for getting ‘Bama to change his tune post-Chrysler public tongue lashing (and Biff Basness performance art). The question is who and how?
Comments (27)
Leave a comment
You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.
SC; blow jobs and lots of em.
Chim Janos
It was my letter. It got him to WAKE UP and smell what the Asness is cooking.
-cliff
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/contrib.php?cycle=2010&ind=f2700
@2 is correct
@4- that was before. for instance citadel gave a shit ton of money, but griffin’s hand isn’t in this.
Tits Cabrera just said that Chanos was in the audience for Obama’s speech so…
@4 winner! Add Soros to list
-Obama 2012
@3 cliff is mad his high beta bets won’t pay off..Obama could care less about him
Forcing hf to talk to kneale is unconstitutional- cruel, unusual punishment
It’s not hedge fund friendly reform. The SEC can share their reports with the Fed who can then classify a HF as a Tier 1 FHC; Tier 1 FHCs are subject to the highest form of regulation because they are considered a threat to the financial system. An institution will be qualified as a Tier 1 FHC based on (i) size, (ii) leverage and (iii) interconnectedness.
It’s not hedge fund friendly reform. The SEC can share their reports with the Fed who can then classify a HF as a Tier 1 FHC; Tier 1 FHCs are subject to the highest form of regulation because they are considered a threat to the financial system. An institution will be qualified as a Tier 1 FHC based on (i) size, (ii) leverage and (iii) interconnectedness.
It’s not hedge fund friendly reform. The SEC can share their reports with the Fed who can then classify a HF as a Tier 1 FHC; Tier 1 FHCs are subject to the highest form of regulation because they are considered a threat to the financial system. An institution will be qualified as a Tier 1 FHC based on (i) size, (ii) leverage and (iii) interconnectedness.
It’s not hedge fund friendly reform. The SEC can share their reports with the Fed who can then classify a HF as a Tier 1 FHC; Tier 1 FHCs are subject to the highest form of regulation because they are considered a threat to the financial system. An institution will be qualified as a Tier 1 FHC based on (i) size, (ii) leverage and (iii) interconnectedness.
It’s not hedge fund friendly reform. The SEC can share their reports with the Fed who can then classify a HF as a Tier 1 FHC; Tier 1 FHCs are subject to the highest form of regulation because they are considered a threat to the financial system. An institution will be qualified as a Tier 1 FHC based on (i) size, (ii) leverage and (iii) interconnectedness.
It’s not hedge fund friendly reform. The SEC can share their reports with the Fed who can then classify a HF as a Tier 1 FHC; Tier 1 FHCs are subject to the highest form of regulation because they are considered a threat to the financial system. An institution will be qualified as a Tier 1 FHC based on (i) size, (ii) leverage and (iii) interconnectedness.
It’s not hedge fund friendly reform. The SEC can share their reports with the Fed who can then classify a HF as a Tier 1 FHC; Tier 1 FHCs are subject to the highest form of regulation because they are considered a threat to the financial system. An institution will be qualified as a Tier 1 FHC based on (i) size, (ii) leverage and (iii) interconnectedness.
It’s not hedge fund friendly reform. The SEC can share their reports with the Fed who can then classify a HF as a Tier 1 FHC; Tier 1 FHCs are subject to the highest form of regulation because they are considered a threat to the financial system. An institution will be qualified as a Tier 1 FHC based on (i) size, (ii) leverage and (iii) interconnectedness.
It’s not hedge fund friendly reform. The SEC can share their reports with the Fed who can then classify a HF as a Tier 1 FHC; Tier 1 FHCs are subject to the highest form of regulation because they are considered a threat to the financial system. An institution will be qualified as a Tier 1 FHC based on (i) size, (ii) leverage and (iii) interconnectedness.
is it hedge fund friendly reform?
@10-18, OK Mr. President, we hear you.
@20- why would obama want you to think he’s harsh on hfs?
@21 because I’m not a hedgie?
It was me. I don’t find it hard to identify, given his smoking habits and time he spent (briefly) in NYC. Back in the day there used to be this little Jack in the Box out near Conscience Bay Rd. in Setauket, and he would come out and we would talk law and mathematics over fries.
It was only natural when he called me for advice; we headed over to Avalon Park for a chat, then to Smithtown for a bite and he took notes. Soros has been telling him some crazy one world regulation shit, and I just said, “Don’t fuck the goose.”
Jim Simons
Jim (23), tell us more!
10-18 your first post was bad enough.
Nonuple posting bastard!
@10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17&18
Apologize to us and then never post again.