Picture 1479.png
David Faber reports that the SEC will charge the Tan Man “imminently.” Coupla his cronies at Countrywide (David Sambol, Eric Sieracki) will be getting the royal treatment as well, but obviously we only care about Orange. Note that these are civil fraud charges, which are not
expected to be accompanied by criminal indictments. More from the Fabe:

Mozilo sold hundreds of millions in Countrywide’s stock in late 2006 and 2007, and stands accused by the SEC of remaining publicly upbeat about this company’s prospectus during that period, while he knew things were not good in Counrywide’s business. How the SEC intends to prove that is unclear, but Mozilo’s change to a 10-B 5-1 plan under which he systematically sold stock may be used as evidence of his culpability. Mozilo allegedly established one 10-B 5-1 plan in October of ‘06 and another in December of ‘06 and then revised the October plan in February of ‘07 so that he could increase his sale of Countrywide stock.

Earlier: WSJ: SEC Staff Recommending Filing Civil Fraud Charges On Angelo Mozilo’s Ass

Comments (24)

  1. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:03 PM

    Federal pound me in the ass prison

  2. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:04 PM

    So what does this mean for 1st year analysts at Bank of Amerrillwide?

  3. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:04 PM

    He was framed by the mastermind himself, Shia LaBeouf.

  4. Posted by EvilBuzzard | June 4, 2009 at 3:08 PM

    So how does Sen Dodd’s ass taste this morning, Angel?

  5. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:10 PM

    My GOD! it’s Orange!
    Apologies to 2001 fans

  6. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:12 PM

    I wish Greg would stop trying to get me into a private chat room.

  7. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:16 PM

    Congrats SEC on another timely collar. How much weed were they actually smoking at headquarters over the past decade?

  8. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:23 PM

    Obama reflation trade working well today. The 10yr tsy beatdown has resumed in full.

  9. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:25 PM

    @1
    That was such a lame movie.

  10. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:34 PM

    Sorry Bess, AMoz isn’t worthy of your talents. You should’ve handed this one to Greg.

  11. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM

    @12- I think Bess should decide who is and who isn’t worthy of her talents, and unless you’re new here, you know BL loves writing about Ang Moz.

  12. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:38 PM

    I really have no interest in reading about Oompa Loompa prison rape stories.

  13. Posted by american bandersnatch | June 4, 2009 at 3:39 PM

    That picture of the Lizard King brings back fond memories of a time when America was a capitalist country. Sigh – Remember the Titans.

  14. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:40 PM

    10 I would call it the what else could Obama do having inherited quite a mess from GWB trade. And save the its all barney frank’s fault for your conversation on the way home tonight on the Staten Island ferry.

  15. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:44 PM

    A little buggery never hurt anybody.
    Porker Stansberry

  16. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:45 PM

    16 I’ll give you half credit, but at some point that argument will get old, real old if it isn’t already. BTW don’t live in NY. I like to spend my own money.

  17. Posted by Anal_yst | June 4, 2009 at 3:46 PM

    SO wait the 10-b-5-1 makes him MORE culpable?
    Also, is the SEC surprised – to the point where they think they have a case – that an executive painted a rosy picture while that wasn’t necessarily the case?
    sigh…

  18. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:48 PM

    Moz, “Protect the House”.

  19. Posted by american bandersnatch | June 4, 2009 at 3:54 PM

    @19 – The case is simple:
    1) Is he an insider?
    2) Did he sell the stock?
    3) Did the stock subsequently go down?
    4) Are people angry about the company?
    Jail time.

  20. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    @11
    Go fuck yourself. In fact, why are you even posting on DB?

  21. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 3:55 PM

    Anyone else notice this similarity?
    http://blogs.cisco.com/collaboration_img/Kramer.jpg

  22. Posted by wolphkaat | June 4, 2009 at 4:08 PM

    Oompa Loompa Doompadee Dock,
    What is wrong with dumping my stock.

  23. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 4:17 PM

    Hey BofA, enjoy your bonuses going into the Tangelo legal defense fund contractually setup during the merger

  24. Posted by guest | June 4, 2009 at 4:43 PM

    At least his face will match his jumpsuit.

Leave a comment

You can log in with your account or comment as a guest below.